شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان در زنجیره تأمین لارجت و پایدار با استفاده از تکنیک دلفی در شرکت‌های مواد غذایی شهرک صنعتی شهرکرد

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتی

meysam babaee ¹ , Maliheh roshan ²

1 - Phd in Industrial Management, School of Management, Noor Hedayat University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran
2 - Master Degree, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, Noor Hedayat Non-Profit University, Shahrekord, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/06/16 تاریخ پذیرش : 1399/09/05 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/10/22

کلید واژه: زنجیره تأمین لارجت, روش ترکیبی اکتشافی, روش دلفی, زنجیره تأمین پایدار,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف اصلی این پژوهش، شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی شاخص‌های موثر بر انتخاب تامین‌کنندگان در زنجیره تأمین لارجت و پایدار در صنعت مواد غذایی شهرک صنعتی شهرکرد با استفاده از روش دلفی می‌باشد. برای نیل به این هدف، با استفاده از روش ترکیبی اکتشافی، داده‌ها در دو مرحله (کیفی و کمّی) جمع‌آوری شد. در ابتدا، ضمن مطالعه ادبیات تحقیق، از طریق مصاحبه ساخت‌یافته و نیمه‌ساخت‌یافته با 11 نفر از مدیران و خبرگان دانشگاهی که با روش نمونه‌گیری نظری انتخاب شدند، مؤلفه‌ها مورد شناسایی قرار گرفت. در بخش کیفی، با استفاده از روش دلفی، تعداد 14 نفر از پانلیست‌ها پس از چهار راند، در مورد مؤلفه‌های زنجیره تأمین لارجت و پایدار به اتفاق‌نظر دست‌یافتند و اعتبار بخش کیفی نیز، از طریق ضریب هماهنگی کندال (k=0.61) مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. روش تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات در بخش کمّی، در دو سطح توصیفی و استنباطی (فریدمن) از طریق نرم‌افزار SPSS22 و Lisrel اجرا شد. پانلیست‌های تحقیق حاضر، مؤلفه‌های کلیدی را در قالب 123 مفهوم کلیدی، 26 زیرمعیار و 6 معیار اصلی که شامل: معیار ناب، چابک، تاب‌آوری، سبز، استعداد و نهایتاً پایدار می‌باشد را مورد شناسایی قرار دادند، که بیشترین امتیاز فریدمن مربوط به معیار پایدار با مقدار 5.29 و کمترین امتیاز مربوط به معیار تاب‌آور با مقدار 2.25 می‌باشد. ارزش پژوهش حاضر، به دلیل نوآوری محتوایی (استفاده هم زمان از شش رویکرد) می-باشد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The main purpose of this study is to identify and prioritize the indicators affecting the Supplier’s selection in LARGT and Sustainable Supply Chain in the Food industry of Shahrekord industrial town using Delphi Mhetod. To this end, data were collected in two stages (qualitative and quantitative) using the Sequential Exploratory method. Initially, reviewing the research literature, the components were identified through structured and semi-structured interviews with 11 academic executives and experts selected by theoretical sampling. 14 panelists reached a consensus on the components of LARGT and Sustainable Supply Chain in the qualitative section after four rounds using the Delphi technique and the validity of the qualitative section was also confirmed by Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (k=0.61). The quantitative data analysis method was done in two descriptive and inferential statistics through SPSS and Lisrel software. The panelists identified key components in several formats including 123 key concepts, 26 sub-criteria and 6 main criteria which were Lean, Agile, Resilience, Green, Talent and Sustainable which the highest score of Freedman is related to Sustainable criterion with the value of 5.29 and lowest score was for Resilience criterion with the value of 2.25. The research value is due to the content (using six approaches simultaneously).

منابع و مأخذ:

1. AbassiEsfanjani, H. and Forouzandeh Dehkordi, L. (2015). Identifying and explaining the determinant factors in the commercialization of academic research using the three-dimensional model. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 6(4), 33-46.


2. Abdoli Bidhandi, R, Valmohammadi, C. (2017). Effects of supply chain agility on profitability. Business Process Management Journal, 23 (50), 1064-1082.


