پتانسیل تغذیه‌ای و بقای بالتوری سبز (Chrysoperla carnea) رویسفید بالک گلخانه (Trialeurodes vaporarium) در شرایط آزمایشگاهی
محورهای موضوعی : گیاه پزشکی
زینت احمدزاده
1
()
بیژن حاتمی
2
()
کلید واژه: بالتوری سبز, سفید بالک گلخانه, پتانسیل تغذیه‌ای, درصد بقا, green lacewing, Greenhouse whitefly, feeding potential, survival percent,
چکیده مقاله :
پتانسیل تغذیه‌ای و بقا مراحل مختلف زیستی شکارگر بالتوری سبز Chrysoperla carnea روی مخلوطی از سنین پورگی سفید بالک گلخانه Trialeurodes vaporariumدر شرایط آزمایشگاهی بررسی شد. میزان مصرف روزانه لاروهای سنین مختلف بالتوری سبز از پوره‌های آفت، برای سنین اول، دوم و سوم به ترتیب 74/1±04/16، 56/2±5/21 و 92/1±3/22 پوره بود و شکارگر در طول دوره لاروی خود، مجموعاً به‌طور متوسط 215 پوره از سنین مختلف سفید بالک گلخانه را مصرف نمود. درصد بقا مراحل مختلف زیستی شکارگر از تخم (85 درصد) تا سن سوم لاروی تخم‌ها (4 درصد) کاهش یافت به‌طوری‌که هیچ یک از لاروهای سن سوم به شفیره تبدیل نشده و از بین رفتند. لذا با وجود جمعیت نسبتاً کافی آفت، شکارگر نتوانست رشد و نمو خود را تکمیل کند.
Feeding potential and survival of predator, Chrysoperla carnea on nymphal population of greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporarium were studied in lab conditions. Daily consumption rate of larval different stages of green lacewing on pest nymphs was 16.04±1.74, 21.5±2.56 & 22.3±1.92 for 1st instar, 2nd instar and 3rd instarrespectively and predator consumpted 215 different stsge nymphs of greenhouse whitefly totally. Survival percent reduced from egg(85%) to 3rd instar(4%) so that not convert to pupariom stage anyone and died. So in spite of enough population of pest, the predator could not complete it, s development.
Abbott, W. S., 1925. A method of computing the effectivness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18: 265-67.
Afzal, M. & Khan, M. R., 1978. Life histories and behaviour of green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea. Pakestan Journal of Zoology, 10: 83-90.
Ahmadzadeh, Z. & Hatami, B.,2003. Comparision of the effect of three insecticides and realise of geen lacewing C. carnea against greenhouse whitefly T. vaporarium. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resours. 7(3): 225-234.
Alasady, M. A.A., Omar, D. B., Ibrahim, Y. B. & Ibrahim R. B., 2010.Life teble of the green lacewing, Apertochrysa sp. on the rice moth Coreyra cephalonica. International Journal of Agriculture Biology, 266-270.
Atlihan, R. B. K. & Ozgokee.2004. . Feeding activity and life history carateristics of generally predator,Chrysoperla carnea at different prey densities. Journal of Pest Science, 77:17-21
Balasubramani, V. & Swamiappan, M., 1994. Development and feeding potential of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea on different insects of cotton, Anzieger fur Schadlingskunde pflanzenschutz, 67( 8):165-67.
Borisov, B. A. & Akhatov, A. K., 1991. Greenhouse whitefly control: an analysis of difficulties and the quest for rotation way. Zashchita Rastenii, 9: 6-10.
Byrne, D. N. & Bellows T. S., 1991. Whitefly biology. Annual Reviw of Entomology, 36:431-57.
Dean, D. E. & Schuster, D. J.,1995. Bemisia argentifolii (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) and Macrosiphum euphorbiae(Hom.:Aphididae) as prey for two spisies ao chrysopidea. Environmental Entomology, 24( 6):1562-68.
Hydron, S. B. & Whitcomb, W. H., 1979. Effect of larva diet on Chrysoperla rufilabris, Florida Entomology, 62: 293-98.
Kapadia, M. N. & Puri, S. N., 1992. " Development of Chrysoperla carnea reared on aphids and whitefly ", Journal of Mahashtara Agriculture University, 17:163-64.
Legaspi, J. C., Nordlund, D. A. & Legaspi, B. C., 1996. Tri-trophic interactions and predation rates in Chrysoperla spp. attacking the silverleaf whitefly. Soutwest Entomologist, 21( 1): 31-42.
Legaspi, J. C., Correa, J. A., Carvuthers, R. I., Legaspi, B. C. & Nordlund, D. A., 1996. Effect of short-term releases of Chrysoperla rufilabris against silverleaf whitefly (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) in field cages. Journal of Entomological Science, 31( 1):102-11.
Legaspi, J. C., Carrutherts, R. I. And Nordlund, R. I., 1994. Life history of Chrysoperla rufilabris provided sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci and other food. Biological Control, 4: 178-84.
Or, R. and Gerling, D., 1985. The green lacewings Chrysoperla carnea as a predator of Bemisia tabaci. Phytoparasitica, 13:P 75.
Rashid, M. M.U., Khattak, M.K., Abdullah, K., Amir, M., Tanq M. & Nawaz S., 2012. Feeding Potential of Chrysoperla carnea and Cryptolaemus montrozieri on cotton mealybug , Phenacoccus solenapsis. Journal of Animal & Plant Science, 22(3), 639- 643.
Shahkarami, J., Kamali, K. & Heydari, H., 2002. Study on efficacy of Chrysoperla carnea on control of Tetranychus urticae and Helicoverpa armigera in lab conditions. 15th Iranian Plant Protection. Congress, p 345.
Sattar, M., Hamed, M. & Nadeem, S., 2004. Predatory potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Steph) (Neuro :Chrysopidea) against cotton mealybug. Pakistan Entomologist, 29(2), 103- 106.
Senior, L. J. & McEwen P. K., 1998. Laboratory study of Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.)predation on Trialeurodes vaporarium (Westwood). Journal of Applied Entomology, 122: 99-101.
TongXian, L., Stansly, P. A. & Liu, T. X., 1995. Oviposition by Bemisia argentifolii on tomato:effect of leaf factor and insecticide residues. Journal of Economic Entomology, 88(4):992-97.
Van Lenteren, J. C. & Woest, J., 1988. Biological and integrated pest control in the greenhouse. Annual Reviwe of Entomolgy, 33: 239-69.
Zia, K., Hafeez, F., Khan, R, R., Arshad, M., & Naeem- Ullah, 2008. Effectiveness of Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.)(Neuro.: chrysopidae) on the population of Bemesia tabaci (Gem.) (Hom.: Aleurodidae) indifferent cotton genotypes. Journal of Agriculture and Social Science, 4;112-116.
