• صفحه اصلی
  • سنجش رضایت ساکنان از کیفیت معماری مسکن مهر شهر جدید سهند با توجه به شاخص های معماری پایدار

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : JSDE-2303-1273 (R1) بازدید : 127 صفحه: 61 - 82

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

سنجش رضایت ساکنان از کیفیت معماری مسکن مهر شهر جدید سهند با توجه به شاخص های معماری پایدار

محورهای موضوعی : تنوع زیستی

حامد پویافر 1 ( دانشجوی دکتری معماری، واحد بین المللی جلفا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، جلفا، ایران. )
حسن ستاری ساربانقلی 2 ( دانشیار گروه معماری و شهرسازی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات) )
حسن ابراهیمی اصل 3 ( استادیار گروه معماری، واحد بین المللی جلفا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، جلفا، ایران. )
شبنم اکبری نامدار 4 ( استادیار گروه معماری، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران. )

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/12/14 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/01/30 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/04/01

کلید واژه: معماری پایدار, رضایت مندی, کیفیت معماری, رضایت از مسکن مهر, پایداری محیط,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: سنجش رضایتمندی سکونتی به عنوان یکی از شاخصهای کیفیت محیط سکونتی و از مباحث اصلی و مورد توجه پژوهشگران در مطالعات معماری و شهرسازی است است. هدف این تحقیق بررسی و ارزیابی رضایت ساکنان مسکن مهر از لحاظ کیفیت معماری با توجه به شاخص های معماری پایدار که منجر به پایداری و رضایت ساکنان مسکن مهر می شود. روش کار: روش تحقیق حاضر بصورت توصیفی- تحلیلی و گردآوری داده ها بصورت مطالعات پیمایشی و کتابخانه ای انجام شد. جامعه آماری تحقیق نیز شامل ساکنان مسکن مهر سهند که برابر 25394 هستند که با روش نمونه گیری کوکران 378 نفر به عنوان نمونه جهت توزیع پرسشنامه انتخاب شدند. برای روایی سوالات از روایی صوری و برای پایایی از آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد. برای تحلیل داده ها از روش معادلات ساختاری با نرم افزار Spss و Amos استفاده شد. یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که بر اساس تحلیل عاملی مرتبۀ دوم بارهای عاملی تمام عوامل کیفیت معماری پایدار بر روی میزان رضایت ساکنین مسکن مهر بزرگتر از 4/0 بوده و در سطح احتمال 99% باهم معنی دار هستند. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد بیشترین تأثیرات مربوط به عوامل کالبدی-عملکردی بوده با بار عاملی (75/0) و بعد آن به ترتیب عوامل اجتماعی-معنایی با بار عاملی(69/0) کیفیت ساختاری-فضایی با بار عاملی(61/0) و کیفیت محیطی با بار عاملی (55/0) قرار دارند. بحث و نتیجه گیری: در نهایت نتیجه گرفته می‌شود که در میزان رضایت ساکنان از مسکن مهر شهر سهند چهار عامل کیفیت معماری به لحاظ شاخص های معماری پایدار اثرگذار بوده‌اند و رابطه مستقیم و معنی داری باهم دارند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Measuring residential satisfaction as one of the indicators of the quality of the residential environment is one of the main topics and of interest to researchers in architecture and urban planning studies. The purpose of this research is to investigate and evaluate the satisfaction of the residents of Mehr housing in terms of architectural quality, according to the indicators of sustainable architecture that lead to the stability and satisfaction of the residents of Mehr housing. Material and Methodology: The current research method was descriptive-analytical and data collection was done in the form of survey and library studies. The statistical population of the research includes 25394 residents of