The New Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence and the Challenges of Global Governance
محورهای موضوعی :
Ziauddin Sabouri
1
,
Seyyed Behnam Mehrdel
2
1 - Iranian International Studies Association (IISA)President of IISA
2 - Permanent Member of Iranian International Studies Association (IISA)
کلید واژه: Algorithmic Revolution, Artificial Intelligence (IA), Geopolitics, Technology,
چکیده مقاله :
From the beginning of the age of technology; Every idea, innovation and new invention has helped humans to start a new era of economic growth. This growth has usually been accom-panied by a change in the fundamental principles of nations and their security. In this new era; Artificial intelligence is mentioned as the background of the revolution and the evolution of all human ecosystems in virtual, terrestrial, celestial, etc. spaces. Geopolitical factors seem to play a decisive role in the work process. Predicting an algorithmic revolution that could se-riously challenge the model of global governance is not unexpected. It is here that govern-ments must not only increase their understanding of the potential impact of artificial intelli-gence, but also change their governance model in advancing the technology. This requires understanding the new and future geopolitics of this technology. Therefore, in this study, while examining the current and possible changes in the power factors of governments by arti-ficial intelligence technologies, the new geopolitics of this technology is explained. The meth-od used in this research is descriptive-analytical and library tools, documents and electronic resources have been used to collect data.
From the beginning of the age of technology; Every idea, innovation and new invention has helped humans to start a new era of economic growth. This growth has usually been accom-panied by a change in the fundamental principles of nations and their security. In this new era; Artificial intelligence is mentioned as the background of the revolution and the evolution of all human ecosystems in virtual, terrestrial, celestial, etc. spaces. Geopolitical factors seem to play a decisive role in the work process. Predicting an algorithmic revolution that could se-riously challenge the model of global governance is not unexpected. It is here that govern-ments must not only increase their understanding of the potential impact of artificial intelli-gence, but also change their governance model in advancing the technology. This requires understanding the new and future geopolitics of this technology. Therefore, in this study, while examining the current and possible changes in the power factors of governments by arti-ficial intelligence technologies, the new geopolitics of this technology is explained. The meth-od used in this research is descriptive-analytical and library tools, documents and electronic resources have been used to collect data.
Abdi, Massoud, Faraji Rad, Abdul Reza, Ghorbannejad, Ribaz, (2019). Expla-nation of geopolitical components affecting the formation of strategic relations, International Quarterly of Geopolitics, Spring No. 16, Volume 57, pp. 1-36.
Ahmadi, Seyed Abbas; Badii Ajandehi, Mar-jan. Heydari Moslu, Tahmours. (2016), theoretical explanation of the nature of geopolitical regions in the competition of powers. Geopoli-tics Quarterly, Volume 13, No. 47, pp. 55-78.
Ahmadi, Seyyed Ali Akbar, Chaina, Mo-hammadreza, Salamzad, Arash, Jafa-ri, Mohammadreza (2012), Artificial intelligence and business opportuni-ties: Identifying the functions of ar-tificial intelligence in creating a competitive advantage for technolo-gy businesses (review of the com-puter games industry), Scientific Re-search Quarterly Journal of Entre-preneurship Development, Volume 6, Number 2, Number 20, Summer, pp. 7-26.
Ahmadipour, Zahra and others. (2007). In-vestigating the process of accelerat-ing the development of political-administrative spaces in the country, a case study: Iran's provinces in the first to third development plans (1368-1388), Geopolitics Quarterly, 1(86), 22-49.
Allen Gregory. (2019). Understanding Chi-na's AI Strategy. Center for a New American Security, Retrieved 11 March. PP1-31.
Arnet, Melanie, Terry Gregory and Ulrich Zierahn (2016). “The Risk of Auto-mation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No.189. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-impact-of-artificial-intelligence-on-international-trade/(2021/1/30).
Brynjolfsson, Erik. (2017). “Artificial Intel-ligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics”, NBER Working Pa-per, Vol24, No. 1, October, pp10-35.
Byrne, David M, J.G. Fernald and M.B. Reinsdorf (2016). “Does the United States Have a Productivity Slow-down or a Measurement Prob-lem?” Brookings Papers on Econom-ic Activity, Vol 47, spring, No1, pp109-182.
Crootof, Rebecca (2015). The Killer Robots Are Here: Legal and Policy Implica-tions. http://cardozolawreview.com/the-killer-robots-are-here-legal-and-policy-implica-tions%E2%80%A8/(2021/1/30).
Dennett, D. C (1998). Brainchildren Essays on Designing Minds, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Edelman, Benjamin G. and Luca, Michael (2014). Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com, Working Paper Number 14-054, Negotiations, Or-ganizations, and Markets Unit, Har-vard Business School, Cambridge, MA. https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/digital-discrimination-the-case-of-airbnb-com (2021/1/30).
Felten, Ed (2016). Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence, White House blog, May 3. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/05/03/preparing-future-artificial-intelligence(2021/1/30).
