تبیین سیاست‌های فرهنگی تاثیرگذار بر بازآفرینی شهری فرهنگ محور (با تاکید بر تجارب بازآفرینی شهری استانبول ترکیه)
محورهای موضوعی : معماری
علی کریم زاده
1
(
دانش آموخته دکتری شهرسازی، گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
)
سید کمال الدین شهریاری
2
(
استادیار دانشکده هنر و معماری، گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
)
مهیار اردشیری
3
(
استادیار،گروه شهرسازی، واحد بیضا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بیضا، ایران.
)
کلید واژه: بازآفرینی شهری, رویکرد فرهنگی, سیاست فرهنگی, بازآفرینی شهری فرهنگ محور,
چکیده مقاله :
در بیست سال اخیر، سیاست‌های فرهنگی تأثیرگذار بر برنامه‌ریزی شهری، نیاز به بازآفرینی مناطق بی‌رونق شهری و حرکت به سمت فعالیت‌های خلاق فرهنگی در جهت پیشرفت‌های اقتصادی و اجتماعی مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. این پژوهش به روش کیفی صورت پذیرفته و ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، منابع کتابخانه‌ای و اسناد بوده است. هدف این پژوهش تبیین مولفه‌های فرهنگی تأثیر گذار بر بازآفرینی شهری فرهنگ محور می‌باشد که مولفه‌هایی چون کاربری‌های فرهنگی، فعالیت‌های فرهنگی درفضای عمومی شهری، ترکیب فعالیت‌های فرهنگی با طراحی شهری خلاقانه، حفاظت میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری فرهنگی را به عنوان معیارهایی کلیدی معرفی نموده و در سه پروژه بازآفرینی شهری در شهر استانبول ترکیه مورد مقایسه و این نتیجه حاصل گردید که بازآفرینی شهری با بهره گیری از صنایع خلاق فرهنگی منجر به احیای اقتصادی مناطق مورد نظر گردیده و همگرایی اقتصاد و فرهنگ تأثیرات بسزایی بر بازآفرینی بناهای تاریخی داشته است.
The institutionalization of cultural events play an important role in stabilizing approach to urban regeneration and improving environmental quality as a factor for heritage protection, restoration and rehabilitation of physical structures, new design and new functions in line with the previous and the arrival of new structures. The cultural regeneration of a culture as a development strategy is very important in the local and global scale. Since the 1970s, many European cities, some sort of restructuring was unexpected that the reasons may be handling industry and consequently employment, migration, urban middle class to the suburbs, changing patterns of employment, the development of shopping centers outside the cities and increasing dependence on private car ownership. In the 70's decade, the manufacturing sector, followed by urban decline and governments attempt to shift to a service economy, including the factors that cause changes in the theory of politicians in the 80's decade, which for the first time, culture as a tool of urban regeneration and economic problems were caused. Due to concerns of the finance, the arts and creative industries in particular emerged quickly led to economic development. Taking into account this new reality, many cities were forced together in the quest for uniqueness of the cultural, human and physical advantage over their competition to emphasize to other cities. This competition between cities in an effort to attract and deploy them in the field of hi-tech industries, as well as private sector investment and become a central part in national and international tourism and culture reflected. Increased competition led many in the policy with the aim of recreating the index of cultural distinctions from other cities, driven, in which the cultures plays a key role in urban regeneration policies. The main objective of this research is to develop a conceptual framework in order to explain the policies, culture-based urban regeneration and cultural factors affecting urban regeneration. In this regard, this study seeks to answer the question, "What are the cultural policies affecting urban regeneration?" Then, the approaches and cultural policies, and at the end of the components such as the "cultural uses", "urban cultural activities in the public space", "combines urban design creative cultural activities", "protection of cultural heritage" and "cultural tourism" as key measures of culture-based urban regeneration, urban regeneration project has introduced a three comparative tests were in Istanbul, Turkey. In this paper, the strategy of logical reasoning is used as a research strategy. This article is largely descriptive, sowe will attempt to review the concepts of urban renewal, cultural policy effectively introduced and the role and function in culture-based urban regeneration scrutiny and thus the basis for the continuation and identify pathways towards cultural policy affecting culture-based urban regeneration are provided. The skill of reading and studding documents based on the contents of the books, articles and documents as tools for research in relation to urban regeneration projects in the study sample were used. Finally, examples of effective components of the solutions culture-based to successfully achieve urban regeneration projects.
1. امین زاده، بهناز؛ د‌اد‌رس، راحله. (1391). بازآفرینی فرهنگ‌مد‌ار در بافت تاریخی شهر قزوین با تأکید بر گردشگری شهری. د‌وفصلنامه معماری ایرانی، 2 ،99-108.
2. چشمه قصابانى، مریم؛ و کریمى، نوشین. (1390). رویکرد‌ى تحلیلى به تاثیر روید‌اد‌هاى فرهنگى در کیفیت منظر موقت شهرى. هویت شهر، 5 (9)، 27-36.
3. حبیب، فرح؛ و حسینی نیا، مهد‌یه. (1392). تحلیلى برمفهوم فرهنگ شهرى و تأثیر آن در جذب گرد‌شگر فرهنگى، (بررسى چند مصد‌اق جهانى). هویت شهر، 7(14)، 5-16.
4. لطفی، سهند. (1390). بازآفرینی شهری فرهنگ مبنا: تأملی بر بنُمایه‌های فرهنگی وکُنش بازآفرینی، نشریه هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی، 45،
47-60.
