New Security Architecture with the Transformation of U.S. Smart Power in the Post-COVID Era
محورهای موضوعی : Political ScienceAli Bijani Nasab 1 , رضا سیمبر 2
1 - Department of International Relations, Kish International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kish, Iran
2 - استاد علوم سیاسی روابط بین الملل دانشگاه گیلان
کلید واژه: power, smart power, post-COVID, United States of America,
چکیده مقاله :
The outbreak of the coronavirus has posed a significant threat to global security and governance. The rapid global spread of this virus has not only created an atmosphere of fear and concern for the general public but has also confronted a majority of governments, including developed and post-industrial Western countries, with serious economic and social challenges as well as a new security landscape. In the realm of international security, the pandemic has presented the United States with a set of new challenges. This crisis has provided its competitors, especially China, an opportunity to challenge its global dominance. Therefore, the primary objective of this article is to examine and analyze the role of the United States in shaping the post-COVID security archi-tecture on a global scale. This article further argues that the U.S. approach to smart power re-quires fundamental transformation, as it is a crucial prerequisite for maintaining its global domi-nance. This argument is based on the premise that smart power has not only been an important tool in U.S. foreign policy since the post-Cold War era but has also enabled Washington to sus-tain its leadership after the September 11 attacks. While the COVID crisis will have long-term implications for the global security architecture, this article emphasizes that the pandemic has not fundamentally altered the global order. Ultimately, the findings of this research acknowledge that changes in U.S. strategies to adapt to new security challenges and to maintain its position in the international system are essential.
The outbreak of the coronavirus has posed a significant threat to global security and governance. The rapid global spread of this virus has not only created an atmosphere of fear and concern for the general public but has also confronted a majority of governments, including developed and post-industrial Western countries, with serious economic and social challenges as well as a new security landscape. In the realm of international security, the pandemic has presented the United States with a set of new challenges. This crisis has provided its competitors, especially China, an opportunity to challenge its global dominance. Therefore, the primary objective of this article is to examine and analyze the role of the United States in shaping the post-COVID security archi-tecture on a global scale. This article further argues that the U.S. approach to smart power re-quires fundamental transformation, as it is a crucial prerequisite for maintaining its global domi-nance. This argument is based on the premise that smart power has not only been an important tool in U.S. foreign policy since the post-Cold War era but has also enabled Washington to sus-tain its leadership after the September 11 attacks. While the COVID crisis will have long-term implications for the global security architecture, this article emphasizes that the pandemic has not fundamentally altered the global order. Ultimately, the findings of this research acknowledge that changes in U.S. strategies to adapt to new security challenges and to maintain its position in the international system are essential.
References
Anvar A, (2020) “USA is Increasingly Prob-lematic, EU Should Restore ties with Russia,” Euractiv, Jan 29, 2020, https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/opinion/usa-isincreasingly-problematic-eu-should-restore-ties-with-russia.
Bahrami, R. (2022). The Role of Smart Power in American National Security. Na-tional Security Quarterly, 6(1), 89-104
Beck, Ulrich (2003)"The Silence of Words: On Terror and War," Security Dia-logue 34, no. 3 (April 2003): 255-267, https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106030343002
Buzan, B. (2019). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
Buzzle. (2023). The Economic Impact of COVID-19 on Global Markets.
Cammack, P (2018) "Smart Power and US Leadership: A Critique of Joseph Nye," 49th Parallel. An Interdiscipli-nary Journal of North American Stud-ies 22, no. 1 (Autumn 2018): 5-18, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Cammack2/publication/41199534_Smart_power_and _US_leadership_a_critique_of_Joseph_Nye/links/5626127208ae4d9e5c4c868c.pdf.
David. M. Malone and Yuen F Kh,(2003) "Unilateralism and U.S. Foreign Poli-cy: International Perspectives," in Unilateralism and U.S. Foreign Poli-cy: International Perspectives, ed. David M. Malone and Yuen Foong Khong, (Boulder: Lynne Reiner Pub-lishers,p1-19
Dmitriev, K (2020) “Op-Ed: The US and Rus-sia Should Work Together to Defeat the Coronavirus,” CNBC, April 6, 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/06/op-ed-us-and-russia-should-worktogether-to-defeat-coronavirus.html.
Finnemore, M. (2003). The Purpose of Inter-vention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Cornell University Press.
Friedman, G. (2020). The Storm Before the Calm: America's Discord, the Coming Crisis of the 2020s, and the Triumph Beyond. Doubleday.
Gelb, Leslie H. (2009) “The World Still Needs a Leader,” Current History 108, no. 721 (September 2009): 387-389, https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2009.108.721.387.
Hoffman, A (2020) “The Securitization of the Coronavirus Crisis in the Middle East,” in the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Middle East and North Africa (Tel Aviv: Middle East Political Science Institute), 10-14, http://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2020.1709329.
Hosseini, F. (2021). Smart Power and Interna-tional Relations: A Case Study of the United States. International Journal, 8(3), 15-32
Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After Victory: Institu-tions, Strategic Restraint, and the Re-building of Order after Major Wars. Princeton University Press.
Kaufmann, C. (2016). Interventions in For-eign Conflicts: A Cost-Benefit Ap-proach. International Security, 41(4), 82-118.
Luttwak, E. N. (1996). The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). The Great Delu-sion: Liberal Dreams and Imperial Realities. Yale University Press.
Moon, Y (2013) “The Future of NATO: The Purpose of the Alliance after the Cold War,” Harvard International Review 34, no.3 (Winter 2013): 19-21, https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981
Nakano, k& Yanagisawa et al (2019)., “Kaiken no ronten (Issues of Consti-tutional Reform),” Social Science Ja-pan Journal 23, no. 1 (November 2019): 125-157, https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyz037.
Noori, S. (2020). An Analysis of American Smart Power in Facing Global Chal-lenges. Journal of Political Science, 15(2), 123-140
Nye, J and Armitage, R(2008) CSIS Commis-sion on Smart Power. A smarter, more Secure America (Washington D.C.: The Center for Security and Interna-tional Studies Press, 2007), 28, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/csissmartpowerreport.pdf
Nye, J, (2009) "Get Smart: Combining Hard and Soft Power," Foreign Affairs 88, no. 4 (July/August 2009): 160-164, http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588862.013.0031.
Pickering J and. Kisangani, Emizet F (2009) "The International Military Interven-tion Dataset: An Updated Resource for Conflict Scholars," Journal of Peace Research 46, no. 4 (June 2009): 589- 599, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343309334634.
Pickering, J., & Kisangani, E. (2009). Politi-cal Reform in the Arab World: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Protero, M “Russia sent Italy a Military Con-voy of Medical Supplies to help with the Coronavirus Outbreak. Italy said it was Useless and Accused them of a PR Stunt,” Business Insider, March 26, 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-italy-russia-militaryconvoy-supplies-useless-pr-stunt-2020-3.
Sullivan, T. (2021). COVID-19 and the Im-pact on International Relations: A Review. Global Policy, 12(1), 1-17.
Wallenstein p and Axell, k (1994) "Conflict Resolution and the End of the Cold War, 1989- 93," Journal of Peace Re-search 31, no. 3 (August 1994): 333-349, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343394031003007
Wilson, Ernest J. (2008)"Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616, no. 1 (March 2008): 110-124, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312618
Zalzadeh, A. (2020). Smart Power and Its Impact on American Security Poli-cies. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 201-220
