Explaining stock anomalies using multifactorial asset pricing models
محورهای موضوعی : Financial and Economic Modelling
Morteza Mahmoudi
1
(
Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Urmia Brnach
Departmet of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Urmia Brnach, Urmia
)
jamal bahri sales
2
(
Department of Accounting, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran
)
Saeed Jabbarzadeh Kangarlouie
3
(
Department of Accounting, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran
)
Ali Ashtab
4
(
Department of Accounting, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Excess stock returns, multifactorial models, unexplained returns, stock anomalies,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigates the effects of stock anomalies on excess stock and unexplained returns of multifactorial models in the companies listed at the Tehran Stock Exchange. We selected a sample of 120 companies listed at the Tehran Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2019 using the Fama-Macbeth [18] regression approach. The results revealed that stock anomalies led to considerable differences in excess stock returns of different portfolios, implying that stock returns at different anomaly levels significantly differ. In addition, it was found that the anomalies related to stock characteristics greatly impacted explaining excess stock returns in the three-factor and five-factor models suggested by Fama and French. Besides, in different portfolios of the anomalies, the unexplained return rates were significantly different from each other. Moreover, in Fama and French's three-factor and five-factor models, different anomaly portfolios show significant differences in explaining excess stock returns.
[1] Alamifar, S., Khani, A., Amiri, H., Development of Fama and French pricing factor models using fundamental factors based on ccounting characteristics, Journal of Accounting Improvements, Shiraz University, 2020, 12(2), P. 105-67. Doi:10.22099/jaa.2021.39285.2077. (in Persian).
[2] Amihud, Y., I., lliquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects, Journal of Financial Markets, 2002, 5, P. 31-56. Doi:10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6.
[3] Arabzadeh, M., Foroughi, D., Amiri, H., Explaining accrual anomaly using multifactor pricing model in Tehran Stock Exchange, Financial Research Quarterly, 2018, 20(3), P.305-326.
Doi:10.22059/frj.2018.261339.1006690. (in Persian).
[4] Banz, R. W., The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks, Journal of Financial Economics, 1981, 9(3), P. 3-18. Doi:10.1016/0304-405X(81)90018-0.
[5] Bashir Khodaparsati, R. Saba, M., Boroumandzadeh, H., Efficiency of Fama and French Five-Factor Model in Offensive and Defensive Stocks, Scientific Journal of Financial Management Strategy, 2019, 6(4), P. 109-130. (in Persian).
[6] Basu, S., Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis, Journal of Finance, 1977, 12(3), P. 129-156. Doi:10.2307/2326304 .
[7] Basu, S., The Relationship Between Earnings Yield, Market Value, and Return for NYSE Common Stocks: Further Evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, 12(8), P. 129-156, Doi:10.1016/0304-405X(83)90031-4.
[8] Bhandari, L., Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence, Journal of Finance, 1988, 43(12), P. 507-528. Doi:10.2307/2328473.
[9] Bin, G., Zhang, Y., Zhange, H., The Five-factor Asset Pricing Model Tests for theChinese Stock Market, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2018, 43(4), P. 84–106. Doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.02.001.
[10] Bozorg Asl, M., Masjed Mousavi, M., Comparison of Explanatory Power of Return Prediction Models in Tehran Stock Exchange, Financial Accounting Knowledge, 2017, 4(4), P. 45-64, Doi: JR.JFAK.4.4.003 (in Persian).
[11] Carhart, M.,On Persistence on Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(5), P. 57-82. Doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
[12] De Bondt, W.F. M., Thaler, R. H., Does the Stock Market Overreact? Journal of Finance,1985, 40(4), P. 793-805. Doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x.
[13] Durnev, A., Morck, R., Yeung, B., Zarowin, P., Does Greater Firm-specific Return Variation Mean More or Less Informed Stock Pricing? Journal of Accounting Research, 2003, 41, P. 797-836.
[14] Fama, E., French, K., The cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Finance, 1992, 47, P. 427-465.
[15] Fama, E., French, K., Common Risk Factor in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds, Journal of Finance, 1993, 33(6), P. 3-56. Doi:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5.
[16] Fama, E., French, K. A., Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model, Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 116(1), P. 1-22. Doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010.
[17] Fama, E., French, K., A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. ssrn.com/abstract, 2013, P.2287202. Doi:10.2139/ssrn.2287202.
[18] Fama, E., Eugene F., MacBeth, D., Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests, Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81(3), P.607–636. Doi:10.1086/260061
[19] Fan, S., Yu, L., Does the Alternative Three-Factor Model Explain Momentum Anomaly Better in G12 countries? Journal of Finance & Accountancy, 2103, 12.
[20] Hou, K., Xue, C., Zhang, L., Digesting Anomalies: An Investment Approach, Unpublished working paper, 2012, The Ohio StateUniversity.
[21] Huynh, T., Explaining anomalies in Australia with a five-factor asset pricing model, International Review of Finance, 2018, Doi:10.1111/irfi.12125.