Mehr Sahand housing, of which 378 people were selected as a sample to distribute the questionnaire using the Cochran sampling method. Face validity was used for validity of questions and Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability. For data analysis, structural equation method with Spss and Amos software was used. The results showed that according to the second-order factor analysis, the factor loadings of all factors of sustainable architecture quality on the satisfaction level of the residents of Mehr residence are greater than 0.4 and are significant at the 99% probability level. The results of the research showed that the greatest effects were related to physical-functional factors with a factor load (0.75), followed by socio-semantic factors with a factor load (0.69) and structural-spatial quality with a factor load (0.61). and environmental quality with factor load (0.55). Discussion and conclusion: In the end, it is concluded that four architectural quality factors have been effective in terms of sustainable architecture indicators and have a direct and meaningful relationship with the residents' satisfaction with Mehr housing city Sahand.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Kim, J., Woo, A., & Cho, G.-H. Is shared housing a viable economic and social housing option for young adults? Willingness to pay for shared housing in Seoul. Cities, 2020, 102, 102732. http:‏/‏/www.sciencedirect.com‏/science‏/article‏/pii‏/S026427511930931X.  http:‏/‏/dx.doi.org‏/.10.1016‏/j.cities.2020.102732.
    2.
  2. Rafiyan M, Masoudi Rad M, Rezaei M & Masoudi Rad M, Measuring the level of satisfaction of residents with residential quality of Mehr housing, a case study: Mehr Zahedan city. Geography and Urban-Regional Studies, 2010, 4(12), 135-150. (In Persian)
    3.
  3. Khorasani Moghadam, S., Mozafar, F., & Hosseini, S. B. Assessing the Meaning of Housing Attribute Based on Meaning Structure Method; Case Study: Andisheh Mehr Housing, Ardabil, Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2021, 13(33), 75-90. doi: 10.22034/aaud.2019.168788.1796
    4.
  4. Chen, J.; Pellegrini, P.; Wang, H. Comparative Residents’ Satisfaction Evaluation for Socially Sustainable Regeneration-The Case of Two High-Density Communities in Suzhou. Land, 2022, 11, 1483. 1-16 https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091483. (In Persian)
    5.
  5. Sundelin, A. (2019), Reaching Social Sustainability in Residential Architecture. Master’s Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
    6.
  6. Zhang, Q.; Hiu-Kwan Yung, E.; Hon-Wan, C.E. Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China. Land, 2021, 10(11), 1-21.1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111280.
    7.
  7. Rezaei, B., Pakdel Fard, M. R., Sattari Sarbanqoli, H., & Akbari Namdar, S. Satisfaction Analysis of Mehr Housing Residents based on Physical-Social Dimension in Sahand New City, Case Study: Aftab Complex. Geography, 2021, 19(69), 53-69. (In Persian)
    8.
  8. Abdali, Y., Razavian, M. T., alipoori, E., & Nadizadeh Shorabeh, S. The Assessment of Residents' Satisfaction with the Quality of Mehr Housing Complexes (A Case study of Nourabad), 2021, 13(51), 43-62. (In Persian)
    9.
  9. Lansing j. B. Marans R. Evaluation of neighborhood. journal of the american Institute of Planners, , 1969, 135. 25-39.
    10.
