هوش مصنوعی، اخلاق فضیلت و شکوفایی انسان
محورهای موضوعی : ادیان ابتدایی
1 - گروه ادیان، عرفان اسلامی و علوم سیاسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
2 - دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
کلید واژه: هوش مصنوعی, اخلاق فضیلت, شکوفایی انسان,
چکیده مقاله :
در جهان شبکهای قرن بیست و یکم، هوش مصنوعی (AI) در بسیاری از ابعاد وجودی و زیستی انسان نفوذ فزایندهای پیدا کرده است. چنین فنآوریهای نوظهوری موجب تغییرات فنی-اجتماعی پیچیده و غیرقابل پیشبینی شده است. این تحولات، عدم قطعیتهای عملی و شرایط ناشفافی را به وجود آورده و انسان را با چالشهای اخلاقی زیادی مواجه ساخته است. برای رفع نگرانیهای اخلاقی به رویکرد اخلاقی منعطفی نیاز است که بتواند در سراسر مرزهای انضباطی، ملی، فرهنگی و سایر مرزها کشش پیدا کند، طوری که با پوششدهی شکافهای جهانی برای فنآوریِ نوظهوری از جمله هوش مصنوعی اعمال شود و عملکرد انسان را هدایت کند. با درک اهمیت موضوع، در نوشتار حاضر، اهداف هوش مصنوعی و دیدگاههای فلسفی در اخلاق فنآوری تبیین شدهاند. علاوه بر این، مقایسهی اخلاق فضیلت با اخلاقهای اصولگرا و نحوه زندگی خوب با این رویکرد، همچنین، چالشهای اخلاقی رباتهای اجتماعی و اخلاق این رباتها مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که در این چشم انداز اخلاقی سیال، آنچه که نیاز هست، اخلاقی است که بر حضور عوامل انسانی انعطافپذیر، فهیم و عملاً خردمند متکی باشد. اخلاق فضیلت میتواند اخلاق فنآوریهای نوظهور را روشن کند و راهنمای زندگی خوب در عصر هوش مصنوعی باشد.
In the networked world of the 21st century, artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly penetrated many aspects of human existence and biology. Such emerging technologies have caused complex and unpredictable socio-technical changes. These developments have created practical uncertainties and opaque conditions, and have confronted humans with many ethical challenges. To address ethical concerns, a flexible ethical approach is needed that can stretch across disciplinary, national, cultural, and other boundaries, so that it can be applied to emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, by covering global gaps and guiding human performance. Understanding the importance of the subject, in this paper, the goals of artificial intelligence and philosophical perspectives in technological ethics are explained. In addition, a comparison of virtue ethics with principled ethics and how to live well with this approach, as well as the ethical challenges of social robots and the ethics of these robots, have been examined. The results of the research suggest that in this fluid ethical landscape, what is needed is an ethics that relies on the presence of flexible, insightful, and practically wise human agents. Virtue ethics can illuminate the ethics of emerging technologies and guide the good life in the age of artificial intelligence..
منابع
صمدیه، و ملایوسفی. (1396). ارسطو و فرونسیس (حکمت عملی). آینه معرفت، 17(4)، 1-24.
دادجو، ابراهیم. (1399). ذات گرایی جدید مابعدالطبیعه جدید. ذهن. 21(84). 112-77.
نعمت اللهی، شرلی، آزادی، کیهان، و وظن پرست، محمدرضا. (1398). بررسی پیامدگرایی و وظیفه گرایی اخلاقی با تاکید بر نظریه کانت در جامعه حسابداران رسمی ایران و تاثیر آن بر میزان پایبندی بر رفتار حرفه¬ای حسابرسان. پژوهش¬های اخلاقی (انجمن معارف اسلامی)، 10(1 )، 48-31.
References
1. Acquisti A (2009) Nudging privacy: the behavioral economics of personal information. IEEE Secur Priv 7:82–85.
2. Aristotle (2007) The Nicomachean ethics. Filiquarian Publishing, Minneapolis.
3. Bakhurst, D. (2018). Practice, Sensibility and Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52(4).
4. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race After Technology. Polity Press.
