A Counterfactual thinking Approach to Human Resources' Perception of Unfavorable aAspects of Organizational life: A two-stage Methodology based on a Systematic review and AHP Method
محورهای موضوعی : OrganizationsGholamreza Ghanimati 1 , Zahra Alipour Darvishi 2 , Hamidreza Yazdani 3 , Nader Sheikh Al-Islami 4
1 - Faculty of Management and Social Sciences, Department of Management, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Public Management, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran
3 - Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of Management, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: consequences, AHP, antecedents, Counterfactual Thoughts (CTs), Human resource (HR),
چکیده مقاله :
Nowadays, researchers and managers believe that paying attention to employees' thoughts facilitates sustainable competitive advantage in organizations. After the introduction of cognitive science into organizations, the identification of what it is, how it is formed, and the formulation of Counterfactual Thoughts (CTs) have been investigated and analyzed in the field of Human Resources (HR). In this study, a systematic review of the literature in the field of CT has been done with the aim of identifying the antecedents and key consequences of this field and analyzing them. In this research, a two-stage methodology has been considered including (i) Extraction of antecedents and consequences, (ii) Weighting of antecedents. In the first stage, using the screening of articles based on the seven-step method of Sandelowski and Barroso, the antecedents and consequences of CTs, synthesis and interpretation have also been implemented through the coding method of qualitative interpretive meta-analysis. In the second stage, the consequences extracted in the field of counterfactuals are weighted using the matrix of paired comparisons based on the opinions of experts in the field of HR and AHP, which can be used to evaluate employees' thoughts and behavior. Based on the screening of the articles, the antecedents are categorized into 4 general concepts with 12 codes, and the consequences are classified into 2 and 8 codes. The results of the AHP analysis show that the normalization of the condition related to the behavioral outcome has the greatest impact on the evaluation of employees' thoughts and behavior, while the regulation of related emotions as a result of attitude has the least impact among the codes introduced in this evaluation.
Nowadays, researchers and managers believe that paying attention to employees' thoughts facilitates sustainable competitive advantage in organizations. After the introduction of cognitive science into organizations, the identification of what it is, how it is formed, and the formulation of Counterfactual Thoughts (CTs) have been investigated and analyzed in the field of Human Resources (HR). In this study, a systematic review of the literature in the field of CT has been done with the aim of identifying the antecedents and key consequences of this field and analyzing them. In this research, a two-stage methodology has been considered including (i) Extraction of antecedents and consequences, (ii) Weighting of antecedents. In the first stage, using the screening of articles based on the seven-step method of Sandelowski and Barroso, the antecedents and consequences of CTs, synthesis and interpretation have also been implemented through the coding method of qualitative interpretive meta-analysis. In the second stage, the consequences extracted in the field of counterfactuals are weighted using the matrix of paired comparisons based on the opinions of experts in the field of HR and AHP, which can be used to evaluate employees' thoughts and behavior. Based on the screening of the articles, the antecedents are categorized into 4 general concepts with 12 codes, and the consequences are classified into 2 and 8 codes. The results of the AHP analysis show that the normalization of the condition related to the behavioral outcome has the greatest impact on the evaluation of employees' thoughts and behavior, while the regulation of related emotions as a result of attitude has the least impact among the codes introduced in this evaluation.
Ahmad, Z., & Norhashim, M. (2008). The control environment, employee fraud and counterproductive workplace behaviour: An empirical analysis. Communications of the IBIMA, 3, 145–155.
Alipour Darvishi, Z. (2012). Introducing the model of factors influencing knowledge sharing departments of Islamic Azad University (Survey in the North Branch of Tehran and Science and Researches Campus). Journal of Information Technology Management, 4(10), 93–118.
Alipour Darvishi, Z., Doroudi, F., & Madani, N. (2018). Fuzzy Modeling of the Enactment of Stigma by Healthcare Personnel Toward People Living with HIV in the Frame of Counterfactual Thinking: A Mixed-Method Approach. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 34(9), 808–815.
Azar, A., & Darvishi, Z. A. (2011). Development and validation of a measure of justice perception in the frame of Fairness theory--Fuzzy approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7364–7372.
Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2023). Counterfactual thinking as a prebunking strategy to contrast misinformation on COVID-19. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 104(March 2022), 104404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104404
Brendl, C. M., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative?
Broomhall, A. G., & Phillips, W. J. (2023). Upward counterfactual thinking and state depression: investigating a causal relationship. Current Psychology, 1–16.
Byrne, R. M. J. (2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135–157.
Dalvand, M. R., & Zohdi, M. H. (2023). Virtual \& Cyber Whistle Blowing Role of Brand Hate among Home Appliance Customers. Journal of System Management, 9(3), 249–261.
Drayton, S., Turley-Ames, K. J., & Guajardo, N. R. (2011). Counterfactual thinking and false belief: The role of executive function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.007
Dunning, D., Madey, S. F., & Parpal, M. (1995). Frames and counterfactual thought، On comparing the “road taken” to hypothetical alternatives and the past. What Mi\&t Have Beevj،. In The Social Pgcho10\~{} Qy of Colrnterfactrral Thizzki\~{} g. Mahwah, NJ، Erlbaum.
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice. Journal of Accounting Research, 19(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490959
Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 168–192.
