Ring Compression Test Analysis on Lead and Plasticine Materials
محورهای موضوعی : Manufacturing process monitoring and control
1 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, YI.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Bulk Metal Forming, Friction, Ring Compression Test, Numerical Analysis, Finite Element Modeling,
چکیده مقاله :
In this study, the coefficient of friction in bulk metal forming processes was investigated using the ring compression test for two different materials: lead and plasticine. The main objective was to determine the friction coefficients under various lubrication conditions by employing both theoretical calibration curves and numerical simulations using ANSYS software. The experimental data, including dimensional changes during the ring test, were compared to simulation results to extract accurate values for the coefficient of friction. The discrepancies between theoretical and numerical outcomes were primarily attributed to strain hardening and other modeling considerations not accounted for in analytical methods. The study showed that numerical simulations provided more realistic estimates of frictional behavior, making them better suited for industrial applications. Furthermore, the results confirmed that using a combined lubricant of talc powder and vegetable oil significantly reduced the coefficient of friction compared to using talc powder alone. This research highlights the importance of selecting appropriate lubricants and modeling methods for accurate prediction and optimization of metal and polymer forming processes. Overall, combining experimental testing and finite element analysis presents a comprehensive and effective approach to evaluating tribological conditions in forming operations.
In this study, the coefficient of friction in bulk metal forming processes was investigated using the ring compression test for two different materials: lead and plasticine. The main objective was to determine the friction coefficients under various lubrication conditions by employing both theoretical calibration curves and numerical simulations using ANSYS software. The experimental data, including dimensional changes during the ring test, were compared to simulation results to extract accurate values for the coefficient of friction. The discrepancies between theoretical and numerical outcomes were primarily attributed to strain hardening and other modeling considerations not accounted for in analytical methods. The study showed that numerical simulations provided more realistic estimates of frictional behavior, making them better suited for industrial applications. Furthermore, the results confirmed that using a combined lubricant of talc powder and vegetable oil significantly reduced the coefficient of friction compared to using talc powder alone. This research highlights the importance of selecting appropriate lubricants and modeling methods for accurate prediction and optimization of metal and polymer forming processes. Overall, combining experimental testing and finite element analysis presents a comprehensive and effective approach to evaluating tribological conditions in forming operations.
[1] Joun, M.S., Moon, H.G., Choi, I.S., Lee, M.C. and Jun, B.Y. 2009. Effects of friction laws on metal forming processes. Tribology International. 42: 311–319. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.06.012.
[2] Male, A.T. and Cockcroft, M.G. 1965. A method for the determination of the coefficient of friction of metals under conditions of bulk plastic deformation. Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals and Materials. 93: 38-45.
[3] Sigvant, M., Pilthammar, J., Hol, J., Wiebenga, J.H., Chezan, T., Carleer, B. and van den Boogaard, T. 2019. Friction in sheet metal forming: Influence of surface roughness and strain rate on sheet metal forming simulation results. Procedia Manufacturing. 29: 512–519. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.169.
[4] Stembalski, M., Prés, P. and Skoczyński, W. 2013. Determination of the friction coefficient as a function of sliding speed and normal pressure for steel C45 and steel 40HM. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 13: 444–448. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2013.04.010.
[5] Ramaraj, T.C. and Shaw, M.C. 1985. A new method of evaluating metal-working lubricants. Journal of Tribology. 107: 216–219. doi: 10.1115/1.3261023.
[6] Arentoft, M., Bay, N., Tang, P.T. and Jensen, J.D. 2009. A new lubricant carrier for metal forming. CIRP Annals. 58: 243–246. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.062.
[7] Polcar, T., Novák, R. and Široký, P. 2006. The tribological characteristics of TiCN coating at elevated temperatures. Wear. 260: 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.12.031.
[8] Kubart, T., Polcar, T., Kopecký, L., Novák, R. and Nováková, D. 2005. Temperature dependence of tribological properties of MoS2 and MoSe2 coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 193: 230–233. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.146.
[9] Ludema, K.C. 1996. Mechanism-based modeling of friction and wear. Wear. 200: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07312-7.
[10] Hawryluk, M., Dudkiewicz, Ł., Marzec, J., Rychlik, M. and Tkocz, R. 2023. Selected aspects of lubrication in die forging processes at elevated temperatures—A review. Lubricants. 11: 206. doi: 10.3390/lubricants11050206.
