Impact of Enzymatically Hydrolyzed and Fermented Canola Meal on Broiler Performance, Intestinal Health, and Peptide Transporter Peptide Transporters Gene Expression
محورهای موضوعی :R. Rassoli Dabagh 1 , B. Navidshad 2 , A. Kalantari Hesari 3 , F. Mirzaei Aghjehgheshlagh 4 , L. Hosseinpoor 5
1 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 - Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
4 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
5 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
کلید واژه: broiler chickens, canola meal peptides, enzymatic hydrolysis, solid-state fermentation,
چکیده مقاله :
This study examined the impact of enzymatically hydrolyzed and fermented canola meal (CM) on broiler performance, carcass traits, blood serum parameters, cecal microbiota, intestinal morphology, and gene expression. A total of 540 Ross 308 broiler chicks were randomly divided into nine dietary groups: a con-trol group (soybean meal-based), CM at 5% and 10%, CM hydrolyzed with protease at 5% and 10%, and CM fermented with Lactobacillus reuteri at 5% and 10%. The birds were fed these experimental diets from day 10 to day 32. Enzymatic hydrolysis and solid-state fermentation were performed using commercial protease and L. reuteri, respectively. The results showed that including 5% fermented CM in the diet had a minimal negative effect on broiler performance compared to other CM-supplemented diets. Additionally, this treatment resulted in the lowest abdominal fat, the highest gene expression levels (PepT1, PepT2, LEAP2), and improved small intestinal morphology. These findings indicate that enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation can alleviate the negative impacts of CM on broiler performance and intestinal health.
This study examined the impact of enzymatically hydrolyzed and fermented canola meal (CM) on broiler performance, carcass traits, blood serum parameters, cecal microbiota, intestinal morphology, and gene expression. A total of 540 Ross 308 broiler chicks were randomly divided into nine dietary groups: a con-trol group (soybean meal-based), CM at 5% and 10%, CM hydrolyzed with protease at 5% and 10%, and CM fermented with Lactobacillus reuteri at 5% and 10%. The birds were fed these experimental diets from day 10 to day 32. Enzymatic hydrolysis and solid-state fermentation were performed using commercial protease and L. reuteri, respectively. The results showed that including 5% fermented CM in the diet had a minimal negative effect on broiler performance compared to other CM-supplemented diets. Additionally, this treatment resulted in the lowest abdominal fat, the highest gene expression levels (PepT1, PepT2, LEAP2), and improved small intestinal morphology. These findings indicate that enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation can alleviate the negative impacts of CM on broiler performance and intestinal health.
Abdel-Wareth A.A.A., Williams A.N., Salahuddin M., Gadekar S. and Lohakare J. (2024). Algae as an alterna-tive source of protein in poultry diets for sustainable pro-duction and disease resistance: present status and future considerations. Fron. Vet. Sci. 11, 1-16.
Abdelli N., Ramser A., Greene E.S., Beer L., Tabler T.W., Orlowski S.K., Pérez J.F., Solà-Oriol D., Anthony N.B. and Dridi S. (2021). Effects of Cyclic Chronic heat stress on the expression of nutrient transporters in the jejunum of modern broilers and their ancestor wild jungle fowl. Front. Physiol. 12, 733134-733143.
Abele R. and Tampé R. (2018). Moving the cellular peptidome by transporters. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 43-52.
Ajao A.M., White D., Kim W.K. and Olukosi O.A. (2022). Partial replacement of soybean meal with canola meal or corn DDGS in low-protein diets supplemented with crys-talline amino acids—effect on growth performance, whole-body composition, and litter characteris-tics. Animals. 12, 2662-2671.
Akbarian M., Khani A., Eghbalpour S. and Uversky V.N. (2022). Bioactive peptides: Synthesis, sources, applica-tions, and proposed mechanisms of action. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 1445-1454.
Alashi A.M., Blanchard C.L., Mailer R.J. and Agboola S.O. (2014). Technological and Bioactive Functionalities of Canola Meal Proteins and Hydrolysates. Food Rev. Int. 29, 231-260.
Aloo S.O. and Oh D.H. (2022). The functional interplay be-tween gut microbiota, protein hydrolysates/bioactive pep-tides, and obesity: A critical review on the study ad-vances. Antioxidants. 11, 333-343.
Asadi M., Rahmani M., Samadi A. and Kalantari Hesari A. (2022). Acetylsalicylic acid‐induced alterations in male reproductive parameters in Wistar rats and the effect of sprint interval training. Andrologia. 54, e14339.
