مدل سازی ساختاری رابطه بین انگیزه شناختی و رفتاری بر میزان مشارکت عملی دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد واحد کیش
محورهای موضوعی : آموزشامیر حسام amir hesam 1 , سیده فاطمه افراز طولیان 2
1 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی ، واحد بین الملل کیش، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، کیش ، ایران
2 - گروه مدیریت آموزشی ، واحد بین الملل کیش ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، کیش ، ایران
کلید واژه: انگیزه شناختی و رفتاری, شناخت انطباقی و رفتاری , مشارکت دانشجویان , مشارکت عملی ,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از این پژوهش، مدل سازی ساختاری رابطه بین انگیزه شناختی و رفتاری بر میزان مشارکت عملی دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد واحد کیش می¬باشد. این پژوهش با هدف کاربردی و به روش توصیفی- پیمایشی انجام شده است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل 300 نفر از مدیران مشاغل محلی یا صنایع دستی در کشور عراق می¬باشند که برای نمونه گیری از روش غیر احتمال در دسترس استفاده گردید و 169 نفر بر اساس فرمول کوکران مورد ارزیابی و اندازه گیری قرار گرفتند. در این پژوهش برای جمع آوری داده¬ها از پرسش¬نامه استفاده گردید که روایی صوری، محتوایی آن توسط متخصصان مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. برای سنجش روایی پرسشنامه، تحلیل عاملی تاییدی و روایی همگرا و واگرا انجام شد. برای سنجش پایایی از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده گردید که پایایی خوب ابزار را نشان داد. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده¬ها از روش حداقل مربعات جزئی و نرم افزار آماری Smart PLS استفاده شد و نتایج نشان از تایید تمامی فرضیه ها داشت و بیان گردید که بین انگیزه شناختی رفتاری و میزان مشارکت عملی دانشجویان رابطه وجود دارد.
The purpose of this research is to present the model of structural equations of the relationship between cognitive and behavioral motivation on the amount of practical participation of students of Kish Azad University. This research was carried out with a practical purpose and a descriptive-survey method. The statistical population of this research includes 300 students of Kish branch of Azad University, which was used for sampling by the available non-probability method, and 169 people were evaluated and measured based on Cochran's formula. In this research, a questionnaire was used to collect data, and its face validity and content validity were confirmed by experts. To measure the validity of the questionnaire, confirmatory factor analysis and convergent and divergent validity were performed. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure reliability, which showed good reliability of the tool. In order to analyze the data, partial least squares method and Smart PLS 3 statistical software were used and the results showed that all the hypotheses were confirmed and it was stated that there is a relationship between cognitive behavioral motivation and the level of students' practical participation.
منابع
Abramson, L.Y., Seligman, M.E., Teasdale, J.D., 1978. Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 87 (1), 49.
Alderfer, C.P., 1969. An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 4 (2), 142–175.
Alvarez, D., 2002. Engaging students in their own learning. Leadership 32 (2), 12–15. Anderman, L.H., Kaplan, A., 2008. The role of interpersonal relationships in student motivation: introduction to the special issue. J. Exp. Educ. 76 (2), 115–119.Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 16 (1), 74–94.
Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., Verbeke, W., 2004. Using the Job Demands-Resources Model to Predict Burnout and Performance, 43. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, pp. 83–104 (1).
Bautista, L., Relojo, D., Pilao, S.J., Tubon, G., Andal, M., 2018. Link between lifestyle and self-regulated development as components of academic performance: basis for a psychoeducational intervention. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology 8 (1).
Bruinsma, M., 2004. Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education. Learn. InStruct. 14 (6), 549–568.
Bryson, C., Hand, L., 2007. The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovat. Educ. Teach. Int. 44 (4), 349–362.
Chemolli, E., Gagn_x0019_e, M., 2014. Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychol. Assess. 26 (2), 575.
Cho, S., Lee, M., Lee, S.M., 2022. Burned-Out Classroom Climate, Intrinsic Motivation, and Academic Engagement: Exploring Unresolved Issues in the Job Demand- Resource Model. Psychological Reports, 00332941211054776.
Churchill Jr., G.A., 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Market. Res. 16 (1), 64–73.
Coates, H., 2005. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Qual. High Educ. 11 (1), 25–36.
Connell, J.P., 1990. Context, Self, and Action: A Motivational Analysis of Self-System Processes across the Life Span.
