نوفرمگرایی ادراکمبنا: گذاری نظاممند بر روانشناسی زیبایی در معماری
محورهای موضوعی : نظریه ها و معماری
1 - استادیار گروه معماری و شهرسازی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران.
کلید واژه: زیباییشناسی, نوفرمالیسم, رابطه فرم – عملکرد, پارادایم فراعملکرد, روانشناسی محیطی,
چکیده مقاله :
زندگی بشر در بستر محیط انسانساخت با تکامل تدریجی اندیشه، دگرگون گشته و معیارهای ارزشی متفاوتی یافته است. انسان به طور فطری، جویای زیبایی و پیوسته در پی تجلی آن در محیط پیرامون میباشد؛ از این رو، مقوله زیبایی در معماری، جایگاهی قابل تأمل داشته و ادراک زیبایی در فضاهای معماری با تحریک انگیزش کاربران و اثرگذاری بر کیفیت زندگی و تجربیات آنان، همراه است. لذا پژوهش حاضر با رویکردی کیفی و به روش تفسیری - تطبیقی، به مرور مطالعات حوزه زیباییشناسی به مثابه یکی از اهداف غایی طراحی محیطی پرداخته و با بهرهگیری از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی و استدلال منطقی، یافتههای این عرصه را نقد کرده است. هدف، بازشناسی رابطه فرم معماری و زیبایی محیطی به عنوان یکی از نیازهای متعالی انسان بوده و نتایج، حاکی از آن است که بر خلاف دیدگاه مکاتب فرمالیستی که رابطه زیبایی فرمال با ادراک را حداقلی میدانند، فرم بنا با تأمین عملکردها و فراعملکردهای مورد انتظار و اثرگذاری انکارناپذیر بر ادراک، نقشی اساسی در پاسخگویی به انواع نیازهای انسان از جمله زیبایی ایفا میکند. به عبارتی، فرم تأمین کلیه نیازهای کاربران در سطوح مختلف را، از عملیاتی و کاربردی تا نمادین و انتزاعی، تحتالشعاع قرار داده و در تعریف زیبایی سهیم میسازد. بر این اساس، نقش فرایند طراحی نظاممند و بهویژه برنامهدهی معماری، به منظور ایدهپردازی هدفمند و همسوسازی فرم با خواستهای عملکردی و فراعملکردی، در قالب سناریوهایی راهبردی و راهگشا، حائز اهمیتی ویژه بوده و ادراک زیبایی را با موازنهای نسبی از حس و عقل در هر سطحی میسر مینماید.
Human life in the context of the built environment has evolved in tandem with the gradual maturation of thought, acquiring diverse value systems. Humans possess an innate propensity for beauty, continuously striving to manifest it in their surroundings. Consequently, the concept of beauty holds a significant position in architecture. The perception of beauty in architectural spaces stimulates users' motivation, influencing their quality of life. Therefore, this study, employing an interpretive-comparative approach, reviews many studies in the field of aesthetics as a fundamental objective of environmental design. Utilizing qualitative content analysis and logical reasoning, this critique examines the theories in this domain. The aim is to re-examine the relationship between architectural form and environmental beauty as one of humanity's higher-order needs. The results indicate that, contrary to the viewpoint of formalist schools, which posit a minimal relationship between formal beauty and perception, architectural form plays the essential role in fulfilling various human needs, including beauty. It is achieved by accommodating expected functions and meta-functions and exerting an undeniable influence on perception. In other words, form fundamentally underpins the fulfillment of all user needs across different levels, from practical to symbolic, thereby contributing to the very definition of beauty. Accordingly, the role of a systematic design process, particularly architectural programming, is paramount. It enables purposeful ideation and aligns form with functional and meta-functional demands through strategic, solution-oriented scenarios. This approach facilitates the perception of beauty through a relative balance of sensation and intellect at every level.
Balasubramaniam, M., 2018. The Extent and Relevance of Aesthetics in Architecture. Int. J. Eng. Res. 7, 94–97.
Bell, C., 1914. Art. Stokes.
Bolouri Bazzaz, M., Mostaghni, A., 2019. Formalism in Architecture and its Relation with the Concept of Form. J. Soffeh 29, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.29252/soffeh.29.4.5.
Bowie, A., 2003. Aesthetics and Subjectivity : From Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK ; New York.
Carroll, N., 1999. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge, London ; New York.
Chamani, R., 2008. The Dialectic Nature of Artworks in St. Augustine’s notions. Mon. Sci. J. Bagh-E Nazar 5, 17–26.
Croce, B. (Ed.), 1995. Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic. Routledge, New Brunswick, U.S.A.
Cuthbert, A.R., 2006. The Form of Cities: Political Economy and Urban Design. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA ; Oxford.
Davies, S., Higgins, K.M., Hopkins, R., Stecker, R., Cooper, D. (Eds.), 2009. Blackwell Companion to Aesthetics. Wiley, Malden, MA.
Duerk, D.P., 1993. Architectural programming: information management for design. Wiley.