3. Ali Soltani, N. (2019). Identification and prioritization of indicators affecting the sustainable supply chain using the Delphi method, M.A Thesis in Industrial Management, Noor hedayat Institute of Higher Education, Shahrekord.


4. Ameyaw, E.E, Hu, Y, Shan, M, Chan, C & Le, y. (2016). Application of Delphi method in construction engineering and management research: A quantitative perspective. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(8), 991–1000.


5. Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghania, A., Bahreininejad, A (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12(6), 1668-1677.


6. Cabrita, M.D, Duarte,S , Carvalho, H, Cruz-Machado, V. (2016). Integration of Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green Paradigms in a Business Model Perspective: Theoretical Foundations", 8th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control MIM, 49(12), 1306-1311.


7. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.


8. Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2011). Integrating Lean, Agile, Resilience and Green Paradigms in Supply Chain Management (LARG_SCM). Faculae de Cadencies e Technologic da Universidad Nova de Lisboan, 27-48.


9. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the Resilient Supply Chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14.


10. Creswell jw, Plano Clark VL. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Second edition, Sage Publication, inc. Day.


11. Danaeifard, H. & Emami, M. (2007), Strategies of Qualitative Research: A Reflection on Grounded Theory. Quarterly Journal of Management Thought, 2, 69-97.


12. Delvar, A. (2012). Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences. Tehran: Nashre Viraiesh Press (in Persian).


13. Dickson, G. W., (1966). An analysis of vendor selection system and decisions. Journal of Purchasing and supply management, 17-25.


14. Falasca M., Zobel, C.W., & Cook, D. (2008). A Decision Support Framework to Assess Supply Chain Resilience. In the proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 596-605.


15. Fahimnia, B, Jabbarzadeh, A, Sarkis, J (2018). .Greening versus resilience: A supply chain design perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 119, 129-148.


16. Fallah Lajimi, H., Mohammadi Kani, Z. & Rasooli Khatir, Z. (2019). Applying of Piecewise Linear Value Functions in LARG Suppliers Ranking: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Mixed Approach. Quarterly Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 9(33), 115-140 (in Persian).


17. Ghasemieh, Rahim, Jamali, Gh. & Karimiasl, E. (2015). Analysis of LARG Supply Chain Management Dimensions in Cement Industry (An Integrated multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach). Quarterly Journal of Industrial Management (Management Knowledge,7(4), 813-836 (in Persian).


18. Goodarzi, A. (2019). Identification and prioritization of indicators affecting Larget supply chain using Delphi technique. M.A. thesis, Noor Hedayat Institute of Higher Education, Shahrekord.


19. Hassan, H, Nabil, E, and Rady, M. (2015). A Model for Evaluating and Improving Supply Chain Performance. International Journal of Computer Science and Software Engineering (IJCSSE), 4(11), 2409-4285.


20. Heidarali, H. (2015). A practical guide to qualitative research. Tehran: Samt Press (in Persian).


21. Ho, William., Xu, Xiaowei., Dey, Prasanta. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 16–24.


22. Holt, D., & Ghobadian, A. (2009). An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), 933-956.


23. Hooman, H, A. (2015). A Practical Guide to Qualitative Research. (7^th ed) Tehran, Samat Publications (in Persian).


24. Ismail, H.S. and Sharifi, H. (2006). A balanced approach to building agile supply chains.International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36(6), 431-444.


25. Jafarpour, M. & Babaeifarsani, M. (2013). Scientific essay writing, a practical approach. Tehran, Allameh Tabatabai University press (in Persian).


26. Jamali, Gh. & Karimiasl, E. (2018 A).Competitive positioning for LARG Supply Chain in Cement Industry and its Strategic Requirements Importance-Performance Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Industrial Management Studies, 16(50), 53-77 (in Persian).


27. Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research, International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 116–13.


28. Lee, H.L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties, California Management Review, 44(3), 105-119.


29. Lin, C., Chiu, H., & Chu, P. (2006). Agility index in the supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 285-299.


30. Linstone, H. A.; Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: techniques and applications, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.


