A New Method for Allocating Fixed Costs with Undesirable Data: Data Envelopment Analysis Approach

محورهای موضوعی : Financial Mathematics

Mohhamad Reza Mozafari ¹ , Marzieh Ghasemi ² , Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi ³ , Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh ⁴ , Mohammad Hasan Behzadi ⁵

1 - Department of Mathematics, Shiraz University Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 - Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
5 - Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/07/22 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/11/17 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/10/11

کلید واژه: Fair allocation, Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA), undesirable data, Fixed costs,

چکیده مقاله :

Allocating fixed costs with undesirable data has recently been one of the most important issues for managers to discuss. Lack of attention to undesirable data may lead to incorrect cost allocation. Considering and determining undesirable inputs and outputs, data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique can be significantly helpful in determining the cost allocation strategy. In-puts and outputs are divided into two desirable and undesirable groups. Obviously, desirable inputs and undesirable outputs must be reduced and undesirable inputs and desirable outputs must be increased to improve performance. This manuscript presents two strategies for allocating fixed costs with undesirable data. In the first strategy, each decision making unit (DMU) first determines the minimum and maximum shares that it can receive from the fixed resources while the efficiency of that DMU and other DMUs re-mains the same after receiving the fixed resources. Finally, the decision maker chooses the fixed cost for each DMU between the minimum and maxi-mum cost values proposed. In the second strategy, the allocation of fixed costs is done using the CCR multiplicative model with undesirable data. The effectiveness of both methods is examined by an applied study on the commercial banks.

منابع و مأخذ:

[1] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., E. Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2, P. 429-444, Doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.

[2] Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, 1984, 30, P. 1078-1092, Doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.

[3] Allen, R., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, R. G., Thanassoulis, E., Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development and future directions, Annals of operations research, 1997, 73, P. 13-34, Doi: 10.1023/A:1018968909638.

[4] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis, Annals of Operations research, 1984, 2, P. 59-94, Doi: 10.1007/BF01874733.

[5] Charnes, A., Clark, C. T., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the US air forces, Annals of Operations Research, 1984, 2, P. 95-112, Doi: 10.1007/BF01874734.

[6] Thrall, R. M., Duality, classification and slacks in DEA, Annals of Operations Research,1996, 66, P. 109-138, Doi: 10.1007/BF02187297.

[7] Lin, W. B., Meng, W., Li, X. X., Zhang, D. Q., DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs, Annals of Operations Research, 2010, 173, P. 177-194, Doi: 10.1007/s10479-009-0587-3.

[8] Izadikhah, M., Farzipoor Saen, R., Assessing sustainability of supply chains by chance-constrained two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable factors, Computers and Operations Research, 2018, 100, P. 343-367, Doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2017.10.002.

[9] Shi, X., Emrouznejad, A., Yu, W., Overall efficiency of operational process with undesirable outputs containing both series and parallel processes: A SBM network DEA model, Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 178, Doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115062.

[10] Eyni, M., Tohidi, G., Mehrabeian, S., Applying inverse DEA and cone constraint to sensitivity analysis of DMUs with undesirable inputs and outputs, Journal of the Operational Research Society,2017, 68, P. 34-40.

Doi: 10.1057/s41274-016-0004-7.

[11] Wu, J., Xia, P., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., Measuring environmental efficiency of thermoelectric power plants: a common equilibrium efficient frontier DEA approach with fixed-sum undesirable output, Annals of operations research, 2019, 275, P. 731–749. Doi: 10.1007/s10479-018-2958-0.

[12] Zhao, P., Zeng, L., Li, P., Lu, H., Hu, H., Li, C., Zheng, M., Li, H., Yu, Z., Yuan, D., Xie, J., Huang, Q., Qi, Y., China's transportation sector carbon dioxide emissions efficiency and its influencing factors based on the EBM DEA model with undesirable outputs and spatial Durbin model, Energy, 2022, 238.

 Doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121934.

[13] Cook, W. D., Kress, M., Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 119, P. 652-661, Doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00337-3.

[14] Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Shoja, N., Sanei, M., An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using DEA, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2004, 153, P. 267-274.

Doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00631-3

[15] Cook, W. D., Zhu, J., Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a DEA approach, Computers & Operations Research, 2005, 32, P. 2171-2178. Doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2004.02.007.

[16] Lin, R., Allocating fixed costs or resources and setting targets via data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2011, 217, P. 6349-6358, Doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.008.

[17] Ghasemi, M., Mozaffari, M. R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Rostamy-malkhalifeh, M., Behzadi, M. H., New Approach in Fixed Resource Allocation and Target Setting Using Data Envelopment Analysis with Common Set of Weights, Complexity, 2022, 2022, P. 1-11. Doi: 10.1155/2022/2149093.

[18] Si, X., Liang, L., Jia, G., Yang, L., Wu, H., Li, Y., Proportional sharing and DEA in allocating the fixed cost, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2013, 219, P. 6580-6590, Doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.12.085.

[19] Du, J., Cook, W. D., Liang, L., Zhu, J., Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency, European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 235, P. 206-214, Doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.002.

[20] Sharafi, H., Lotfi, F. H., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Razipour-GhalehJough, S., Fair Allocation Fixed Cost Using Cross-Efficiency Based on Pareto Concept, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 37, P. 1-23, Doi:10.1142/S0217595919500362.

[21] Beasley, J. E., Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147, P. 198-216, Doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00244-8.

[22] Jahanshahloo, G. R, Sadeghi, J., Khodabakhshi, M., proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles, Math Meth Oper Res, 2017, 85, P. 4982-4997, Doi: 10.1007/s00186-016-0563-z.

[23] Li, F., Song, J., Dolgui, A., Liang, L., Using common weights and efficiency invariance principles for resource allocation and target setting, International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55, P. 4982-4997.

 Doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1287450.

[24] An, Q., Wang, P., Yang, H., Wang, Z., Fixed cost allocation in two-stage system using DEA from a noncooperative view, OR Spectrum, 2021, 43, P. 1077-1102, Doi: 10.1007/s00291-021-00643-y.

[25] Li, F., Zhu, Q., Liang, L., Allocating a fixed cost based on a DEA-game cross efficiency approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 2018, 96, P. 196-207, Doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.12.002.

[26] An, Q., Wang, P., Emrouznejad, A., Hu, J., Fixed cost allocation based on the principle of efficiency invariance in two-stage systems, European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 283, P. 662-675, Doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.031.

[27] Li, F., Wang, Y., Emrouznejad, A., Zhu, Q., Kou, G., Allocating a fixed cost across decision-making units with undesirable outputs: A bargaining game approach, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2021, P.1-17, Doi: 10.1080/01605682.2021.1981781.

[28] Lotfi, F. H., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Mozaffari, M. H., Behzadi, M. H., Ghasemi, M., Fair allocation of fixed costs in data envelopment analysis, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2020, 1301, P. 399–405, Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-66501-2_32.

[29] Li, Y., Yang, M., Chen, Y., Dai, Q., Liang, L., Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree, Omega, 2013, 41, P. 55-60. Doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2011.02.008.

[30] Chu, J., Jiang, H., Fixed cost allocation based on the utility: A DEA common-weight Approach. IEEE Access, 2013,7, P. 72613-72621. Doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919645.

[31] Khodabakhshi, M., Aryavash, K., The fair allocation of common fixed cost or revenue using DEA concept, Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 214, P. 187-194. Doi: 10.1007/s10479-012-1117-2.

[32] Charnes, A., Cooper. W. W., Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research logistics quarterly, 1962, 9, P. 181-186. Doi:10.1002/nav.3800090303.