  10. Gilbert, A.G, Free housing for the poor: Aneffective way to address prove. Habital International, 2014, 41(1), 253-261.
    11.
  11. Gooding, T, Low-income housing provision in Mauritius: Improving social justice and place quality. Habitat International, 2016, 53, 502-516.
    12.
  12. Ramos, N. M. M., Almeida, R. M. S. F., Simões, M. L., Delgado, J. M. P. Q., Pereira, P. F., Curado, A., Fraga, S. Indoor hydrothermal conditions and quality of life in social housing: A comparison between two neighborhoods. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 38, 80-90. https:‏/‏/doi.org‏/10.1016.‏/j.scs.2017.1
    13.
  13. Duvier, C., Anand, P. B., & Oltean-Dumbrava, C. Data quality and governance in a UK social housing initiative: Implications for smart sustainable cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018b, 39, 358-365. Retrieved from http:‏/‏/www.sciencedirect.com‏/science‏/article‏/pii‏/S2210670717312520. https:‏/‏/doi.org‏/10.1016‏/j.scs.2018.02.015.  (In Persian)
    14.
  14. Manville, G., & Greatbanks, R. Performance management in hybrid organizations: A study in social housing. European Management Journal, 2020, 38(3), 533-545. Retrieved from http:‏/‏/www.sciencedirect.com‏/science‏/article‏/pii‏/S026323732030058X.http:‏/‏/dx.doi.org‏/10.1016‏/j.emj.2020.04.006.
    15.
  15. shiran, H., & Rakhshaninasab, H. R. Comparative Assessment of Residents' Satisfaction with Mehr Housing (Case Study: Mehr Shargh Housing and Mehr Gharb Housing in Zahedan). Physical Social Planning, 2022, 9(1), 53-66. doi: 10.30473/psp.2022.53955.2330. (In Persian)
    16.
  16. Zangāneh, A., Parizād, T., & Maskani, S. Assessing the quality of the urban environment in Mehr housing in Rasht. Geographical Studies of Coastal Areas Journal, 2021, 2(3), 31-52. doi: 10.22124/gscaj.2021.20734.1114. (In Persian)
    17.
  17. Sheikhul-Islami, A, & Akbari, S. Assessing the level of satisfaction of the residents of Mehr residential complexes with a future research approach (case study: Mehr Shahr Bank housing). Journal of Zagros Landscape Geography and Urban Planning, 2021, 13(47), 71-97. (In Persian)
    18.
  18. Ahmadi, P., & Charehjoo, F. Investigating the Level of Residents’ Satisfaction with the Residential Quality of the Mehr Housing Project Focusing on Sustainable Housing Indicators. Spatial Planning, 2021, 11(1), 151-178. doi: 10.22108/sppl.2020.116756.1378. (In Persian)
    19.
  19. Biswas B, Ahsan MN, Mallick B, Analysis of residential satisfaction: An empirical evidence from neighbouring communities of Rohingya camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, 2021, 16(4): e0250838. https:‏/‏/doi.org‏/10..1371‏/journal.pone.0250838.
    20.
  20. Jiang W, Feng T, Timmermans H, Li H. A gap-theoretical path model of residential satisfaction and intention to move house applied to renovated historical blocks in two Chinese cities. Cities. 2021, 71: 19-29.
    21.
  21. Yazdani, M. Ahmadi, S., Pashazadeh, A. Surveying the level of satisfaction of Mehr housing residents (case example: Mehr Sham Esbi Ardabil housing), Geography and Planning, 2018, 23(67), 327-349. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. Borgoni, R., Michelangeli, A., & Pirola, F. Residential Satisfaction for a Continuum of Households: Evidence from European Countries. University of Milan Bicocca Department of Economics, Management and Statistics Working Paper, 2018, 378.
