Investigating the Influence of Interstitial Spaces on the Architectural Identity of the Safavid Era
محورهای موضوعی : ArchitectureMehrdad Mahi Khamaneh 1 , Hossein Moradi Nasab 2 , Hamed Sheikh Taheri 3
1 - Department of Architecture, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
2 - Department of Architecture, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
3 - Department of Architecture, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
کلید واژه: Interstitial spaces, spatial organization, architectural identity, Safavid architecture,
چکیده مقاله :
Safavid Isfahan (1501–1736) has long been celebrated for its monumental mosques, palaces, and gardens, yet scholarship has often privileged domes, façades, and ornament while neglecting the interstitial spaces that mediate between them. This study addresses that gap by examining the formative role of thresholds, corridors, galleries, gardens, and terraces in structuring experience and constructing architectural identity. A qualitative methodology was adopted, combining a systematic literature review, semi-structured interviews with eight leading scholars of Iranian and Islamic architecture, and detailed case analyses of the Imam Mosque, ʿAlī Qāpū Palace, and the Chahār-Bāgh School. Thematic coding of expert testimonies, triangulated with architectural evidence, revealed six interdependent domains of interstitial design: geometric order, spatial hierarchy, environmental intelligence, socio-cultural practice, sensory–spiritual orchestration, and political–aesthetic representation. The findings demonstrate that in Safavid architecture, interstitial spaces were not residual connectors but polyvalent instruments that simultaneously organized movement, moderated climate, encoded hierarchy, and materialized cosmological and ideological meanings. These results reframe Safavid design as a grammar of thresholds in which form, function, and symbolism are fused. Beyond historical insight, the study underscores the continuing relevance of interstitial design as a model for integrating climate, community, and cosmology in contemporary architectural practice.
Safavid Isfahan (1501–1736) has long been celebrated for its monumental mosques, palaces, and gardens, yet scholarship has often privileged domes, façades, and ornament while neglecting the interstitial spaces that mediate between them. This study addresses that gap by examining the formative role of thresholds, corridors, galleries, gardens, and terraces in structuring experience and constructing architectural identity. A qualitative methodology was adopted, combining a systematic literature review, semi-structured interviews with eight leading scholars of Iranian and Islamic architecture, and detailed case analyses of the Imam Mosque, ʿAlī Qāpū Palace, and the Chahār-Bāgh School. Thematic coding of expert testimonies, triangulated with architectural evidence, revealed six interdependent domains of interstitial design: geometric order, spatial hierarchy, environmental intelligence, socio-cultural practice, sensory–spiritual orchestration, and political–aesthetic representation. The findings demonstrate that in Safavid architecture, interstitial spaces were not residual connectors but polyvalent instruments that simultaneously organized movement, moderated climate, encoded hierarchy, and materialized cosmological and ideological meanings. These results reframe Safavid design as a grammar of thresholds in which form, function, and symbolism are fused. Beyond historical insight, the study underscores the continuing relevance of interstitial design as a model for integrating climate, community, and cosmology in contemporary architectural practice.
Aghadavoudi, M. (2019). Analysis of decorative elements in educational-religious buildings of the Safavid period: Case studies (Molla Abdullah, Chaharbagh, and Ali Qoli Agha). Islamic Culture and Civilization History, 10(37), 69–86.
https://civilica.com/doc/920118
Ahmadi, M., Farkish, H., Ahmadi, V., & Mirzakochak Khoshnevis, A. (2020). Recognition of the relationship between architectural codes of mosques and the quality of worshipers' spiritual presence (Case study: Safavid era mosques in Isfahan). Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Culture, 5(2), 51–74.
https://civilica.com/doc/1134901
Alemi, M. (2010). The reflection of Safavid palaces in European travel accounts. In S. Babaie & T. Grigor (Eds.), Iran and the world in the Safavid age (pp. 223–240). London, England: I.B. Tauris.
https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/iran-and-the-world-in-the-safavid-age-9781845117450/
Ardalan, N., & Bakhtiar, L. (1973). The sense of unity: The Sufi tradition in Persian architecture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/S/bo5977274.html
Babaie, S. (1994). Safavid palaces at Isfahan: Continuity and change (1590–1666) [Doctoral dissertation, New York University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
https://www.proquest.com/docview/304115252
Babaie, S. (2008). Isfahan and its palaces: Statecraft, Shi‘ism and the architecture of conviviality in early modern Iran. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-isfahan-and-its-palaces.html
Babayan, K. (2002). Mystics, monarchs, and messiahs: Cultural landscapes of early modern Iran (Vol. 35). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Center for Middle Eastern Studies.
https://cmes.fas.harvard.edu/publications/mystics-monarchs-and-messiahs
Belilan Asl, L., Etesam, I., & Islami, S. G. (2011). The role of interstitial spaces in defining spatial identity in the historical textures of Iran. City Identity, 5(8), 59–71.
https://civilica.com/doc/140765
Blair, S. S., & Bloom, J. M. (1999). The art and architecture of Islam: 1250–1800. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300088670/the-art-and-architecture-of-islam-1250-1800/
Blake, S. P. (1999). Half the world: The social architecture of Safavid Isfahan, 1590–1722. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers.
https://www.worldcat.org/title/42293558
Diba, L. (2001). Residential architecture in Safavid Persia: Continuity and change. In Studies in Persian art and architecture (pp. 45–60). Tehran, Iran: Tehran University Press.