Bastian F., Syarifuddin A., Chandran D. and Nainu F. (2024). Enriching canola meal to an alternative source of protein. Pp. 99-124 in Oilseed Meal as a Sustainable Contributor to Plant-Based Protein. M. Kumar, Ed., Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Bischoff K. (2019). Glucosinolates and Organosulfur Com-pounds. Pp. 113-119 in Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine. R. Gupta, A. Srivastava and R. Lall, Eds., Springer, Switzerland.
Canola Council of Canada. (2024). Canola Meal in Poultry Diets. Canola Council of Canada. Available at: https://www.canolacouncil.org/canolamazing/poultry-diets.
Cherian E., Mohan L. and Rosamma A. (2024). Fermented Foods and Their Impact on Gut Health. Pp. 405-425 in Traditional Foods: The Reinvented Superfoods. S. Roy, P. Nisha and R. Chakraborty, Eds., Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Chiang G., Lu W.Q., Piao X.S., Hu J.K., Gong L.M. and Thacker P.A. (2010). Effects of feeding solid-state fer-mented rapeseed meal on performance, nutrient digesti-bility, intestinal morphology and intestinal microflora of broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 23, 263-271.
Chourasia R., Chiring Phukon L., Abedin M.M., Padhi S., Singh S.P. and Rai A.K. (2023). Bioactive peptides in fermented foods and their application: a critical re-view. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 3, 88-109.
Cian R.E. and Drago S.R. (2022). Microbial Bioactive Pep-tides from Bacteria, Yeasts, and Molds. Pp. 101-125 in Handbook of Food Bioactive Ingredients. S.M. Jafari, A.Rashidinejad and J. Simal-Gandara, Eds., Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Cordiano R., Di Gioacchino M., Mangifesta R., Panzera C., Gangemi S. and Minciullo P.L. (2023). Malondialdehyde as a potential oxidative stress marker for allergy-oriented diseases: An update. Molecules. 28, 5979-5985.
Damgaard T., Lametsch R. and Otte J. (2015). Antioxidant capacity of hydrolyzed animal by-products and relation to amino acid composition and peptide size distribution. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52, 6511-6519.
Desbruslais A. and Wealleans A.L. (2022). Oxidation in poultry feed: Impact on the bird and the efficacy of die-tary antioxidant mitigation strategies. Poult. Sci. 1, 246-277.
Elbaz A.M., El-sheikh S.E. and Abdel-Maksoud A. (2023). Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant state, ileal histomorphometry, and cecal ecology of broil-ers fed on fermented canola meal with and without ex-ogenous enzymes. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 55, 46-57.
Engberg R.M., Hammershøj M., Johansen N.F., Abrahamsen K., Steenfeldt S. and Jensen B.B. (2009). Fermented feed for laying hens: Effects on egg production, egg quality, plumage condition and composition and activity of the in-testinal microflora. Br. Poult. Sci. 50, 228-239.
Fabia J. and Ju Z. (2011). Enzyme-assisted extraction of plant proteins. J. Food Sci. Technol. 48, 321-329.
Ghanbarzadeh Z., Mohagheghzadeh A. and Hemmati S. (2024). The roadmap of plant antimicrobial peptides un-der environmental stress: From farm to bedside. Probiotics Antimicrobial Proteins. 16(6), 2269-2304.
Gilbert E.R., Wong E.A. and Webb K.E. (2008). Peptide absorption and utilization: Implications for animal nutri-tion and health. J. Anim. Sci. 86, 2135-2155.
Gopinger E., Xavier E.G., Elias M.C., Catalan A.A.S., Castro M.L.S., Krabbe E.L. and Roll V.F.B. (2014). Growth per-formance of broilers fed canola meal. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 23, 491-497
Griffiths M.W. and Tellez A.M. (2013). Lactobacillus helve-ticus: the proteolytic system. Front. Microbiol. 4, 30-41.
Hameed S., Ahmad N. and Rabbani M. (2002). Effect of re-placing dietary levels of soybean meal with canola meal in Japanese Quail. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 4, 389-391
Hosseinpoor L., Navidshad B., Faseleh Jahromi M., Karimzadeh S., Kalantari Hesari A., Mirzaei Agh-jehgheshlagh F., Lotfollahian H., Oskoueian E. and Hey-dari A. (2023). The antioxidant properties of bioactive peptides derived from enzymatic hydrolyzed or fermented canola meal and its effects on broiler chickens. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 29, 40-51.
Hu Y., Wang Y., Li A., Wang Z. and Zhang X. (2016). Ef-fects of dietary postbiotic and inulin on growth perform-ance, IGF1 and GHR mRNA expression, faecal microbi-ota and volatile fatty acids in broilers. BMC Vet. Res. 12, 163-173.
