ارزیابی کارکردهای رهبری سالتوژنیک در شرکت‌های نفتی: تمرکز بر پذیرش انرژی سبز

محورهای موضوعی : اقتصاد محیط زیست

شیما صفرمحمدلو ¹ , علیرضا کوشکی جهرمی ² , مهدی خیراندیش ³

1 - دانشجوی دکتری،گروه مدیریت دولتی، ‌دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، ‌دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشیارمدعوگروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، ‌دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. دانشیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران. * (مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - استادمدعوگروه مدیریت دولتی، ، ‌دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، ‌دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران ، ایران، استاد دانشگاه هوایی شهید ستاری ،تهران، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/12/18 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/04/08 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/05/01

کلید واژه: شرکت‌های نفتی, انرژی سبز, رهبری سالتوژنیک,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: رهبری زمانی که با ویژگی‌های مربیگری همراه باشد، بهتر قادر به ایجادِ فضای مثبت و ارتقاء تعاملات بین فردی در درون سازمان و تعاملات شرکت با اجتماعی در خارج از سازمان به عنوان مسئولیت اجتماعی است. هدف از این پژوهش ارزیابی کارکردهای سبک رهبری سالتوژنیک در شرکت‌های نفتی با تمرکز بر پذیرش انرژی سبز بوده است. روش بررسی: در این پژوهش که از نظر روش شناسی توسعه‌ا‌ی و ترکیبی محسوب می‌شود، تلاش شد تا با اتکا به فرآیندهای تحلیل فراترکیب و دلفی در بخش کیفی پژوهش، اقدام به شناسایی مولفه‌های کارکرد رهبری سالتوژنیک شود. سپس در بخش کمی از تحلیل رتبه بندی تفسیری جهتِ شناسایی اثرگذارترین کارکرد رهبری سالتوژنیک جهت ارزیابی پذیرش انرژی سبز استفاده گردد. جامعه‌ی آماری در بخش کیفی، ۱۸ نفر از متخصصان و خبرگان رشته مدیریت در سطح دانشگاهی بودند و در بخش کمی از مشارکت ۲۴ نفر از مدیران شرکت‌های فعال در شرکت‌های نفتی که چه به لحاظ دانشی و چه به لحاظ تجربی دارای سابقه بودند، بهره برده شد. مبنای انتخاب نمونه، استفاده از روش همگن بود.یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که با توجه به مقایسه زوجی بین مولفه‌های پژوهش، درصدِ تاثیرگذاری مولفه‌ی پیروان استراتژیک نسبت به بقیه مولفه‌های کارکرد رهبری سالتوژنیک نقش موثرتری در پذیرش انرژی‌های سبز دارد، که به معنای این است که جهتِ جاری‌سازی پذیرش انرژی‌های سبز براساس رویکردِ کارکرد رهبری سالتوژنیک در سطح شرکت‌های نفت، نقش هنجارسازی ارزش‌های همسویی با رویکردهای رهبری می‌تواند بسیار موثر باشد.بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: نتیجه کسب شده گویای این است که پیروان استراتژیک با درک عملکردهای رهبری در تلاش هستند تا در مسیر تدوین استراتژیک از نظر توسعه‌ی انرژی‌های سبز حرکت نمایند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functions of salutogenic leadership style in oil companies with a focus on green energy acceptance.Material and Methodology: In this research, which is considered as a methodology of development and composition, an attempt was made to identify the components of salutogenic leadership function by relying on meta-synthesis and Delphi analysis processes in the qualitative part of the research. This research is considered a methodology of development and composition. An attempt was made to identify the components of salutogenic leadership function by relying on meta-combination and Delphi analysis processes in the qualitative part of the research. Then, in a Quantitative part, interpretive ranking analysis can be used to identify the most effective function of salutogenic leadership to evaluate green energy acceptance. The statistical population in the qualitative section was 18 specialists and experts in the field of management at the university level, and in the quantitative section, the participation of 24 managers of companies operating in oil companies who had both knowledge and experience were experienced. The basis for sample selection was the use of the homogeneous method.  Findings: The results showed that of based on the pair scale among the research components, the percentage of strategic follower's component has a more effective role in green energy acceptance than other components of the salutogenic leadership function.Discussion and Conclusion: This acceptance means that to streamline the acceptance of green energy based on the approach of salutogenic leadership function at the level of oil companies, the role of normalizing values in line with leadership approaches can be very effective. In other words, strategic followers understand the performance of leadership and try to move in the direction of strategic development in terms of green energy development.  

