Comparative evaluation of the performance of selected portfoli-os based on AHP and Topsis multi-criteria decision-making techniques with Markowitz mean-variance model
محورهای موضوعی : Financial Accounting
Mahmoud Hematfar
1
(Department of Accounting, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran)
کلید واژه: Portfolio Performance Evaluation, TOPSIS, analytic hierarchy process, Markowitz Optimization Model,
چکیده مقاله :
In this research, using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and TOPSIS method (TOP) based on financial criteria, earnings per share, dividend per share, operating cash flow growth, earnings per share growth, beta (systematic) risk, volatility Operating profit, stock liquidity and price-to-earnings ratio selected according to the opinions of investment experts, formed a portfolio. Then, the criteria for evaluating the performance of risk-adjusted portfolios according to modern portfolio theory (Sharp, Trainer and Alpha Jensen) were calculated based on monthly stock prices during the 5-year period from 1393 to 1397 and com-pared with the criteria for evaluating portfolio performance according to Marko-witz model. The results showed that the selection of stock portfolio using the mentioned financial criteria and using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model leads to the acquisition of adjusted returns with more risk than the Marko-witz optimization model and the TOPSIS model (TOP).
[1] Abzari, M., Samati, M., Delbari, M., Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model in determining the effective criteria on stock selection in Tehran Stock Exchange, Quarterly Journal of Planning and Budget, 2002, 7(5), 3. Doi: 20.1001.1.22519092.1381.7.5.1.9.
[2] Amiri, M., ShariatPanahi, M., Banakar, M. H., Selecting the optimal stock portfolio using multi-criteria decision making, Quarterly Journal of the Stock Exchange, 2010, 3(11), 5. https://journal.seo.ir/article_10895.html.
[3] Anvary Rostami, A., Saberi, M., Hamidian, M., Esfandiyar Pour, M., Evaluating and Ranking the Firms in Chemical Industry Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange with TOPSIS. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2017, 2(2), 73. doi: 10.22034/amfa.2017.531319.
[4] Aliakbarpoor, Z., Izadikhah, M. Evaluation and ranking DMUs in the presence of both undesirable and ordinal factors in data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Autom. Comput, 2012, 9, P. 609–615, Doi: 10.1007/s11633-012-0686-5
[5] Bandari, M., Talaeizadeh, A., Investigating the best portfolio composition in Tehran Stock Exchange, Quarterly Journal of New Research in Accounting, 2015, 2(3), 10 .http://nra.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_4045.html.
[6] Barkhordari, M.H., Rezaei, M., Determining the optimal portfolio of efficient stock industries using data envelopment analysis method from the perspective of institutional investment (Case study of Ansar Bank), Monetary and Banking Management Development Quarterly, 2014, 2(5), 72. COI: JR_ANSAR-2-5_003.
[7] Barzideh, F., Taghavi Fard, M. T., Zamaynan, F., Stock portfolio design framework using Dimatel method and network analysis process, Experimental Quarterly of Financial Accounting, 2012, 11(39), 124. COI: JR_QJMA-11-39_005.
[8] Chen, C. T., Hung, W. Z. & Cheng, H. L., “Applying linguistic PROMETHEE method in investment portfolio decision-making”. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 2011, 9(2), 139. https://journaldatabase.info/articles/applying_linguistic_promethee_method.html.
[9] Chen, L. & Pan, H., “Selection of stocks using constrained fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE”. Advances in information Sciences and Service Sciences (AISS), 2013, 5(15), 97. Corpus ID: 11929538.
[10] Edirisinghe, N. C. P., Zhang, X., Portfolio selection under DEA based relative financial strength indicators: case of US industries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2008, 59(6). 842. Doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602442.
[11] Ertugrul, I., & Karakasoglu, N., Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications., 2009, 36(1), 702. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014.
[12] Fauzi, N. & Ismail, Munira&Jaaman, SaifulHafizah&Kamaruddin, Siti., Applicability of TOPSIS Model and Markowitz Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series., 2019, 1212(1). 012032. Doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1212/1/012032.
[13] Ghizlane, E., & Abdelaziz, B., Categorizing projects for portfolio selection using clustering techniques. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018, Article 31, 2317. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3289402.3289531.
[14] Gompf, K., Traverso, M., Hetterich, J., Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services. Sustainability, 2021, 13(3), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031258.
[15] Gupta, L. C., Rates of return on equities: The Indian experience. Delhi: Oxford University Press,1981.
