A Novel Technique of the MARCOS Method for q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information and E-Transport for Urban Mobility Explorations
Abdulgawad A.Q. AL-Qubati
1
(
Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences and Arts, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
)
Kifayat Ullah
2
(
Department of Mathematics, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, India.
)
Abrar Hussain
3
(
Department of Mathematics, Riphah International University (Lahore Campus), Lahore, Pakistan.
)
Lemnaouar Zedam
4
(
Laboratory of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, University of M’sila, M’sila, Algeria.
)
کلید واژه: q-rung orthopair fuzzy set, Aczel Alsina aggregation operators, Assessment of etransport, and the decision analysis process.,
چکیده مقاله :
Due to the lack of adequate public transportation in developing countries, ride-hailing services are becoming more popular to satisfy the need for urban travel. As far as we are aware, there is a dearth of research on how passengers behave and feel about the quality of ride-hailing services, especially when it comes to studies conducted in developing countries. Ride-hailing services were introduced to accommodate the transport needs of people living in urban areas. E-transportation in urban areas can be optimized through various mathematical models and decision-making frameworks that address complex challenges like traffic flow, energy consumption, and infrastructure placement. Multi-criteria decision analysis and simulation techniques help balance costs, environmental impacts, and efficiency. Decision-makers must evaluate factors like charging station locations and vehicle routes to maximize sustainability and minimize congestion. This article articulates a novel decision-making model of the MARCOS method under the system of q-rung orthopair fuzzy (q-ROF) information. A q-ROF set (q-ROFS) is an extended and well-known mathematical model for handling uncertain human information. Additionally, we established a decision algorithm of the MARCOS method for the multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem. This decision analysis technique ranks alternatives by computing the utility function and credibility degrees of alternatives in the MARCOS method. To prove the validity of diagnosed theories, we discuss an application related to the E-transportation system with the help of numerical examples. Furthermore, a comprehensive contracting technique is stated to verify the results of pioneering approaches with existing mathematical terminologies. At the end, concluding remarks summarize the whole article.
چکیده انگلیسی :
Due to the lack of adequate public transportation in developing countries, ride-hailing services are becoming more popular to satisfy the need for urban travel. As far as we are aware, there is a dearth of research on how passengers behave and feel about the quality of ride-hailing services, especially when it comes to studies conducted in developing countries. Ride-hailing services were introduced to accommodate the transport needs of people living in urban areas. E-transportation in urban areas can be optimized through various mathematical models and decision-making frameworks that address complex challenges like traffic flow, energy consumption, and infrastructure placement. Multi-criteria decision analysis and simulation techniques help balance costs, environmental impacts, and efficiency. Decision-makers must evaluate factors like charging station locations and vehicle routes to maximize sustainability and minimize congestion. This article articulates a novel decision-making model of the MARCOS method under the system of q-rung orthopair fuzzy (q-ROF) information. A q-ROF set (q-ROFS) is an extended and well-known mathematical model for handling uncertain human information. Additionally, we established a decision algorithm of the MARCOS method for the multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem. This decision analysis technique ranks alternatives by computing the utility function and credibility degrees of alternatives in the MARCOS method. To prove the validity of diagnosed theories, we discuss an application related to the E-transportation system with the help of numerical examples. Furthermore, a comprehensive contracting technique is stated to verify the results of pioneering approaches with existing mathematical terminologies. At the end, concluding remarks summarize the whole article.
[1] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and control. 1965; 8: 338–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019- 9958(65)90241-X
[2] Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1986; 20: 87–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
[3] Yager RR. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), 24-28 June 2013, Edmonton, Canada. p.57–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375
[4] Yager RR. Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2017; 25(5): 1222– 1230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
[5] Ashraf S, Rehman N, Hussain A, AlSalman H, Gumaei AH. Q-Rung orthopair fuzzy Rough Einstein aggregation information-based EDAS method: applications in robotic agrifarming. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2021; 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5520264
[6] Darko AP, Liang D. Some q-Rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making with modified EDAS method. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2020; 87: 103259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103259
[7] Abbas F, Ali J, Mashwani WK. Partitioned Hamy mean aggregation for multi-criteria group decisionmaking in the MAIRCA framework with q-Rung orthopair fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic information. Granular Computing. 2024; 9: 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-024-00483-5
[8] Özer Ö. Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators based on complex picture fuzzy sets and their applications in decision-making problems. Journal of Innovative Research in Mathematical and Computational Sciences. 2022; 1(1): 33–54. DOI: https://jirmcs.agasr.org/index.php/jirmcs/article/view/3
[9] Ahmmad J. Classification of renewable energy trends by utilizing the novel entropy measures under the environment of q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft sets. Journal of Innovative Research in Mathematical and Computational Sciences. 2023; 2: 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62270/jirmcs.v2i2.19
[10] Bibi H, Ali Z. Ambiguities in the X-ray analysis of crystal structure based on neutrosophic fuzzy rough Aczel-Alsina aggregation operators and their application in decision-making. Journal of Innovative Research in Mathematical and Computational Sciences. 2023; 2(1): 46–75. https://jirmcs.agasr.org/index.php/jirmcs/article/view/17
[11] Dağıstanlı HA. An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR approach for R& D project selection in defense industry investment decisions. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics. 2024; 2(1): 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda21202428
[12] Al-Barakati A, Mishra AR, Mardani A, Rani P. An extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS method based on new similarity measures to evaluate the renewable energy sources. Applied Soft Computing. 2022; 120: 108689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108689
