• صفحه اصلی
  • Assessment of excavability classification in a Limestone Quarry: A case study from Bayburt, Turkey

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : IJES-2112-1697 (R2) بازدید : 219 صفحه: 241 - 251

10.30495/ijes.2022.1948500.1697

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

Assessment of excavability classification in a Limestone Quarry: A case study from Bayburt, Turkey

محورهای موضوعی : Economic Geology

Gökhan Külekçi 1 , Alaaddin Vural 2 , Şener Aliyazıcıoğlu 3

1 - Gumushane University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Mining Eng. 29100 Gumushane, Turkey
2 - Gumushane University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Mining Eng. 29100 Gumushane, Turkey
3 - Gumushane University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Mining Eng. 29100 Gumushane, Turkey

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/08/19 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/11/14 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/11/14

کلید واژه: Classification Systems, Degree of Weathering, Excavability Limestone Quarry, Point Load Index Test,

چکیده مقاله :

Excavability is a measure of material which can be excavated with classical excavation equipment. Studies to decide the rock excavability characteristics contribute to the suitability of engineering projects. In this study, a limestone quarry (in Bayburt, Turkey) was analysed with excavability classification systems and appropriate systems were determined. To accomplish this aim, point load index and Schmidt hardness tests were practiced and changed to uniaxial compressive strength tests. After that, findings were categorized with classification systems in excavation and matched against practices from field. In this study, rock mass was addressed as “pre-explosion”, “hard ripping” and “hammer and blasting” in accordance with distinctive classification systems. All determined as rock mass should be blasted for loosening then dug with hydraulic breakers. This practice is totally compatible with in-site excavations fulfilled. According to study results, the most suitable parameters to decide surface excavational classification are load strength index, geological strength index and the degree of rock mass weathering.

چکیده انگلیسی:

