Deleuze's Philosophy and its Impact on Late 20th Century Architectural Theory: A Study of ANY Magazine
محورهای موضوعی : Architecture
Ehsan Kakhani
1
,
Zohreh Tafazzoli
2
1 - Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
کلید واژه: ANY Magazine, Bruno Latour, Autonomy of Architecture, Architectural Theory, Gilles Deleuze,
چکیده مقاله :
Throughout history, the relationship between architecture and philosophy has been intricately intertwined. In the 1990s, architectural theory witnessed a significant influx of theoretical and critical debates influenced by French philosophy. This scholarly article delves into the intricate connection between architecture and philosophy, specifically focusing on transforming architectural discourse from theoretical and critical debates by French philosophy to an antitheoretical standpoint. Emphasizing the emergence of (neo-)pragmatism within architectural theory, it closely examines the pivotal role played by translating philosophical concepts, particularly those derived from the works of Deleuze and Guattari, in this paradigm shift. Employing a research methodology centered around thematic analysis, the study explores the multifaceted relationship between architecture and philosophy, shedding light on Deleuze's philosophical framework as evident in the publications of the esteemed Anyone Corporation. The theoretical framework serves as a lens through which the difference, transformation, and change within the translation of Deleuze's ideas into architectural theory are meticulously examined. The findings conclude that architects selectively incorporate certain significant tenets from Deleuze's philosophy, such as smooth spaces, the fold, and the diagram. Furthermore, while the interaction between philosophy and architecture fosters fruitful exchanges, it also gives rise to criticisms for instrumentalizing philosophy and utilizing buzzwords without fully grasping their intended contexts. Ultimately, this article underscores architecture and philosophy's reciprocal dependence and interconnectedness as distinct yet interdependent disciplines, emphasizing the significance of transdisciplinarity and disciplinary constitution.
Throughout history, the relationship between architecture and philosophy has been intricately intertwined. In the 1990s, architectural theory witnessed a significant influx of theoretical and critical debates influenced by French philosophy. This scholarly article delves into the intricate connection between architecture and philosophy, specifically focusing on transforming architectural discourse from theoretical and critical debates by French philosophy to an antitheoretical standpoint. Emphasizing the emergence of (neo-)pragmatism within architectural theory, it closely examines the pivotal role played by translating philosophical concepts, particularly those derived from the works of Deleuze and Guattari, in this paradigm shift. Employing a research methodology centered around thematic analysis, the study explores the multifaceted relationship between architecture and philosophy, shedding light on Deleuze's philosophical framework as evident in the publications of the esteemed Anyone Corporation. The theoretical framework serves as a lens through which the difference, transformation, and change within the translation of Deleuze's ideas into architectural theory are meticulously examined. The findings conclude that architects selectively incorporate certain significant tenets from Deleuze's philosophy, such as smooth spaces, the fold, and the diagram. Furthermore, while the interaction between philosophy and architecture fosters fruitful exchanges, it also gives rise to criticisms for instrumentalizing philosophy and utilizing buzzwords without fully grasping their intended contexts. Ultimately, this article underscores architecture and philosophy's reciprocal dependence and interconnectedness as distinct yet interdependent disciplines, emphasizing the significance of transdisciplinarity and disciplinary constitution.
Asada, A. (1997). Jury Discussion. ANY, 19/20, 34. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/45048867
Bachmann-Medick, D. (2012). Travelling Concepts for the Study of Culture. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bachmann-Medick, D. (2016). Cultural Turns. New Orientations in the Study of Culture. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bal, M. (2002). Traveling Concepts in the Humanities. A Rough Guide, Toronto
Benjamin, A. (1989). Eisenman and the Housing of Tradition. Oxford Art Journal, 1, 47. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1360266
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Czarniawska, B. (2014). Bruno Latour: An Accidental Organization Theorist. In P. Adler, P. D. Gay, G. Morgan, & M. Reed (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dal Co, F. (1991). In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anyone (pp. 133). New York: ANY.
Danailov, A. (2019). The Emancipation of the Intermediary. The Other Reality of the Architectural Form in the Work of Peter Eisenman. Visual Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.54664/jokl4138
Davidson, C. C. (1993). Dear Reader. ANY, 0, 4-5. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41845566
De Michelis, M. (2018). Manfredo Tafuri and the death of architecture. In G. P. a. G. T. Teresa Stoppani (Ed.), This Thing Called Theory. New York: Routledge.
de Sola-Morales, I. (1995). Differences. Massachusetts: MIT Publication.
Deleuze, G. (1992). The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Minnesota Univ Of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. G., Félix. (1993). A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, J. (1991). Jacques Derrida. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anyone (pp. 90). New York: ANY.
Draude, A. (2017). Translation in motion: a concept’s journey towards norm diffusion studies. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 2(5), 588-605. doi:10.1080/23802014.2017.1436984
During, É. (2001). Blackboxing in Theory: Deleuze versus Deleuze. In L. Cohen (Ed.), (pp. 163–189).