Connell, J.P., Wellborn, J.G., 1991. Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness: A Motivational Analysis of Self-System Processes.
Connell, J.P., Spencer, M.B., Aber, J.L., 1994. Educational risk and resilience in African- American youth: context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Dev. 65 (2), 493–506.
de Borba, G.S., Alves, I.M., Campagnolo, P.D.B., 2020. How learning spaces can collaborate with student engagement and enhance student-faculty interaction in higher education. Innovat. High. Educ. 45 (1), 51–63.
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior.
Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., Ryan, R.M., 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull. 125 (6), 627.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W.B., 2001. The job demands- resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psychol. 86 (3), 499.
Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., Demiro€z, H., 2017. Multi-Dimensional Classroom Engagement in EFL Contexts. Online Submission.
Dincer, A., Yes ̧ilyurt, S., Noels, K.A., Vargas Lascano, D.I., 2019. Self-determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners: a mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development. Sage Open 9 (2), 2158244019853913.
Dismore, H., Turner, R., Huang, R., 2019. Let me edutain you! Practices of student engagement employed by new lecturers. High Educ. Res. Dev. 38 (2), 235–249.
Do€rnyei, Z., 2000. Motivation in action: towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 70 (4), 519–538.
Duda, J.L., 1989. Goal perspectives, participation and persistence in sport. Int. J. Sport Psychol.
Flynn, D., 2014. Baccalaureate attainment of college students at 4-year institutions as a function of student engagement behaviors: social and academic student engagement behaviors matter. Res. High. Educ. 55 (5), 467–493.
Ford, M.E., Smith, P.R., 2009. Commentary: Building on a strong Foundation. Handbook of motivation at school, p. 265.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res. 18 (1), 39–50.
Frey, A., Ruchkin, V., Martin, A., Schwab-Stone, M., 2009. Adolescents in transition: school and family characteristics in the development of violent behaviors entering high school. Child Psychiatr. Hum. Dev. 40 (1), 1–13.
Furlong, M.J., Christenson, S.L., 2008. Engaging Students at School and with Learning: A Relevant Construct for All Students. Psychology in the Schools.
Gulankar, A.C., 2020. Over 62% of Dropouts in Education Happens at School Level. The Federal. https://thefederal.com/news/over-62-of-dropouts-in-education-happens-at- school-level/. (Accessed 18 March 2022).
Hair, J., Andreson, R., Tatham, R., Black, W., 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th. Prentice-Hall Inc. Unites States of America.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition, 1. Pearson Education Limited, Essex (2).
Herzberg, F., 1965. The motivation to work among Finnish supervisors. Person. Psychol. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Snyderman, B.B., 1959. The Motivation to Work. New York
Wiley, 1959. Studies of Accountants and Engineers.
Horstmanshof, L., Zimitat, C., 2007. Future time orientation predicts academic
engagement among first-year university students. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 77 (3),
703–718.
Howard, J.L., Gagn_x0019_e, M., Van den Broeck, A., Guay, F., Chatzisarantis, N., Ntoumanis, N.,
Pelletier, L.G., 2020. A review and empirical comparison of motivation scoring
methods: an application to self-determination theory. Motiv. Emot. 44 (4), 534–548. Hsieh, T.L., Yu, P., 2022. Exploring achievement motivation, student engagement, and
learning outcomes for STEM college students in Taiwan through the lenses of gender
differences and multiple pathways. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 1–16.
Hufton, N.R., Elliott, J.G., Illushin, L., 2002. Educational motivation and engagement:
qualitative accounts from three countries. Br. Educ. Res. J. 28 (2), 265–289.
Jagodics, B., Szabo_x0019_, E_x0019_., 2022. Student burnout in higher education: a demand-resource model approach. Trends Psychol. 1–20.
Kahu, E.R., Nelson, K., 2018. Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. High Educ. Res. Dev. 37 (1), 58–71.
Kline, R.B., 2015. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford publications.
Koretz, D., 2017. The testing charade. In: The Testing Charade. University of Chicago Press.
Krause, K.L., Bochner, S., Duchesne, S., 2006. Educational Psychology for Learning and Teaching. Cengage Learning Australia, Australia.
Kuh, G.D., 2009. The national survey of student engagement: conceptual and empirical foundations. N. Dir. Inst. Res. 141, 5–20.
