مدیریت دانش در فرایند خط مشی گذاری عمومی: پژوهشی فراترکیب
محورهای موضوعی : خطمشیگذاری عمومی در مدیریتداراب احمدوند 1 , وجه الله قربانی زاده 2
1 - دکتری خط مشی گذاری عمومی، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
2 - استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: مدیریت دانش, چرخه خط مشی, قلمرو خط مشی, زیرساخت دانشی, فراترکیب,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه: مدیریت دانش در فرایند خط مشی گذاری عمومی، بینش حاصل از کارهای بین رشته ای را برای ارتقاء آموزشها و مهارتها در عرصه خط مشی ترکیب کرده، با توجه به پیچیدگی فزاینده موضوعات خط مشی و همچنین رشد بسیار بالای دانش خط مشی گذاری، برای موفقیت این حوزه بسیار ضروری است. هدف: گردآوری؛ تلخیص؛ ارزیابی؛ و ارتباط و انسجام ادبیات نظری حوزه مدیریت دانش در فرایند خط مشی گذاری عمومی هدف اصلی این پژوهش است. روشها: پژوهش با روش کیفی فراترکیب انجام شده است. نمونه گیری پژوهش به شیوه غیراحتمالی هدفمند بوده، مقالات و مطالعاتی انتخاب گردیده است که بتوانند پاسخگوی پرسش پژوهش باشند. یافته ها: چرخه مدیریت دانش؛ خلق؛ نگهداری؛ تسهیم و بکارگیری دانش؛ زیرساخت دانشی؛ چرخه خط مشی؛ قلمرو خط مشی؛ و پیامدها، ابعاد و عوامل مختلف موثر بر مدیریت دانش در فرایند خط مشی گذاری عمومی می باشند. نتیجه گیری: توزیع مناسب دانش و یادگیری خط مشی در عرصه خط مشی گذاری؛ اشاعه، نوآوری و رقابت پذیری خط مشی؛ افزایش سرمایه فکری، اجتماعی و روانشناختی عرصه خط مشی؛ بهبود ظرفیت حل مسئله، عملکرد و بهره وری؛ و در نهایت تدوین، اجرا و ارزیابی مطلوب خط مشی از جمله نتایج پیاده سازی مدیریت دانش در فرایند خط مشی گذاری عمومی خواهد بود.
Background: Knowledge management in public policymaking process, synthesised the insights from interdisciplinary works to promote training and skills in the field policy, and is very necessary for the success of the policy considering the growing complexity of policy issues. Objective: The main goal of this research is to collect; summary; assessment; and the connection and coherence of the theoretical literature in the field of knowledge management in public policymaking process. Methods: This research has been done using the qualitative method of metasynthesis. The research sampling method is purposeful sampling, articles and studies have been selected that can answer the research question. Findings: The knowledge management cycle; creation; retention; sharing and knowledge application; knowledge infrastructure; policy cycle; policy area; and outcomes, has been extracted as different dimensions and factors affecting on knowledge management in the process of public policymaking. Conclusion: Finally, the proper distribution of knowledge and policy learning in the field of policy making; policy diffusion, innovation and competitiveness; increasing the intellectual, social and psychological capital of the policy arena; improve problem-solving capacity, performance and productivity; And finally, the formulation, implementation and evaluation of the policy will be among the results of the implementation of knowledge management in the public policy making process.