Editors. (1986). About Assemblage. Assemblage, 1, 4-5. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3171050
Eisenman, P. (1991). Unfolding Frankfurt. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Eisenman, P. (1993). Alteka Office Building. Architectural Design, 3/4(102), 28.
Eisenman, P. (1995). Discussion 1. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anyplace (pp. 43). New York: Any Corporation.
Eisenman, P. (1999). Diagram Diaries. New York: THAMES HUDSON.
Eisenman, P. (2001). Making the Cut. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anything (pp. 260 -263). New York: ANY.
Evers, B. F. A. (2019). Architectural Theory: From the Renaissance to the Present: Taschen.
Fischer, O. W. (2015). Anyone Corporation: Architecture Anyone? A Non-profit and the Traveling Circus of Theory. In G. Borasi (Ed.), The Other Architect. Another Way of Building Architecture (pp. 408). Montréal
Foucault, M. (1976). Discipline and Punish. The birth of the prison: Frankfurt.
Frichot, H. (2020). Infrastructural affects Challenging the autonomy of architecture. In M. F. Jobst, Hélène (Ed.), Architectural Affects after Deleuze and Guattari: Routledge.
Frichot, H. S., Loo. (2013). Deleuze and Architecture: Edinburgh University Press.
Heynen, H. (2020). Meaning and Effect: Revisiting Semiotics in Architecture. In H. A. Heynen, Loeckx (Ed.), The Figure of Knowledge Conditioning Architectural Theory, 1960s – 1990s: Leuven University Press.
Isozaki, A. (1991). In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anyone (pp. 89). New York: Anyone Corporation.
Jobst, M. F., Hélène. (2020). Introduction. In M. F. Jobst, Hélène (Ed.), Architectural Affects after Deleuze and Guattari: Routledge.
Jormakka, K. (2008). Lecture script "Architectural Theory." Weimar Bauhaus University Weimar WS
Juel-Christiansen, C. (1993). The Anhalter Folding. Architectural Design, 3/4(102), 39.
Karatani, K. (1995). Architecture as Metaphor Language, Number, Money (S. Kohso, Trans.). New York: The MIT Press.
Kipnis, J. (2007). Introduction: Act Two. In P. Eisenman (Ed.), Written into the Void. Selected Writings 1990-2004 (pp. xxvii). New Haven.
Köhler, E. C. (2020). Of Culture Wars and the Clash of Civilizations in Prehistoric Egypt – an Epistemological Analysis. Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant, 17-58. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27045075
Kwinter, S. (1992). Emergence: or the Artificial Life of Space. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anywhere (pp. 162-171). New York.
Kwinter, S. (1997). FFE. Infrared, the Treason of Language, and the Failure of the Geometric Imagination. ANY, 19/20, 6–7. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/45048850
Kwinter, S. (2011). Foreword. In S. Brott (Ed.), Architecture for a Free Subjectivity Deleuze and Guattari at the Horizon of the Real (pp. 19). New York: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1991). The Powers of Association. In J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Livesey, G. (2015). Deleuze and Guattari on Architecture. New York: Routledge.
Lotringer, S. (2001). Doing Theory. In S. C. Sylvere Lotringer (Ed.), French Theory in America (pp. 132). New York: Routledge.
Lynn, G. (1993b). INeffective DESCRIPTions: SUPPLEmental LINES. In P. Eisenman (Ed.), Re:working Eisenman (pp. 100). London Peter Eisenman.
Lynn, G. (1995a). Forms of Expression. The Proto-functional Potential of Diagrams in Architectural Design. El Croquis, 72.1, 24.
Lynn, G. (1995b). The Well Conference. ANY, 10, 27. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41847839
Massumi, B. (1987). Translator's Foreword: Pleasures of Philosophy. In D. Guattari (Ed.), A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia (pp. xv). Minneapolis.
Moneo, R. (2001). In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anything (pp. 122). New York: ANY.
Ockman, J. (1988). Resurrecting the Avant-Garde. The History and Program of Oppositions. In B. Colomina (Ed.), Architecture production. Revisions 2, (pp. 192). New York/NY.
Parr, A. (2013). Politics + Deleuze + Guattari + Architecture. In S. L. Helene Frichot (Ed.), Deleuze and Architecture (pp. 197- 214). EDINBURGH EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS.
Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the Contact Zone. Profession, 34. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25595469
Rajchman, J. (1998). In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anyhow (pp. 254). New York: ANY.
Spencer, D. (2011). Architectural Deleuzism. Neoliberal Space, Control and the »Univer-city. Radical Philosophy(168), 9-21.
Tafuri, M. (1980). Theories and History of Architecture. New York.
Tarasova, I. V. (2020). ON THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING A HISTORY OF THEORETICAL ARCHITECTURAL THOUGHT. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.47055/1990-4126-2020-4%2872%29-3
Thiele, K. (2016). Of Immanence and Becoming: Deleuze and Guattari's Philosophy and/as Relational Ontology. Deleuze Studies, 10(1), 117-134. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/45331864
Vidler, A. (2002). Warped Space Art, Architecture, and Anxiety in Modern Culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
