Continuity in Urban Heritage Identity: A Tourists' and Residents' Perceptions Perspective (Case Study: Districts 11 and 12 of the City of Tehran)
محورهای موضوعی : Urban Design
Mohsen Abbaszadeh Zanjani
1
,
Zahra Nadalipour
2
1 - M.A. in Tourism Development Planning, Faculty of Tourism, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Associate Professor, Faculty of Tourism, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
کلید واژه: Place Identity, Identity Continuity, Neighborhoods, Tourists, Residents, Tehran,
چکیده مقاله :
Today, places play a significant role in shaping individuals' identities. However, due to phenomena such as urbanization and urban development, places are often under threat and may lose their true meaning. The role of neighborhoods as elements that strengthen and preserve the sense of place identity among citizens is undeniable. As such, this study aims to explore the perceptions of residents and tourists regarding urban heritage identity and the old neighborhoods of Tehran to determine whether these neighborhoods still successfully create a sense of place identity among their inhabitants. The purpose of this research is to identify the aspects of continuity in urban heritage identity in Tehran's old neighborhoods, with an emphasis on the perceptions of tourists and residents. This research is practical and descriptive-analytical. Data and information were collected using library resources, field studies, and questionnaires. The study population includes tourism and cultural heritage experts, tourism officials, as well as residents and tourists who have visited the old fabric of Tehran. To test the hypotheses, a 21-item questionnaire was prepared and distributed among 188 residents and 245 tourists of the neighborhoods, selected through convenience sampling. The findings revealed six components—familiarity and attachment, nostalgia and memories, architecture, security, values, and vibrancy—that can be considered as the components of continuity in urban heritage identity. Furthermore, the findings indicated that residents and tourists have a relatively favorable perception of the components of continuity in urban heritage identity in the studied areas.
Today, places play a significant role in shaping individuals' identities. However, due to phenomena such as urbanization and urban development, places are often under threat and may lose their true meaning. The role of neighborhoods as elements that strengthen and preserve the sense of place identity among citizens is undeniable. As such, this study aims to explore the perceptions of residents and tourists regarding urban heritage identity and the old neighborhoods of Tehran to determine whether these neighborhoods still successfully create a sense of place identity among their inhabitants. The purpose of this research is to identify the aspects of continuity in urban heritage identity in Tehran's old neighborhoods, with an emphasis on the perceptions of tourists and residents. This research is practical and descriptive-analytical. Data and information were collected using library resources, field studies, and questionnaires. The study population includes tourism and cultural heritage experts, tourism officials, as well as residents and tourists who have visited the old fabric of Tehran. To test the hypotheses, a 21-item questionnaire was prepared and distributed among 188 residents and 245 tourists of the neighborhoods, selected through convenience sampling. The findings revealed six components—familiarity and attachment, nostalgia and memories, architecture, security, values, and vibrancy—that can be considered as the components of continuity in urban heritage identity. Furthermore, the findings indicated that residents and tourists have a relatively favorable perception of the components of continuity in urban heritage identity in the studied areas.
Aptekar, S. (2017). Looking Forward, Looking Back: Collective Memory and Neighborhood Identity in Two Urban Parks. Symbolic Interaction, 40(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.271
Azarian, R. (2023). Social construction of places as meaningful objects: A symbolic interactionist approach. Int. Rev. Sociology 2023,
Bernardo, F., Loupa-Ramos, I., & Coelho, R. (2023). How to Capture Place Identity Contents? A Tool for Planning Interventions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15535. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1521155352023, 2259060.
Ginting, N., & Wahid, J. (2015). Exploring identity's aspect of continuity of urban heritage tourism. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202(December 2014), 234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.227.
