Investigating the Level of Acoustic Comfort in Contemporary Apartments based on Standards and the Existing Situation (Case Study: Tabriz City)
محورهای موضوعی : ArchitectureMohammad Javad Abbaszadeh 1 , Ramin Madani 2 , Abbas Ghaffari 3
1 - Ph.D., Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
3 - Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, tabriz islamic art university, Tabriz, Iran.
کلید واژه: Noise, Acoustical Comfort, Tabriz, Urban space, Apartment,
چکیده مقاله :
The extant study aimed to analyze the acoustic comfort situation in contemporary apartments based on urban spaces in Tabriz, Iran. This study was conducted using a quantitative method within the field survey at two levels of the questionnaire (perceptual situation) and field measurements (acoustical condition). The researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data in the first step. Architecture experts approved the validity of the questionnaire; its reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha (0.926). All experiments associated with airborne noise field measurements (background sound and sound pressure level) were done using 2260Investigator. First, background noise was measured in two open and closed windows inside the considered residential units. In the next step, sound pressure level (SPL) Figures were plotted using level rate and sound standard in different plan spaces. Ultimately, the authors assessed noise criteria and their difference with sound levels. The results indicated the undeniable effect of traffic, among other variables of acoustic comfort, on dissatisfaction caused by noise in urban areas of Tabriz. This effect was not only definite but also so significant that there was no change in patterns emerging in noise level, even based on the SPL measurements.
Anoop, C. K., Noor, N., James, M., Paul, P. N., & Harikrishnan, R. (2018). Technological and green solutions for rural house construction. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 5(4), 2291–2293.
Ayr, U., Cirillo, E., Fato, I., & Martellotta, F. (2003). A new approach to assessing the performance of noise indices in buildings. Applied Acoustics, 64(2), 129–145.
Bluhm, G., Nordling, E., & Berglind, N. (2004). Road traffic noise and annoyance-An increasing environmental health problem. Noise and Health, 6(24), 43.
Botteldooren, D., Dekoninck, L., & Gillis, D. (2011). The influence of traffic noise on appreciation of the living quality of a neighborhood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(3), 777–798.
Commins, D. E. (1978). Classes of acoustical comfort in housing. INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 631–636.
Coverings, F. (2005). Measurement of Walking Noise on Floor Coverings. 22(1), 1–28.
Davis, M. J. M., Tenpierik, M. J., Ramírez, F. R., & Pérez, M. E. (2017). More than just a Green Facade: The sound absorption properties of a vertical garden with and without plants. Building and Environment, 116, 64–72.
Dien, H. H. El, & Woloszyn, P. (2005). The acoustical influence of balcony depth and parapet form : experiments and simulations. 66, 533–551.
Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A., & Öhrström, E. (2007). Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(2–3), 115–126.
Grimwood, C. (1997). Complaints about poor sound insulation between dwellings in england and wales. Applied Acoustics, 52(3–4), 211–223.
Guarnaccia, C. (2013). Advanced tools for traffic noise modelling and prediction. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 12(2), 121–130.
Guski, R. (1999). Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise and Health, 1(3), 45.
Hongisto, V., Mäkilä, M., & Suokas, M. (2015). Satisfaction with sound insulation in residential dwellings–The effect of wall construction. Building and Environment, 85, 309–320.
Hurrell, A. I., Horoshenkov, K. V., & Pelegrinis, M. T. (2018). The accuracy of some models for the airflow resistivity of nonwoven materials. Applied Acoustics, 130 (October 2017), 230–237.
Jeon, J. Y., Ryu, J. K., & Lee, P. J. (2010). A quantification model of overall dissatisfaction with indoor noise environment in residential buildings. Applied Acoustics, 71(10), 914–921.
Lee, S. C., Hong, J. Y., & Jeon, J. Y. (2015). Effects of acoustic characteristics of combined construction noise on annoyance. Building and Environment, 92, 657–667.
Maschke, C., & Niemann, H. (2007). Health effects of annoyance induced by neighbour noise. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 55(3), 348.
Namba, S., Kuwano, S., Schick, A., Aclar, A., Florentine, M., & Da Rui, Z. (1991). A cross-cultural study on noise problems: Comparison of the results obtained in Japan, West Germany, the USA, China and Turkey. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 151(3), 471–477.
National Buidling Regulation of Iran (forth edit). (2018). tehran.
Navai, M., & Veitch, J. A. (2003). Acoustic satisfaction in open-plan offices: review and recommendations. Citeseer.
Öhrström, E. (2004). Longitudinal surveys on effects of changes in road traffic noise—annoyance, activity disturbances, and psycho-social well-being. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(2), 719–729.
Ottoz, E., Rizzi, L., & Nastasi, F. (2018). Recreational noise: Impact and costs for annoyed residents in Milan and Turin. Applied Acoustics, 133, 173–181.
Park, S. H., & Lee, P. J. (2017). Effects of floor impact noise on psychophysiological responses. Building and Environment, 116, 173–181.
Pérez, G., Coma, J., Barreneche, C., De Gracia, A., Urrestarazu, M., Burés, S., & Cabeza, L. F. (2016). Acoustic insulation capacity of Vertical Greenery Systems for buildings. Applied Acoustics, 110, 218–226.
Peters, R. J. (2013). Acoustics and noise control. Routledge.
Rasmussen, B. (2007). Chapter 114 Sound Insulation of Residential Housing — Building Codes and Classification Schemes in Europe. Evaluation.
Rindel, J. (2002). Acoustical comfort as a design criterion for dwellings in the future. 16th Biennial Conference of the New Zealand Acoustical Society; "Sound in the Built Environment, (November), 1–9.
Sadouki, M. (2018). Experimental characterization of rigid porous material via the first ultrasonic reflected waves at oblique incidence. Applied Acoustics, 133 (August 2017), 64–72.
Samani, P., Mendes, A., Leal, V., Miranda Guedes, J., Correia, N., & Guedes, J. (2015). A sustainability assessment of advanced materials for novel housing solutions. Building and Environment, 92, 182–191.
Schiavoni, S., D’Alessandro, F., Bianchi, F., & Asdrubali, F. (2016). Insulation materials for the building sector: A review and comparative analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62.
Scholl, W., Wittstock, V., Bietz, H., & Stange-Kölling, S. (2015). Measurement of Walking Noise on Floor Coverings. Building Acoustics, 22(1), 1–27.
Schultz, T. J. (1978). Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(2), 377–405.
sokhandan, Z., nasrollahi, F, & Ghafari, A. (2019). Optimization of Acoustical Function of Sound Absorbers with Emphasis on Geometry and Height of Spaces. Hoviatshahr, 13(1), 8–18.
Thomazelli, R., Caetano, F. D. N., & Bertoli, S. R. (2016). Acoustic properties of green walls: Absorption and insulation. 015017.
Vardaxis, N.-G., Bard, D., & Persson Waye, K. (2017). On the definition of acoustic comfort in residential buildings. In The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (Vol. 141).
Wang, C., Si, Y., Abdul-Rahman, H., & Wood, L. C. (2015). Noise annoyance and loudness: Acoustic performance of residential buildings in tropics. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 36(6), 680–700.
Whittle, N., Peris, E., Condie, J., Woodcock, J., Brown, P., Moorhouse, A. T., … Steele, A. (2015). Development of a social survey for the study of vibration annoyance in residential environments: Good practice guidance. Applied Acoustics, 87, 83–93.
Yu, C.-J., & Kang, J. (2014). Soundscape in the sustainable living environment: A cross-cultural comparison between the UK and Taiwan. Science of the Total Environment, 482, 501–509.