The Influences of Physical Features of Space on Sense of Place (Case study: Prayer Rooms of Mehrabad International Airport)
محورهای موضوعی : Urban DesignMohammadjavad Abbaszadeh 1 , Saba Sultan Qurraie 2 , Azadeh Mohajer Milani 3
1 - M.A., School of Architecture, University College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.
2 - M.A., School of Architecture, University College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.
3 - Ph.D. Candidate of Architecture, School of Architecture, University College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.
کلید واژه: Physical features, Sense of place, Prayer room, signs, Decoration, activity,
چکیده مقاله :
Sense of place is the most important features of space for designers in relation between human and environment, although key theories of the mid-twentieth century have shown that some social and psychological factors are more effective than physical characteristics but in this research, the focus is on the physical features of space. Many researchers have been analyzed Physical features and its influence on human life in recent years. The aim of this paper is to focus on perception of users from prayer room. In other word, the objective of this paper is to find most effective features of a space that are key factors regarding physical attributes. The main question here is what are these features? Moreover, how much is their influence on sense of place? Furthermore, the attitudes and opinions of users were surveyed with the help of questionnaire and the result was calculated with SPSS. Finally, the results summarized in a form of tables show that gender and age are not major or effective factors in sense of place in prayer room. Signs, decoration and activities of prayers are among main elements of identity in prayer rooms. Overall, the result shows that physical features of spaces do not have a great influence on sense of place.
Abbaszadeh, M.J. (2013). Designing a prayer room, case study: Prayer room of terminal 4 in Mehrabad international airport. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Tehran, Iran
Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (1992). Place attachment In I. Altman & S. Low, Human behavior and environments: Advances in theory and research (Vol.12). New York: Plenum Press.
Canter, D. (1977a). The psychology of place.The University of Michigan: Architectural Press.
Canter, D. (1977b). Book review of E. Relph, ‘Place and placelessness’. Environment and Planning B, 4, 118-120.
Canter, D. (1997). The facets of place. In Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods, Research, and Utilization (pp. 109-147). Springer US.
Carmona, M. (2010). Public places-urban spaces. Routledge.
Falahat, M. (2005). The role of physical design in mosque's sense of space. Fine Arts, 22(35), 4.
Falahat, M. (2006). The sense of space and its factors. Fine Arts, 26(57), 6.
Groat, L. (1995). Introduction: Place, aesthetic evaluation and home.In L.Groat (Ed.), Giving places meaning (1-25).New York: Academic.
Gustafson, P. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 5-16.
Hashemnezhad, H., Heidari, A. A., & Mohammad Hoseini, P. (2013). Sense of Place” and “Place Attachment. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 3(1), 5-12.
Holt-Jensen, A. (1999). Geography-History and Concepts: A Student's Guide. London: Sage Publication
Jackson, J. B. (1994). A sense of time, a sense of place. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owner’s attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233-248.
Lin, C. C., & Lockwood, M. (2014). Forms and sources of place attachment: Evidence from two protected areas. Geoforum, 53, 74-81.
Lukermann, F. (1964). Geography as a formal intellectual discipline and the way in which it contributes to human knowledge. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 8(4), 167-172.
Marcus, C. C. (1974). The house as symbol of self. Dowden: Hutchinson & Ross.
Motalebi, G. (2006). Recognition the Relationship between Form and Function. Fine Arts, 25(25),55-64.
Poursoleiman, Z. (2012). An Investigation on Elements Creating Sense of Place in Historical Site of Babol. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 2(3), 13-22.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness (Vol. 67). London: Pion.
Relph, E. (1987). Book review of D. Canter 'the psychology of place'. Environment and planning A, 10, 237-238.
Salvesen, D. (2002). The making of place. Urban Land, 61(7), 36-41.
Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347-358.
Sime, J. D. (1986). Creating places or designing spaces?, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1), 49-63.
Stedman, R. C. (2003). Sense of place and forest science: Toward a program of quantitative research. Forest Science, 49(6), 822-829.
Steele, F. (1981). The sense of place(Vol. 87). Boston: CBI Publishing Company Boston.
Tuan, Y.F. (1974). Topophilia. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliff NJ.
Tuan, Y.F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience.Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
Wynveen, C., Kyle, G., Sutton, S., (2012). Natural area visitors’ place meaning and place attachment ascribed to a marine setting. J. Environ. Psychol. 32 (4), 287–296.
Zia, A., Norton, B. G., Metcalf, S. S., Hirsch, P. D., & Hannon, B. M. (2014). Spatial discounting, place attachment, and environmental concern: Toward an ambit-based theory of sense of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 283-29.
