The Role of Managers' Information Interpretation on Cost Behavior
محورهای موضوعی : Financial Accounting
Akbar Rahbarimoghadm
1
,
Zahra Madahi
2
1 - Department of Accounting, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
2 - Department of Accounting, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
کلید واژه: Cost Behavior , Changes in Managers , Profit Information , Private Profit Information,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aimed to investigate the role of managers' information interpretation on cost behavior. The locative domain of this research is the companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange during 2014-2020 and through systematic elimination method, 112 companies have been selected as statistical sample. Managers' information interpretation is considered as an independent variable and cost behavior is considered a dependent variable. The current research is applied research, and if the classification of types of re-searches be considered based on the nature and method, the method of the present study is essentially descriptive in terms of the nature, and in terms of the method is considered in correlation researches category. In this study, library method was used to collect data. In the research data section, data was collected through collecting data of sample companies by referring to financial statements, explanatory notes and stock exchange magazine. In order to describe and summarize the data collected, the descriptive and inferential statistics are used. In order to analyze the data, variance heterogeneity pre-test, F Leimer test, Hausman test and Jarque-Bera test and then multivariate regression test were used to confirm and reject the research hypotheses (EVIEWS software). The results showed that the extent of effectiveness of managers’ information interpretation factors, including changes in managers' consensus on profit, changes in public profit information, changes in private profit information, and changes in bias in profit forecasting on cost behavior in potentially competitive conditions are different from de facto competition. The results obtained in this research are consistent with the documents mentioned in the research theoretical framework and financial literature.
This study aimed to investigate the role of managers' information interpretation on cost behavior. The locative domain of this research is the companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange during 2014-2020 and through systematic elimination method, 112 companies have been selected as statistical sample. Managers' information interpretation is considered as an independent variable and cost behavior is considered a dependent variable. The current research is applied research, and if the classification of types of re-searches be considered based on the nature and method, the method of the present study is essentially descriptive in terms of the nature, and in terms of the method is considered in correlation researches category. In this study, library method was used to collect data. In the research data section, data was collected through collecting data of sample companies by referring to financial statements, explanatory notes and stock exchange magazine. In order to describe and summarize the data collected, the descriptive and inferential statistics are used. In order to analyze the data, variance heterogeneity pre-test, F Leimer test, Hausman test and Jarque-Bera test and then multivariate regression test were used to confirm and reject the research hypotheses (EVIEWS software). The results showed that the extent of effectiveness of managers’ information interpretation factors, including changes in managers' consensus on profit, changes in public profit information, changes in private profit information, and changes in bias in profit forecasting on cost behavior in potentially competitive conditions are different from de facto competition. The results obtained in this research are consistent with the documents mentioned in the research theoretical framework and financial literature.
[1] Abdoli, MR., Gholami, M., The effect of managers' overconfidence on cost stickiness, Journal of Man-agement Accounting, 2016; 29(1):104-119.
[2]Ali, M., Liu, D., Xu, T., Yao., Corporate disclosure, analyst forecast dispersion, and stock returns, Jour-nal of Accounting, 2019; 16(2):55-65. Doi:10.1177/0148558X16674857
[3] Anderson, M., Banker, R. Huang, R, Janakiraman, S, Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2007; 22(2):1-28. Doi:10.1177/ 0148558x0702200103
[4] Anderson, ¬ M.¬, Benker, R., ¬Janakiraman, ¬S., Are Selling, General and Administrative CostSticky? Jour-nal of Accounting Research, 2003; 41(1): 47-63. Doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00095
[5] Bahar Moghadam, M., Khademi, S., Examining the cost stickiness in periods of boom and bust, Man-agement Accounting, 2016; 30(47): 67- 86. article_9482.html
[6] Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Ciftci, M., Mashruwala. R., The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior, Journal of ManagementAccounting Research, 2014; 26(2): 221-242. Doi:10.2308/jmar-50726
[7] Barron, Orie, E., Donal, Byard., Earnings Announcement Disclosures and Changes in Analysts’ Infor-mation Article Type: Original Article. 2017; 23(1): 218-222. Doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12275
[8] Berger, P., Hann, G., R., The impact of SFAS 131 on information and monitoring, Journal of Account-ing Research, 2003; 41(2): 163-223. Doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00100
[9] Chen, I., Kama, R., Lehavy., the tone of management forward looking statements and asymmetric cost behavior, deepblue.lib.umich.edu. 2016; 22(3): 153-168.
