Comparison of Methods for Participation of Vulnerable Children in Neighborhood Rehabilitation (Case Studies: Tehran’s Southern Neighborhoods)
محورهای موضوعی : Urban DesignBehnaz Aminzadeh 1 , Mehrnaz Attaran 2
1 - Associate Professor, University College of Fine Arts, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
2 - M.A in Urban Design, University College of Fine Arts, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Vulnerable Children, Participatory Methods, Urban Rehabilitation, Tehran’s Southern Neighborhood,
چکیده مقاله :
Due to the poor social and economic conditions of vulnerable children's families, vulnerable children experience urbanspaces for work and play more than other children. Although these children gain a solid understanding of urban spaces,which can be used in the process of designing desirable urban spaces in their neighborhoods, they are less considered insuch projects. Thus, the methodology for the participation of vulnerable children is not developed well to be suited fortheir involvement in urban rehabilitation. This study examined the application of various qualitative methods to find thesuitability of each method for vulnerable children participation in the urban rehabilitation, such as drawing, interview,visiting site and writing essays complemented with drawings, if desired. The results of the study in Tehran’s southernneighborhoods reveal that certain group interviews and site visiting with these children could be more beneficial ascompared to other participation methods. This is due to a number of factors including better verbal skills as comparedto writing and drawing capabilities. Further, studies show that the participation of vulnerable children requires suitablemeasures to obtain their trust and encourage participation. None-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) can play asignificant role in this.
Archambault, C. S., de Laat, J., & Zulu, E. M. (2012). Urban Services and Child Migration to the Slums of Nairobi. World development, 40(9), 1854-1869.
Bademci, H. Ö. (2012). ‘Working with vulnerable children’: Listening to the views of the service providers working with street children in Istanbul. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 725-734.
Bechtel, B.R. Marans, W.R., & Michelson, W. (1987). Methods In Environmental and Behavioral Research. New York: VAN Nostr and Reinhold Company.
Blakely, K. S. (1994). Parents' conceptions of social dangers to children in the urban environment. Children's Environments, 16-25.
Castonguay, G., & Jutras, S. (2009). Children's appreciation of outdoor places in a poor neighborhood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 101-109.
Davar, Z. (2007). Investigation of the Government Actions on Children Rights. Child Rights. Proceedings of the Conference in Children Rights. July 1-2 (pp.217-218), Iran: University of Tehran
Driskell, D.(2002).Creating Better Cities with Children and Youth: a Manual for Participation. UK. UNESCO Publishing.
Gleeson, B., & Sipe, N. (2006). Creating Child Friendly Cities. London and New York: Routledge
Haghi, H., & Zabihi, H. (2012). Social and Cultural Sustainability. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 2(4), 31-38.
Halseth, G., & Doddridge, J. (2000). Children's cognitive mapping: a potential tool for neighbourhood planning. Environment and planning B, 27(4), 565-582.
Kamel-Nia, H., & Haghir, S. (2009). Design patterns of urban green spaces in child-friendly cities: the case of Bam city.Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 12, 77-88.
Lapan, D.S. Quartaroli, T.M., & Riemer, J.F. (2012).Qualitative Research: An Introduction to Methods and Designs. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons
Mayo, M. (2001). Children’s and young people’s participation in development in the South and in urban regeneration in the North. Progress in Development Studies, 1(4), 279-293.
Mitchell, H., Kearns, R. A., & Collins, D. C. (2007). Nuances of neighbourhood: children’s perceptions of the space between home and school in Auckland, New Zealand. Geoforum, 38(4), 614-627.
Moztarzadeh, H., Mofidi Shemirani, S. M., & Hodjati, V. (2013). Explaining theComponents of Sustainability in Urban Communities. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 3(2), 67-74.
Othman, S., & Said, I. (2012). Affordances of cul-de-sac in urban neighborhoods as play spaces for middle childhood children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 38, 184-194.
Racelis, M., Aguirre, A. D. M., Pena-Alampay, L., Etemadi, F. U., Fernandez, T. B., Fernandez, R. M., ... & Reyes, C. P. (2006). Making Philippine Cities Child Friendly: voices of children in poor communities (No. innins06/25). UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre
Shokoohi, R. Noor Rosly, H., & Md Dali, M. (2012). Children walking to and from School in Tehran: Associations with Neighborhood Safety, Parental Concerns and Children’s Perceptions. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific International Conference on Environment-Behavior Studies, December 7-9 (pp 315-323). Malaysia: University of Technology.
Spencer, C., & Blades, M. (2006). Children and their Environments. New York: Cambridge University Press
Stephens, C. (2012). Urban inequities; urban rights: a conceptual analysis and review of impacts on children, and policies to address them. Journal of urban health, 89(3), 464-485
UNICEF, (2011). Report on the Progress of the 2007 Program. Tehran: The Center for UNICEF in Iran
Wolff, Lisa. (2009).Child-Friendly Cities, Cities Fit for Children Summit. UNICEF Canada (British Columbia): Langley
Young, L. (2004). Journeys to the street: the complex migration geographies of Ugandan street children. Geoforum, 35(4), 471-488.