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Ghaed, E., Dehghani, A., Fattahy, M. (2019). The effect of Types renewable resources on the economic growth of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 9(35): 137-148.


2. Sousa, S.R.d.O., da Silva, W.V., Kaczam, F., Cruz, N.J.T.d., Veiga, C.P.d. and Zanini, R.R. (2022). The relationship between socioeconomic development, renewable energies and the innovative process, International Journal of Energy Sector Management https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-05-2021-0020


3. Kazemifard, S., Naji, L., Afshar Taromi, F. (2017). Review on Renewable Energy Sources Role in Sustainable Development. Journal of Renewable and New Energy, 4(1): 34-43.


4. Garavand, S., Mehregan, N., Sadegh, H., Malekshahi, M. (2013). Energy efficiency analysis in the petrochemical industry of Iran. The Journal of Economic Policy, 5(10): 57-74.


5. Makhkamova, M, A., Allaeva, G. (2019). Relationship between Sustainable Development of Branches of Fuel and Energy Complex and Growth GDP, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4): 2-11.


6. Azizi, S., Radfar, R., Nikomaram, H., Rajabzadeh, A. (2021). An analysis of the cost index of renewable energy production in Iran ‎(Case study: home scale photovoltaic power plant, Quarterly Journal of Industrial Management, 16(56): 66-87.


7. Khanahmadi A, Ghaffarpour R. (2021). Optimal Design and Practical Implementation of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Remote Areas: Case Study. Journal of Iranian Association of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 18(2) :139-151


8. Khan, S.A.R., Yu, Z. and Umar, M. (2021). How environmental awareness and corporate social responsibility practices benefit the enterprise? An empirical study in the context of emerging economy, Management of Environmental Quality, 32(5): 863-885. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2020-0178


9. Ng, L.K. and Curran, L. (2020). Evolving existence of assets and liabilities of foreignness: The experiences of EU environmental protection companies in China, Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(1): 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-04-2019-0050


10. Nandakumar, M.K., Ghobadian, A. and O'Regan, N. (2010). Business‐level strategy and performance: The moderating effects of environment and structure, Management Decision, 48(6): 907-939. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011053460


11. Yan, J. and Hu, W. (2021). Environmentally specific transformational leadership and green product development performance: the role of a green HRM system, International Journal of Manpower,. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2020-0223


12. Alibašić, H. (2018). Leadership strategies for embedding sustainability and resilience in organizations with an emphasis on sustainable energy, Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership, 4(1): 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.17062/cjil.v4i1.63


13. Dobiáš, J., Macek, D. (2014). Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and its Impact on Building Operational Expenditures, Procedia Engineering, 85(2): 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.537


14. Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress and coping: New perspective on mental and physical wellbeing. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.


15. Pearson E. S. (2011). The ‘how-to’ of health behaviour change brought to life: a theoretical analysis of the Co-Active coaching model and its underpinnings in self-determination theory. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 4(2): 89-103


16. A. (1990). Lecture at the Congress for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Berlin, 19 February 1990


17. Gray, D., Burls, B., Kogan, M. (2014). Salutogenisis and coaching: Testing a proof of concept to develop a model for practitioners, International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2): 41-58.


18. Parkes, M.W. & Horwitz, P. (2009). Water, ecology and health: ecosystems as settings for promoting health and sustainability. Health Promotion. International. 24(1): 94-102.


19. O’Connor J. & Seymour J. (1990) Introducing NLP. Harper Element, London. p.83.


20. Wolter, Ch., Santa Maria, A., Georg, S., Lesener, T., Gusy, B., Lleiber, D., Renneberg, B. (2021). Relationships between effort-reward imbalance and work engagement in police officers: taking a salutogenic perspective, Journal of Public Health, 29(2): 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01112-1


21. Bauer, G, F., Jenny, G. (2016). The Application of Salutogenesis to Organizations, M.B. Mittelmark et al. (eds.), The Handbook of Salutogenesis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04600-6_21


22. Sangroya, D., Kabra, G., Joshi, Y. and Yadav, M. (2020). Green energy management in India for environmental benchmarking: from concept to practice, Management of Environmental Quality, 31(5): 1329-1349. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2019-0237


23. Daneshvari, S., Salatin, P., khalilzadeh, M. (2020). Impact of Renewable Energies on Green Economy. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21(12): 165-179.


