Influence of Waste Rubber Powder on the Physical and Mechanical Behavior of Clay Soils
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Building Information ModelingHamidreza Kazemi 1 , Alireza Hajiani Boushehrian 2 , Ali Parhizkar 3
1 - Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shiraz, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 - writer
3 - Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shiraz, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
کلید واژه: Waste Material, Rubber Powder, Clay Soils, Mechanical Behavior ,
چکیده مقاله :
transportation networks. One major challenge is the presence of weak soils. Clayey soils, due to their high plasticity and deformability, are considered problematic, and improving their geotechnical properties remains a key issue in civil engineering. Recently, the use of waste materials, especially waste rubber powder, as sustainable soil stabilizers has gained attention.This study examines the influence of different contents (5%, 10%, and 15%) and particle sizes (0.5, 1.3, and 3.5 mm) of waste rubber powder on the strength and mechanical behavior of clayey soils. Untreated clay was used as a control, and standard laboratory tests—including Atterberg limits, compaction, consolidated drained direct shear, and unconfined compressive strength—were conducted according to ASTM standards.The results show that adding rubber powder lowers the liquid limit, plastic limit, optimum moisture content, and maximum dry density. Higher rubber content reduced unconfined compressive strength, while the internal friction angle increased and cohesion decreased.Overall, incorporating waste rubber powder offers a sustainable approach to improving the engineering performance of clayey soils while reducing the environmental burden of rubber waste.
transportation networks. One major challenge is the presence of weak soils. Clayey soils, due to their high plasticity and deformability, are considered problematic, and improving their geotechnical properties remains a key issue in civil engineering. Recently, the use of waste materials, especially waste rubber powder, as sustainable soil stabilizers has gained attention.This study examines the influence of different contents (5%, 10%, and 15%) and particle sizes (0.5, 1.3, and 3.5 mm) of waste rubber powder on the strength and mechanical behavior of clayey soils. Untreated clay was used as a control, and standard laboratory tests—including Atterberg limits, compaction, consolidated drained direct shear, and unconfined compressive strength—were conducted according to ASTM standards.The results show that adding rubber powder lowers the liquid limit, plastic limit, optimum moisture content, and maximum dry density. Higher rubber content reduced unconfined compressive strength, while the internal friction angle increased and cohesion decreased.Overall, incorporating waste rubber powder offers a sustainable approach to improving the engineering performance of clayey soils while reducing the environmental burden of rubber waste.
Ayothiraman, R., & Meena, A. K. (2011, December). Improvement of subgrade soil with shredded waste tyre chips. In Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference (Vol. 15, No. 17).
Balasooriya, M. G. B. T., Kumari, W. G. S. D., Mallawarachchi, M. A. S. N., & Udakara, D. D. D. S. (2012). Study the effect of waste rubber materials on shear strength of residual soils.
Boushehrian, A. H., & Hataf, N. (2008). Bearing capacity of ring footings on reinforced clay. In G. Li, Y. Chen, & X. Tang (Eds.), Geosynthetics in civil and environmental engineering (pp. 267–271). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69313-0_32
Boushehrian, A. H., Hataf, N., & Ghahramani, A. (2011). Modeling of the cyclic behavior of shallow foundations resting on geomesh and grid-anchor reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(3), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.01.004
Bridgwater, A. V., & Mumford, C. J. (1979). Waste recycling and pollution control handbook. Great Britain.
Carraro, A., Budagher, E., Badanagki, M., & Kang, J. B. (2013). Sustainable stabilization of sulfate-bearing soils with expansive soil-rubber technology (No. CDOT-2013-2). Colorado Department of Transportation, Research Branch.
Cetin, H., Fener, M., & Gunaydin, O. (2006). Geotechnical properties of tire-cohesive clayey soil mixtures as a fill material. Engineering Geology, 88(1–2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.004
Foose, G. J., Benson, C. H., & Bosscher, P. J. (1996). Sand reinforced with shredded waste tires. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122(9), 760–767. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:9(760)
Ghazavi, M. (2004). Shear strength characteristics of sand-mixed with granular rubber. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 22(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEGE.0000018342.20738.0c
Hataf, N., & Rahimi, M. M. (2006). Experimental investigation of bearing capacity of sand reinforced with randomly distributed tire shreds. Construction and Building Materials, 20(10), 910–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.017
Humphrey, D. N., Katz, L. E., & Blumenthal, M. (1997). Water quality effects of tire chip fills placed above the groundwater table. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1275, 299–313.
Jastrzębska, M. (2019). Strength characteristics of clay-rubber waste mixtures in uu triaxial tests. Geosciences, 9(8), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9080352
Lee, J. H., Salgado, R., Bernal, A., & Lovell, C. W. (1999). Shredded tires and rubber-sand as lightweight backfill. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:2(132)
Massey, R. I. (2020). Use of tire crumb in recreational settings: Science and policy implications (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Lowell).
Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. N., Joz Darabi, N., Tavakoli Mehrjardi, G., & Dawson, A. (2019). Experimental and numerical investigation of footing behaviour on multi-layered rubber-reinforced soil. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 23(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1261809
Nightingale, D. E., & Green, W. P. (1997). An unresolved riddle: Tire chips, two roadbeds, and spontaneous reactions. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1275, 265–285.
O'Shaughnessy, V., & Garga, V. K. (2000). Tire-reinforced earthfill. Part 3: Environmental assessment. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-077
Poh, P. S., & Broms, B. B. (1995). Slope stabilization using old rubber tires and geotextiles. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 9(1), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1995)9:1(76)
Ramirez, G. G. D., Casagrande, M. D. T., Folle, D., Pereira, A., & Paulon, V. A. (2015). Behavior of granular rubber waste tire reinforced soil for application in geosynthetic reinforced soil wall. Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais, 8(4), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952015000400008
Tuncan, M., Cetin, A., Tuncan, A., & Koyuncu, H. (1998). Assessment of waste tires and plastic on asphalt concrete pavement mixtures.
Yoon, Y. W., Cheon, S. H., & Kang, D. S. (2004). Bearing capacity and settlement of tire-reinforced sands. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 22(5), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2003.12.002
