ارایه روشی برایTOPSIS فازی با اعمال اصل گسترش"زاده
محورهای موضوعی : آمار
1 - گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد قم، قم، ایران
کلید واژه: Ideal, Maximal, TOPSIS, fuzzy, Extension principle (Zade),
چکیده مقاله :
فرایند TOPSISیکی از جامع ترین سیستم های طراحی شده برای تصمیم گیری با معیارهای چندگانه است زیرا این تکنیک امکان فرموله کردن مساله را به صورت ماتریس تصمیم فراهم میکند و همچنین امکان در نظر گرفتن معیار های مختلف کمی و کیفی را در مساله دارد. به روشهای TOPSIS فازی موجود ایرادات اساسی وارد است که باعث میشود مفاهیم تصمیم در این روشهاکمرنگ شوند از جمله این اشکالات می توان به عدم دقت لازم در محاسبات فازی اشاره داشت و علت آن عدم استفاده از اصل گسترش "زاده " در تعریف اپراتورها ست.به عنوان مثال ضرب دو عدد فازی مثلثی الزاما فازی مثلثی نخواهد بود.لکن در عمده روشهای TOPSISفازی اینگونه فرض شده است . در این مقاله تلاش می شود ابتدا تعریف بردار ایده آل وضدایده آل فازی بیان گردد سپس برای تحقق این منظور دو تابع طراحی میشود سپس بهینه این توابع به کمک GA یافت می گردد. همه مراحل بر اساس اصل زاده است.
The TOPSIS process is one of the most comprehensive systems designed for decision making with multiple criteria, since this technique enables formulation of the problem as decision matrix, as well as the possibility of considering different quantitative and qualitative criteria in the problem. Fuzzy TOPSIS methods have been introduced to make fundamental decisions that make decisions decisions in these ways, including the lack of precision in fuzzy calculations, which can be attributed to the lack of use of the principle of "Zadeh” in the definition of operators. For example, the multiplication of two triangular fuzzy numbers will not necessarily be triangular fuzzy. However, in most of the fuzzy TOPSIS methods, this is assumed. In this paper, we attempt to first define the ideal vector of false algebra, then two functions are designed for this purpose, then the optimal of these functions can be found using GA. All steps are based on the principle of "Zadeh”".
[1] Hwang C.L, Yoon K. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and applications. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer.
[2] Ching-Lai Hwang, Young-Jou Lai, Ting-Yun Liu A new approach for multiple objective decision making, Computers & Operations Research, Volume 20, Issue 8, October 1993, Pages 889–899.
[3] Liang G.S, Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti ideal concept , European Journal of Operational Research ,112, 1999, Pages 682–691.
[4] Chen C.T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems.
[5] M.S. Osman, M.A. Abo-Sinna A.H. Amer,O.E. Emam, A multi-level non-linear multi-objective decision-making under fuzziness, Applied Mathematics and Computation Volume 153, Issue 1, 25 May 2004, Pages 239–252.
[6] Jahanshahloo G.R., Hosseynzade L.F Izadikhah M., Extenssion of the method for decision making problem with fuzzy data, Appl Math Comput 181 2006p. 1544_1555.
[7] Wang Y.J, Lee H.S. Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decisionmaking. An International Journal Computing and Mathematics with Applications.
[8] Ta-Chung Chu, Yi-Chen Lin, An interval arithmetic based fuzzy TOPSIS model, Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 36, Issue 8, October 2009, Pages 10870–10876.
[9] Ting-Yu Chen, Interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method with leniency reduction and an experimental analysis, Applied Soft Computing, Volume 11, Issue 8, December 2011, Pages 4591–4606.
[10] Ting-Yu Chen, Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: Discussions on score functions and weight constraints, Applications, Volume, 1 February 2012, Pages 1848–1861.
[11] Young-Jou Lai, Ting-Yun Liu, Ching-Lai Hwang, TOPSIS for MODM, European Journal of Operational Research Volume 76, Issue 3, 11 August 1994, Pages 486–500.
[12] Akram Zouggari, Lyes Benyouce, Simulation based fuzzy TOPSIS approach for group multi-criteria supplier selection problem, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,Volume 25, Issue 3, April 2012, Pages 507–519.
[13] Metin Celik, Selcuk Cebi, Cengiz Kahraman, I.Deha Er, Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network, Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 36, Issue 3, Part 1, April 2009, Pages 4541–4557.
[14] Renato A. Krohling, Vinicius C. Campanharo, Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea, Expert Systems with Applications,Volume 38, Issue 4, April 2011, Pages 4190–4197.
[15] Bhattacharya U., Rao J.R., Tiwari R.N.1992, Fuzzy multi-criteria facility location problem.Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 51, No.3, PP. 277-287.
[16] Triantphyllou E, Lin C.T. Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multi attribute. decision making methods. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning.
]17[ رساله دکتری رضا کارگر استاد راهنما فرهاد حسینزاده و... دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات دانشکده علوم پایه زمستان 92.
]18[ محمد جواد اصغر پور، تصمیمگیریهای چند معیاره انتشارات دانشگاه تهران چاپ ششم 1387.
