ارزیابی ریسک ایمنی، بهداشت و محیط‌زیست بخش صنعت شرکت کشت و صنعت سلمان فارسی با استفاده از روش Delphi و مدل تلفیقی FMEA&TOPSIS

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت محیط زیست، بهداشت و ایمنی

حسین حبیبی‌نیا ¹ ( گروه مدیریت محیط زیست، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران. )
سولماز دشتی ² ( استادیار گروه محیط زیست، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران )

تاریخ دریافت : 1395/07/08 تاریخ پذیرش : 1395/10/15 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/01/01

کلید واژه: ارزیابی ریسک, Delphi, FMEA, مدل تلفیقی FMEA&amp, TOPSIS, کشت و صنعت سلمان‌ فارسی,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: فعالیت های صنعتی و توسعه ای بخشی از تلاش انسان برای رسیدن به رفاه بیش تر است اما در اثر این تغییرات و گسترش این نوع فعالیت ها مخاطرات خاصی که ناشی از تغییر در نظام رایج طبیعت است نیز می شود. کارکنان شاغل در بخش صنعت این شرکت در سطوح مختلف، با توجه به فعالیت هایی که انجام می شود، در معرض خطرهای ایمنی و بهداشتی قرار می گیرند. تحقیق حاضر به منظور شناسایی جنبه ها و ریسک های بارز ایمنی، بهداشت و محیط زیستی در بخش صنعت کشت و صنعت سلمان فارسی در سال 1393 انجام پذیرفت. روش بررسی: در این مطالعه از روش های Delphi، FMEA و مدل تلفیقی FMEA&TOPSIS استفاده گردید. یافته ها: بر اساس روش دلفی از 57 جنبه و ریسک شناسایی شده مربوط به فعالیت های این صنعت، 13 مورد آن ها بارز تشخیص داده شد. ریسک تماس با سر و صدا با کد شناسایی 1R بالاترین و حمل قطعات سنگین با کد شناسایی 44R پایین ترین نمره را به خود اختصاص دادند. در ادامه به کمک روش FMEA، 57 جنبه و ریسک شناسایی و تعداد 21 مورد از آن ها غیرقابل تحمل و بارز شناخته شدند، که به عنوان داده های ورودی مدل تلفیقی FMEA&TOPSIS جهت وزن دهی و رتبه بندی استفاده گردیدند. جنبه محیط زیستی ورود فاضلاب به محیط زیست با کد شناسایی 57R بالاترین و دررفتن سبد سانتریفیوژ با کد 18R پایین ترین اولویت را در این روش به خود اختصاص دادند. بحث و نتیجه گیری: استقرار سیستم های مدیریت یکپارچه و پیاده سازی شایسته آن ها می تواند به عنوان پیشنهاد عملی تأثیر گذار بر حذف و یا کاهش جنبه ها و ریسک های موجود در بخش صنعت شرکت کشت و صنعت سلمان فارسی باشد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Industrial and development activities are parts of the human attempt to achieve greater prosperity. But the effects of these changes and develop this kind of activity due to specific risks arising from changes in prevalent system of nature. Working staff in the agricultural sector of this company at different levels, according to a variety of activities that can be done, are exposed to health and safety risks. This research has been done in order to identify safety, health and environmental aspects and important risks of Salman Farsi Agroindustry Company in 2014. Method: In this study Delphi, FMEA and FMEA & TOPSIS Integrated models are used. Findings: According to Delphi method 57 aspects and risks related to the activities of this industry identified and 13 of them were diagnosed significantly. Risk of exposure to noise with identification code R1 obtain the highest score and transport the heavy parts with identification cod R44 obtain the lowest score respectively. According to the FMEA method, 57 aspects and risks identified based on industry activities and 21 of them became intolerable and clear, as input data to the weighting stage and grading were used combined method TOPSIS and FEMEA. According to this method environmental aspects of waste entering to the environment with identification cod R57 obtained the highest score and falling the centrifuges basket with identification cod R18 obtained the lowest score. Discussion and Conclusion: Establish and implement integrated management systems that can be qualified as a practical proposal affecting elimination or reduction of risk in industrial sector of Salman Farsi agro-industrial Company.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Jozi, S.A., Atabi, F., Honarmand, H., 2014. Management of the Health, Safety and Environmental Risks of the Shomal Cement Factory using the William Fine Technique. Environmental Research, Vol. 5, No. 10, pp. 23-34. (In Persian)


2. Ghasemi, J., Shahraki, F, Mohebbi Kalhori, D, 2011. Evaluation of the Effect of Flare Radiation in Kermanshah Refinery in Emergencies Conditions. Fifth National Conference and Specialized Exhibition of Environmental Engineering. Tehran. (In Persian)


3. Habibi, E.A. 2007. Applied Safety and Performance Indicators in the Industry. Second edition, Fanavaran Publishing House, 358 pages. (In Persian)


4. OGP & IPIECA, 2006. A roadmap to Health Risk Assessment in the oil and gas industry. www.ipieca.org/activities/health/downloads/.../hra_ro admap.pdf


5. Nivo Lianito, Z., 2002. Risk Analysis and Risk Management: A European in sight Law, Prohability and Risk, 1(2):161- 174.


