ساخت، اعتباریابی و هنجاریابی آزمون منطقی بودن/ احساسی بودن و بررسی رابطۀ آن با توانایی تصمیم‌گیری در کارکنان بانک مسکن
محورهای موضوعی : تربیتیخسرو رشید 1 , فضل الله حسنوند 2 , مائده عطائی 3 , احمد بیات 4
1 - دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
2 - دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
3 - کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.
4 - دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.
کلید واژه: تحلیل عاملی, تصمیم‌گیری, منطقی/ احساسی, کارکنان بانک مسکن,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش با هدف ساخت، اعتباریابی و هنجاریابی آزمون منطقی بودن/ احساسی بودن و بررسی رابطۀ آن با توانایی تصمیم‌گیری در کارکنان بانک مسکن انجام شد. نخست، فهرستی از رفتارهای مناسب برای اندازه‌گیری ویژگی مورد نظر فراهم شد. پس از تأیید روایی محتوایی، برای آگاهی از مشکلات احتمالی و برطرف نمودن آنها، 50 نفر پرسش‌نامه را تکمیل و عبارت‌ها و واژه‌های نامفهوم را مشخص کردند. سپس برخی از گویه‌ها حذف یا اصلاح و آزمون نهایی آماده شد. 1024 نفر از کارکنان بانک مسکن به آزمون منطقی بودن/ احساسی بودن و آزمون توانایی تصمیم‌گیری پاسخ دادند. داده‌ها به کمک نرم‌افزار لیزرل و با روش‌های توصیفی، همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی تجزیه و تحلیل شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد آزمون ساخته شده چهار عامل کنترل شخصی، تأثر عاطفی، بردبار، و نوروزگرایی را می‌سنجد. پایایی کل آزمون با روش آلفای کرونباخ 86/0 و برای 4 عامل کنترل شخصی، تأثر عاطفی، بردباری، و نوروزگرایی به ترتیب 78/0، 69/0، 65/0 و 63/0 به دست آمد و میانگین و انحراف معیار آزمون ساخته شده به ترتیب 002/67 و 63/12 بود. با توجه به میزان پایایی و روایی، می‌توان گفت که پرسش‌نامۀ منطقی بودن/ احساسی بودن، ابزار مناسبی برای اندازه‌گیری میزان منطقی بودن یا احساسی بودن افراد است.
The aim of this research was to develop, validate, and standardize the Rationality-Emotionality Test and studying its relationship with decision-making ability in Maskan Bank staff. At first, a list of appropriate behaviors to measure the desired characteristics were prepared. After confirming the content validity, in order to aware and inhibit the probable problems, 50 people completed the questionnaire and highlighted unclear phrases and words. Then, some of the items were deleted or modified and the final test was prepared. 1024 persons of Maskan Bank staff answered Rationality-Emotionality Test and Decision-Making Scale. The data analyzed by Lisrel software, and descriptive analysis, Pearson correlation, and exploratory factor analysis were calculated. The findings showed that the developed test measures four factors called: personal control, affective impression, patience, and neuroticism. By Cronbach's alpha, the reliability of the whole test was 0.86 and for personal control, affective impression, patience, and neuroticism was 0.78, 0.69, 0.65 and 0.63 respectively. The mean and standard deviation of the test were 67.002 and 12.63 respectively. According to the reliability and validity, it can be said that the Rationality-Emotionality Test is an appropriate tool for measuring the level of rationality or emotionality of individuals.
Adler, R. F., Iacobelli, F., & Gutstein, Y. (2016). Are you convinced? A Wizard of Oz study to test emotional vs. rational persuasion strategies in dialogues. Computers in Human Behavior. 57, 75-81.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (2013). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In Affect, cognition and stereotyping (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Cohen, J. B., Pham, M. T., & Andrade, E. B. (2007). The role of affect in consumer judgment and decision-making. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Darke, S. (1988). Anxiety and working memory capacity. Cognition and Emotion. 2(2): 145-154.
Delavar, A. (2015). Introduction to measurement theories. Tehran: Samt Publications. [Persian]
Eimontaite, I., Goel, V., Raymont, V., Krueger, F., Schindler, I., & Grafman, J. (2018). Differential roles of polar orbital prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes in logical reasoning with neutral and negative emotional content. Neuropsychologia. 119, 320-329.
Eskandari, M & Movahedi, M. (2006). Cultural Approach Decision Making: A Study of Decision Making Behavior in Iran. Humanities. 15(63): 34-51. [Persian]
Ezheei, J; Dehghani, M; Ganjavi, A & Khodapanahi, M. (2008). Validation of homesickness questionnaire in students. Behavioral Sciences. 2(1): 1-12. [Persian]
Humphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review. 91(2): 153.
Kato, Y., Nakatsuka, M., Meguro, K., Kumai, K., Akanuma, K., & Yamaguchi, S. (2015). Impaired ‘logical judgment’ associated with ‘behavioral and emotional judgment’ in Alzheimer’s patients: Implication for right temporal function—the osaki-tajiri project. Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 11(7): 521.
KeivanAra, M; Naeem-Isfahani, M; Bahrami, S; Karimi, S & Azizzadeh M. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between Emotional Work and Job Satisfaction among Executive and Nursing Managers of Teaching Hospitals in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Community Health Research. 1(2): 47-54. [Persian]
Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., Dermody, J., & Urbye, A. (2014). Consumers' evaluations of ecological packaging–Rational and emotional approaches. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 37, 94-105.
Markič, olga. (2009). Rationality and emotions in decision making. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems. 7(2): 54-64.
Mueller, J. H. (1977). Test anxiety, input modality, and levels of organization in free recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 9(1): 67-69.
Mueller, J. H. (1978). The effects of individual differences in test anxiety and type of orienting task on levels of organization in free recall. Journal of Research in Personality. 12(1): 100-116.
Nadi, A; Abedi, Q; Abedi, A & Rostami, F. (2016). Design and validation of a questionnaire on patients' sense of security in hospital. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 139, 178-189. [Persian]
Nancy, L; Sibart, K & Morgan, C. (2006). Reporting and interpreting SPSS results in research. Translated by Yousefi, N; Dashti, K & Tahmasebi V. (2008). Razi University of Kermanshah Publications. [Persian]
Neshatdoost, H; Nouri, N; Rumi, H; Kalantari, M & Mehrabi, H. (2005). Standardization of Mood and Emotion Questionnaire. Journal of Psychology. 9(4): 334-350. [Persian]
Pham, M. T. (2007). Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of General Psychology. 11(2): 155-178.
Rahimzadeh, S. (2018). Iranian Loneliness Questionnaire: Implementation and scoring method. Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists. 57, 113-117. [Persian]
Rashidi, A & Alavi, H. (2005). Evaluation of logical behavior and effectiveness of communication and the relationship between them in faculty members of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. Educational Psychology Studies. 2(2): 1-20. [Persian]
Sorabji, R. (2006). Self: ancient and modern insights about individuality, life, and death. OUP Oxford.
Strongman, K. T. (2012). The psychology of emotion. New York: Wiley.
Vahid, M. (2001). Rationalism and decision-making, the limits of policymaker freedom in decision-making. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science. 54(209): 209-226. [Persian]
_||_