ارزش تشخیصی مارکرهای آنزیمی لاکتات دهیدروژناز و آلکالین فسفاتاز شیر برای ورم پستان تحت بالینی در گاوهای شیری

محورهای موضوعی : پاتوبیولوژی مقایسه ای

سعید اکبری علی آباد ¹ , سیده ام البنین قاسمیان ² , سیده زینب پیغمبر زاده ³

1 - گروه دامپزشکی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران.
2 - گروه دامپزشکی، واحد بهبهان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بهبهان، ایران
3 - گروه دامپزشکی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/06/18 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/06/18 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/12/01

کلید واژه: ورم پستان تحت بالینی, لاکتات دهیدروژناز, شمارش سلولهای سوماتیک, آلکالین فسفاتاز, گاو شیری,

چکیده مقاله :

ورم پستان را می توان به روش های مختلفی از جمله تست های فیزیکی، آزمون های بالینی و آزمایشگاهی تشخیص داد. هدف از این مطالعه ارزیابی دقت تشخیص ورم پستان تحت بالینی با استفاده از تست های تشخیصی آنزیمی لاکتات دهیدروژناز و آلکالین فسفاتاز شیر می باشد. در مطالعه حاضر 90 رأس گاو هلشتاین به صورت تصادفی از بین گاوهای پر تولید و کم تولید انتخاب شدند. بر اساس نتیجه تست کالیفرنیایی ورم پستان (CMT)از کارتیه یا کارتیه های مورد نظر 2 نمونه شیر طبق اصول نمونه گیری انجمن ملی ورم پستان امریکا (NMC)اخذ شد. یک نمونه برای کشت میکروبی در نظر گرفته شد و نمونه ی دیگر برای آزمایش لاکتات دهیدروژناز و آلکالین فسفاتاز شیر با استفاده ازکیت های تشخیصی و آزمایش شمارش سلولهای سوماتیک (SCC) استفاده شد. زمانی که کشت میکروبی به عنوان گلد استاندارد تشخیص ورم پستان تحت بالینی در نظر گرفته شد. حساسیت تست SCC ، ALP و LDH به ترتیب 87،3/59 و 4/70 درصد بود. همچنین ویژگی این تست ها به ترتیب 8/77،6/80 و 8/77 درصد بود. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که همبستگی بالایی بین SCC و LDH و ALP وجود دارد. از لحاظ آماری ارتباط معنی داری بین پاسخ LDH و نتیجه تست SCC مشاهده شد که با افزایش درجه SCC درجه پاسخ آنزیم LDH هم افزایش پیدا کرد. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که از لحاظ کارایی تشخیص ورم پستان تحت بالینی در گاو به ترتیب SCC ، LDH وALP بهترین تست ها هستند .

چکیده انگلیسی:

Mastitis could be diagnosed by diverse methods, including physical, clinical, and laboratory tests. The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of subclinical mastitis diagnosis using enzymatic diagnostic tests for milk lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP).  This study was performed on 90 Holstein cows selected randomly out of high- and low-yielding dairy cattle. According to the result of the California Mastitis Test, two milk samples were obtained from the intended udder quarters based on the principles of the National Mastitis Council. One specimen was used for microbial culture and the other one was utilized for somatic cell count (SCC), as well as milk LDH and ALP tests by diagnostic kits. Considering microbial culture as the gold standard for subclinical mastitis diagnosis, the sensitivity of SCC, ALP, and LDH tests was 87%, 59.3%, and 70.4%, respectively. Moreover, the specificity of these tests was 77.8%, 80.6%, and 77.8%, respectively. Our findings revealed a strong correlation between SCC, LDH, and ALP. It was observed that an increase in SCC was accompanied by augmented LDH response. According to the results of the present study, SCC was the most efficient test for diagnosing subclinical mastitis in dairy cows, followed by LDH and ALP.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Pyörälä S. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Veterinary research. 2003;34(5):565-78.


2. Babaei H, Mansouri-Najand L, Molaei M, Kheradmand A, Sharifan M. Assessment of lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase activities in cow’s milk as an indicator of subclinical mastitis. Veterinary research communications. 2007;31(4):419-25.


3. Viguier C, Arora S, Gilmartin N, Welbeck K, O’Kennedy R. Mastitis detection: current trends and future perspectives. Trends in biotechnology. 2009;27(8):486-93.


4. Donovan GA, Risco CA, Shearer JK. Assessment of the mammary system. The Veterinary clinics of North America Food animal practice. 1992;8(2):361-72.


5. Mohammadian B. The effect of subclinical mastitis on lactate dehydrogenase in dairy cows. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2011;3(3):161-3.


6. Andrei S, Matei S, Fit N, Cernea C, Ciupe S, Bogdan S, et al. Glutathione peroxidase activity and its relationship with somatic cell count, number of colony forming units and protein content in subclinical mastitis cows milk. Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 2011;16(3):6209-17.


7. Kalantari A, Safi S, Foroushani AR. Milk lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase as biomarkers in detection of bovine subclinical mastitis. Annals of Biological Research. 2013;4(2):302-7.


8. Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals: Academic press; 2008.