[22] Izadinia, N., Ebrahimi, M., Hajiannejad, A., Comparison of Fama and French three-factor model with Carhart's main four-factor model in explaining stock returns of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 2014, 2 & 3 (6), P. 17-28. Doi:20.1001.1.23831170.1393.2.3.3.0 (in Persian).
[23] Izadinia, N., Nazarzadeh, Y., The relationship between earning quality and stock returns in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Development and Capital, 2009, 3, P. 61-72, (in Persian).
[24] Jafari, M., Misaghi Farooji, J., Ahmadvand, M., Comparison of capital asset pricing models, Fama and French three-factor models, and artificial neural networks in predicting Iran stock market, Journal of Business and Economics, 2013, 4(5), P. 53-63. (in Persian)
[25] Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S., Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency, Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(2), P. 65-91. Doi:10.2307/2328882.
[26] Kiamehr, A., Banayi, M. H., Hemmatfar, M, Explaining the role of stock market anomalies in capital asset pricing, Financial Economics Quarterly, 2020, 14 (53), P. 193-212. (in Persian)
[27] Kordestani, G., Majdi, D.,Investigating the relationship between the quality characteristics of earnings and capital expenditures of common stocks, accounting and audit reviews, 2007, 14(2), P.38-67. Doi:20.1001.1.26458020.1386.14.2.5.8 (in Persian).
[28] Kordestani, G., Tayefeh, S., Qualitative Characteristics of Common Stock Capital earning and Expenditures, Financial Research, 2013, 5(1), P. 75-94. Doi:10.22059/jfr.2013.35433 (in Persian).
[29] Konstantin, K. B., Runge, P., Charifzadeh, M., An Analysis and Comparison of Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Model Performance during Pandemic Situations in Developed and Emerging Markets, Mathematics, 2022, 142 (10). Doi:10.3390/math10010142.
[30] Kubota, K., Takehara, H., Does the Fama and French Five-Factor Model Work Well in Japan? International Review of Finance,2017, SN, P. 1468-244. Doi:10.1111/irfi.12126.
[31] Lee, D., Kim, M., Kim, T., Abnormal Trading Volume and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns, 2016, KAIST College of Business.
[32] Lintner, J., The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in StockPortfolios and Capital Budgets, The Review of Economics and Statistics,1965, 47(5), P. 13-37. Doi:10.2307/1924119.
[33] Lin Q., Residual momentum and the cross-section of stock returns: Chinese evidence, Finance Research Letters, 2019, 1(29), P. 206-15. Doi:10.1016/j.frl.2018.07.009.
[34] Pantzalis, Christos., Xu, Ziwei, Does Stock Return Synchronicity Really Matter in Terms of Stock Price Informativeness, 2017, University of South Florida
[35] Philipp, D., Franziska J. P., The Fama-French Five-Factor Model Plus Momentum: Evidence for the German Market, Schmalenbach Bus Rev, 2020, 72, P. 661–684, Doi:10.1007/s41464-020-00105-y.
[36] Rahimpour, M., Ghaemi, M., Evaluation of Pricing Model and Time-Calendar Portfolio Approach in Long-Term Event Research, Quarterly Journal of Empirical Studies of Financial Accounting, 2019, 15(61), P. 101-130. Doi:10.22054/qjma.2019.41172.1991 (in Persian).
[37] Ranjbar, M. Badiei, H., Mohebbi, M., Investigation and evaluation of capital asset pricing models and comparing them with Fama and French 5-factor model, using economic variables of exchange rate, inflation rate, import, and liquidity, Financial knowledge stock analysis, 2019, 12(42), P. 195-215. (in Persian).
[38] Rosenberg, B., Reid, K., Lanstein, R., Persuasive Evidence of Market Inefficiency, Journal of Portfolio Management, 1985, 11(3), P. 9-17. Doi:10.3905/jpm.1985.409007
[39] Ross, S., Risk, Return and Arbitrage', Risk and Return in Finance, I., Friend, I. Bicksler, J. (Eds.), 1977, Ballinger, Cambridge.
[40] Sadeghi Sharif, J., Talaneh, A., Askari Rad, H., Investigating the Effect of Momentum Factor on Explanatory Power of Fama and French Three-Factor Model: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 2018, 28, P. 39-22. (in Persian).
[41] Sharpe, W.F., Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk, Journal of Finance,1964, 19(3), P. 425-442. Doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x.
[42] Soleimanian, G. R., Foroughi, D., Amiri, H., The performance of value, momentum, and market factor pricing model in explaining the excess returns of portfolios resulted from accrual anomalies and financial constraints: A comparative approach to competing factor models through GRS test, Quarterly Journal of Financial Engineering and Stock Management, 2020, 43(7), P. 363-393. Doi: 20.1001.1.22519165.1399.11.43.16.9 (in Persian).
[43] Sundqvist, T., Tests of a Fama-French Five Factor Asset Pricing Model in Nordic Stock Markets, 2018, Department of Finance.