    23.
  23. Nouri Imani, E; Malek Fazli, A; Saeednia, Measuring the satisfaction of the quality of the residential environment from the point of view of the residents of Mehr Housing with emphasis on the physical-visual dimension (case study: Ardabil city), Urban Management Studies, 2020, 11(40), 17-30.
    24.
  24. Bunster, V., & Bustamante, W. Structuring a Residential Satisfaction Model for Predictive Personalization in Mass Social Housing. Sustainability, 2019, 11(14), 3943. doi:10.3390‏/su11143943.
    25.
  25. [25] Zohra, M., Rezaei, H. Evaluation of residential satisfaction in Mehr housing complex as a strategy to prevent the loss of national capital (case study: Mehr government complex in Kermanshah), Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran, 2019, 11(2), 20-5.
    26.
  26. Eattinnanzi, E., Acampa G., Forte F., Rocca F., The overall quality assessment in an architecture project, Valorie Valuation, 2018, 21, 3-13.
    27.
  27. Forte F, (2019), Architectural quality and evaluation: a reading in the European framework, journal valorie valutazioni, 23, 37-45.
    28.
  28. Hedayat, A., Ishrati, P., & Karimi, B. Investigating the effect of outdoor semi-open space on the quality of the residential environment, case study: Bandar Bushehr apartment building. Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran (JIAU), 2019, 11(2), 57-76. doi: 10.30475/isau.2020.214584.1338. (In Persian)
    29.
  29. Acampa G., European Guidelines on quality requirements and evaluation in architecture, Valorie Valutazioni, 2019, 23, 47-56.
    30.
  30. Lawrence RJ, Constancy and change: key issues in housing and health research, 1987-2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(7): 763-9. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070763.
    31.
  31. Oluwabunmi Ige, J, Environmental health and housing: issues for public health. Housing Studies, 2019, 34(3), 561-562. doi:10.1080/02673037.2019.1558597  
    32.
  32. Reifsnider; E, Packer, P. W; Argent‐DeLorme, A; Suarez, C; Community development for improved housing, health equity, and education in rural Honduras. Public Health Nursing, 2021, 38(4), 680-686, doi:10.1111/phn.12902.
    33.
  33. Yu, R.; Gu, N.; Ostwald, M.J. Architects’ Perceptions about Sustainable Design Practice and the Support Provided for This by Digital Tools: A Study in Australia. Sustainability, 2022, 14, 13789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113789.
    34.
  34. Al-Saggaf, A.; Taha, M.; Hegazy, T.; Ahmed, H. Towards Sustainable Building Design: The Impact of Architectural Design Features on Cooling Energy Consumption and Cost in Saudi Arabia. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 44, 140–147.
    35.
  35. Beheshti, Z. & Monavari, M. Evaluation of ecological potential of urban use with MCDM and GIS model (case study: Sahand city). Geography and development of urban space, 2016, 4(1), 41-55. doi:10.22067/gusd.v4i1.25904.
    36.
  36. Pourjafar M, Montazeral Hajjah M, Ranjbara E, Kabiri R, evaluation of ecological potential in order to determine suitable areas for development in the new city of Sahand. Geography and Development, 2012, 10(28), 11-22. 
    37.
  37. Statistical annals, East Azarbaijan Province, publications of the country's program and budget organization, 2016. (In Persian)
    38.

