The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Data-Driven Governance and Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies: From Challenges to Solutions
محورهای موضوعی : Artificial Intelligence Tools in Software and Data Engineering
Sadra Rahmati
1
,
shima ghobadi
2
1 - Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
2 - Department of Foreign Languages Teaching, Shah. C., Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
کلید واژه: Artificial Intelligence, Data-Driven Governance, Four-Dimensional Model, Emerging Economies, Structural Equation Modelling,
چکیده مقاله :
AI has shifted from a technical innovation to a strategic foundation for data-driven governance and sustainable growth.. This study seeks to fill theoretical and methodological voids by creating and empirically validating a Four-Dimensional Data Governance Model (FDGM) that encompasses four essential dimensions: data infrastructure, intelligent policymaking, technological human capital, and institutional trust, alongside data transparency. Employing a convergent mixed-method design, the research combines cross-national quantitative indicators—sourced from Oxford Insights (2024), the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Global Innovation Index (2025), the World Bank’s Digital Development Indicators (2025), and UNESCO’s AI Ethics and Governance Index (2025)—with a qualitative thematic content analysis of national AI policy documents from India, Brazil, Indonesia, and Iran. Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) results demonstrate that data infrastructure exerts a significant direct effect on the efficiency of smart policymaking (β = 0.67, p < 0.01); smart governance, mediated by technological human capital, positively influences technology-driven sustainable development (β = 0.58, p < 0.05); and institutional trust and data transparency play a moderating role in strengthening the relationship between policymaking and innovation outcomes (β = 0.41, p < 0.01). Comparative results reveal that India exhibits a high maturity level across all four dimensions, particularly in data trust and policy coherence. At the same time, Iran and Indonesia demonstrate lower maturity due to institutional fragmentation and limited transparency. Brazil, on the other hand, lies in a transitional phase, leveraging human capital and agricultural innovation as strategic advantages. The novelty of this study lies in proposing and empirically validating an actionable, data-driven analytical framework that quantifies causal and moderating relationships among the four pillars of AI governance. The FDGM offers a replicable framework for national AI strategies, enabling policymakers to identify barriers, enact reforms, and monitor progress toward trustworthy AI governance.
AI has shifted from a technical innovation to a strategic foundation for data-driven governance and sustainable growth.. This study seeks to fill theoretical and methodological voids by creating and empirically validating a Four-Dimensional Data Governance Model (FDGM) that encompasses four essential dimensions: data infrastructure, intelligent policymaking, technological human capital, and institutional trust, alongside data transparency. Employing a convergent mixed-method design, the research combines cross-national quantitative indicators—sourced from Oxford Insights (2024), the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Global Innovation Index (2025), the World Bank’s Digital Development Indicators (2025), and UNESCO’s AI Ethics and Governance Index (2025)—with a qualitative thematic content analysis of national AI policy documents from India, Brazil, Indonesia, and Iran. Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) results demonstrate that data infrastructure exerts a significant direct effect on the efficiency of smart policymaking (β = 0.67, p < 0.01); smart governance, mediated by technological human capital, positively influences technology-driven sustainable development (β = 0.58, p < 0.05); and institutional trust and data transparency play a moderating role in strengthening the relationship between policymaking and innovation outcomes (β = 0.41, p < 0.01). Comparative results reveal that India exhibits a high maturity level across all four dimensions, particularly in data trust and policy coherence. At the same time, Iran and Indonesia demonstrate lower maturity due to institutional fragmentation and limited transparency. Brazil, on the other hand, lies in a transitional phase, leveraging human capital and agricultural innovation as strategic advantages. The novelty of this study lies in proposing and empirically validating an actionable, data-driven analytical framework that quantifies causal and moderating relationships among the four pillars of AI governance. The FDGM offers a replicable framework for national AI strategies, enabling policymakers to identify barriers, enact reforms, and monitor progress toward trustworthy AI governance.
D. Acemoglu and P. Restrepo, The race between man and machine revisited. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1394–1433, 2022.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597, 2019.
Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology, National Artificial Intelligence Policy Report (PNIA). Brasília: Government of Brazil, 2022.
E. Brynjolfsson and A. McAfee, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company, 2014.
J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
Y. Goodfellow, Bengio and A. Courville, Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.
Iran ICT Report, Annual Report on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation. Tehran: Ministry of ICT of Iran, 2023.
Iran Ministry of ICT, National Artificial Intelligence Policy Draft (Version 1.0). Tehran: Ministry of Information and Communications Technology, 2023.
Indonesia ICT Ministry, Indonesia Digital Roadmap 2023–2030. Jakarta: Ministry of Communication and Informatics, 2023.
N. Kshetri, Big Data’s Role in Expanding Access to Financial Services in China. In Big Data for Development (pp. 41–59). Routledge, 2020.
H. Margetts and C. Dorobantu, Rethinking public policy in the age of AI. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101729, 2022.
McKinsey Global Institute, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and the Future of Work. McKinsey & Company, 2018.
NASSCOM, India AI Talent Report 2023. New Delhi: National Association of Software and Service Companies, 2023.
NITI Aayog, National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence – AI for All. Government of India, New Delhi, 2021.
OECD, The Path to Becoming a Data-Driven Public Sector. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
OECD, Data-Driven Public Sector Framework (Updated Edition). Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025.
Oxford Insights, Government Artificial Intelligence Readiness Index 2023. London: Oxford Insights, 2024.
PwC, Sizing the Prize: What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business—and How Can You Capitalize? PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Report, 2023.
UNDP, Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development: Policy Frameworks and Global Trends. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2025.
UNESCO, AI and Data Governance in Emerging Economies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, 2024.
WIPO, Global Innovation Index 2024. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2024.
World Bank, Digital Development and AI Readiness Data Report 2024. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group, 2024.
World Economic Forum, The Future of Jobs Report 2024. Geneva: WEF Publications, 2024.