5. Berg, P. (2008). Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured. Nature 455: 290–291.
6. Borgmann, Albert. 1984. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2012). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
8. Camerer CF, Loewenstein G, Rabin M (2004) Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
9. Cath CJN, Wachter S, Mittelstadt B, Taddeo M, Floridi L (2016) Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY
10. Craglia M, Annoni A, Benczur P et al (2018) Artificial intelligence: a European perspective. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
11. Creemers R (2018) China’s social credit system: an evolving practice of control. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY
12. Croce, M., & Pritchard, D. (2022). Education as the Social Cultivation of Intellectual Virtue. In M. Alfano, C. Klein, & J. de Ridder (Eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology. Routledge, pp. 583–601.
13. Danaher J (2019) The philosophical case for robot friendship. J Posthum Stud 3(1):5–24.
14. Dignum V (2019) Responsible artبificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland.
15. Doudna, J. & Sternberg, S. (2017) A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
16. Ericsson, A. & Pool, R. (2016) Peak: The New Science of Expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
17. Farina, M., Zhdanov, P., Karimov, A., & Lavazza, A. (2022). AI and society: a virtue ethics approach. AI & SOCIETY, 1-14.
18. Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press, USA.
19. Floridi, L. et al. (2021). “An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.” In: Floridi, L. (eds) Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 144. Springer, Cham.
20. Floridi, L., Cowls, J. (2021). “A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society.” In: Floridi, L. (eds) Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 144. Springer, Cham.
21. Gabriel I (2020) Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment. Minds Mach 30(3):411–437.
22. Hanks, Craig, ed. 2010. Technology and Values. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
23. Haydon, G. (2010). Reason and Virtues: The Paradox of R. S. Peters on Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43: 173–188.
24. Hursthouse, R. (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
25. Isaak J, Hanna MJ (2018) User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection. Computer 51:56–59.
26. Johal W (2020) Research trends in social robots for learning. Curr Robot Rep 1:75–83.
27. Jonas, H. (1979). Toward a philosophy of technology. Hastings Center Report, 34-43.
28. Jonas, H. (1984). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago, 202.
29. Kant, Immanuel. [1785] 1997. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Klar R, Lanzerath D (2020) The ethics of COVID-19 tracking apps—challenges and voluntariness. Res Ethics 16:1–9.
31. Krakovsky M (2018) Artificial (emotional) intelligence. Commun ACM 61(4):18–19.
32. Liu C (2019) Multiple social credit systems in China. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
33. MacIntyre AC (2007) After virtue: a study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
34. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After Virtue, 2nd edn (Notre Dame, IN. IN: University of Notre DamePress.
35. Orona, G. A., & Pritchard, D. (2022). Inculcating curiosity: pilot results of an online module to enhance undergraduate intellectual virtue. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3): 375–389.
36. Scharff, R. C. (2012). Empirical technoscience studies in a Comtean world: too much concreteness?. Philosophy & Technology, 25, 153-177.
37. Scheutz, M. (2011). 13 The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots. Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics, 205.
38. Schuller D, Schuller BW (2018) The age of artificial emotional intelligence. Computer 51(9):38–46.
39. Stahl, B. C. (2023). Embedding responsibility in intelligent systems: from AI ethics to responsible AI ecosystems. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 7586.
40. Schwitzgebel, E., Corklet, B. & Singer, P. (2020) "Do Ethics Classes Influence Student Behavior? Case Study: Teaching the Ethics of Eating Meat", Cognition, 203: 104397.
41. Rawas, S. (2024). AI: the future of humanity. Discover artificial intelligence, 4(1), 25.
42. Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
43. Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford University Press.
44. Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press.
45. Whitby, B. (2011). 15 Do You Want a Robot Lover? The Ethics of Caring Technologies. Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics, 233.
46. Yashchenko, V. (2024). Artificial intelligence: free will, self-consciousness and ethics. Artificial Intelligence, 29(AI. 2024.29 (3)), 32-51.
47. Yearley, Lee H. 1990. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
48. Yearley, Lee H. 2002. “An Existentialist Reading of Book Four of the Analects.” In Confucius and the Analects, New Essays, edited by Bryan Van Norden, 237– 274. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Zuboff PS (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books, London.
