Dynamic System Analysis of R&D Based on Localization Capabilities in the Commercial Auto Industry
محورهای موضوعی : Business Strategy
Soraya Lashgari
1
,
Sadegh Abedi
2
,
Seyedjavad Iranban
3
1 - Department of Technology Management, Management and Economics Faculty, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Industrial Management,
Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
3 - Department of Management,
Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
کلید واژه: R&D, System Dynamics, Automotive Industry, Localization Capabilities,
چکیده مقاله :
According to published reports on the level of internalization of commercial vehicles, it shows that most carmakers pursue a minimal domestic manufacturing policy and less have a policy of increasing domestic manufacturing on their agenda. The most important research gaps are need to study R&D activities in the form of a dynamic system in the automotive industry based on the three variables of supply network capabilities, product innovation and process. The purpose of this study is to provide a dynamic model to investigate the behavior of a commercial vehicle R&D system. The present study is applied in terms of purpose. The basis of the system analysis is previous research as well as information obtained from interviews with automotive industry experts. For this purpose, first the variables affecting the cycle of R&D activities are studied and modeling is presented using the dynamics approach. Also, various policies on the performance of the development research cycle based on the time of knowledge acquisition and product introduction have been simulated and analyzed. The results of system performance simulation show that the weak share of research and development budget along with low and limited market share and lack of proper investment makes the research and development capability at an unfavorable level during the next 10 years. Therefore, it is suggested that the necessary measures in this regard be taken in the fields of product sales marketing along with appropriate investment in research and development.
Abedi. S., & Oryani, M.(2016).Commercial Vehicle Industry Development: Prospects and Challenges, International Conference on Industrial and Commercial Policies for Export and Employment Development, Institute for Business Studies and Research.
Aníbal, N. C., & Gonzalo, F.S.(2017). Principal researcher and project manager: who should drive R&D projects?. R&D Management. 47(2), 277-287.
Arun, A. Elias., Robert, Y., Cavana & Laurie,S. (2002). Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management.32(4), 301-310.
Barragán, O.A., & Zubieta, G.J.(2018). Critical Factors toward Successful R&D Projects in Public Research Centers: a Primer. Applied Research and Technology, 11(6), 866–875.
Coyle, G., & Exelby, D. (2000). The validation of commercial system dynamics models. System Dynamics Review, 16(1), 27 – 41.
Daim, T.U., Gulgun, K., & Cowa, K.(2017). Developing Oregon’s renewable energy portfolio using fuzzy goal programming model. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 59, 786-793.
Daneshzand , F., Amin-Naseri , M.R., Asali, M., Elkamel, A. & Fowler, M. (2019). A System Dynamics Model for Optimal Allocation of Natural Gas to Various Demand Sectors. Computers and Chemical Engineering. 118, 709-723.
Dorota, K., & Dorota, S.(2016). Classification of R&D projects and selection of R&D project management concept. R&D Management. 46(5), 831-841.
Félix, J., López. I., Emilio, J., & López, M.(2017). Institutional framework, corporate ownership structure, and R&D investment: an international analysis.R&D Management. 47(1), 141-157.
Gasbi, S., & Chkir, A.(2016). R&D (R&D) Spillovers and Economic Growth: Empirical Validation in the Case of Developing Countries. Journal of Economics and International Finance. 4(5), 107–122.
Ghasinoory, S., Amiri, M.,& Alizadeh .P.(2017). A Study of the Factors Affecting the Cost of Iranian Business Sector in R&D Activities; Study of three different industries.Technology Development Management. 4(2) ,22-44.
Hans, J. T.(2003) Managing innovative R&D teams, R&D Management. 33(3)
Huang, C.C., Chub, Pung, Y., & Chiang, Y. H. (2008). A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega. 36, 1038-1052.
Juite, W.(2017). Structuring innovation funnels for R&D projects under uncertainty. R&D Management. 47(1), 127-140.
Juliana, H., & Volker, M.(2011). Outsourcing R&D: a review, model, and research agenda. R&D Management.41(1),1-7.
Jung, U., & Seo, D.(2010). An ANP approach for R&D project evaluation based on interdependencies between research objectives and evaluation criteria, Decis. Supp. Syst. 49 (3), 335–342.
Kaisa, H., Pia H. L.,& Paavo, R.(2016). Managing the appropriability of R&D collaboration, R&D Management. 46, (S1), 145-158 .
Latipova, A.( 2015), On optimization of R&D Project Selection and Scheduling. IFAC-Papers On Line 48-25, 006–010.
Kaveh M., Ardekani S., &Tabatabaeen, M. (2020) Marketing Strategy Evaluation by Integrating Dynamic Systems Modeling and Network Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of System Management. 6(1), 19-34.
Linton, J.D., Walsh, S.T., Kirchhoff, N.A., Morabito, J.M., & Merges, M.J. (2000). selection of R&D Project in a Portfolio. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE. 506-511.
Martha, L., Torres,B ., Rebeca, M. D.,& Felipe H.P.(2016). Technological impact of R&D grants on utility models.R&D Management. 46(S2), 537-551.
Meade, L., & Presly, A.(2002). R&D project selection Using the Analytic Network process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 49(1), 59-66.
Oliver, G., Edmund, C., Salzmann., & Alexander, K .(2019). university‐industry collaboration and frontend success: the moderating effects of innovativeness and parallel cross firm collaboration. R&D Management.49(5), 835-849.
Peyvasteh M., Sohrabi T. & Shadnoush, N.(2019)Technology Assessment Model with Dynamic Capabilities Approach in Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of System Management. 5(3), 23-48.
Samadi, M .Y., Hashemzadeh, K. G., Radfar, R.,& Manteghi, M.(2017). Investigating the importance of empowerment factors of R&D centers on technology transfer methods in investment (Case study: Iranian automotive industry). Investment knowledge. 6(3), 68-83( in Persian).
Shah Hosseini, M., Heidari, A., Arabi, M.&, Qaderi, K .S.(2017). Presenting a Model for Managing Strategic Unions of R&D in the Automotive Industry of Iran. Business Management . 11(2), 39-58( in Persian).
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics, systems thinking and modeling for the complex world. Boston: McGro.23(2),165-189.
Szmigiera M.( 2021). Percentage of global R&D spending, by industry 2018, Statista report.
Thomas, L., & Peter, S.(2013) Managing the manufacturing–R&D interface in the process industries .R&D Management. 43(3), 252-270.
Yan, Chen.(2018).Partial adjustment toward target R&D intensity. R&D Management. 48(5), 591-602.
Yu, Q.Z.(2017) Why and how knowledge sharing matters for R&D engineers. R&D.
Zolaikhaei R., & Radfar, R.(2020). A System Model for Technological Capabilities Assessment in High-Speed Train Industries. Journal of System Management. 6(3), 01-138.