24. Baş, H., Eti, S. and Ersin, Q. (2022). Importance of Renewable Energy Investments for Qualified Workforce", Dinçer, H. and Yüksel, S. (Ed.) Multidimensional Strategic Outlook on Global Competitive Energy Economics and Finance, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-898-320221015


25. Arefian, M., Faraji Dizaji, S., ghasemi, S. (2020). Investigating the Role of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy and Economic Growth on Carbon Emission in OECD Countries. new economy and trad, 15(3): 109-137


26. Nguyen, V.C.T. and Le, H.Q. (2022). Renewable energy consumption, nonrenewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Vietnam, Management of Environmental Quality, 33(2): 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2021-0199


27. Chithambaranathan, P., Subramanian, N. and Palaniappan, P.K. (2015). An innovative framework for performance analysis of members of supply chains, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(2): 309-334


28. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make decision: the analytical decision process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1): 9-26


29. Sushil (2009). Interpretive ranking process, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(4): 1-10.


30. Sushil (2017^a), “Multi- criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with a big data framework, Production Planning & Control, 28(11/12): 999-1010


31. Shepley, M, M., Peditto, K., Sachs, N, A., Barankevich, R., Crouppen, G. (2022). Staff and resident perceptions of mental and behavioural health environments, Building Research & Information, 50(1/2): 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.1963653


32. Brick, S. (2022). Improving health in the military and beyond using salutogenic design, Facilities, 40(15/16): 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-06-2021-0058


33. Voordt, T.v.d. and Jensen, P.A. (2021). The impact of healthy workplaces on employee satisfaction, productivity and costs, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-03-2021-0012


34. Roskams, M. and Haynes, B. (2020). Salutogenic workplace design: A conceptual framework for supporting sense of coherence through environmental resources, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 22(2): 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-01-2019-0001


35. Nunstedet, H., Eriksson, M., Obeid, A., Hillström, L., Truong, A., Pennbrant, S. (2020). Salutary factors and hospital work environments: a qualitative descriptive study of nurses in Sweden, BMC Nursing, 19(125): 88-119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00521-y


36. Persson, S, S., Lindström, P, N., Pettersson, P., Andersson, I., Bliomqvist, K. (2019). Relationships between healthcare employees and managers as a resource for well-being at work, Society, Health & Vulnerability, 9(1): 43-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/20021518.2018.1547035


37. Saksvik, P.Ø., Faergestad, M., Fossum, S., Olaniyan, O.S., Indergård, Ø. and Karanika-Murray, M. (2018). An effect evaluation of the psychosocial work environment of a university unit after a successfully implemented employeeship program, International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 11(1): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-08-2017-0065


38. Andervazh, L., Razjoo, R. (2021). Investigating the role of green innovation, green transformational leadership; Green human resource management on environmental performance. Progress and Excellence Research, 4(1): 99-82.


39. Rastgar, A., Keshavarz, M., Rouhani Rad, S., Rouhani Rad, S. (2021). Thinking on Green Transformational Leadership on Environmental Citizenship Behaviors with the Mediating Role of Environmental Beliefs and Green Policies. Environment and Interdisciplinary Development, 6(72): 23-36.


40. Farhadi Nejad, M., Alikarami, S., Abdi, M. (2019). Examining the Impact of Green Transformational Leadership on Green Behaviors Considering the Mediating Role of Environmental Attitudes. Transformation Management Journal, 11(2): 29-52.


41. Pourkarimi, J., Homayeni Demirchi, A., Fakoor, R., Najafpour, Y. (2020). An Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Organizational Creativity on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Innov. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 12(3): 153-182.


42. Cunha, M. P., Rego, A., Clegg, S., & Neves, P. (2013). The case for transcendent followership. Leadership, 9(1): 87–106


43. Zoogah, D. B. (2014). Strategic Followership: How Followers Impact Organizational Effectiveness. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.