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Abdullatif OM, Cruden DM (1983) The relationship between rock mass quality and ease of excavation. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology 28:183–187.
    2.
  2. Ağar Ü (1977) Geology of Demirözü (Bayburt) and Köse (Kelkit). PhD thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Türkiye, 59 p.
    3.
  3. Alemdağ S, Kaya A, Gürocak Z, Dağ S (2011) Excavatability Properties of Rock Masses Having Different Weathering Degrees: An Example of Gümüşhane Granitoid, Gümüşhane, NE Turkey, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi 35(2):133-150
    4.
  4. Aliyazicioğlu Ş, Külekçi G (2018) Investigation of Usability of Limestone and Basalt Type Rocks As Road Infrastructure Fiilling, Trabzon Çatak Case. II. Cappadocian Geosciences Symposium, Niğde, Türkiye (in Turkish with English abstract).
    5.
  5. Arıoğlu E, Bilgin N (1978) Point load test and its application. ITU Journal 36:21–26.
    6.
  6. Arslan M, Aliyazicioglu I (2001) Geochemical and petrological characteristics of the Kale (Gümüşhane) volcanic rocks: Implications for the Eocene evolution of eastern Pontide arc volcanism, northeast Turkey, International Geology Review 43:595–610.
    7.
  7. Arslan M, Aslan Z, Dokuz A (2005a) Petrographical, geochemical and petrological characteristics of the Bayburt tuffs: Eocene calk-alkaline felsic volcanism in the southern zone of Eastern Pontide. Selcuk University Journal of Engineering, Science 20:49–67.
    8.
  8. Arslan M, Kolayli H, Temizel İ, Çiftçi DE, Alp İ, Yılmaz AO, Er, M (2005b) Petrography, geochemistry and formation conditions of Gümüşhane and Bayburt area travertine and onyxes deposits, NE Turkey. 1st International Symposium on Travertine, Denizli, Türkiye.
    9.
  9. ASTM (2001) Standard Test Method for Determination of Rock Hardness by Rebound Hammer Method, pp. D5805-D5873.
    10.
  10. Aufmuth R. (1973) A systematic determination of engineering criteria for rock, Bulletin of Association of Engineering Geology 11:235–245.
    11.
  11. Aydın A, Basu A (2005) The Schmidt hammer in rock material characterization, Engineering Geology 81:1–14.
    12.
  12. Bieniawski ZT (1975) The point-load test in geotechnical practice, Engineering Geology 9:1–11.
    13.
  13. Bozdağ T (1988) Indirect rippability assessment of coal measure rocks. PhD thesis, Middle East Technical University Institute of Science, Ankara, Turkey.
    14.
  14. Brown ET (1981) Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring I.S.R.M.: Suggested Methods. Pergamon Press.
    15.
  15. Büyüksağış IS, Göktan RM (2007) The effect of Schmidt hammer type on uniaxial compressive strength prediction of rock, International Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 44:299–307
    16.
  16. Ceylanoğlu A, Gül Y, Ayda A (2007) Investigation of diggability and rippability classification systems and proposition of a new classification system, Scientific Mining Journal 46:13–26
    17.
  17. Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classifications and index properties of intact rock. Technical Report (Report Number: AFWL-TR-65-116), Defense Technical Information Center, New Mexico.
    18.
  18. Franklin JA, Broch E, Walton G (1971) Logging the mechanical character of rock, Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy 80:A1-9.
    19.
  19. Gökçeoğlu C (1996) Evaluation on reliability of predicted uniaxial compressive strength data using Schmidt hardness test, Geology Engineering 48:78– 81.
    20.
  20. Göktan RM, Ayday C (1993) A Suggested Improvement to the Schmidt Rebound Hardness ISRM Suggested Method with Particular Reference to Rock Machineability, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, Geomechanics Abstract 30:321–322.
    21.
  21. Göktan RM, Güneş N (2005) A comparative study of Schmidt hammer testing procedures with reference to rock cutting machine performance prediction, International Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 42(3):466-472.
    22.
  22. Goudie AS (2006) The Schmidt Hammer in geomorphological research, Progress in Physical Geography 30:703–718.
    23.
  23. Haramy KY, DeMarco MJ (1985) Use of Schmidt Hammer for Rock and Coal Testing. 26th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Rapid City, Balkema, Rotterdam.
    24.
  24. Hucka V (1965) A rapid method for determining the strength of rocks in situ, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences Geomechanics: 127–134.
    25.
  25. ISRM (1981) ISRM Suggested Methods Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring. Pergamon Press, London.
    26.
  26. ISRM (1985) Point load test, suggested methods for determining point load strength. International Journal Rock Mechanics Mining Science, Geomech 22: 55–60.
    27.
  27. Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxialcompressive strength of rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 38:.981–994.
    28.
  28. Karpuz C (1990) A classification system for excavation of surface coal measures, Mining Science Technology 11:157–163.
    29.
  29. Katz O, Reches Z, Roegiers JC (2000) Evaluation of Mechanical Rock Properties Using a Schmidt Hammer, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 37:723–728.
    30.
  30. Kaya A, Bulut F, Alemdağ S (2011) Applicability of Excavatability Classification Systems in Underground Excavations: A Case Study, Scientific Research and Essays 6(25):5331-5341
    31.
  31. Kaygusuz A, Arslan M, Sipahi F, Temizel İ (2016) U-Pb zircon chronology and petrogenesis of Carboniferous plutons in the northern part of the Eastern Pontides, NE Turkey: Constraints for Paleozoic magmatism and geodynamic evolution, Gondwana Research 39:327–346.
    32.
  32. Kaygusuz A, Öztürk M (2015) Geochronology, geochemistry, and petrogenesis of the Eocene Bayburt intrusions, Eastern Pontide, NE Turkey: implications for lithospheric mantle and lower crustal sources in the high-K calc-alkaline magmatism, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 108:97–116.
    33.
  33. Ketin İ (1951) Geology of Bayburt region, IU Science Faculty Magazine-B 16:113–127
    34.
  34. Kirsten HAD (1982) A classification system for excavation in natural materials, The Civil Engineering in South Africa 24:293–308.
    35.
  35. Korkmaz S, Baki Z (1984) Stratigraphy of south of Demirözü (Bayburt). Bulletin of Geological Congress of Turkey 5:107–115
    36.
  36. Külekçi G, (2021a) Comparison of Field and Laboratory Result of Fiber Reinforced Shotcrete Application, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 65:2, 463-473.
    37.
