واکاوی آوای سبز حسابرسان داخلی: ارزیابی فازی ماتریسی جهت افشاء عملکردهای زیستمحیطی شرکتهای بازار سرمایه
محورهای موضوعی : اقتصاد محیط زیستعبداله حسن پور درزی 1 , زهرا پورزمانی 2 , حمیدرضا وکیلی فرد 3 , آزیتا جهانشاد 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حسابداری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - استاد گروه حسابداری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
4 - دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: آوای سبز, عملکردهای زیستمحیطی, الزامات محیطزیست.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: امروزه حسابرسان داخلی فراتر از نقشهای تخصصی خود، در راستای توسعه پایدار، نقش مهمی در افشاء ریسکهای زیستمحیطی و ارائه اطلاعات شفاف از عملکردهایی همچون کربن یا سرمایهگذاری در انرژیهای تجدیدپذیر دارند. هدف این پژوهش واکاوی آوای سبز حسابرسان داخلی جهت ارزیابی فازی شهودی افشاء عملکردهای زیستمحیطی شرکتهای بازار سرمایه میباشد.
روش بررسی: در این پژوهش تلاش گردید تا براساس ماهیت ترکیبی بودن جمعآوری دادهها، ابتدا از طریق تحلیل فراترکیب نسبت به شناسایی ابعاد آوای سبز حسابرسان داخلی در افشاء عملکردهای زیستمحیطی شرکتها اقدام شود و سپس باهدف تعیین پایایی ابعاد شناسایی شده، از تحلیل دلفی فازی استفاده شود. در نهایت در بخش کمی باهدف تعیین مطلوبترین بعد آوای سبز حسابرسان داخلی در افشاء عملکردهای زیستمحیطی شرکتهای بازار سرمایه، از تحلیل فازی ماتریسی، بهره برده شد.
یافتهها: نتایج حاصل از تحلیل فراترکیب براساس غربالگری محتوایی 12 پژوهش تعیین شده، از وجود 8 بعد از آوای سبز حسابرسان داخلی حکایت دارد. همچنین پایایی ابعاد شناسایی شده از طریق تحلیل دلفی فازی مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. در نهایت براساس تحلیل فازی ماتریسی مشخص کرد که افشاء رعایت حدود الزامات محیطزیست، مطلوبترین بعد آوای سبز حسابرسان داخلی در افشاء عملکردهای زیستمحیطی شرکتها میباشد.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتیجه بدست آمده بیان کنندهی این واقعیت است که حسابرسان دارای هویت و متکی بر آیین رفتار حرفهای، براساس حدود الزامات تعیین شده جهت افشاء عملکردهای محیطزیست، همواره تلاش مینمایند تا عملکردهای شرکت در این حوزه را افشاء نمایند و از این طریق سطح شفافیتهای اطلاعاتی شرکت به ذینفعان بیرونی را ارتقاء بخشند.
Background and Objective: As an internal advisor, internal auditors play a leading role in integrating environmental sustainability into an organization's operations, articulating potential risks threatening environmental sustainability, providing assurance to environmental sustainability–related information, and enhancing environmental sustainability practices. The purpose of this research is the green voice of internal auditors: Fuzzy matrix evaluation to disclose the environmental performance of capital market companies.
Material and Methodology: In this research, based on the hybrid nature of data collection, first, through meta-synthesis analysis, to identify the dimensions of the green voice of internal auditors in disclosing the environmental performance of companies and then, in order to determine the reliability of the identified dimensions, fuzzy Delphi analysis should be used. Finally, quantitative part through fuzzy matrix analysis, this study tries to select the most favorable dimension of green voice of internal auditors in disclosing the environmental performance of capital market companies.
Findings: The results of the meta-synthesis analysis based on the content screening of 12 determined studies indicate the existence of 8 dimensions of the green voice of internal auditors. Also, the reliability of the identified dimensions was confirmed through fuzzy Delphi analysis. Finally, based on the fuzzy analysis of the construction matrix, it was determined that the disclosure of compliance with environmental requirements is the most desirable aspect of the green voice of internal auditors in disclosing the environmental performance of companies
Discussion and Conclusion: The obtained result expresses the fact that auditors who have an identity and rely on the code of professional conduct, based on the limits of the requirements set for the disclosure of environmental performance, always try to disclose the company's performance in this field and thus the level of transparency Improve company information to external stakeholders.
1. Hosseini, E., Saeida ardekani, S., & Sabokro, M. (2020). Presentation the Pattern of Knowledge Employees Voice (Case Study: Shiraz Gas Company Employees). Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 8(4): 57-72. (In Persian).
2. Kim, S., Vaiman, V., Sanders, K. (2022). Strategic human resource management in the era of environmental disruptions, Human Resource Management, 61(3): 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22107
3. Ercantan, O., Eyupoglu, S. (2022). How Do Green Human Resource Management Practices Encourage Employees to Engage in Green Behavior? Perceptions of University Students as Prospective Employees, Sustainability, 14(3): 17-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031718
4. Du, J., Li, W., Lin, B., Wu, D. (2021). Financial ecological environment and internal audit outsourcing: evidence from survey in China, China Journal of Accounting Studies, 9(3): 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2021.2009175
5. Akinteye, S, A., York, O., Henderson, J, Sh. (2017). Corporate Governance: An Investigation of the Competence of the Head of Internal Audit Function in Nigerian Listed Firms.