Law, W., Elliot, A.J., Murayama, K., 2012. Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. J. Educ. Psychol. 104 (3), 806.
Lee, J.Q., McInerney, D.M., Liem, G.A.D., Ortiga, Y.P., 2010. The relationship between future goals and achievement goal orientations: an intrinsic–extrinsic motivation perspective. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 35 (4), 264–279.
Levitt, S.D., List, J.A., Neckermann, S., Sadoff, S., 2016. The behavioralist goes to school: leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Pol. 8 (4), 183–219.
Lin, T.J., 2012. Student Engagement and Motivation in the Foreign Language Classroom. Washington State University, pp. 1–78.
Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P., 1990. A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance. Prentice- Hall.
Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C.M., 2017. Psychological capital: an evidence-based positive approach. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4, 339–366.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B., Norman, S.M., 2007. Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Person. Psychol. 60 (3), 541–572.
Martin, A.J., 2001. The Student Motivation Scale: a tool for measuring and enhancing motivation. J. Psychol. Coun. Sch. 11, 1–20.
Martin, A.J., 2003. The Student Motivation Scale: further testing of an instrument that measures school students' motivation. Aust. J. Educ. 47 (1), 88–106.
Martin, A.J., 2007. Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 77 (2), 413–440.
Maslow, A.H., 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50 (4), 370–396. Maslow, A.H., 1954. Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row, New York. McClelland, D.C., 1958. Methods of measuring human motivation. Motiv. Fant. Action
Soc. 7–42.
McClelland, D.C., Mac Clelland, D.C., 1961. Achieving Society, 92051. Simon & Schuster. McIver, J., Carmines, E.G., 1981. Unidimensional Scaling, 24. Sage.
Montenegro, A., 2017. Understanding the concept of student agentic engagement for
learning. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J. 19 (1), 117–128.
Newmann, F.M., 1992. Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary
Schools, 1234. Teachers College Press. Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027
(paperback:, $17.95; hardcover.
Nicholls, J.G., 1984. Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective
experience, task choice, and performance. Psychol. Rev. 91 (3), 328.
Noels, K.A., Lascano, D.I.V., Saumure, K., 2019. The development of self-determination
across the language course: trajectories of motivational change and the dynamic interplay of psychological needs, orientations, and engagement. Stud. Sec. Lang. Acquis. 41 (4), 821–851.
Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P.M., Schaufeli, W.B., 2011. Flourishing students: a longitudinal study on positive emotions, personal resources, and study engagement. J. Posit. Psychol. 6 (2), 142–153.
Paradise, A.W., Kernis, M.H., 2002. Self-esteem and psychological well-being: implications of fragile self-esteem. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 21 (4), 345–361.
Park, L.E., Crocker, J., 2008. Contingencies of self-worth and responses to negative interpersonal feedback. Self Ident. 7 (2), 184–203.
Pascarella, E.T., Terenzini, P.T., 1991. How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research, 1.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A.M., Kaplan, A., 2007. Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. J. Educ. Psychol. 99 (1), 83.
Pett, M.A., Lackey, N.R., Sullivan, J.J., 2003. Making Sense of Factor Analysis: the Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. sage.
Pintrich, P.R., 2003. A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. J. Educ. Psychol. 95 (4), 667.
Qureshi, A., Wall, H., Humphries, J., Balani, A.B., 2016. Can personality traits modulate student engagement with learning and their attitude to employability? Learn. Indiv Differ 51, 349–358.
Reeve, J., 2012. A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 149–172. Roebken, H., 2007. The Influence of Goal Orientation on Student Satisfaction. Academic
Engagement and Achievement.
Roth, G., Assor, A., Niemiec, C.P., Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., 2009. The emotional and
academic consequences of parental conditional regard: comparing conditional positive regard, conditional negative regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Dev. Psychol. 45 (4), 1119.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25 (1), 54–67.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., 2017. Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Publications.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., 2020. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 61, 101860.
Saeed, S., Zyngier, D., 2012. How motivation influences student engagement: a qualitative case study. J. Educ. Learn. 1 (2), 252–267.
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., Breso_x0019_, E., 2010. How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: the mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Hist. Philos. Logic 23 (1), 53–70.
Salmela-Aro, K., Moeller, J., Schneider, B., Spicer, J., Lavonen, J., 2016. Integrating the light and dark sides of student engagement using person-oriented and situation- specific approaches. Learn. InStruct. 43, 61–70.
Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., 2004. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav.: Int. J. Indus. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Behav. 25 (3), 293–315.
Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., 2010. Defining and measuring work engagement: bringing clarity to the concept. Work Engage.: Handb. Essen. Theory Res. 12, 10–24.
Schaufeli, W.B., Martinez, I.M., Pinto, A.M., Salanova, M., Bakker, A.B., 2002. Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross-national study. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 33 (5), 464–481.
Schuetz, P., 2008. A theory-driven model of community college student engagement. Community Coll. J. 32 (4-6), 305–324.
Schunk, D.H., DiBenedetto, M.K., 2016. Self-efficacy theory in education. Handb. Motiv. Sch. 2, 34–54.
Shah, M., Cheng, M., 2019. Exploring factors impacting student engagement in open access courses. Open Learn.: J. Open Dist. e-Learn. 34 (2), 187–202.
Sheldon, K.M., Osin, E.N., Gordeeva, T.O., Suchkov, D.D., Sychev, O.A., 2017. Evaluating the dimensionality of self-determination theory’s relative autonomy continuum. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 43 (9), 1215–1238.
Shipley, B., Walker, I., 2019. Here Comes the Drop: university Drop Out Rates and Increasing Student Retention through Education.
Sinclair, M.F., Christenson, S.L., Lehr, C.A., Anderson, A.R., 2003. Facilitating student engagement: lessons learned from Check & Connect longitudinal studies. Calif. Sch. Psychol. 8 (1), 29–41.
Siu, O.L., Bakker, A.B., Jiang, X., 2014. Psychological capital among university students: relationships with study engagement and intrinsic motivation. J. Happiness Stud. 15 (4), 979–994.
Skinner, E.A., Belmont, M.J., 1993. Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. J. Educ. Psychol. 85 (4), 571.
Skinner, E.A., Kindermann, T.A., Furrer, C.J., 2009. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 69 (3), 493–525.
Skinner, E.A., Pitzer, J.R., Steele, J.S., 2016. Can student engagement serve as a motivational resource for academic coping, persistence, and learning during late elementary and early middle school? Dev. Psychol. 52 (12), 2099.
Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., Connell, J.P., 1990. What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: a process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. J. Educ. Psychol. 82 (1), 22.
Sternberg, R.J., 2005. Intelligence, competence, and expertise. Handb Compet. Motiv. 15–30.
Tani, M., Gheith, M.H., Papaluca, O., 2021. Drivers of student engagement in higher education: a behavioral reasoning theory perspective. High Educ. 82 (3), 499–518. Tight, M., 2020. Student retention and engagement in higher education. J. Furth. High.
Educ. 44 (5), 689–704.
Trowler, V., 2010. Student engagement literature review. High. Edu. Acad. 11 (1),
1–15.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K.M., Deci, E.L., 2004. Motivating
learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal
contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87 (2), 246. Vossensteyn, J.J., Kottmann, A., Jongbloed, B.W., Kaiser, F., Cremonini, L., Stensaker, B., et al., 2015. Dropout and Completion in Higher Education in Europe: Main Report.
Wentzel, K.R., 2003. Motivating students to behave in socially competent ways. Theory Into Pract. 42 (4), 319–326.
Wiegand, D.M., Geller, E.S., 2005. Connecting positive psychology and organizational behavior management: achievement motivation and the power of positive reinforcement. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 24 (1-2), 3–25.
Wigfield, A., Wagner, A.L., 2005. Competence, motivation, and identity development during adolescence. Handb Compet. Motiv. 222–239.
Wigfield, A.L.L.A.N., Rosenzweig, E., Eccles, J., 2017. Achievement values. Handbook of competence and motivation. Theo. Appl. 116.
Wijsman, L.A., Warrens, M.J., Saab, N., Van Driel, J.H., Westenberg, P.M., 2016. Declining trends in student performance in lower secondary education. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 31 (4), 595–612.
Woolfolk, A., Margetts, K., 2012. Educational Psychology, Australian Edition. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Zepke, N., Leach, L., Butler, P., 2010. Student Engagement: what Is it and what Influences it? Teaching & Learning Research Initiatives.
Zyngier, D., 2008. (Re) conceptualising student engagement: doing education not doing time. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24 (7), 1765–1776.