Jiang Z., Zhou X. and Wang L. (2009). Peptides: Chemistry, structure, and biology. J. Pept. Sci. 15, 321-329.
Jové M., Mota-Martorell N., Pradas I., Martín-Gari M., Ayala V. and Pamplona R. (2020). The advanced lipoxi-dation end-product malondialdehyde-lysine in aging and longevity. Antioxidants. 9, 1132-1143.
Kalavathy R., Abdullah N., Jalaludin S. and Ho Y.W. (2010). Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of or-gans of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 44, 139-144.
Leeson S., Caston L. and Summers J.D. (1987). The effect of dietary protein and energy levels on the growth and car-cass characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 66, 125-132.
Li J., Hu S., Jian W., Xie C. and Yang X. (2021). Plant an-timicrobial peptides: structures, functions, and applica-tions. Bot. Stud. 62, 5-16.
Li S., Liu J., He Z. and Du R. (2024). Plant-derived as alter-natives to animal-derived bioactive peptides: A review of the preparation, bioactivities, structure–activity relation-ships, and applications in chronic diseases. Nutrients. 16, 3277-3285.
Liu J., Luo Y., Zhang X., Gao Y. and Zhang W. (2022). Ef-fects of bioactive peptides derived from cottonseed meal solid-state fermentation on the growth, metabolism, and immunity of yellow-feathered broilers. Anim. Sci. J. 93, 13781-13793.
Manyeula F., Mlambo V., Marume U. and Sebola N.A. (2023). Partial replacement of soybean products with ca-nola meal in indigenous chicken diets: Size of internal organs, carcass characteristics and breast meat quality. Poult. Sci. 99, 25-32.
Meena S., Kanthaliya B., Joshi A., Khan F. and Arora J. (2020). Biologia futura: medicinal plants-derived bioac-tive peptides in functional perspective—a review. Biol. Futura. 71, 195-208.
Michlmayr H. and Kneifel W. (2014). β-Glucosidase activi-ties of lactic acid bacteria: mechanisms, impact on fer-mented food and human health. FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 352, 1-10.
Montagne L., Boudry G., Favier C., Le Huërou-Luron I., Lallès J.P. and Sève B. (2007). Main intestinal markers associated with the changes in gut architecture and func-tion in piglets after weaning. Br. J. Nutr. 97, 45-57.
Monteiro L.S. and Paiva-Martins F. (2022). Amino Acids, Amino Acid Derivatives and Peptides as Antioxidants. Pp. 121-187 in Lipid Oxidation in Food and Biological Systems. C. Bravo-Diaz, Ed., Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Morales M. and Munné-Bosch S. (2019). Malondialdehyde: Facts and artifacts. Plant Physiol. 180, 1246-1250.
Nemati M., Shahosseini S.R. and Ariaii P. (2024). Review of fish protein hydrolysates: Production methods, antioxi-dant and antimicrobial activity and nanoencapsula-tion. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 33, 1789-1803.
Niba A.T., Beal J.D., Kudi A.C. and Brooks P.H. (2009). Bacterial fermentation in the gastrointestinal tract of non-ruminants: Influence of fermented feeds and fer-mentable carbohydrates. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 41, 1393-1407.
Nie M., Vashisht A.A., Wohlschlegel J.A. and Boddy M.N. (2015). High confidence fission yeast sumo conjugates identified by tandem denaturing affinity purification. Sci. Rep. 5, 1-11.
NRC. (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th Rev. Ed. Na-tional Academy Press, Washington, DC., USA.
Ohkawa H., Ohishi N. and Yagi K. (1979). Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reac-tion. Anal. Biochem. 95, 351-358.
Olukomaiya O., Fernando W.C., Mereddy R., Li X. and Sul-tanbawa Y. (2020). Solid-state fermentation of canola meal with Aspergillus sojae, Aspergillus ficuum and their co-cultures: Effects on physicochemical, microbiological and functional properties. LWT – Food. Sci. Technol. 127, 109362-109376.
Osmanyan A.K., Atakishiyev V.T. and Sadighzadeh H.E. (2018). Effect of dietary protein and feed restriction on PepT1 gene expression in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 97, 1251-1260.
Rabie M.H., Hayam M.A., Abo El-Maaty M.R., El-Gogary A. and Marwa S.A. (2015). Nutritional and physiological effects of different levels of canola meal in broiler chick diets. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10, 161-172.
Räder H., Müller M., Schmidt K. and Weber T. (2018). En-zymatic hydrolysis and bioactive peptides: A review. J. Nutr. Biochem. 58, 1-10.