[16] Heibati, F., Rahnama Rudposhti, F., Afshar Kazemi, M. A., Vabiri, A. H., Evaluation of stock portfolio selection model using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Gray Relationship Analysis (GPA) and Ideal Planning (GP), Journal of Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 2011, 2(6), 137. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=203732.
[17] Hsu, M. H., Resolving a portfolio optimization problem with investment timing through using the analytic hierarchy process, support vector regression and a genetic algorithm. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2018, 11(1), 1016. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.11.1.77.
[18] Izadikhah, M., Using goal programming method to solve DEA problems with value judgments, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 2016, 24 (2), P. 267–282. Doi: 10.2298/YJOR121221015I
[19] Janani, M. H., Ehsanifar, M., & S. Bakhtiarnezhad., "Selection of Portfolio by Using Multi Attributed Decision Making (Tehran Stock Exchange) ", American Journal of Scientific Research, 2012, 44(2), 15. Doi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281113706.
[20] Kaiser, R., Futami, A. H., Valentina, L. V. O. D., & Oliveira, M. A., Development of a managerial tool for prioritization and selection of portfolio projects using the Analytic Hierarchy Process methodology in software companies. Gestão&Produção, 2019, 26(4), e4267. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X4267-19.
[21] Khajavi, S., Ghayuri Moqaddam, A., DEA Method of Choosing Optimum Portfolio in Accordance with Stock Liquidity: The Case Study of Listed Companies of Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Accounting Advances, 2013, 4(2), 27. Doi: 10.22099/JAA.2012.1728.
[22] Lee, W.S., Tzeng, G.H., Guan, J.L., Chien, K.T., & Huang J.M., Combined MCDM techniques for exploring stock selection based on Gordon model. Expert Syst. Appl, 2009, 36(3), 6421. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.084.
[23] Mohammaddoost, A., Falah Shams Dialestani, M., Eshaghi Gordji, M., Ebadian, A., Evaluating the Factors Affecting on Credit Ratings of Accepted Corporates in Tehran Securities Exchange by Using Factor Analysis and AHP. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2021, 6(1), 161. doi: 10.22034/amfa.2020.1899553.1421.
[24] Pakizeh, K., & FallahTalab, H., Applying a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach in Stock Evaluation and Portfolio Formation, Quarterly Journal of Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 2011, 2(8), 121. Doi: //www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx? id=204606.
[25] Poordavoodi, A., Moazami Goudarzi, M.R., Haj Seyyed Javadi, H., Rahmani, A.M., Izadikhah, M., Toward a More Accurate Web Service Selection Using Modified Interval DEA Models with Undesirable Outputs, Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2020, 123(2), P. 525-570, Doi: 10.32604/cmes.2020.08854
[26] Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., Mokhatab Rafiei, F. & Ghezelbash, M., Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach. Financ Innov, 2020, 6(1), 1. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-020-00175-4.
[27] Rezaei, S., Vaez-Ghasemi, M., A new Method for Sustainable Portfolio Selection with DEA, TOPSIS and MIP in Stock exchange, Financial Engineering and Portfolio Management, 2020, 11(43), 474-. Doi: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=787796.
[28] Safari, S., Sheikh Mohammad, J., & Moshtaghi, Yousef., Optimal Portfolio Selection using Goal Programming and Analysis Hierarchical Process- EVA Approach, Financial Management Perspective, 2016, 6(13), 37. Doi: http://jfmp.sbu.ac.ir/issue/archive.
[29] Sukhkian, M.A., Valipour, H., & Fayazi, L., Multi-Criteria Method (MCDM) for selecting stocks in Tehran Stock Exchange using financial variables, Quarterly Journal of Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 2010, 1(5), 35. Doi: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=205785.
[30] Tang, G.Y.N., How Efficient Is Native Portfolio -Diversification? An Educational Note. The international Journal of Management Science, 2004, 32(2), 155. Doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2003.10.002.
[31] Zanjirdar, M., Overview of Portfolio Optimization Models. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2020, 5(4), 419. doi: 10.22034/amfa.2020.674941.
[32] Zanjirdar, M., Kasbi, P., Madahi, Z., Investigating the effect of adjusted DuPont ratio and its components
on investor & quot; s decisions in short and long term, Management Science Letters, 2014, 4(3), P.591-596.
Doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2014.1.003
[33] Markowitz, H., Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7, P. 77-91. Doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
[34] Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York. 1981, Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