- Abedi Jafari, A. and Amiri, M. 2019. Metasynthesis: a method for synthesizing
qualitative studies. Humanities methodology. 99. 73-87. -
Alvani, M. 2016. Public Policy-Making and. Tehran: Samt. - Alvani, M., and Sharifzadeh, F. 2015. Public Policy Making Process. Tehran:
Allameh Tabatabai University. - Asian Preductivity Organization. 2014. Knowledge Management for the Public. Translation by Keshavarzi, A.H. Tehran: Higher Education Research and Planning
Institute. - Barao, A. et al. 2017. A Knowledge Management Approach to Capture Organization Learning Network. International Journal of Information
Management. 1-6. - Bourgon, J. 2007. Responsive, Responsible and Respected Government: Towards a New Public Administration Theory. International Review of Administrative
Sciences. 73. 7-26. - Butschi, D. 2012. Knowledge-based Policy Making. Copenhagen: Report of the
First Parliamentary TA Debate. - Castello, P. 2017. Knowledge Management for Policy – Stocktaking of One Year of
JRC Activities. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. - Corcoran, N. and Duane, A. 2017. Using Enterprise Social Networks as a Knowledge Management Tool in Higher Education. VINE Journal of Information
and Knowledge Management Systems. 47. 555-570. - Danaeefard, H. 2015. New Development in the Public Policy Making. Tehran:
Imam Sadegh University. - Danaefard, H. Hosseini, Y. and Fani, A. 2017. Public Policy Capacity: The Key to
National Development. Tehran: Safar. - Darvishi, D. and Darvishi, H. 2019. Assessing the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management Using Analytic Network Process. International Journal of Applied
Operational Research. 9. 31-40. - Daviter, F. 2015. The Political Use of Knowledge in the Policy Process. Policy
Sciences. 48. 491–505. - Dumitriu, P. 2016. Knowledge Management in the United Nations System.
Geneva, United Nations: Joint Inspection Unit. - Edwards, J.S. 2008. Knowledge Management in the Energy Sector: Review and
Future Directions. International Journal of Energy Sector Management. 2. 197-217. - Hazlehurst, D. 2001. Networks and Policy Making: From Theory to Practice in Australian Social Policy. Discussion paper No. 83, Australian, Australian National
University. - Hill, M. and Hupe, P. 2018. Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice. Translation and summary by Madani, j. and Khodaee, N. Tehran:
Azrin Mehr. - Mara, A. Mazzocchitti, M. and Sarra, A. 2018. Knowledge Sharing and Scientific Cooperation in the Design of Research-based Policies: The Case of the Circular
Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 194. 800-812. - McNab, D. 2018. Knowledge Management in the Public Sector: A Guide to Innovation in Government. Translation by Yaqoubi, N. Kazemi, M. and Jamali
Paghale, M. Zahedan: University of Sistan and Baluchestan. - Meisenberger, S. 2013. The Art of Management – a Science. The Global Peter
Drucker Essay Contest: Managing Complexity. - Melati, C. Janissek-Muniz, R. and Curado, C. 2021. Decision-Making Quality of Public Managers: Contributions from Intelligence and Knowledge Management.
Journal of Contemporary Administration. 25.2. 1-17. - Mezghani, E. Exposito, E. and Drira, K. 2016. A Collaborative Methodology for Tacit Knowledge Management: Application to Scientific Research. Future
Generation Computer System. 54. 450-455. - Monavarian, A. 2015. Implementation and Evaluation of Public Policy. Tehran:
Mehraban Nashr. - North, K. and Komta, G. 2016. Knowledge Management: Value Creation Through
Organizational Learning. Translation by Ghorbanzadeh, V. et al. Tehran: Baztab. - O'riordan, J. 2020. Knowledge Management: Lessons for Local Government.
Institute of Public Administration: Local Government Research Series. 17. 1-38. - Rastogi, N.P. 2000. Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital: The New
Virtuous Reality of Competitiveness. Human Systems Management. 19. 39 - 48. - Sabatier, P. 2017. Theories of the Public Policy Process. Translation by
Danaeefard, H. Tehran: Safar. - Topp, L. et al. 2018. Knowledge Management for Policy Impact: The Case of The European Commission’s Joint Research Centre. Palgrave Communications. 87. 1-
10. - Wiig, K.M. 1993. Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking about Thinking – How People and Organizations Create, Represent and use Knowledge.
Arlington: Schema Press.