[11] Wu, Y., Recklin, V. and Groche, P. 2021. Strain induced surface change in sheet metal forming: Numerical prediction, influence on friction and tool wear. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 5: 29. doi: 10.3390/jmmp5020029.
[12] Jeswiet, J. and Wild, P. 2001. Sensing friction: Methods and devices. Journal of Forming Processes. 4: 125–134. doi: 10.3166/ijfp.4.125-133.
[13] Sofuoglu, H. and Gedikli, H. 2002. Determination of friction coefficient encountered in large deformation processes. Tribology International. 35: 27–34. doi: 10.1016/S0301-679X(01)00076-7.
[14] Sofuoglu, H., Gedikli, H. and Rasty, J. 2001. Determination of friction coefficient by employing the ring compression test. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. 123: 338–348. doi: 10.1115/1.1369601#.
[15] Menezes, P.L., Kumar, K., Kishore and Kailas, S.V. 2009. Influence of friction during forming processes—A study using a numerical simulation technique. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 40: 1067–1076. doi: 10.1007/s00170-008-1425-5.
[16] Ramezani, M. and Ripin, Z.M. 2010. A friction model for dry contacts during metal-forming processes. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 51: 93–102. doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2608-4.
[17] Bucholz, E.W., Kong, C.S., Marchman, K.R., Sawyer, W.G., Phillpot, S.R., Sinnott, S.B. and Rajan, K. 2012. Data-driven model for estimation of friction coefficient via informatics methods. Tribology Letters. 47: 211–221. doi: 10.1007/s11249-012-9975-y.
[18] Zhou, C., Hu, B., Qian, X. and Han, X. 2018. A novel prediction method for gear friction coefficients based on a computational inverse technique. Tribology International. 127: 200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.06.005.
[19] Honarpisheh, M. and Shooshtari, N. 2023. Numerical and Experimental Comparison of Flow Stress and the Effect of Microcylinder Topography in the Barreling Test: An Artificial Neural Network Model. Journal of Modern Processes in Manufacturing and Production. 12(1): 17-29. dor: 20.1001.1.27170314.2023.12.1.2.5.
[20] Weinmann, K.J., Bhonsle, S.R. and Gerstenberger, J. 1990. On the determination of the coefficient of friction and the friction factor by the strip-tension friction test. CIRP Annals. 39: 263–266. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61049-X.
[21] Storchak, M., Möhring, H.-C. and Stehle, T. 2022. Improving the friction model for the simulation of cutting processes. Tribology International. 167: 107376. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107376.
[22] Han, H. 2005. Determination of mean flow stress and friction coefficient by the modified two-specimen method in cold rolling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 159: 401–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.005.
[23] Kramer, P. and Groche, P. 2019. Friction measurement under consideration of contact conditions and type of lubricant in bulk metal forming. Lubricants. 7(2): Article 12. doi: 10.3390/lubricants7020012.
[24] Sofuoğlu, H. and Gedikli, H. 2002. Determination of friction coefficient encountered in large deformation processes. Tribology International. 35(1): 27–34. doi: 10.1016/S0301-679X(01)00076-7.
[25] Ivanov, G., Petrov, D. and Stoyanov, S. 2018. Experimental and simulation determination of friction coefficient by using the ring compression test. Proceedings of International Scientific Conference,Borovets, Bulgaria.
[26] Wolla, D.W., Davidson, M.J. and Khanra, A.K. 2016. Evaluation of friction of powder metallurgical Al–4 wt% Cu preforms by employing ring compression test and FEM in hot compression test. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals. 69(5): 1031–1041. doi: 10.1007/s12666-015-0617-6.
[27] Fereshteh-Saniee, F., Pillingey, I. and Hartley, P. 2004. Friction modelling for the physical simulation of the bulk metal forming processes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 153(1): 151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.217.
[28] Rudenko, P. and Bandyopadhyay, A. 2013. Talc as friction reducing additive to lubricating oil. Applied Surface Science. 276: 383–389. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.102.
[29] Hama, T., Oka, M., Nishi, T., Matsumo, T., Hayashi, S., Takada, K. and Okitsu, Y. 2023. Crystal plasticity finite-element simulation of non-uniform deformation behavior at grain level of ultralow carbon steel. ISIJ International. 64(3): 631–640. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-416.
[30] Eom, J.G. , Son, Y.H. , Jeong, S.W.., Ahn, S.T. , Jang, S.M. , Yoon, D.J. and Joun, M.S. 2014. Effect of strain hardening capability on plastic deformation behaviors of material during metal forming. Materials & Design. 54: 1010–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.101.
