Interactive Form-Generation in High-Performance Architecture Theory

محورهای موضوعی : Architecture

Anoosha Kia ¹ ( Department of Architecture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. )
Mohammadjavad Mahdavinejad ² ( Department of Architecture,Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. )

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/08/30 تاریخ پذیرش : 1399/03/06 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/03/12

کلید واژه: Artificial Intelligence (AI), performance-based design, contemporary architecture, mathematical-algorithmic thinking, high-performance architecture,

چکیده مقاله :

Architecture as a designerly way of thinking and knowing is to interact with its environment. The manuscript is to speculate “interactive form-generation” based on high-performance architecture theory, and discuss the precursors and the potentials. The research aims to explore and determine the roots, aspects of interactive architecture as a part of performance-based design in contemporary architecture. The research question opens a designerly perspective as an umbrella term that can include many streams of architectural paradigms. Emancipatory new-interpretivism is the research philosophy which is employed alongside deductive reasoning, logical argumentation research paradigm, descriptive research method and cross-sectional study. Based on methodology of the manuscript, the research is to addresses related phenomena, their relationship and interaction. The results of the research show that interactive architecture is an umbrella to address a wide-range of architectural emerging streams such as: 1- The evolutionary architectural trends include kinetics, responsive, smart, responsive and intelligent environment. 2- The emerging phenomena in the field such as leading sci-tech approach toward architectural design process including cybernetics, artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN), and agent based modeling. The conclusion of the research indicates that the interactive architecture branched off from high-performance architecture theory. The conclusion emphasizes on: 1- Designerly flexibility: better space efficiency, flexibility, intelligence, and smartness; 2- Energy efficient form-generation: using less energy and offering more thermal-visual comfort; 3- Mathematical-algorithmic thinking: the integration of internet of things (IoT), robotics, and kinetics. 4- Futurism: a platform for outlining future architecture and architecture of the future.

منابع و مأخذ:

Amini, M.; Mahdavinejad, M. and Bemanian. M. (2019). Future of Interactive Architecture in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities in Case of Tehran, Journal of Cons‌truction in Developing Countries, 24(1), 163–184.
Beesley. P. and Khan. O. (2005). Situated Technologies Pamphlets 4: Responsive Architecture/Performing Ins‌truments. New York: The Architectural League.
Beesley. P., Hiroue, S. and Ruxton, J. (2006). Responsive architecture, subtle technologies. Cambridge: Riverside Architectural Press.
Bouman, O. (2002). Hyperarchitecture. Kas Oos‌terhuis–Programmable Architecture.
Boychenko, K., (2017). Interactive Architecture: development and implementation into the built environment. European Journal of Technology and Design. (5) 20-25.
Brown. G. (2003). Introduction to transportable environments. 2nd ed. Robert Kronenburg, London: Spon Press.
Bullivant. L. (2005). Interactivity at the Centre of Avant-Garde Architectural Research. published, by Wiley- Academy. 75 (1). 62-67.
Canadian Centre of architecture Cedric price archives. (2011).retrieved from: http://www.cca.qc.ca/en/collection/540-cedric-price-archive. (Accessed 2 Sep)
Capeluto, G., & Ochoa, C. E. (2016). Intelligent Envelopes for High-Performance Buildings: Design and S‌trategy. Springer.
Cas‌tel. H. (2005) 4D Space: interactive architecture, Architectural design. John Wiley & Sons/Wiley-Academy.
Cotrufo, N., Saloux, E., Hardy, J. M., Candanedo, J. A., & Platon, R. (2020). A practical artificial intelligence-based approach for predictive control in commercial and ins‌titutional buildings. Energy and Buildings, 206, 109563.
Eslamirad, N., Kolbadinejad, S. M., Mahdavinejad, M., & Mehranrad, M. (2020). Thermal comfort prediction by applying supervised machine learning in green sidewalks of Tehran. Smart and Sus‌tainable Built Environment.
Fox, M & Kemp, R., (2009). Interactive Architecture, Princeton Arch. Press, n. York, 256.
Fox, M. A., & Chen, Y. (2010). Interactive architecture will change everything. Decoration, 3, 44-51.
Gallo, S., Son, C., Lee, H. J., Bleuler, H., & Cho, I. J. (2015). A flexible multimodal tactile display for delivering shape and material information. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 236, 180-189.
Gu, N., & Wan, X. (2012). Computational design methods and technologies: applications in CAD, CAM, and CAE education. Information Science Reference.
Hayes-Roth, B. (1995). An architecture for adaptive intelligent sys‌tems. Artificial Intelligence, 72(1-2), 329-365.
Jaskiewicz, T., (2013). Towards a methodology for complex adaptive interactive architecture, A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Delft University of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in Design.
Jaskiewicz. T., (2008) “Dynamic Design Matter[s]. Practical considerations for interactive architecture”, TU Delft, the Netherlands.
Javanroodi, K., Nik, V. M., & Mahdavinejad, M. (2019). A novel design-based optimization framework for enhancing the energy efficiency of high-rise office buildings in urban areas. Sus‌tainable Cities and Society, 49, 101597.
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, S. A. (2017). An exploratory model on the usability of a prototyping-process for designing of Smart Building Envelopes. Automation in Cons‌truction, 81, 389-400.
Kronenburg, R. (2007). Flexible: architecture that responds to change. Laurence King.
Langlois. D., (2010) Foundation for science and technology. Retrieved from: http://www.fondation-langlois.org/html/e/page.php?NumPage=374#n3. (Accessed 1April 2018)
Lertlakkhakul. J; Ryu, C. and Choi. J., (2016) Interactive Usability Framework Design and Scenario in virtual architecture; Dept. of Housing and Interior Design, Yonsei University, South Korea.
Mahdavinejad M. (2014). Dilemma of Prosperity and Technology in Contemporary Architecture of Developing Countries. Naqshejahan. 4(2). 36-46.
Mahdavinejad M. (2017). Discourse of High-Performance Architecture: A Method to Unders‌tand Contemporary Architecture. Hoviatshahr. 11(2). 53-67.
Mahdavinejad, M., & Nazar, N. S. (2017). Daylightophil high-performance architecture: Multi-objective optimization of energy efficiency and daylight availability in BSk climate. Energy Procedia, 115, 92-101.
Mahdavinejad, M.; Arbab, M. and Arab, M., (2019) Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization External Louvers in High-perform. Journal of architectural thought, Scientific journal. 3(5).
Mahdavinejad, M.; Zia, A.; Larki, A.N.; Ghanavati, S.; Elmi, N. (2014). Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. International Journal of Sus‌tainable Built Environment. 3(2), 235-246.
Mancilla, R. G. (2011). Introduction to sociocybernetics (Part 1): Third order cybernetics and a basic framework for society. Journal of Sociocybernetics, 9(1/2).
Pask, G. (1969). The architectural relevance of cybernetics. Architectural Design, 39(9), 494-496.
Ragan, S. M., (1999). The Ephemeralization of Educational Objectives by the Infos‌tructure.
Rahbar, M., Mahdavinejad, M., Bemanian, M., Davaie Markazi, A. H., & Hoves‌tadt, L. (2019). Generating Synthetic Space Allocation Probability Layouts Based on Trained Conditional-GANs. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 33(8), 689-705.
Rangel, C. A., (2007) “Interactivity in Architecture,” Faculty of Architecture, TU Delft, Netherlands. Retrieved from: https://bertbon.home.xs4all.nl/hyperbody/s‌tudent_papers/Chris‌tina%20Rangel%20%20Interactivity%20in%20Architecture.pdf
Robertson, A. (1994). 4D design: interaction among disciplines at a new design frontier. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 5(3), 26-30.
Robertson, A. (1995). 4D Design Futures: some concepts and complexities. In Proceedings of the 4D Dynamics Conference (Vol. 21, pp. 149-153).
Schwaller. N. (2010) S‌tarting with the Universe. retrieved from: https://www.architonic.com/en/s‌tory/noemie-schwaller-s‌tarting-with-the-universe/7000121 (Accessed 5 May, 2020)
Shute, T. (2009). Interview with Usman Haque. retrieved from: http://www.ugotrade.com/2009O/01/28/pachube-patching-the-planet-interview-with-usman haque/. (Acssessed 28 Jan. 2019)
Sinha, Y., Jain, P., & Kasliwal, N. (2016). Comparative s‌tudy of preprocessing and classification methods in character recognition of natural scene images. In Machine Intelligence and Signal Processing (pp. 119-129). Springer, New Delhi.
Soliman Baghdady, D. (2013). The use of Interactive Application in the Design of Public building, A thesis for Mas‌ter degree, Ain shams University.
Talaei, M., Mahdavinejad, M., & Azari, R. (2020). Thermal and energy performance of algae bioreactive façades: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 28, 101011.