Golrokh, S. (2015). Place and Personal Identity: The Role of the Physical Environment in Creation "the sense of self ". Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 3(3), 97-108. (In Persian). https://smb.yazd.ac.ir/article_241.html?lang=en
Habibi, A., Adanvar, M. (2017). Structural Equation Modeling, Tehran: ACECR (In Persian) https://www.gisoom.com/book/11315799/کتاب-مدل-یابی-معادلات-ساختاری-و-تحلیل-عاملی-آموزش-کاربردی-نرم-افزار-LISREL/
Jang, K. M., Chen, J., Kang, Y., Kim, J., Lee, J., Duarte, F., & Ratti, C. (2024). Place identity: a generative AI's perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. (2024) 11:1156, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03645-7
Kaviyani Rad, M., & Azizi, K. (2011). The role of place identity in political action (Case study: Enghelab Square and Tehran Street). Journal of Applied Social Sciences Research, 20, 151-167. (In Persian). http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-۱-۶۰۰-fa.html
Khaki, G. (2007). Research Methodology Applied to Thesis Writing. Tehran: Baztab (In Persian)
Lalli, M., (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7
Lewicka, M., (2008). Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001
Musa, M. (2013). Globalization, Identity, and the Urban Built Environment: A Theoretical Context, University of Sharjah.
Negarestan, F., Teimouri, M., & Atashinbar, M. (2010). Landscape Theory, an Approach to the Preservation of Identity in Urban Renewal. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 7(14), 59-68. (In Persian) https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_19.html?lang=en
Radstrom, S. (2011). A PlaceSustainingFramework for Local Urban Identity: An Introduction and History of Cittaslow, IJPP Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 1(1), 2011. https://ijpp.dicam.unitn.it/past-issues-2-2/volume-1-issue-1-spring-2011/
Ramesht, M. H., Mahmoudi, T., Entezari, M., Abbas Ali, V., & Rabbavi, A. (2018). Space identity and its role in Iran civil nuclear generation. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 4(4), 56-71. 20.https://www.geomorphologyjournal.ir/article_78018.html?lang=en (In Persian)
Roszczynska-Kurasinska, M., Domaradzka, A., Wnuk, A., & Oleksy, T. (2021). Intrinsic Value and Perceived Essentialism of Culture
Heritage Sites as Tools for Planning Interventions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095078
Sadeque, S., Roy, S. K., Swapan, M. S. H., Chen, C. H., & Ashikuzzaman, M. (2020). An integrated model of city and neighborhood identities: A tale of two cities, Journal of Business Research, Volume 117, 2020, Pages 780-790, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.040.
SAĞLIK, E., & KELKİT, A. (2019). Evaluation of Urban Identity and its Components in Landscape Architecture. Uluslararası Peyzaj Mimarlığı Araştırmaları Dergisi (IJLAR) E-ISSN: 2602-4322, 1(1), 36–39. Retrieved from https://ijlar.org/index.php/ijlar/article/view/123
Simandan, D. (2011). On time, place, and happiness. New Zealand Geographers, 67(1), April 2011, 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.2011.01192.x
Shamayi, A., Jahani Dolatabad, R., & Jahani Dolatabad, E. (2013). Measuring Neighborhood Identity with an Emphasis on the Role of Community-Based Organizations in District 7 of Tehran. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences. 13(31): 191–210. http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-۱-۱۶۸۴-fa.html (In Persian)
Shokoui, H. (1995). New Perspectives in Urban Geography. Tehran: SAMT Publications. (In Persian) https://samt.ac.ir/en/book/5327/new-perspectives-in-urban-geography-vol.i-
Skelton, T., & Gough, K. V. (2013). Introduction: Young People's Im/Mobile Urban Geographies. Urban Studies, 50(3), 455-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012468900
Stedman, R. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predictive behavior from place-based cognitions, attitudes, and identity, Environmental behavior, No. 34, 561-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165020340050
Taban, M., Pourjafar, M. R., & Pourmand, H. A. (2012). Identity and Place, Phenomenological Approach. Hoviatshahr (City Identity), 6(10), 79-90. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/154761/en (In Persian)
Twigger-Ross, C. L., Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and identity process. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0017
Ujang, N., (2008). Place Attachment, Familiarity and sustainability of urban place identity, Department of Land Scape Architecture, University Putra Malaysia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237273282_PLACE_ATTACHMENT_FAMILIARITY_AND_SUSTAINABILITY_OF_URBAN_PLACE_IDENTITY
Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). The notion of place, place meaning and identity in urban regeneration, Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, Vol 170, 709-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.073
Veisi, A., & Zarei, E. (2011). The Role of Culture and Cultural Heritage Identity in Sustainable Urban Development. Third National Conference on Urban Development. https://civilica.com/doc/129952/
Yun, H.Y., & Kwon, H. A. (2023). Neighborhood Identity Formation and the Changes in an Urban Regeneration Neighborhood in Gwangju, Korea. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511792