https://www.worldcat.org/title/47573612
Esmaeili, A., & Piri, S. (2020). Examining the necessity of interstitial spaces in a macro scale with transitional characteristics, focusing on the concept of indoor-outdoor connection (Case study: Transitional spaces in four domestic and international public complexes). Haft Hesar Environmental Studies, 9(33), 79–92.
https://civilica.com/doc/1119348
Gholami, M., & Rezaei, M. (2018). Analysis of interstitial spaces in Safavid mosques. Iranian Architecture Studies Journal, 6(1), 110–123.
https://civilica.com/doc/937572
Grabar, O. (1987). The formation of Islamic art (Rev. and enl. ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300040463/the-formation-of-islamic-art/
Hakim, B. S. (1990). The Islamic city and its architecture: A review essay. Third World Planning Review, 12(1), 75–90.
https://doi.org/10.3828/twpr.12.1.v58u81r8g81613h1
Hedayati, F., Soheili, J., & Rahbarimanesh, K. (2023). Examining the connection between the configuration of in-between spaces and the quality of flexibility by focusing on adaptability in Seljuk Grand Mosques. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 20(126), 17–34.
https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2023.378019.5311
Heidari, S. (2010). Climatic analysis of the traditional Iranian courtyard as a passive cooling system. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 29(4), 245–256.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14786450701770852
Hillenbrand, R. (1994). Islamic architecture: Form, function, and meaning. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
https://cup.columbia.edu/book/islamic-architecture/9780231101320
Karimi, M., Hosseinpour Tovani, N., & Delshad Siyahkali, M. (2020). Comparative study of interstitial spaces in Iranian and global architecture. Architecture Studies, 3(17), 1–13.
https://civilica.com/doc/1139333
Mahboobi, G., Mokhtabad, M., Etesam, I., & Attarabbasi, M. (2018). Symbiosis of inside and outside in architecture of the Naqsh-e Jahan Square. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 15(58), 51–64.
https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_68932.html
Mahboobi, Q., Mokhtabad, S. M., Etesam, I., & Attar Abbasi, M. (2018). The coexistence of interior and exterior architecture in Naqsh-e Jahan Complex. Bagh-e Nazar, 15(58), 51–64.
https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_68932_en.html
Memarian, G., & Brown, F. E. (2003). Climate, culture, and religion: Aspects of the traditional courtyard house in Iran. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20(3), 181–198.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030656
Mitchell, K. (2004). Iranian cities: Formation and development. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
https://press.syr.edu/supressbooks/245/iranian-cities/
Momeni, K. (2018). Comparative analysis of transparency in the body and design of houses from the Safavid and Qajar periods in Isfahan. Islamic Architecture Research, 6(1), 23–42.
https://civilica.com/doc/1123421
Morgan, D. O. (2013). Iran and the world in the Safavid age. International Journal of Turkish Studies, 19(1–2), 153–155.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43855308
Mousavi Haji, S. R., Taghavi, A., & Sharifi Nejad, S. (2014). Comparative research on the spatial structure of Persian gardens in the Safavid and Mughal eras. Subcontinent Studies, 6(21), 151–167.
https://civilica.com/doc/309561
Moynihan, E. B. (1980). Paradise as a garden in Persia and Mughal India. New York, NY: George Braziller.
https://www.worldcat.org/title/6364924
Necipoğlu, G. (1996). The Topkapi scroll: Geometry and ornament in Islamic architecture. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications.
https://www.getty.edu/publications/topkapiscroll/
Nejad Ebrahimi, A., Qara Baglou, M., & Vafaei, S. M. (2018). Factors affecting communication and semiotics in architecture – Case study: Blue Mosque of Tabriz. Javidan Kherad, 15(34), 179–202.
https://civilica.com/doc/852478
Piravolia, M., & Soheili, J. (2017). Quality of interstitial spaces in historical passages: Case study of Saghrisazan Passage in Rasht City. Iranian Architecture and Urbanism, 8(1), 33–48.
https://civilica.com/doc/715432
Rostami Ghalelani, M., & Bakhtiarimanesh, E. (2021). Examining the interior-exterior relationship and its evolution in Iranian mosques (from the beginning to the Safavid era). Architecture of Hot and Dry Climates, 9(13), 119–138.
https://civilica.com/doc/1202818
Sattarzadeh, D., & Mohammadi, M. (2013). The analysis of light and color in Islamic architecture: Case study of Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3), 2553–2560.
https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/2832
Tavakoli Arian, A., Foroutan, M., & Nazari Arshad, R. (2022). Arrangement of Iranian palaces in Azari architecture style: Comparative study of furnishings, interior architectural elements, and illustrations from the 7th to 11th centuries AH (13th to 17th AD). Islamic Art Iconography, 9(24), 1427–1456.
https://civilica.com/doc/1500944
Blair, S. S. (1998). Islamic arts. London, England: Phaidon Press.
https://www.worldcat.org/title/39728247
Babaie, S. (2008). Isfahan and its palaces: Statecraft, Shi‘ism and the architecture of conviviality in early modern Iran. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-isfahan-and-its-palaces.html
Bonner, J. (2017). Islamic geometric patterns: Their historical development and traditional methods of construction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69977-6