 

 

 

 

_||_

  1. Kim, J., Woo, A., & Cho, G.-H. Is shared housing a viable economic and social housing option for young adults? Willingness to pay for shared housing in Seoul. Cities, 2020, 102, 102732. http:‏/‏/www.sciencedirect.com‏/science‏/article‏/pii‏/S026427511930931X.  http:‏/‏/dx.doi.org‏/.10.1016‏/j.cities.2020.102732.
    2.
  2. Rafiyan M, Masoudi Rad M, Rezaei M & Masoudi Rad M, Measuring the level of satisfaction of residents with residential quality of Mehr housing, a case study: Mehr Zahedan city. Geography and Urban-Regional Studies, 2010, 4(12), 135-150. (In Persian)
    3.
  3. Khorasani Moghadam, S., Mozafar, F., & Hosseini, S. B. Assessing the Meaning of Housing Attribute Based on Meaning Structure Method; Case Study: Andisheh Mehr Housing, Ardabil, Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2021, 13(33), 75-90. doi: 10.22034/aaud.2019.168788.1796
    4.
  4. Chen, J.; Pellegrini, P.; Wang, H. Comparative Residents’ Satisfaction Evaluation for Socially Sustainable Regeneration-The Case of Two High-Density Communities in Suzhou. Land, 2022, 11, 1483. 1-16 https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091483. (In Persian)
    5.
  5. Sundelin, A. (2019), Reaching Social Sustainability in Residential Architecture. Master’s Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
    6.
  6. Zhang, Q.; Hiu-Kwan Yung, E.; Hon-Wan, C.E. Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China. Land, 2021, 10(11), 1-21.1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111280.
    7.
  7. Rezaei, B., Pakdel Fard, M. R., Sattari Sarbanqoli, H., & Akbari Namdar, S. Satisfaction Analysis of Mehr Housing Residents based on Physical-Social Dimension in Sahand New City, Case Study: Aftab Complex. Geography, 2021, 19(69), 53-69. (In Persian)
    8.
  8. Abdali, Y., Razavian, M. T., alipoori, E., & Nadizadeh Shorabeh, S. The Assessment of Residents' Satisfaction with the Quality of Mehr Housing Complexes (A Case study of Nourabad), 2021, 13(51), 43-62. (In Persian)
    9.
  9. Lansing j. B. Marans R. Evaluation of neighborhood. journal of the american Institute of Planners, , 1969, 135. 25-39.
    10.
  10. Gilbert, A.G, Free housing for the poor: Aneffective way to address prove. Habital International, 2014, 41(1), 253-261.
    11.
  11. Gooding, T, Low-income housing provision in Mauritius: Improving social justice and place quality. Habitat International, 2016, 53, 502-516.
    12.
  12. Ramos, N. M. M., Almeida, R. M. S. F., Simões, M. L., Delgado, J. M. P. Q., Pereira, P. F., Curado, A., Fraga, S. Indoor hydrothermal conditions and quality of life in social housing: A comparison between two neighborhoods. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 38, 80-90. https:‏/‏/doi.org‏/10.1016.‏/j.scs.2017.1
    13.
  13. Duvier, C., Anand, P. B., & Oltean-Dumbrava, C. Data quality and governance in a UK social housing initiative: Implications for smart sustainable cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018b, 39, 358-365. Retrieved from http:‏/‏/www.sciencedirect.com‏/science‏/article‏/pii‏/S2210670717312520. https:‏/‏/doi.org‏/10.1016‏/j.scs.2018.02.015.  (In Persian)
    14.
  14. Manville, G., & Greatbanks, R. Performance management in hybrid organizations: A study in social housing. European Management Journal, 2020, 38(3), 533-545. Retrieved from http:‏/‏/www.sciencedirect.com‏/science‏/article‏/pii‏/S026323732030058X.http:‏/‏/dx.doi.org‏/10.1016‏/j.emj.2020.04.006.
    15.
  15. shiran, H., & Rakhshaninasab, H. R. Comparative Assessment of Residents' Satisfaction with Mehr Housing (Case Study: Mehr Shargh Housing and Mehr Gharb Housing in Zahedan). Physical Social Planning, 2022, 9(1), 53-66. doi: 10.30473/psp.2022.53955.2330. (In Persian)
    16.
  16. Zangāneh, A., Parizād, T., & Maskani, S. Assessing the quality of the urban environment in Mehr housing in Rasht. Geographical Studies of Coastal Areas Journal, 2021, 2(3), 31-52. doi: 10.22124/gscaj.2021.20734.1114. (In Persian)
    17.
  17. Sheikhul-Islami, A, & Akbari, S. Assessing the level of satisfaction of the residents of Mehr residential complexes with a future research approach (case study: Mehr Shahr Bank housing). Journal of Zagros Landscape Geography and Urban Planning, 2021, 13(47), 71-97. (In Persian)
    18.
  18. Ahmadi, P., & Charehjoo, F. Investigating the Level of Residents’ Satisfaction with the Residential Quality of the Mehr Housing Project Focusing on Sustainable Housing Indicators. Spatial Planning, 2021, 11(1), 151-178. doi: 10.22108/sppl.2020.116756.1378. (In Persian)
