استخراج ابعاد کلیدی تسهیم دانش
محورهای موضوعی :
مدیریت صنعتی
Masoume Sadat Mousavi
1
,
Hessam Zandhessami
2
1 - Department of Management, Qazvin Islamic Azad University (QIAU), Qazvin, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Qazvin Islamic Azad University (QIAU), Qazvin, Iran
تاریخ دریافت : 1394/12/02
تاریخ پذیرش : 1395/04/28
تاریخ انتشار : 1395/11/18
کلید واژه:
knowledge,
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM),
دانش,
ابعاد تسهیم دانش,
تکنیک معادلات ساختاری,
نرم افزار لیزرل,
Knowledge sharing dimension,
LISREL software,
چکیده مقاله :
امروزه عمده ترین سرمایه سازمان ها، دانشی است که به آن دسترسی دارند. بنابراین سازمان هایی می توانند موفق عمل نمایند که مفیدترین، معتبرترین و به روزترین دانش بشری در حوزه کسب و کار خود را در اختیار داشته و به نحو مطلوب از آن استفاده نمایند. در این میان تسهیم دانش به عنوان یک فعالیت پیچیده اما ارزش آفرین، پایه و اساس بسیاری از راهبردهای سازمانی است. از این رو شناسایی عوامل و ابعاد موثر بر تسهیم دانش و نیز آگاهی از میزان تاثیر هر یک از آن ها، می تواند سازمان ها را در اتخاذ استراتژی های مناسب در جهت ارتقاء تسهیم دانش در سازمان یاری بخشد. بدین منظور در تحقیق حاضر ده عامل موثر بر تسهیم دانش در قالب سه بعد کلیدی فردی، سازمانی و تکنولوژیک مورد واکاوی قرار گرفته و تاثیر آن ها بر تسهیم دانش با روش معادلات ساختاری و به کمک نرم افزار آماری لیزرل بررسی گردید. بر اساس نتایج بدست آمده، معناداری تمامی روابط مورد تایید قرار گرفته و نتایج نشان می دهد، شخصیت به عنوان تاثیرگذارترین عامل در بعد فردی، ساختار سازمانی تاثیرگذار ترین عامل در بعد سازمانی و سواد فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات موثرترین عامل بعد تکنولوژیک به شمار می روند. از سویی دیگر بر اساس نتایج حاصل از این تحقیق، علی رغم تاثیر بارز هر سه بعد، بعد سازمانی بیشترین تاثیر را بر تسهیم دانش در سازمان دارد که این امر بیانگر لزوم توجه به عوامل سازمانی در جریان استقرار سیستم های تسهیم دانش در سازمان ها می باشد.
چکیده انگلیسی:
In these days, the most important wealth of organizations is the knowledge that they have. So successful organizations have the most useful, reliable and up to date business knowledge and use them appropriately. In this situation, knowledge sharing as a complex and value creating activity is the foundation of many organizational strategies. Therefore identify the factors and effective dimensions of knowledge sharing and being aware of the impact of each of them could help organizations to adopt appropriate strategies of improving knowledge sharing in the organization. So this study analyzed ten effective factors of knowledge sharing in three Key dimensions involve individual, organizational and technological and investigated the impact of them on knowledge sharing by using structural equation modeling (SEM) with LISREL software. According to the results, significant relations approved in all of the fields that we worked on and it shows that personality is the most influential factor of individual dimension, the structure is the most influential factor of organizational dimension and ICT literacy is the most influential factor of technological dimension. On the other hand, based on results, despite the clear impact of all three dimensions, the organizational dimension has the greatest impact on knowledge sharing in organizations.
منابع و مأخذ:
Ahadi Sarkani, SY, Sang Pahni,H, and Dsynh, M. (2013). Examining of relationships within the company and outside the company with cash holdings in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Quarterly Stock Exchange. 23: 77-101.
Faulkender, M, and Wang, R. (2006). Corporate Financial Policy and the Value of Cash. The Journal of Finance. 4:1957-1990.