6. Gray, G., Gyun, W., Miller, D, W. (2014). Internal Auditors' Experiences and Opinions Regarding Green IT: Assessing the Gap in Normative and Positive Perspectives, Journal of Information Systems, 28(1): 75–109. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50694
7. Qian, W., Burritt, R., & Chen, J. (2016). The potential for environmental management accounting development in China. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11(1): 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC‐11‐2013‐0092
8. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2015). Global Internal Audit Common Body of Knowledge (CBOK) Practitioner Study. The IIA Research Foundation. Altamonte Springs, FL: IIA. Available at: http://www.theiia.org/CBOK.
9. Journeault, M., Levant, Y. and Picard, C.F. (2021). Sustainability performance reporting: a technocratic shadowing and silencing, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 74(2): 102-145
10. Zheng, B, Zh., Patel, Ch., Evans, E. (2019). The influence of construal of self on internal auditors' judgments on whistle-blowing: Evidence from China, International Journal of Auditing, 23(1): 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12146
11. Teichmann, F, M. and Sergi, B.S. (2018). Whistle-Blowing in Corporations, Compliance in Multinational Corporations, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-867-920181006
12. Turetken, O., Jethefer, S. and Ozkan, B. (2020). Internal audit effectiveness: operationalization and influencing factors, Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(2): 238-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2018-1980
13. Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2009). Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness, International Journal of Auditing, 13(1), 43–60.
14. Cohen, A. and Sayag, G. (2010). The effectiveness of internal auditing: an empirical examination of its determinants in Israeli organizations, Australian Accounting Review, 20(3), 296-307.
15. Mihret, D.G., James, K. and Mula, J.M. (2010). Antecedents and organizational performance implications of internal audit effectiveness: some propositions and research agenda, Pacific Accounting Review, 22(3), 224-252.
16. Lenz, R. and Hahn, U. (2015). A synthesis of empirical internal audit effectiveness literature pointing to new research opportunities, Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(1): 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2014-1072
17. Alzeban, A. and Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: a survey of the saudi public sector, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74-86.
18. Rahmani, A., Mahmoudkhani, M. (2017). Investigating the components of assessing the internal auditi effectiveness in Iran. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 6(24), 57-78. (In Persian)
19. Liu, X., Li, W., Parsons, K. (2021). Exploring the antecedents of internal auditors' voice in environmental issues: Implications from China, International Journal of Auditing, 24(3): 396-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12204
20. Ecer, F. (2020). Multi‑criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type‑2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer, Operational Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00552-y
21. Kahraman, C., Öztaysi, B., Sari, I, U., Turanoglu, E. (2014). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Knowledge-Based Systems, 59(3): 48-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.001
22. Liang Q, Mendel JM. (2000) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 8(5):535–550
23. Cao, H., Zhang, L., Qi, Y., Yang, Zh., Li, X. (2022). Government auditing and environmental governance: Evidence from China's auditing system reform, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93(2): 65-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106705
24. Arif, M., Kumar, R., Parveen, S. (2021). Reduction in water pollution in Yamuna river due to lockdown under COVID-19 pandemic, Earth, Space, and Environmental Chemistry, https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.12440525.v1
25. Desimone, S., D’Onza, G., Sarens, G. (2021). Correlates of internal audit function involvement in sustainability audits, Journal of Management and Governance, 25(2): 561–591 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09511-3
26. Wu, X., CAO, Q., Tan, X. and Li, L. (2020). The effect of audit of outgoing leading officials’ natural resource accountability on environmental governance: evidence from China, Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(9): 1213-1241. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2019-2378
27. Hassan, N.A., Mohamad Zailani, S.H. and Hasan, H.A. (2020). Integrated internal audit in management system: A comparative study of manufacturing firms in Malaysia, The TQM Journal, 32(1): 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2019-0077
28. Agudelo, M, A, L., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1): 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
29. Abu-Tayeh, G., Neumann, O., Stuermer, M. (2018). Exploring the Motives of Citizen Reporting Engagement: Self-Concern and Other-Orientation, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(1): 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0530-8
30. Hejazi, R., Rajab Dori, H., Khani Zelan, A, R. (2020). The relationship between ethical leadership and corporate citizen behaviors with the role of moderator of self-efficacy; Respect and interaction between manager and staff, ethics in science and technology, 15(3): 40-48.
31. Zandi, A. (2020). Testing the Effectiveness of Environmental Management Accounting on the Quality of Disclosure of Carbon Information. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 9(35): 207-220.
32. Moosavi, M., Hajiha, Z. (2018). Internal Auditors’ Perceptions of their Role in Environmental, Social and Governance Assurance and Consulting. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 7(25): 153-162.
33. Akbari, A., & Pourzamani, Z. (2018). The Firm Management Structure, Environmental Auditing and Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 7(26), 133-144.
34. Karnik, J.M. Mendel, (2001). Operations on type-2 fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 122(2): 327–348.