    19.
  19. Biswas B, Ahsan MN, Mallick B, Analysis of residential satisfaction: An empirical evidence from neighbouring communities of Rohingya camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, 2021, 16(4): e0250838. https:‏/‏/doi.org‏/10..1371‏/journal.pone.0250838.
    20.
  20. Jiang W, Feng T, Timmermans H, Li H. A gap-theoretical path model of residential satisfaction and intention to move house applied to renovated historical blocks in two Chinese cities. Cities. 2021, 71: 19-29.
    21.
  21. Yazdani, M. Ahmadi, S., Pashazadeh, A. Surveying the level of satisfaction of Mehr housing residents (case example: Mehr Sham Esbi Ardabil housing), Geography and Planning, 2018, 23(67), 327-349. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. Borgoni, R., Michelangeli, A., & Pirola, F. Residential Satisfaction for a Continuum of Households: Evidence from European Countries. University of Milan Bicocca Department of Economics, Management and Statistics Working Paper, 2018, 378.
    23.
  23. Nouri Imani, E; Malek Fazli, A; Saeednia, Measuring the satisfaction of the quality of the residential environment from the point of view of the residents of Mehr Housing with emphasis on the physical-visual dimension (case study: Ardabil city), Urban Management Studies, 2020, 11(40), 17-30.
    24.
  24. Bunster, V., & Bustamante, W. Structuring a Residential Satisfaction Model for Predictive Personalization in Mass Social Housing. Sustainability, 2019, 11(14), 3943. doi:10.3390‏/su11143943.
    25.
  25. [25] Zohra, M., Rezaei, H. Evaluation of residential satisfaction in Mehr housing complex as a strategy to prevent the loss of national capital (case study: Mehr government complex in Kermanshah), Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran, 2019, 11(2), 20-5.
    26.
  26. Eattinnanzi, E., Acampa G., Forte F., Rocca F., The overall quality assessment in an architecture project, Valorie Valuation, 2018, 21, 3-13.
    27.
  27. Forte F, (2019), Architectural quality and evaluation: a reading in the European framework, journal valorie valutazioni, 23, 37-45.
    28.
  28. Hedayat, A., Ishrati, P., & Karimi, B. Investigating the effect of outdoor semi-open space on the quality of the residential environment, case study: Bandar Bushehr apartment building. Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran (JIAU), 2019, 11(2), 57-76. doi: 10.30475/isau.2020.214584.1338. (In Persian)
    29.
  29. Acampa G., European Guidelines on quality requirements and evaluation in architecture, Valorie Valutazioni, 2019, 23, 47-56.
    30.
  30. Lawrence RJ, Constancy and change: key issues in housing and health research, 1987-2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(7): 763-9. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070763.
    31.
  31. Oluwabunmi Ige, J, Environmental health and housing: issues for public health. Housing Studies, 2019, 34(3), 561-562. doi:10.1080/02673037.2019.1558597  
    32.
  32. Reifsnider; E, Packer, P. W; Argent‐DeLorme, A; Suarez, C; Community development for improved housing, health equity, and education in rural Honduras. Public Health Nursing, 2021, 38(4), 680-686, doi:10.1111/phn.12902.
    33.
  33. Yu, R.; Gu, N.; Ostwald, M.J. Architects’ Perceptions about Sustainable Design Practice and the Support Provided for This by Digital Tools: A Study in Australia. Sustainability, 2022, 14, 13789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113789.
    34.
  34. Al-Saggaf, A.; Taha, M.; Hegazy, T.; Ahmed, H. Towards Sustainable Building Design: The Impact of Architectural Design Features on Cooling Energy Consumption and Cost in Saudi Arabia. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 44, 140–147.
    35.
  35. Beheshti, Z. & Monavari, M. Evaluation of ecological potential of urban use with MCDM and GIS model (case study: Sahand city). Geography and development of urban space, 2016, 4(1), 41-55. doi:10.22067/gusd.v4i1.25904.
    36.
  36. Pourjafar M, Montazeral Hajjah M, Ranjbara E, Kabiri R, evaluation of ecological potential in order to determine suitable areas for development in the new city of Sahand. Geography and Development, 2012, 10(28), 11-22. 
    37.
  37. Statistical annals, East Azarbaijan Province, publications of the country's program and budget organization, 2016. (In Persian)
    38.

 

 

 

 

سکوی نشر دانش

سند یا سکوی نشر دانش ،سامانه ای جهت مدیریت حوزه علمی و پژوهشی نشریات دانشگاه آزاد می باشد

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]