Ferrante, D., Girotto, V., Straga, M., & Walsh, C. (2013). Improving the past and the future: a temporal asymmetry in hypothetical thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 23.
Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1994). The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 357.
Grundmann, F., Smallman, R., & Epstude, K. (2022). Grandiose narcissism shapes counterfactual thinking (and regret): Direct and indirect evidence. Journal of Research in Personality, 99(July 2021), 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104235
He, Y., Payne, S. C., Yao, X., & Smallman, R. (2020). Improving workplace safety by thinking about what might have been: a first look at the role of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Safety Research, 72, 153–164.
Helgason, B. A., & Effron, D. A. (2022). From critical to hypocritical: Counterfactual thinking increases partisan disagreement about media hypocrisy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 101(March), 104308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104308
Kahneman, D, & Tversky, A. (1981). Missed opportunities، Psychological ramifications of counterfactual thought in midlife women.
Kahneman, Daniel, & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136.
Kahneman, Daniel, & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246(1), 160–173.
Khoshouei, M. S., & Nouri, A. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale (CTNES). Advances in Cognitive Science, 11(3), 13–23.
Klauer, K. C., & Migulla, G. (1995). Spontanes kontrafaktisches Denken. [Spontaneous counterfactual processing.]. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 26(1), 34–45.
Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Markman, K. D. (2009). Counterfactual structure and learning from experience in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 979–982.
Landman, J., Vandewater, E. A., Stewart, A. J., & Malley, J. E. (1995). Missed opportunities، Psychological ramifications of counterfactual thought in midlife women. Journal of Adult Development, 2, 87–97.
Landman, J., Vandewater, E. A., Stewart, A. J., & Malley, J. E. (1995). Missed opportunities: Psychological ramifications of counterfactual thought in midlife women. Journal of Adult Development, 2(2), 87–97.
Lewin, K. (1935). Psycho-sociological problems of a minority group. Character \& Personality; A Quarterly for Psychodiagnostic \& Allied Studies, 3, 175--187.
Markman, K. D., McMullen, M. N., & Elizaga, R. A. (2008). Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: A test of the reflection and evaluation model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 421–428.
Mehri, G., Izadpanah, N., & JabbariAsl, S. (2023). Identifying Human Resource Management Indicators with a Strategic Tthinking Approach in the Organization for the Collection and Sale of Proprietary Property. Journal of System Management, 9(3), 193–207.
Mercier, H., Rolison, J. J., Stragà, M., Ferrante, D., Walsh, C. R., & Girotto, V. (2017). Questioning the preparatory function of counterfactual thinking. Memory \& Cognition, 45, 261–269.
Nasco, S. A., & Marsh, K. L. (1999). Gaining control through counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(5), 557–569.
Nicklin, J. M. (2013). Expertise, counterfactual thinking, and fairness perceptions: A test of fairness theory. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 42–60.
Ramzy, O., El Bedawy, R., Maher, A., & others. (2018). Dysfunctional Behavior at the Workplace and Its Impact on Employees’ Job Performance. International Journal of Business Administration, 9(4), 224–233.
Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 133.
Roese, N. J., & Epstude, K. (2017). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking: New evidence, new challenges, new insights. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 1–79). Elsevier.
Roese, N. J., & Morrison, M. (2009). The psychology of counterfactual thinking. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 16–26.
Sabet, A., & Razeghi, S. (2019). Presentation of Structural Equation Modeling the Role of Human Resource Strategies on the Development of Job Performance. Journal of System Management, 5(2), 189–210.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company.
Sanna, L. J., & Turley, K. J. (1996). Antecedents to spontaneous counterfactual thinking: Effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(9), 906–919.
Tajik, M., Makui, A., & Mansouri, N. (2020). Suppliers’ Evaluation and Ranking in Telecommunication Infrastructure Company Using the TOPSIS Method in an Uncertain Environment. International Conference on Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 84–99.
Tajik, M., Makui, A., & Tosarkani, B. M. (2023). Sustainable cathode material selection in lithium-ion batteries using a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making. Journal of Energy Storage, 66(December 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107089
Tran, H. A., Strizhakova, Y., Liu, H., & Golgeci, I. (2021). “If only…”: customer counterfactual thinking in failed recovery. European Journal of Marketing, 55(12), 3221–3249. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2019-0883
Turley, K. J., Sanna, L. J., & Reiter, R. L. (1995). Counterfactual thinking and perceptions of rape. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 285–303.
Wang, K. Y., Bublitz, M. G., & Zhao, G. (Terry). (2021). Enhancing dieters’ perseverance in adversity: How counterfactual thinking increases use of digital health tracking tools. Appetite, 164(April), 105261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105261
Wong, E. M. (2007). Narrating near-histories: The effects of counterfactual communication on motivation and performance. Management \& Organizational History, 2(4), 351–370.
Xie, Y., Ma, W., & Tong, Z. (2023). How counterfactual thinking affects willingness to consume green restaurant products: Mediating role of regret and moderating role of COVID-19 risk perception. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 55(58), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.05.001
Zarrinabadi, N., Mohammadzadeh Mohammadabadi, A., & Abbasi, Z. (2023). My language ability could have been better or worse: Examining how upward and downward counterfactual thinking predict self-efficacy and language performance. Learning and Motivation, 82(May), 101893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101893
