ارزيابي اقتصادي اكوسيستم جنگل¬هاي پسته و بادام وحشي با رويكرد ارزش¬گذاري مشروط مبتني بر جامعه روستایی و عشایری(مطالعه موردي: شهرستان بافت)
محورهای موضوعی : اقتصاد محیط زیست
شجاع موسی پور
1
,
ابراهیم مرادی
2
,
یلدا رزاقی
3
1 - فارغ¬التحصیل دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، ایران.
2 - دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، ایران.
کلید واژه: ارزش حفاظتي, مدل لاجيت, جنگل, شهرستان بافت.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: اکوسیستم¬های جنگلی مهم¬ترین ارزش¬های دارایی¬های طبیعی را نشان می¬دهند. ارزشگذاري پایین و نامطلوب جنگل-ها و قلمداد نمودن آن¬ها به منزله کالای رایگان، موجب تخریب و مدیريت ناصحیح جنگل¬ها مي¬شود. جنگل¬هاي پسته وحشي و بادام وحشي از مهم¬ترين جنگل¬هاي استان كرمان مي¬باشند. هدف اين پژوهش برآورد ارزش حفاظتي جنگل¬هاي پسته وحشي(Pistacia terebinthus) و بادام وحشي (Amygdalus scoparia) و ميانگين تمايل به پرداخت خانوار با استفاده از عوامل اقتصادي - اجتماعي، تمايلات زيست محيطي و ديدگاه توريستي مي¬باشد. روش بررسی: اين پژوهش به ارزيابي اقتصادي جنگل¬ها با استفاده از مدل باينري لاجيت با رويكرد ارزش¬گذاري مشروط دوگانه دو حدي پرداخته است. داده¬هاي با استفاده از 172 پرسشنامه از جامعه روستايي و عشايري جمع¬آوري گرديد و براي تخمين مدل از نرم افزارهاي Excel 2013 و Nlogit 5 استفاده شد. یافته‌ها: نتايج نشان داد عواملي اقتصادي - اجتماعي مانند سن، تحصيلات، درآمد و مبلغ پيشنهادي و همچنين، عوامل تمايلات زيست محيطي و ديدگاه توريستي از عوامل موثر بر ارزش حفاظتي و حفاظت از اين اكوسيستم جنگلي مي¬باشند و همچنين، نگرش جامعه محلي از جنگل¬ها مثبت و قابل تامل بود. ميانگين تمايل به پرداخت ارزش¬حفاظتي به روش انتگرال¬گيري عددي 09/16056 تومان به صورت ماهانه براي هر خانوار در سال 1398برآورد شد. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: عواملي مانند سن پايين(جوانان)، خانوار با دارآمد بالا، تحصيلات بيشتر، تمايلات زيست محيطي و ديدگاه¬ توريستي از عوامل موثر بر حفاظت و اهميت جنگل¬ها مي¬باشند. به سياست¬گذاران و برنامه¬ريزان منطقه¬اي پيشنهاد مي¬شود به جوانان جهت مشاركت در امور طرح¬هاي توسعه¬اي و حفاظتي جنگل¬ها توجه ويژه¬اي شود و همچنين، برنامه¬هاي توسعه¬اي و زيست محيطي در جهت افزايش درآمد و افزايش آگاهي و فرهنگ زيست محيطي در برنامه¬هاي خود قرار دهند.
Background and Objective: Forest ecosystems show the most important values of natural assets. Low and unfavorable valuation of forests and considering them as free goods leads to inefficient allocation and mismanagement of forests. Wild pistachio and wild almond forests are among the most important forests in Kerman province. The purpose of this study is to estimate the conservation value of wild pistachio (Pistacia terebinthus) and wild almond (Amygdalus scoparia) forests and the average household willingness to pay using socio-economic factors, environmental inclinations and tourist perspective. Material and Methodology: This study has evaluated the economic evaluation of forests using the logit binary model with a two-dimensional double conditional valuation approach. Data were collected using 172 questionnaires from rural and nomadic communities and Excel 2013 and Nlogit 5 software were used to estimate the model. Findings: The results showed that socio-economic factors such as age, education, income and proposed amount, as well as environmental inclinations and tourist attitudes are factors affecting the conservation value and protection of this forest ecosystem and also the attitude of society. The location of the forests was positive and thought-provoking. The average willingness to pay protection value by numerical integration method was estimated to be 16059.09 Tomans per month for each household in the year 2019. Discussion and Conclusion: Factors such as young age (youth), high-income household, higher education, environmental inclinations and tourism perspective are among the factors affecting the protection and importance of forests. Regional policymakers and planners are encouraged to pay special attention to young people participating in forest development and conservation projects, as well as development and environmental programs in In order to increase income and increase environmental awareness and culture in their plans.
1. Nguyen, M. D., Ancev, T. and Randalla, A., 2020. Forest governance and economic values of forest ecosystem services in Vietnam. Journal Land Use Policy, Vol. 97, pp 1-17.