  37. Külekçi G, Çullu M (2021) The Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Composites Produced With the Use of Alternative Wastes, Journal of Polytechnic 4:3, 1171-1180.
    38.
  38. Külekçi G (2021b) Investigation of The Statistical Relationship Between Porosity, Schmidt Hardness and Water Absorption Rates in Volcanic Rocks Using SPSS Program, 3. International Sciences and Innovation Congress: 302-309.
    39.
  39. Külekçi G, Vural A (2021) Determination of Excavatorability in a Quarry and Comparison with the Applied Method. International Halich Congress, İstanbul, Türkiye.
    40.
  40. Külekçi G (2019) The Distribution of Water in Artvin Region Volcanites, ICOCEM 2019.
    41.
  41. Külekçi G (2018) Investigation of the utilization areas of construction and demolition wastes in the Black Sea region instead of aggregate and their areas of usage in the mining industry, Karadeniz Tecnical Universty, Institute of science, PHD dissertation, Trabzon.
    42.
  42. Külekçi G, Yılmaz AO (2018) Classification of Rock and Support Applications far Tunneling, Sample of Environmental Road in Gümüşhane. 4th International Underground Excavations Symposium, İstanbul, Türkiye.
    43.
  43. Külekçi G, AO Yilmaz (2017) Investigation of Trabzon Volcanilities Usable as External Covering, MSU Journal of Science 5:2, 459-464
    44.
  44. Külekçi G, Yılmaz AO (2016) Classification of Rock and Support Applications far Tunneling, Sample of Environmental Road in Gümüşhane. 4th International Underground Excavations Symposium, İstanbul, Türkiye.
    45.
  45. McFeat SI, Tarkoy PJ (1979) Assessment of tunnel boring machine performance, Tunnels Tunn 11:33–37
    46.
  46. Okay Aİ, Şahintürk Ö (1997) Geology of the Eastern Pontides. In: Robinson AG (ed) Regional and Petroleum Geology of the Black Sea and Surrounding Region. AAPG Memoir 68: 291–311.
    47.
  47. Özer E (1984) Geology of Bayburt (Gümüşhane) region. Karadeniz University Journal 3:77–89
    48.
  48. Palmström A (2005) Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD), Tunnels and Underground Space Technology 20:362–377.
    49.
  49. Pelin S (1977) Geological study of the area southeast of Alucra (Giresun) with special reference to its petroleum potential. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon, Türkiye.
    50.
  50. Pettifer GS, Fookes PG (1994) A revision of the graphical method for assessing the excavatability of rock, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 27:145–164.
    51.
  51. Poole RW, Farmer IW (1980) Consistency and Repeatability of Schmidt Hammer Rebound Data During Field Testing, International Journal Rock Mechanics Mining Science 167–171.
    52.
  52. Priest SD, Hudson J (1976) Discontinuity spacing in rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Geomechanics Abstracts 13:135e48.
    53.
  53. Schmidt E (1951) A non-destructive Concrete Tester, Concrete 59:34–35.
    54.
  54. Scoble MJ, Müftüoğlu YV (1984) Derivation of a diggability index for surface mine equipment selection, Mining Science and Technology 1:305–322.
    55.
  55. Şengör A, Yılmaz Y (1981) Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach, Tectonophysics 75:181–241.
    56.
  56. Singh RN, Denby B, Eğretli İ, Pathan AG (1986) Assessment of ground rippability in opencast mining operations, University of Nottingham Mining Department Magazine 38:21–34.
    57.
  57. Sipahi F, Saydam Eker Ç, Akpınar İ, Gücer, MA, Vural A, Kaygusuz A, Aydurmuş T (2021) Eocene magmatism and associated Fe-Cu mineralization in northeastern Turkey: a case study of the Karadağ skarn, International Geology Review 1–26.
    58.
  58. Smith HJ (1986) Estimating rippability of rock mass classification. The 27th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Proceedings, University of Alabama, US.
    59.
  59. Sumner P, Nel W (2002) The effect of moisture on Schmidt hammer rebound: Tests on rock samples from Marion Island and South Africa, Earth Surf Proc Land forms 27:1137–1142.
    60.
  60. Tokel S (1972) Stratigraphical and volcanic history of Gümüşhane region. PhD thesis, University College London, England.
    61.
  61. Topuz G, Altherr R, Satır M, Schwarz W (2001) Age and metamorphic conditions of low-grade metamorphism in the Pulur Massif, NE Turkey. Fourth International Turkish Geology Symposium (ITGS IV), Adana-Turkey.
    62.
  62. Topuz G, Altherr R, Siebel W, Schwarz WH, Zack T, Hasözbez A, Barth M, Satır M, Şen C (2010) Carboniferous high-potassium I-type granitoid magmatism in the Eastern Pontides: The Gümüşhane pluton (NE Turkey), Lithos 116:92–110.
    63.
  63. Tsiambaos G, Saroglou H (2009) Excavatability assessment of rock masses using the Geological Strength Index (GSI), Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environmental 69:13–27.
    64.
  64. USBR (1998) Engineering geology field manual, Field index tests 1:111–120.
    65.
  65. Vural A (2017) K-Ar dating for determining the age of mineralization as alteration product: A case study of antimony mineralization vein type in granitic rocks of Gümüşhane area, Turkey, Acta Physica Polonica A 132:792–795.
    66.
  66. Vural A (2018a) Creation of Awareness of Enhanced Geotourism Routes: Old Gümüshane Dört Konak Route. II. International Sustainable Tourism Congress. Gümüşhane, Türkiye (in Turkish with English abstract).
    67.
  67. Vural A (2019) Creation of Awareness of Enhanced Geotourism Routes: Old Gümüşhane-Dörtkonak Route, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi 10:250–274 (in Turkish with English abstract).
    68.
  68. Vural A (2018b) Enhanced Geoturism Route: Karadağ and Artabel Lakes, Gümüşhane. 71. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı. Ankara, Türkiye (in Turkish with English abstract).
    69.
  69. Vural A, Kaygusuz A (2021) Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic importance of Eocene I-type magmatism in the Eastern Pontides, NE Turkey, Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14:467.
    70.
  70. Vural A, Kaygusuz A, Dönmez H (2018) Geological, Geochemical and Geochronological Investigation of Avliyana Antimonite Mineralization. 8th Geochemistry Symposium, Antalya, Türkiye.
    71.
  71. Weaver JM (1975) Geological factors significant in the assessment of rippability, The Civil Engineering in South Africa 17:313–316.
    72.
  72. Yaşar E, Erdoğan Y (2004) Estimation of rock physio-mechanical properties using hardness methods, Engineering Geology 71:281–288.
    73.

سکوی نشر دانش

سند یا سکوی نشر دانش ،سامانه ای جهت مدیریت حوزه علمی و پژوهشی نشریات دانشگاه آزاد می باشد

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]