[13] Qiao M. TODIM–VIKOR framework for development potential evaluation of forest health tourism based on the single-valued neutrosophic number multiple attribute group decision making. Soft Computing. 2024; 28: 8065–8076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-024-09685-0
[14] Ali Z, Mahmood T, Yang M-S. TOPSIS method based on complex spherical fuzzy sets with Bonferroni mean operators. Mathematics. 2020; 8(10): 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101739
[15] Zeng S, Ye A, Su W, Chen M, Llopis-Albert C. Site Evaluation of Subsea Tunnels with Sightseeing Function Based on Dynamic Complex MARCOS Method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2024; 199: 123041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123041
[16] Mitra A. Cotton fibre selection based on quality value using measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel. 2024; 28(2): 299–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-03-2022-0030
[17] Wang Y, Wang W, Wang Z, Deveci M, Roy SK, Kadry S. Selection of sustainable food suppliers using the Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-MARCOS method. Information Sciences. 2024; 664: 120326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.120326
[18] Rani P, Chen S-M, Mishra AR. Multi-attribute decision-making based on similarity measure between picture fuzzy sets and the MARCOS method. Information Sciences. 2024; 658: 119990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119990
[19] Lukic R. Measurement and analysis of the information performance of companies in the European Union and Serbia based on the fuzzy LMAW and MARCOS methods. Informatica Economica. 2023; 27(1): 17– 31. https://doi.org/10.24818/issn14531305/27.1.2023.02
[20] Akram M, Khan A, Luqman A, Senapati T, Pamucar D. An extended MARCOS method for MCGDM under 2-tuple linguistic -rung picture fuzzy environment. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2023; 120: 105892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105892
[21] Badi I, Pamučar D, Stević Ž, Muhammad LJ. Wind farm site selection using BWM-AHPMARCOS method: A case study of Libya. Scientific African. 2023; 19, e01511. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01511
[22] Majumder P. An integrated trapezoidal fuzzy FUCOM with single-valued neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS and GMDH method to determine the alternatives weight and its applications in efficiency analysis of water treatment plant. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023; 225: 120087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120087
[23] Akram M, Shahzadi G. A hybrid decision-making model under q-rung orthopair fuzzy Yager aggregation operators. Granular Computing. 2021; 6: 763–777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00229-z
[24] Farid HMA, Riaz M. q-rung orthopair fuzzy Aczel–Alsina aggregation operators with multicriteria decision-making. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2023; 122: 106105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10610
[25] Senapati T, Chen G, Yager RR. Aczel Alsina aggregation operators and their application to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2022; 37: 1529– 1551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22684
[26] Stević Ž, Pamučar D, Puška A, Chatterjee P. Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & industrial engineering. 2020; 140: 106231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
[27] Rayle L, Dai D, Chan N, Cervero R, Shaheen S. Just a better taxi? a survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy. 2016; 45: 168–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004
[28] Olayode IO, Severino A, Justice Alex F, Macioszek E, Tartibu LK. Systematic review on the evaluation of the effects of ride-hailing services on public road transportation. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2023; 22: 100943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100943
[29] Shaaban K, Kim I. Assessment of the taxi service in Doha. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2016; 88: 223–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.011
[30] Nguyen-Phuoc DQ, Su DN, Tran PTK, Le D-TT, Johnson LW. Factors influencing customer’s loyalty towards ride-hailing taxi services – A case study of Vietnam. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020; 134: 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.008
[31] Shah SAH, Hisashi K. Analyzing travelers’ attitude towards ride-hailing services in developing countries: case of Lahore, Pakistan. IATSS Research. 2022; 46(2): 223–235.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.12.006
[32] Chan ND, Shaheen SA. Ridesharing in North America: past, present, and future. Transport Reviews. 2012; 32: 93–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.621557
[33] Diao M, Kong H, Zhao J. Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility. Nature Sustainability. 2021; 4: 494–500. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00678-z
[34] Erhardt GD, Roy S, Cooper D, Sana B, Chen M, Castiglione J. Do transportation network companies decrease or increase congestion? Science Advances 2019; 5: eaau2670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau2670
[35] Flores O, Rayle L. How cities use regulation for innovation: the case of uber, lyft and sidecar in San Francisco. Transportation research procedia. 2017; 25: 3756–3768. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.232
[36] Cheng S, Jianfu S, Alrasheedi M, Saeidi P, Mishra AR, Rani P. A new extended VIKOR approach using q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets for sustainable enterprise risk management assessment in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2021; 23: 1347–1369. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01024-3
[37] Riaz M, Hamid MT, Athar Farid HM, Afzal D. TOPSIS, VIKOR and aggregation operators based on qrung orthopair fuzzy soft sets and their applications. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology. 2020; 39(5): 6903-6917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-192175
[38] Li Z, Wei G, Wang R, Wu, J, Wei, C, Wei Y. EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2020; 26(1): 86–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.11333
[39] Wang Y, Hussain A, Yin S, Ullah K, Božanić D. Decision-making for solar panel selection using SugenoWeber triangular norm-based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy information. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2024; 11: 1293623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1293623
[40] Hussain A, Liu Y, Ullah K, Rashid M, Senapati T, Moslem S. Decision algorithm for picture fuzzy sets and aczel alsina aggregation operators based on unknown degree of wights. Heliyon. 2024; 10(6): e27548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27548
[41] Akram M, Naz S, Feng F, Ali G, Shafiq A. Extended MABAC method based on 2-tuple linguistic tSpherical fuzzy sets and Heronian mean Operators: an application to alternative fuel selection. AIMS Mathematics. 2023; 8(5): 10619–10653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023539
[42] Zhao Z, Hussain A, Zhang N, Ullah K, Yin S, Awsar A, El-Bahy SM. Decision support system based on bipolar complex fuzzy Hamy mean operators. Heliyon. 2024; 10(17): e36461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36461