9. Shekari M, Moosavinasab F, Ghasemian O. Diagnostic Value of Milk Total Antioxidant Status (TAS) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) in Cows with Subclinical Mastitis. Journal of Comparative Pathobiology. 2020;17(1):3021-32.


10. Sajadi SS-R, Khoramian B, Azizzadeh M, Farzaneh N. Evaluating the Accuracy of the Diagnosis of Subclinical Mastitis Using Lactate Dehydrogenase-Based Dipsticks. Journal of Veterinary Research. 2021;76(2):260-7.


11. Kitchen BJ. Bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. Journal of Dairy Research. 1981;48(1):167-88.


12. EM Ibtisam EZ, El Owni O, Mohamed G. Correlation of minerals and enzymes in blood serum and milk of healthy and mastitic cows. Research Journal Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2005;1:45-9.


13. Yang FL, Li XS, He BX, Yang Z, Li GH, Liu P, et al. Malondialdehyde level and some enzymatic activities in subclinical mastitis milk. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(28):5534-8.


14. Hiss S, Mueller U, Neu-Zahren A, Sauerwein H. Haptoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase measurements in milk for the identification of subclinically diseased udder quarters. VETERINARNI MEDICINA-PRAHA-. 2007;52(6):245.

15. Batavani R, Asri S, Naebzadeh H. The effect of subclinical mastitis on milk composition in dairy cows. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research. 2007;8(3):205-11.


16. Chagunda MG, Larsen T, Bjerring M, Ingvartsen KL. L-lactate dehydrogenase and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activities in bovine milk as indicators of non-specific mastitis. Journal of Dairy Research. 2006;73(4):431-40.


17. Katsoulos PD, Christodoulopoulos G, Minas A, Karatzia MA, Pourliotis K, Kritas SK. The role of lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase in the diagnosis of subclinical intramammary infections in dairy sheep and goats. Journal of dairy research. 2010;77(1):107-11.


18. NarenjiSani R, Hajigolikhani B, Ahmadi-Hamedani M, Kafshdouzan K. Diagnostic evaluation of milk lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase activities by receiver operating characteristic analysis curve in early lactation of ewes with subclinical mastitis. Veterinary Research Forum, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. 2018;9(4):343 - 8.


19. De Oliveira PVC, Neto EdSL, Lucena NM, Abrantes MR, da Silva JBA, de Azevedo Neto CO, et al. Avaliação da qualidade do leite cru e prevalência de mastite no município de Mossoró-RN. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020;6(8):64027-42.


20. Barbosa CP, Benedetti E, Ribeiro S, Guimarães EC. Relação entre contagem de células somáticas (CCS) e os resultados do “California Mastitis Test”(CMT), no diagnóstico de mastite bovina. Bioscience Journal. 2002;18(1):93-102.


21. Gokceoglu A, Yarim GF, Gultiken N, Yarim M. High epidermal growth factor concentration associated with somatic cell count in milk of cows with subclinical mastitis. Medycyna Weterynaryjna. 2020;76(6): 354-7.


22. Rasouli A, Mosaferi S. Accuracy rate of mastitis on-farm test (udder check) in comparison to somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy herd. J Livestock Sci. 2017;8:191-5.


23. Ahmed LI, Fahim KM. Research Article Incidence of Subclinical Mastitis with Special Reference to Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Enzyme as a Biomarker. 2018.


24. Guha A, Gera S, Sharma A. Evaluation of milk trace elements, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase activity of subclinical mastitis as and indicator of subclinical mastitis in riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences. 2012;25(3):353.


25. Singh M, Sharma A, Mittal D, Yadav P, Charaya G. Assessment of lactate dehydrogenase enzyme activity in milk as a marker for detection of subclinical mastitis. Journal of Animal Research. 2016;6(2):293-6.


26. Tabatabaee N, Heidarpour M, Khoramian B. Milk metabolites, proteins and oxidative stress markers in dairy cows suffering from Staphylococcus aureus subclinical mastitis with or without spontaneous cure. Journal of Dairy Research. 2021;88(3):326-9.


27. Zeinhom M, Abed A, Hashem K. A contribution towards milk enzymes, somatic cell count and bacterial pathogens associated with subclinical mastitis cows milk. Assiut Vet Med J. 2013;59(138):38-48.


28. Hassan M, Yousif A. Evaluation of some biochemical indices in" milk whey" for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis caused by some Enterobacteriaceae family. Mirror of Research in Veterinary Sciences and Animals. 2014;3(1):1-7.


29. Tyagi A, Arora R, Rajora V, Arora N. Evaluation of antioxidant profile in subclinical mastitis in dairy buffaloes. ‏ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2020;8(5)::2256-9.


30. Amiri P, Fallah Rad AH, Heidarpour M, Azizzadeh M, Khoramian B. Diagnostic accuracy of milk oxidation markers for detection of subclinical mastitis in early lactation dairy cows. Comparative Clinical Pathology. 2020;29(1):95-101.


31. Koskinen M, Holopainen J, Pyörälä S, Bredbacka P, Pitkälä A, Barkema H, et al. Analytical specificity and sensitivity of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for identification of bovine mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92(3):952-9.