[10] Chen, T., Gores, J., Nasev, S., Wu.CEOs versus CFOs: Managerial Overconfidence and Cost Behav-ior, 2019; 18(1): 99-111. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3233106
[11] Cheung, J., Hyunpyo, K., Seungjun, K., Rong, H., Is the asymmetric cost behavior affected by compe-tition factors? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting &Economics, 2018; 17 (1): 143-158.
Doi:10.1080/16081625.2016.1266271
[12] Choi, I., Hwang, Park, JH., Managerial Ability and Asymmetric SG&A Cost Behavior, 2019; 15(5): 121-144. Doi:10.2139/ssrn.2672765
[13] Ciftci, R., Mashruwala, D., Weiss., Implications of cost behavior for analysts' earnings forecasts, Journal of Management, 2015; 18(2):112-124. Doi: 10.2308/jmar-51073
[14] Dierynck B., Landsman. W. R., Do Managerial Incentives Drive Cost Behavior? Evidence about the Role of the Zero Earnings Benchmark for Labor Cost Behavior in Private Belgian Firms, The Accounting Review. 2012; 87(4): 1219-1246. Doi:10.2308/accr-50153
[15] Hasanvand, R., Management motivations and asymmetry in wage cost behavior. Sixth International Conference on Accounting and Management and Third Conference on Entrepreneurship and Open Inno-vation, Tehran: Mehr Ishraq Conference. 2016; 23(4):1211-1221. MOCONF06_030
[16] Hutton, A. P., Lee, L. F., Shu. S. Z., Do managers always know better? The relative accuracy of man-agement and analyst forecasts, Journal of Accounting Research, 2012; 50(5): 1217-1244.
[17] Kama, I., Weiss. D., Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research. 2013; 51(1):201–224. Doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00461.x
[18] Kenji, Y., Management Forecasting Japan: Do Managers Accurately Estimate Costs When They Issue Management Forecasts? Available at SSRN. 2014; 33(1): 233–252. Doi:10.2139/ssrn.2312315
[19] Khani, A., Amiri, H., Shamohammadi, M., Investigating the effect of managers' personal motivations on cost asymmetry in Tehran Stock Exchange, Financial Accounting Researches, 2014; 1 (9): 57-74.
[20] Kurdistani, G., Saber, A., Competition in product market, asymmetry in cost behavior, and the man-ager's expectation of future sales: An analysis of the overall business environment, Accounting Knowledge and Management Auditing, 2018; 7(26): 31-42.
[21] Kurdistani, G., Mortazavi, M., Investigating the effect of wise decisions of managers on cost sticki-ness, accounting and auditing reviews, 2012; 12(5): 73-90. Doi:10.22059 / ACCTGREV.2012.28798
[22] Martikainen, M., Kinnunen, J., Miihkinen, A., and Troberg. P., Board’s financial incentives, compe-tence, and firm risk disclosure: Evidence from Finnish index listed companies, Journal of Applied Ac-counting Research, 2016,16(3):123-144. Doi:10.1108/JAAR-10-2014-0117/full/html
[23] Shah Alizadeh, B., Zanjirdar, M., Javanmard, H., Investigating the efficiency of its adjusted DuPont ratio to predict the profitability of companies in each stage of the company life cycle, the second national conference on modern management, Shiraz. 2014; 15(3):123-144FNCAM01_060
[24] Tari Verdi, Y., Nikkar, J., Khodaie. M., The effect of company strategy and management ability on asymmetry of cost behavior, Accounting and auditing reviews, 2017; 4(4): 503-526. Doi: 10.22059 / ACCTGREV.2018.239658.1007673
[25] Venieris, V., Naoum, C., Vlismas, O., Organisation capital and sticky behaviour of selling, general and administrative expenses, Manage. Account. Res. 2014; 3(4):543-566. Doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2014.10.003
[26] Weiss, D., Ciftci, M., Mashruwala, R., Implications of Cost Behavior for Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts, Available at SSRN, 2014; 6(1):125-144. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2327167
[27] Zanjirdar, M., Madahi, Z.,and Kasbi. P., Comparative analysis of sticky SGA costs and cost of goods sold: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Management Science Letters, 2014;4: 521–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
