Explaining the Methods of Architecture Representation Using Semiotic Analysis (Umberto Eco's Theory of Architecture Codes)
محورهای موضوعی : Urban DesignSeyed Mojtaba Shojaee 1 , Seyed Ali Akbar Saremi 2
1 - Ph.D student of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad Universty, Tehran Center Branch, Tehran, Iran/
2 - Associated Professor of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad Universty, Tehran Center Branch, Tehran, Iran.
کلید واژه: Architectural representation, Semiotics, Imitation and mimesis, Abstraction, Simulation,
چکیده مقاله :
: In this paper, it is tried to explain the concept of representation and architectural representation through a qualitative methodology, approach its procedure for gradual creation in architecture and then according to scholars and to obtain the effect of this concept in the process of architectural facts the concepts are presented. In addition, it is referred to theories and practical texts by philosophers, and archaeologists and architects who have spoken about the architectural representation, and its definitions are also provided from the perspective of semiotics. Then through a deductive view aiming to clarify the fundamental differences between types of architectural representation and according to the presented ideas, three fundamental roles in the representation of architecture as mimesis and imitation, architectural representation as abstraction and architectural representation as simulation are described and examples are cited for each of them. In the end, by a qualitative methodology and with an interpretive approach using the theory of Umberto Eco in architectural codes, the comparative tables are provided, and to clarify the relationship between the three methods of representation and the procedure of their ideas on the formation of the architectural reality are analyzed through the semiotic approach. Finally, these comparative tables are separately classified in three groups of three so a variety of architectural representation techniques in diverse historical periods in architecture are explained as a result of this research.
Akin, O., & Weinel, E. F. (1982). Representation and architecture.silver Spring, MD: Information Dynamics.
Archer, I. )1971(. Nabdam compounds, northern Ghana. in P.Oliver (ed.), Shelter in Africa London: Barrie & Jenkins.
Batteux, C.) 1746(. Les Beaux-arts réduits à un même principle. James O. Young(tr.), 2015. The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle, Oxford University Press.
Bazargan, A. (2008). Preface on Qualitative and mixed research Method (Common approaches in Behavioral Sciences).Tehran: Didar Publications (In Persian).
Berger, A. A.(2010). Media analysis techniques. Parviaz Edjlali (Tr), Tehran: Bureau of media studies and planning Ministry of culture and Islamic Guidance publications (In Persian).
Blaser, W. (1994). Mies van der Rohe: the art of structure (No. 72Mies). Watson-Guptill Publishers.
Broadbent, J. (2009). About Architecture. Niloufar Razavi and Hedieh Nourbakhsh and Keyvan JourabChi (Tr), Tehran. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Publications (In Persian).
Burr, V. )1995(. An introduction to social Constructivism. London: Sage Publishers.
Burtt, E. A. (1990). The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. A Historical and Critical Essay, Abdolkarim Soroush (Tr).Tehran: Cultural studies and researches Institute Publications (In Persian).
Chandler, D. (2007). The basic Semiotics. Mehdi Parsa (Tr).Tehran: Soure-ye- Mehr Publications (In Persian).
Constantin, C., Mordant, D., & Simonin, D. (1997). La Culture de Cerny, Nouvelle économie, nouvelle société au Néolithique. Vol. 6, Mémoires du Musée de Préhistoire d Ile-de-France. Actes du 6e colloque international de Nemours 9-11 mai 1994.
De la puerta, J. M. )1997(. El croquis, proyecto y arquitectura. The Sketch, Project and Architecture Madrid: Celeste.
De Sesour, F. (1995), Public Linguistics, Kourosh Safavi (Tr), Tehran, Hermes Publications(In Persian).
Dehkhoda, A. A. (1994). Persian Dictionary. 2nd,Vol, Tehran: Tehran University Publications(In Persian).
Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc.
Eco, O. (2014). La production the signs(2007). Pirouz Izadi (Tr). Tehran: Sales Publications (In Persian).
Eco, U. (1980). ‘Functional and sign: the semiotics of architecture’, in J.Broadbent, R. Bunt and C.Jencks (eds), Signs, Symbols and Architecture, Wiley: Chichester.Edwards, I.E.S. (1947) The Pyramids of Egypt, West Drayton: Penguin.
Frampton, K. (2007). Modern Architecture /A Critical History. Thames and Hudson Publisher.
Gebauer, G. & Wulf, Ch. (1996). Mimesis: Culture, Art, Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Harbison, R. (2009). Travels in the history of architecture. Reaktion Books.
Heidegger, M. (2014). Phenomenology of Technology and Freedom Ontology. Frazi Salimi and Motahhareh Salimi (Tr). Tehran: Asr-e-Modern Publications (In Persian).
Hodder, I. (1984). Burials, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic. in D. Miller and C.Tilley (eds), Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jarzombek, M. M. (2013). Architecture of first societies: A global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
Jokilehto, J. I. (1986). A history of architectural conservation: the contribution of English, French, German and Italian thought towards an international approach to the conservation of cultural property (Doctoral dissertation, University of York).
Laugier, M. A., & Wale, S. (1755). An Essay on Architecture: In which Its True Principles are Explained, and Invariable Rules Proposed, for Directing the Judgement and Forming the Taste of the Gentleman and the Architect... T. Osborne and Shipton.
Madrazo, L. (1994). Durand and the Science of Architecture. Journal of Architectural Education, 48(1), 12-24.
Mallgrave, H. F. (2005). Architectural theory.
Naumann, F. M., & Duchamp, M. (1982). Affectueusement, Marcel: Ten Letters from Marcel Duchamp to Suzanne Duchamp and Jean Crotti. Archives of American Art Journal, 22(4), 3-19.
Pérez-Gómez, A., & Pelletier, L. (1992). Architectural representation beyond perspectivism. Perspecta, 27, 21-39.
Rapoport, E.(2005). The meaning of built environment. Farah Habib (Tr). Tehran: ICT Organization of Tehran Municipality Publications(In Persian).
Shafiee Kadkani, M. R. (2001). Imagery in Persian Poetry. 8th Vol, Tehran: Agaah Publications (In Persian).
Simitch, A., & Warke, V. (2014). The language of architecture: 26 principles every architect should know. Rockport Pub.
Smith, K. S. (2005). Architects' Drawings, A Selection of Sketches by World Famous Architects Through History. Elsevier.
Sojoudi, F. (2011). Practical Semiotics, Tehran, Elm Publications (In Persian).
University of Reading. (2008). Perspectiva Pictorum et Architectorum, Andrea Pozzo. Gooding, Ruth. Andrea Pozzo, Rules and examples of perspective proper for painters and architects. Retrieved from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Perspectiva_Pictorum_et_Architectorum_5.jpg, 23/10/2016.
Voloshinov, V. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Harvard University Press.
Weinel, F. E. (1982). Endnote: representation and architecture: Why?. In Representation and Architecture. Information Dynamic Inc Maryland.
Young, J.O. (2015). The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