5. نوریان، فرشاد؛ و آریانا، اند‌یشه. (1391). تحلیل چگونگی حمایت قانون
ازمشارکت عمومی در باز آفرینی شهری مطالعه مورد‌ی: مید‌ان امام علی (عتیق) اصفهان. نشریه هنرهای زیبا معماری وشهر سازی، 17(2)، 15-27.
6. ATCM. (2006). Adding Value and a Competitive Edge: The Case for Using Arts and Culture in Town Centers. A Report Commissioned by the Association of Town Center management (ATCM). London: Author.
7. Basset, K. (1993). Urban cultural strategies and urban regeneration: a case study and critique. Environment and Planning A, 25, 1773-1788.
8. Bianchini, F. (1994). Night Cultures, night economies.
Journal of town and country planning, 63, 308-310.
9. Bianet (2015), Retrieved May, 2015, from http://bianet.org/english/environment/159157-council-of-state-suspends-galataport-project
10. Bradley, A., Hall, T., & Harrison, M. (2002). Promoting New Images for Meeting Tourism. Cities, 19(1), 61-70.
11. Brown, A., O’Connor, J., & Cohen, S. (2000). Local music policies within a global music industry: cultural quarters in Manchester and Sheffield.
Geoforum, 31, 437-451.
12. Connor, J., & Kong, L. (2009). Creative economies, creative cities, Asian European perspectives. London: Springer.
13. Emlakjet (2012) Retrieved September, from http://images4.emlakjet.com/emlak-haber/2012/09/14/foto_galeri/l/haydarpasa-port-projesi-1347633225.jpg
Congress, (September 19-23), Antwerp, Belgium.
14. Erbas, E. (2007). Port Regeneration and Sustainable Urban Development, The Case of Galata Port and Haydarpasa Port Projects in Istanbul After 2000. ISOCARP. Proceedings of the 43rd ISoCaRP
15. Erbas, E., & Tansel, E. (2011). Rethinking the Urban Transformation Projects Again: the
Distribution of Public Burden and Benefits, the Case of Kartal District, Istanbul. REAL CORP
2011. Proceedings of the Real Corp Change for Stability: Lifecycles of Cities and Regions, May 18-20, (pp.843- 852) , Essen, Germany.
16. Ercan, M. A. (2011). Challenges and conflicts in achieving sustainable communities in historic neighborhoods of Istanbul. Habitat International, 35(2), 295–306.
17. Evans, G. (2001). Cultural Planning: An Urban Renaissance?. London: Routledge.
18. Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. London: Basic Books.
19. Geambazu, S. (2014). Dimensions of urban waterfront regeneration: Case study of Halic/ The Golden Horn. Unpublished master’s thesis, Technische University Berlin, Berlin.
20. Goksin, A., & Muderrisoglu, S. (2005). Urban Regeneration: A Comprehensive Strategy for Creating Spaces for Innovative Economies.
ISoCaRP. Proceedings of the 41st ISoCaRP Congress, October 17-20, Bilbao, Spain.
21. Gospodini, A. (2002). European Cities in Competition and New ‘Use’ of Urban Design. Urban Design, 7( 1), 59-73.
22. Hadid (2015), Retrieved May, 2015, from http://zaha-hadid.com/masterplans/kartal-pendik-masterplan
23. Hall, T., & Robertson, I. (2001). Public Art and Urban Regeneration. Landscape Research, 26(1), 5-26.
24. Hubbard, P. (1995). Urban Design and Local Economic Development: A Case Study of Birmingham. Cities, 12( 1), 5–26.
25. Jones, C., & Orr, A. (2004). Spatial Economic Change and Long-Term Urban Office Rental Trends. Regional Studies, 38(3), 281–292.
26. Law, C. M. (1993). Urban Tourism: Attracting
Visitors to Large Cities. London: Mansell Publishing.
27. Montgomery, J. (2004). Cultural Quarters as Mechanisms for Urban Regeneration Part 2. Planning Practice & Research, 19(1), 3-31.
28. Ozkan, E., & Frison, O. (2008). The Recent Regeneration Process of Istanbul: A Critical Perspective for the Metropolitan Plan 2023,
European Regional Science Association. Proceedings of the 48th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Culture, Cohesion and Competitiveness – Regional Perspectives. August 27- 31, Liverpool, UK.
29. Roberts, P. Sykes, H. (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: Sage.
30. Rutten, P. (2006). Culture & Urban Registration. Cultural Activities and Creative Industries A Driving Force for Urban Regeneration. Lille: URBACT.
31. Scott, A. (2000). The Cultural Economy of
Cities. London: Sage.
32. Shaw, G. Williams, A. M. (1994). Critical issues in tourism: a geographical perspective. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
33. Sijakovic, M. (2010). Between the city and sea: urban waterfront regeneration. Unpublished master’s thesis, Universitat politecnica de catalunya.
34. Sondakikahaberleri, (2015), Retrieved May, 2015, from http://www.sondakikahaberleri.info
tr/images/haberresim/44662-haydarpasa-port-buyuksehir-den-onay-aldi.jpg
35. Van der Borg, J. Russo, A. P. (2008). Area Regeneration and Tourism Development: Evidence from Three European Cities. Social Science Research Network, 21, 1-25.
36. Wynne, D. (1992). The Culture Industry: The Arts in Urban Regeneration. Alder shot: Avebury.
37. Zukin, S. (1995). The Culture of Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