Kim, C.S, Mauer, D.C, and Sherman, A.E. (1998). The determinants of corporate liquidity. Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 33: 305-334.
Kordestani, GR,khaiuor, F, and Ashtab, A. (2011). Compared performance financial ratios based on cash method and accrual method for predicting financial distress in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Quarterly Stock Exchange. 15: 191- 205.
Mehrani, S, Kashanipoor, M, and Rasaiian, A. (2009). The determinants of capital structure in Iran. Journal of Bulletin economic. pp. 125-151.
Ozkan, A, and Ozkan, N. (2004). Corporate cash holdings: an empirical investigation of 11 - UK companies. Journal of Banking and Finance. 28: 2103–2134.
Qadiri Moghaddam, A, Ghlampvrfrd, M.M, and Nasirzadeh, F. (2009). Examine the expertise of models bankruptcy prediction Altman and Ohlson of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Knowledge and Development (scientific and research), the sixteenth year. 28.
Rasaiian, A, Rahimi, F, and Hnjry, S. (2010). Impact of monitoring mechanisms inter- organizational corporate governance on cash holdings in Tehran Stock Exchange. Research Journal the Financial Accounting. 4 (6), 125-144.
Rezai, F, and Goldoz, M. (2011). Compare the predictive power patterns bankruptcy Zavgyn, Ohlson and Shyrata in of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Management Development and Transformation. 6: 69-81.
Sadeghi, H, Rahimi, P, and Salmani, Y. (2014). The effect of macro-economic and Corporate Governance of the financial distress companies listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Quarterly Economics, Financial (Knowledge and Development), new course, year 21. 8.
Setaiesh, M H, and Karimipour, E. (2013). The effect of conservatism conditional and unconditional on distress risk listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of quarterly Tehran Stock Exchange. 24: 5-39.
_||_
Ahadi Sarkani, SY, Sang Pahni,H, and Dsynh, M. (2013). Examining of relationships within the company and outside the company with cash holdings in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Quarterly Stock Exchange. 23: 77-101.
Faulkender, M, and Wang, R. (2006). Corporate Financial Policy and the Value of Cash. The Journal of Finance. 4:1957-1990.
Kim, C.S, Mauer, D.C, and Sherman, A.E. (1998). The determinants of corporate liquidity. Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 33: 305-334.
Kordestani, GR,khaiuor, F, and Ashtab, A. (2011). Compared performance financial ratios based on cash method and accrual method for predicting financial distress in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Quarterly Stock Exchange. 15: 191- 205.
Mehrani, S, Kashanipoor, M, and Rasaiian, A. (2009). The determinants of capital structure in Iran. Journal of Bulletin economic. pp. 125-151.
Ozkan, A, and Ozkan, N. (2004). Corporate cash holdings: an empirical investigation of 11 - UK companies. Journal of Banking and Finance. 28: 2103–2134.
Qadiri Moghaddam, A, Ghlampvrfrd, M.M, and Nasirzadeh, F. (2009). Examine the expertise of models bankruptcy prediction Altman and Ohlson of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Knowledge and Development (scientific and research), the sixteenth year. 28.
Rasaiian, A, Rahimi, F, and Hnjry, S. (2010). Impact of monitoring mechanisms inter- organizational corporate governance on cash holdings in Tehran Stock Exchange. Research Journal the Financial Accounting. 4 (6), 125-144.
Rezai, F, and Goldoz, M. (2011). Compare the predictive power patterns bankruptcy Zavgyn, Ohlson and Shyrata in of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Management Development and Transformation. 6: 69-81.
Sadeghi, H, Rahimi, P, and Salmani, Y. (2014). The effect of macro-economic and Corporate Governance of the financial distress companies listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Quarterly Economics, Financial (Knowledge and Development), new course, year 21. 8.
Setaiesh, M H, and Karimipour, E. (2013). The effect of conservatism conditional and unconditional on distress risk listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of quarterly Tehran Stock Exchange. 24: 5-39.