6. Kazemnejad, M., 2010. Relative Advantage and Supportive Indices of Cultivation and Sugarcane Industries in Iran. First edition, Ministry of Agriculture publications. (In Persian)


7. Research Institute for Sugar Cane Development and Related Industries, Sugar Production Technology in Iran. 2013. Ahvaz: Rosvajeh Publications. (In Persian)


8. Jahangiri, M., MoTevaghe, M., 2010. Health Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Harmful Chemicals: A Case Study in a Petrochemical Industry. Iran Occupational Health Journal Vol 7, Issue 4, pp. 18-24. (In Persian)


9. Chegoni, M., Nik Ayin, F., Golestaneh, H. 2012. Environmental risk assessment of sugar industries using the FMEA method and providing environmental management solutions. The First International Conference on Environmental Crisis and its Improvement. Islamic Azad University of Khuzestan Science and Research Branch. Kish. February. (In Persian)


10. Jahanbin, Sh., 2012. Optimal management of environmental, health and safety rsks in the field of industry, Farabi sugarcane industries of Khuzestan, Master's Degree Thesis in Environmental Planning, Management and Education, Islamic Azad University of Khuzestan Science and Research Branch. (In Persian)


11. Safarian, G., 2016. Environmental Health and Safety Risk Assessment and Management in Debal Khozaei Agro-industry Company. Master's Degree Thesis in Environmental Planning, Management and Education, Islamic Azad University of Khuzestan Science and Research Branch, 103 p. (In Persian)


12. Akesoon, N.B., 2004. Environmental risk assessment of pesticides in America, Agriculture Conference on Environmental Assessment and Management of Pesticide 21, pp. 201-204.


13. Kurt, L., Ozilgen, S., 2013. Failure mode and effect analysis for daily product manufacturing: practical safety improvement action plan with cases from Turkey. Safety Science, 55: 195-206.


14. Jozi, A., Saffarian, SH., Shafiee, M., 2012. Environmental Risk Assessment of a Gas Power Plant Exploitation Unit Using Integrated TOP-EFMEA Method, environmental studies, Vol 21, 95-105.


15. Dunhum, R., 1998. The Delphi technique: A user guide. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Business Press.


16. Jozi, A., Salati, P., 2010. Analysis of environmental risks of Polyethylene unit of Assaluyeye Aria Sasul polymer complex by FMEA method. First National Conference on Health, Environment and Sustainable Development. Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abbas Branch, March 11-12. (In Persian)


17. McDermott, R., Mykolaak, R., Biorigard, M., Translator: Hashemi, A., Attar, H., 2011. FMEA Principles. First Edition, Publisher: Kian Rayaneh Sabz Publishing Services. (In Persian)


18. Rezayi, K., Seyedi, M., Nouri, B., 2005. FMEA Analysis of Error Modes and its Effects, First Edition, Participatory IRAN-Tuv and Athena Publisher. (In Persian)


19. Booklet of Salman Farsi Operational Procedures, 2014. (In Persian)


20. Habibinia, H., 2015.Health, Safety and Environment Risks management of Salman Farsi Agro-industry. Master's Degree Thesis in Environmental Planning, Management and Education, Islamic Azad University of Khuzestan Science and Research Branch. (In Persian)


21. Farrokhian, F., Jahangin, Sh., Alavi Bakhtiyarvand S.N.A., 2012. The most significant safety, health and environmental risks Assessment and management of Farabi agro – industry company Mill Hall using the FMEA & TOPSIS Compilation Model. The First International Conference on Environmental Crisis and its Improvement. Islamic Azad University of Khuuzestan Science and Research Branch. Kish. February. (In Persian)


22. Momeni, M., 2008. New Issues in Operations Research, Second Edition, Tehran, Tehran University Press. 352 pages. (In Persian)


23. Setareh, H, Koohpayi, A., 2005. Fire risk assessment. First edition, Fanavaran Publishing House, Tehran. (In Persian)


24. Harirforoush, A., Mohammadi Ruzbahani, M., Orak, N. 2015. Environmental risk assessment of Khuzestan Hakim Farabi agro_industry Company by Frank & Morgan method. First National Conference on Environmental Assessment, Management and Land use in Iran. (In Persian)