Garvie, Clare and Frankle Jonathan. (2016). “Facial-Recognition Software Might Have a Racial Bias Problem,” Atlan-tic, April 7, 2016. https://www.ncfr.org/events/exploring-implicit-bias-and-promoting-equi-ty?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIqZbjhvPe7QIVhO3tCh3nmQA9EAAYASAAEgLpg_D_BwE (2021/1/30).
Hekmatnia, Mahmoud, Mohammadi, Morte-za, Vosoughi, Mohsen (2018), civil responsibility of robot production based on autonomous artificial intel-ligence, Islamic Law, 16th year, spring, number 60, pp. 231-255.
https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/understanding-chinas-ai-strategy (2021/1/30).
Kadri Hajat, Mustafa, Gol Karami, Abed. (2020). Investigation and analysis of the geopolitical attitude of the up-stream documents of land acquisi-tion in Iran. International Quarterly of Geopolitics, No. 16, Volume 58, pp. 58-87.
Kissinger, Henry (2018). How the Enlight-ment Ends, The Atlantic, June. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/. (2021/1/30).
Luger, G., & Stubblefield, W (2004). Artifi-cial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving (5th Ed.). San Francisco: The Benjamin, Cummings Publish-ing Company.
Maas, Matthijs M (2019). How viable is in-ternational arms control for military artificial intelligence? Three lessons from nuclear weap-ons". Contemporary Security Poli-cy. https://jura.ku.dk/english/staff/research/?pure=en/persons/604485 (2021/1/30).
Marantz, Andrew (2015). When an App Is Called Racist, New Yorker, and July 29: https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/what-to-do-when-your-app-is-racist (2021/1/30).
Matthew U. Scherer (2016). “Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies,” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol 29, No. 2, pp. 393–397.
Maureen K. Ohlhausen. (2013). the Internet of Things and the FTC: Does Inno-vation Require Intervention? Re-marks before the US Chamber of Commerce, Washington, DC, Octo-ber 18. https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2013/10/internet-things-ftc-does-innovation-require-intervention (2021/1/30).
Mearsheimer, john (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: Norton Publication.
Mohammad Ali Khalaj, Mohammad Hossein (2014), Dreyfus Philosophical Histo-ry of Artificial Intelligence, Funda-mental Westernization, Fifth Year, Spring and Summer, No. 1 (9 in a row), pp. 103-128. [In Persian]
Rasouli, Majid, Shariati, Shahrooz. (2020). Geopolitical analysis of Boko Haram terrorism threat in West Africa. In-ternational Geopolitical Quarterly, No. 16, Volume 59, pp. 203-228. [In Persian]
Remes Jaana (2018). Solving the productivi-ty puzzle: the role of demand and the promise of digitiza-tion”,MCKINSEYGLOBALInstitute,https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Meeting%20societys%20expectations/Solv-ing%20the%20productivity%20puzzle/MGI-Solving-the-Productivity-Puzzle-Executive-summary-February-22-2018.pdf
Russell, Stuart (2018). Q & A: The Future of Artificial Intelligence, University of California, Berkeley. http://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~russell/temp/q-and-a.html (2021/1/30).
Russell, Stuart J., Peter Norvig (2003). Arti-ficial Intelligence: A Modern Ap-proach, New Jersey: Pearson Publi-cation.
Smola, Alex and Vishwanathan, S. V. N (2008). An Introduction to Machine Learning (Cambridge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, James B (2015). A Fearless Culture Fuels U.S. Tech Giants, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/19/business/the-american-way-of-tech-and-europes.html (2021/1/30).
Sweeney, Latanya (2013). “Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery,” AC-MQueue, Vol 11, No. 3, pp1-19.
Thierer, Adam (2016). Failing Better: What We Learn by Confronting Risk and Uncertainty, in Nudge Theory in Action: Behavioral Design in Policy and Markets, ed. Sherzod Abdukadi-rov, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thierer, Adam Andrea Castillo, Sullivan, and d Russel, Raymonl (2017). Arti-ficial Intelligence and Public Policy, Arlington: Mercatus Research, Mer-catus Center at George Mason Uni-versity.
Tutt, Andrew (2017). “An FDA for Algo-rithms,” Administrative Law Re-view, Vol 69, No. 1. pp 2-29.
Umbrello, Steven; Torres, Phil; De Bellis, Angelo F (2020). “The future of war: could lethal autonomous weapons make conflict more ethical?” AI & Society. Vol 35, No.1, pp. 273–282.
White House (1997). The Framework for Global Electronic Commerce, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/05/03/preparing-future-artificial-intelligence
Wildavsky, Aaron (1988). Searching for Safety: Social Theory and Social Pol-icy, New Brunswick: CT Transaction Books.
Zarsky, Tal Z (2015). “The Privacy-Innovation Conundrum,” Lewis and Clark Law Review, 19. No. 1. Pp115-168.