31. Lotfi, M. and Saghiri, S. (2018). Disentangling resilience, agility and leanness: Conceptual development and empirical analysis, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29 (1), 168-197.


32. Lu, Huiyun., Jiang, S. & Song, W. & Ming, X. (2018). A Rough Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection under Vague Environment. Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, 10(8), 1-20.


33. MalekZadeh, G. and Kazemi, M. and Lagzian, M. (2014). Organizational Intelligence: Designing a Hierarchy Model for Iranian State Universities with a Demetal Approach. Transformation Management Research, 5(10), 94-124.


34. Mashaiekhi, A. Farhangi, A., Momeni, M. & Alidoosti, S. (2005). Investigating the key factors affecting the application of information technology in Iranian government organizations: Application of Delphi technique. Quarterly Journal of Sciences Modares Human, special issue of management, 191-232 (in Persian).


35. Nematollahzadeh Amoli, F. (2016). Prioritization of Factors Affecting Open Innovation in Food Industry (Case Study: Amol Kalleh Meat Products Company). M.A. thesis, Faculty of Management, Mazandaran University.


36. Nikookar, E., Yanadori, Y., Freeman, S., & Wieland, A. (2019). The Role of Managers in Supply Chain Resilience: A Dynamic Managerial Capabilities Perspective. In G. Atinc (Ed.), Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, Academy of Management. Academy of Management Proceedings https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.11556.


37. Nikoopour J, Amini Farsani M. (2012). Success in Writing Academic Articles Applied Linguistics. Tehran: Asre Moaser.


38. Pashaeizad, H. (2007). A brief look at the Delphi method. Quarterly Journal of Peyk-E-Noor, 6(2), 63-79 (in Persian).


39. Ponis, S.T, Koronis, E. (2012). Supply Chain Resilience: Definition of Concept And Its Formative Elements.The Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(5), 921-930.


40. Qi, Y., Huo, B., Wang, Z. and Yeung, H.Y.J. (2017). The impact of operations and supply chain strategies on integration and performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 162-174.


41. Raiatpishe, S., Ahmadi, R. Kohan, & A., Abbasi, M. (2017). Applying a hybrid, qualitative approach and multi-criteria decision making in order to present a sustainable supply chain model in the petrochemical industry. Quarterly Journal of Industrial Management Studies, 16 (51):145-180 (in Persian).


42. Ruiz-Benitez, R., López, C. and Real, J. (2019). Achieving sustainability through the lean and resilient management of the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(2), 122-155.


43. Safaei Ghadikolaei, A. Mohammadnezhad Chari, F. (2016). Supply Chain Identify and Rank the Criteria for Selecting Suppliers in the LARG (Case Study: KALLEH Food Industry). Quarterly Journal of Operational Research and Its Applications, 13(4):103-120 (in Persian).


44. Sahu, A.k., Datta, S, Mahapatra, S.S., (2017). Evaluation of performance index inresilient supply chain: a fuzzy-based approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(1), 118–142.


45. Sangari, M. S., Razmi, J., & Zolfaghari, S. (2015). Developing a practical evaluation framework for identifying critical factors to achieve supply chain agility, Measurement, 62, 205-214.


46. Soni, U., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). Measuring supply chain resilience using a deterministic modeling approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 74, 11–25.


47. Udokporo, C.K, Anosikea, A, Lim, M, S.P (2020). Impact of Lean, Agile and Green (LAG) on business competitiveness: An empirical study of fast moving consumer goods businesses, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 1-10.


48. Venharbic, V., Varmish, I., & Dizoter, E. (2015). Open Innovation in SMEs, translated by Mashaiekh, J. & Hosseini Parsa. M. Tehran: Rasa Press (in Persian).


49. .Viera, A.L. (2015). Application of Laserl in Practice, translation of Rasoul Nowroozi Seyyed Hosseini and Hamid Ghasemi and Habib Honary, Hatmi Publications, Tehran. (In Persian)


50. Yu, C., Zhao, W.,Li, M. (2019).An integrated sustainable supplier selection approach using compensatory and non-compensatory decision methods.Kybernetes, 48(8), 1782-1805.