Ekhtiari, M., 2012. The Impact of Human Needs and Desires on Architecture. J. Soffeh 22, 31–46.
Forty, A., 2004. Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. Thames and Hudson Ltd, London.
Gibson, J.J., 2014. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. Psychology Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218.
Gifford, R., Hine, D.W., Muller-Clemm, W., Shaw, K.T., 2002. Why Architects and Laypersons Judge Buildings Differently: Cognitive Properties and Physical Bases. J. Archit. Plan. Res. 19, 131–148.
Gombrich, E.H. (Ernst H., 1960. Art and illusion; a study in the psychology of pictorial representation. [New York] Pantheon Books.
Grütter, J.K., 2020. Basics of Perception in Architecture. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31156-8.
Hall, C.S., Lindzey, G., 1978. Theories of Personality. Wiley.
Khandan, P., Rezaei, H., 2021. Investigate and Analyze the Adaptation of Physical Factors with Perceptual-Cognitive Dimensions of the Sense of Place in Public Spaces from Socio-Cultural Perspective; Case Study: Public Spaces in Kermanshah City. Armanshahr Archit. Urban Dev. J. 13, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2019.167623.1789.
Mahmoodi, S.A.S., 2010. Architectural Programming, A Necessity for Design. J. Fine Arts Archit. Urban Plan. 2, 77–85.
Maslow, A.H., 1970. Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row.
McMahon, J.A., 1999. Towards a Unified Theory of Beauty. J. Lit. Aesthet. 9, 7–27.
Mohammadi, M., Nadimi, H., Saghafi, M.R., 2017. Investigating the Application of the Concept of ‘Affordance’ in the Design and Evaluation of the Built Environment. J. Soffeh 27, 21–34.
Motalebi, G., 2006. Recognizing the relationship between form and function in architecture. J. Fine Arts Archit. Urban Plan. 25, 55–64.
Motalebi, G., 2002. Environmental Psychology: A New Science Serving Architecture and Urban Design. J. Fine Arts Archit. Urban Plan. 10.
Motalebi-Esfidvajani, G., 1998. A theory of meaning in architecture and urban design (Thesis). UNSW Sydney. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/4238.
Noruzitalab, A., 2008. Formalistic Approach As the Basis of Criticism in Arts (artistic criticism). Mon. Sci. J. Bagh-E Nazar 5, 69–88.
Pakzad, J., Saki, E., 2014. Aesthetic Experience of Built Environment. J. Fine Arts Archit. Urban Plan. 19, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2014.55399.
Rezaei, H., 2020. A Creative Cycle of Promotion: From Architectural Creativity to the Sense of Place and its Resulting Creativeness. Space Ontol. Int. J. 5, 15. https://doi.org/10.22094/soij.2020.680027.
Rezaei, H., Keramati, G., Dehbashi Sharif, M., 2018a. A Psychological Meta-Analysis of the Form-Function Relation in Architectural Design Process from the Perspective of Creativity. J. Innov. Creat. Hum. Sci. 4, 265.
Rezaei, H., Keramati, G., Dehbashi Sharif, M., Nasir Salami, M., 2018b. A Schematic Explanatory Pattern for the Psychological Process of Achieving Environmental Meaning and Actualizing Sense of Place Focusing on the Intervening Role of the Perception. Mon. Sci. J. Bagh-E Nazar 15, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2018.74083.
Rezaei, H., Keramati, G., Dehbashi Sharif, M., Nasirsalami, M., 2020. Architectural Creativity as Architecture of Creativity; Analysis and Rating of the Physics-Based Psychological Effects of the Sense of Place on Environment Users’ Creativity; Case Study: Higher Education Institutions of Kermanshah. Armanshahr Archit. Urban Dev. J. 13, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2020.133277.1550.
Rezaei, H., Keramati, G., Sharif, M.D., Nasirsalami, M., 2018c. A meta-analytical attitude to the form–function relation in architecture using the concept of creativity. J. Cogent Arts Humanit. 5, 1506602. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1506602.
Rezaei, H., Soltani, P., 2023. Explaining the Psychological Model of Liveliness Actualization in the Context of Residential Architecture. J. Space Place Stud. 5, 15. https://doi.org/10.30495/jsps.2023.2001449.1073.
Rezaei, H., Ziaei, N.P., Mehrnia, S., 2023. Recognizing the Concept of “Utopia” and the Feasibility of its Actualization by Biophilic Urbanism. Sustain. Dev. Geogr. Environ. 4, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.52547/sdge.4.7.65.
Tahbaz, M., 2003. Beauty in Architecture. J. Soffeh 13, 75–97. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1382.13.4.1.9.
Tatarkiewicz, W., 2005. History of aesthetics. London ; New York, Continuum.
Vitruvius, P., 1960. Vitruvius: The Ten Books on Architecture. Dover Publications, New York.
Zucker, P., 1951. The Paradox of Architectural Theories at the Beginning of the “Modern Movement.” J. Soc. Archit. Hist. 10, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/987445.
