شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر ایجاد سقف شیشه‌ای برای زنان در سازمانهای دولتی با استفاده روش TOPSIS (مورد مطالعه استانداری و شهرداری همدان)
محورهای موضوعی :
1 - مدیریت، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد، واحد همدان
کلید واژه: سقف شیشه‌ای عوامل مؤثر بر ایجاد سقف شیشه‌ای روش تاپسیس ,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر به بررسی شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر ایجاد سقف شیشه‌ای برای زنان در استانداری و شهرداری همدان با استفاده روش TOPSIS پرداخت این پژوهش، از نظر هدف، توصیفی-ارزشیابی و روش جمع آوری اطلاعات در این تحقیق کتابخانه‌ای و مطالعه‌ای است و ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات این تحقیق مصاحبه خواهد بود. جامعه آماری شامل نفر از اساتید و خبرگان آگاه به حقوق زنان درسازمانهای دولتی می‌باشند که از سوابق اجرایی در سطوح تصمیم‌گیری برخوردار می‌باشند. در این تحقیق برای شناسائی عوامل مؤثر بر سقف شیشه‌ای و تعیین اولویت معیارهای تحقیق حاضر از مدلهای تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره و مدل TOPSIS استفاده شده است تجزیه و تحلیل با استفاده از تاپسیس در 6 گام انجام گرفت ابتدا نظرات خبرگان جمع‌آوری شد سپس نرمالسازی یا بی‌مقیاس کردن ماتریس و دنبال آن وزن دهی به ماتریس نرمال شده انجام گرفت و سپس تعیین راه حل ایده‌آل مثبت و ایده‌آل منفی معیارها و بعد از آن تعیین اندازه فاصله از راه حل ایده‌آل مثبت و منفی گزینه‌ها و در انتها نتایج حاصل از محاسبه نزدیکی به راه حل ایده‌آل مثبت و منفی و رتبه‌بندی گزینه‌ها نشان داد عوامل سازمانی بیشترین فاصله را نسبت به دیگر گزینه‌ها از راه حل ایده‌آل مثبت دارد و بنابراین ضریب نزدیکی آن 1 است و لذا در رتبه اول قرار می‌گیرد و سپس گزینه عوامل زمینه‌ای با ضریب نزدیکی 8/0، در رتبه دوم است و در نهایت گزینه عوامل رفتاری و نگرشی با ضریب نزدیکی صفر، دارای پایین ترین رتبه نسبت به دیگر گزینه‌ها از منظر خبرگان می‌باشد.
The current research is to investigate the identification and ranking of factors affecting the glass ceiling in Hamedan Governorate and Municipality using the TOPSIS method. This research is descriptive-evaluative in terms of its purpose, and the data collection tool of this research will be interviews. The statistical population includes professors and experts knowledgeable about women's rights in government organizations who have executive records at decision-making levels. In this research, the TOPSIS model was used to identify the factors affecting the glass ceiling and to determine the priority of the criteria of the present research. The analysis using TOPSIS was done in 6 steps, first, the opinions of the experts, then normalization or de-scaling of the matrix, and then weighting. to the normalized matrix, determining the positive ideal solution and the negative ideal of the criteria, and then determining the distance from the positive and negative ideal solution of the options, and finally, the results of calculating the proximity to the positive and negative ideal solution and ranking the options showed the factors An organization has the greatest distance from the positive ideal solution compared to other options, and therefore its proximity coefficient is 1, and therefore it is ranked first, then the contextual factors option with a proximity coefficient of 0.8 is in the second place, and finally the behavioral factors option And an attitude with a closeness coefficient of zero has the lowest rating compared to other options from the point of view of experts.
1. Allahyari, F.,Bayati,H., Sajjadi, S. N., Godarzi, M., & Alidoost Qahfarkhi, E. (2014). The role of the
glass ceiling on the empowerment of women in Tehran Municipal Sports Organization. Applied research in
sports management. (1), 59-69. [inpersian].
2. Bukstein, D., & Gandelman, N. (2019). Glass ceilings in research: evidence from a national program in
Uruguay. Research Policy, 48(6), pp 1550-1563.
3. Cotter, D., Hermsen, J., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 2,
655-682.
4. European Union (2023). The Glass Ceiling: New Realities from Old Challenges. Case Study Report.
5. Harvey, C. (2018). When queen bees attack women stop advancing: recognising and addressing female
bullying in the workplace. Development and learning in organizations: An International Journal. 32 (5), 1-4.
6. Baxter, J., & Rashid, R. (2022). The glass ceiling in public sector organizations: An empirical study.
Public Management Review, 24(5), 719-742.
7. Hoobler, J. M., Masterson, C. R., & Nkomo, S. M. (2021). The role of organizational structure, culture
and policies in shaping the glass ceiling. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 759-782.