2. Amirnajad, H. and Khalilian, S., 2006. Estimate the existence value of north forests of Iran using a cotingent valuation method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Vol. 13(2), pp 1-13. (In Persian)
3. Riera, P. P., Mogas, J. and Brey, R., 2013. Using the Contingent Grouping Method to Value Forest Attributes, ISNR Forestry, pp 1-9. doi.org/10.1155/2013/359584
4. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Greene, W. H., 2005. Applied Choice Analysis. A Primer, New York, NY,USA. 150p.
5. Amirnejad, H. and Ataiee Solout, K., 2011. Valuation of environmental resources, First Edition, The avaie masih Publication, pp 290. (In Persian)
6. Ciriacy – Wanterup, S. V., 1947. Capital returns from soil conservation practices, Farm Economics, Vol. 29, pp 1181 – 1196.
7. Davis, R., 1963. The value of outdoor recreation: an economic study of the marine woods, Ph.D. Thesis. Harvard University. 152p
8. Kramer, R. A., Holmes, T. P. and Haefele, M., 2003. Contingent Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Protection, Forests in a Market Economy, Vol. 72, pp 303-320.
9. Kerman province Natural Resources Organization., 2015. Studies of the second stage of Kerman province planning and review of the first stage studies, pp 147-364 (In Persian)
10. Eregae, J., Njogu, P., Rebecca, K. and Gichua, M., 2021. Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, Kenya, International Journal of Forestry Research, Vol. 12, pp 1-12.
11. Jianjun, J., Chong, J. and Lun, L., 2013. The economic valuation of cultivated land protection: A contingent valuation study in Wenling City, China, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 119, pp 158-164.
12. Lee, C. and Han, S., 2002. Estimating the use and preservation value of national parks tourism resources using a contingent valuation method, Tourism management, Vol. 23, pp 531-540.
13. Shojaie, A., Yarali, N., Mafi Gholami, D. and Adeli, K. 2021. Valuation of ecosystem functions and services: Dehdez forest in Iran, Forest Research, Vol. 26: 1-11.
14. Attarroshan, S., Pourrostami, R., Zare, A. and Katebifar, S., 2021. Economic valuation and estimation of willingness to pay for Jahan Nama forest park in Karaj (Iran) using contingent valuation method (CVM), Forest and Poplar Research, Vol. 28(4), pp 382-396. (In Persian)
15. Jafarzadeh, A. A., Mahdavi, A., Falah Shamsi, R. and Yousefpour, R., 2020. Economic evaluation of some of the most important ecosystem services in Zagros Forests, Environmental Sciences, Vol. 18(1), pp 137-150. (In Persian)
16. Amini, A. and Shahbazi, Z., 2015. Estimating the recreational value of oak forest in Sirvan and Chardavol Townships using contingent valuation method (CVM), Journal of Spatial Planning, Vol. 5(1), pp 27-48.(In Persian).
17. Sabouhi, M. and Ataie Solout, K., 2014. The Application of One and One-Half Bound (OOHB) Choices in the Contingent Valuation to Determine Tourists Consumer Surplus of Sisangan Forest Park, Environmental Studies, Vol. 40(2), pp 439-450. (In Persian)
18. McGurk, E., Hynes, S. and Thorne, F., 2020. Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 262, pp 1-10.
19. Cooper, J. C., Hanemann, M. and Signorello, G., 2002. One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous- Choice Contingent Valuation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84 (4), pp 742-750.
20. Haab, T. C. and McConnell, K. E., 2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resourses: the Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 325p.
21. Mousapour, Sh., Ahmadpour, M., Kheikha, A. A., Sasouli, M. R. and Sarani, V., 2017. Estimation of the value of conservation of the Khabr National Park's natural resources from the perspective of villagers and tourists inside the park using willingness to pay, Rural Development Strategies, Vol. 4(1), pp 122-135. (In Persian)
22. Hanemann, M. W., 1985. Some issues in continuous and discrete response contingent valuation studies. North–eastern, journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 14, pp 5–13.
23. International Carbon Sequestration Atlas Project, 2013. Office of the desert, Haraz publications.
24. Mousapour, Sh., 2015. Estimation the willingness to participation of local communities to Khabr national Park Conservation in Baft region, Thesis Master of Science, Department of Agriculture Economic, University of Zabol Iran. 115p. (In Persian)
25. Chhetri, B . B. K., Johnsen, F. H., Konoshima, M. and Yoshimoto, A., 2013. Community forestry in the hills of Nepal: Determinants of user participation in forest management,
Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 30, pp 6–13.
26. Agrawal, A. and Gupta, K., 2005. Decentralization and participation: the governance of common pool resources in Nepal's Terai, World Development, Vol. 33(7), pp 1101–1114.
27. Edwards, D., Jay, M., Jensen, F., Lucas, B., Marzano, M., Montagne, C., Peace, A. and Weiss, G., 2012. Public preferences for structural attributes of forests: towards a pan-European perspective, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 19, pp 12–19.