8. International Labor Organization (2023). Breaking the Glass Ceiling: The Role of Organizations in
Gender Equality. Global Progress Report.
تاعلاطم یدربهار رد بسک و راک هرود 2، هرامش 2 : 12-1
1
12
9.
:
2
هرامش
،
2
هرود
راک
و
بسک
رد
یدربهار
تاعلاطم
Jones, A. B., Nilsson, J., & Eriksson, K. (2023). Breaking the glass ceiling: Lessons from Sweden's
family-friendly policies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), 312-335.
10. Keivani, R, & Alavi-Salkuye R. (2019). Investigating the relationship between the glass ceiling
phenomenon and organizational justice. J Sci Eng Elit, 19(4), 1–12.[inpersian].
11. Marianne, B. (2018). Coase lecture – the glass ceiling. Economica, 85(338), 205-231.
12.
Martínez-Martínez, M., Molina-López, M. M., Mateos de Cabo, R., Gabaldón, P., González-Pérez, S.,
& Izquierdo, G. (2021). Awakenings: An Authentic Leadership Development Program to Break the Glass
Ceiling. Sustainability, 13(13), 74-76.
13. Mortazavi, S. M. J., & Shekarpour, N. (2014). Academic progress of female faculty members in Shiraz
University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Ethics and History of Medicine, 3(1), 77-89. [inpersian].
14. Nasiri F., & Beheshtirad R. (2022). Investigating the role of the glass ceiling on perceived organizational
justice reduction (A case study of female staff of Urmia University). Soc Psychol Stud Women [Internet].
[inpersian].
15. Ng, E. S., & McGowan, R. A. (2022). Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Views of Women from the Second
Wave Feminist Movement. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de
l'Administration. , 1-15.
16. Parsa, E., & Khushkam, M. (2016). Examining the role of the glass ceiling phenomenon on the decline of
social capital in the organization. The second international conference and the fourth national conference on
management and humanities researches (pp. 1-17). Tehran: University of Tehran. [inpersian].
17. Patriarca, M., Rossi, M., & Vertozi, A. (2023). The Glass Ceiling and Its Consequences for Organizations.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(2), 184-207.
18. Peterson, H., & Morgan, L. (2022). The persistent masculine culture in Australian public sector
organizations: A barrier to women's career advancement. Public Management Review, 24(7), 1031-1052.
19. Radhakrishnan, R. (2019). Cultural variations in the glass ceiling effect: a review. Artha Journal of Social
Sciences, 18(1), 23-30.
20. Rahmani, F., et al. (2021). Investigating the Effective Factors on the Glass Ceiling in Iranian Government
Organizations. Public Management Quarterly, 13(2), 271-290. [inpersian].
21. Salehnia, N., & Ghanbari, S. (2023). Factors Affecting the Glass Ceiling for Women Employed in Iranian
Government Organizations. Quarterly Journal of Public Management Studies, 23(1), 41-62. [inpersian].
22. Sepahvand, R., Arefnezhad, M., & Ahmadi, S. (2022). Analyzing the glass ceiling factors affecting
women's career advancement in government organizations using grounded theory. Women in Development &
Politics, 20(1), 65-92. [inpersian].
23. Sedaghat, M., & Amiri, F. (2023). The Glass Ceiling and Challenges Facing Working Women in Iran.
Biannual Journal of Employment Policies, 17(2), 74-92. [inpersian].
24. Seyed J., S. R., & Jalilian, H. (2016). Management theories. Tehran: Negah Danesh Publications.
[inpersian].
25. Shakouri, A. (2020). Identifying and Ranking the Barriers to Women's Career Advancement in
Government Organizations Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. Executive Management Research Quarterly, 12(2),
89-114 .[inpersian].
26. Soleimani, M., & Ahmadi, F. (2021). Analyzing the Effective Factors on the Glass Ceiling in Government
Organizations Using the Grounded Theory Approach. Public Management Quarterly, 13(1), 129
152[inpersian]..
27. Soumya, R. R., & Sathiyaseelan, A. (2021). Mindfulness: An emotional aid to the glass ceiling
experiences. Cogent Psychology, 8:1907911
28. Weidmann, C. T., & Baptist, P. J. (2023). Overcoming the Glass Ceiling: Gender Differences in the
Attainment of Senior Executive Service Positions in the US Federal Government. Public Administration Review,
83(1), 72-89.
29. Zarghami Far, M., Behbodhi, M. R. (2014). The phenomenon of the glass cliff: examining the experiences
and challenges of women in the leadership positions of the organization. Journal of Organizational Culture
Management, (2)12, 211-191. [inpersian].
30. Zhang, J., Liao, C., & Chen, A. (2023). The Glass Ceiling and Its Impact on Diversity of Opinion in
Organizational Decision-Making. Strategic Management Quarterly, 65(3), 24-45. Topsis model