SAS Institute. (2013). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 9.4. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
Sheng Z., Turchini G.M., Xu J., Fang Z., Chen N., Xie R. and Li S. (2022). Functional properties of protein hydro-lysates on growth, digestive enzyme activities, protein metabolism, and intestinal health of larval largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Front. Immunol. 13, 913024-913035.
Shoaib M., Bhatti S.A., Ashraf S., Hamid M.M.A., Najam-us-Sahar N., Javed M.M., Amir S., Aslam N., Roobi A., Iqbal H.H., Asif M.A., Nazir U. and Saif-ur-Rehman M. (2023). Fat digestion and metabolism: Effect of different fat sources and fat mobilisers in broilers’ diet on growth performance and physiological parameters. Ann. Anim. Sci. 23, 641-661.
Soleymanzadeh N., Mirdamadi S. and Kianirad M. (2016). Antioxidant activity of camel and bovine milk fermented by lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional fermented camel milk (Chal). Dairy Sci. Technol. 96, 443-457.
Song A.A.L., In L.L.A., Lim S.H.E. and Rahim R.A. (2017). A review on Lactococcus lactis: From food to fac-tory. Microb. Cell. Factories. 16, 55-67.
Subramaniyam R. and Vimala R. (2012). Solid state and submerged fermentation for the production of bioactive substances: A comparative study. Res. J. Biotechnol. 7, 149-157.
Sun H., Tang J.W., Yao X.H., Wu Y.F., Wang X. and Feng J. (2013). Effects of dietary inclusion of fermented cot-tonseed meal on growth, cecal microbial population, small intestinal morphology, and digestive enzyme activ-ity of broilers. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 45, 987-993.
Sureshkumar S., Song J., Sampath V. and Kim I. (2023). Exogenous enzymes as zootechnical additives in monogastric animal feed: A review. Agriculture. 13, 2195-2205.
Talevi A. and Bellera C.L. (2021). The ADME Encyclopedia. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Tokutake Y., Taciak M., Sato K., Toyomizu M. and Kikusato M. (2021). Effect of dipeptide on intestinal peptide trans-porter 1 gene expression: An evaluation using primary cultured chicken intestinal epithelial cells. Anim. Sci. J. 92, 13604-13614.
Torkova A., Koroleva O., Khrameeva E., Fedorova T. and Tsentalovich M. (2015). Structure-functional study of ty-rosine and methionine dipeptides: An approach to anti-oxidant activity prediction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 25353-25376.
Tsikas D. (2017). Assessment of lipid peroxidation by measuring malondialdehyde (MDA) and elatives in biological samples: Analytical and biological challenges. Anal. Biochem. 1, 524, 13-30.
Urban J., Kareem K.Y., Matuszewski A., Bień D., Ci-borowska P., Lutostański K. and Michalczuk M. (2024). Enhancing broiler chicken health and performance: The impact of phytobiotics on growth, gut microbiota, anti-oxidants, and immunity. Phytochem. Rev. 21(3), 55-67
Vieco-Saiz N., Belguesmia Y., Raspoet R., Auclair E., Gan-cel F., Kempf I. and Drider D. (2019). Benefits and inputs from lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins as alterna-tives to antibiotic growth promoters during food-animal production. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1-11.
Vieira L., Filipe D., Amaral D., Magalhães R., Martins N., Ferreira M., Ozorio R., Salgado J., Belo I. and Oliva-Teles A. (2023). Solid-state fermentation as green tech-nology to improve the use of plant feedstuffs as ingredi-ents in diets for european sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles. Animals. 13, 2692-2701.
Vig A.P. and Walia A. (2001). Reduction of glucosinolates in canola meal by fermentation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 81, 835-841.
Wang W. and Gonzalez De Mejia E. (2005). A new frontier in soy bioactive peptides that may prevent age-related chronic diseases. Com. Rev. Food Sci. Food. Saf. 4, 63-78.
Wickramasuriya S.S., Yi Y.J., Yoo J., Kang, N.K. and Heo J.M. (2015). A review of canola meal as an alternative feed ingredient for ducks. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 57, 1-9.
Wu Z., Liu J., Chen J., Pirzado S.A., Li Y., Cai H. and Liu G. (2020). Effects of fermentation on standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids and apparent metabolizable energy in rapeseed meal fed to broiler chick-ens. Animals. 10, 1774-1785.
Wunderle C., Haller L., Laager R., Bernasconi L., Neyer P., Stumpf F., Tribolet P., Stanga Z., Mueller B. and Schuetz P. (2024). The association of the essential amino acids ly-sine, methionine, and threonine with clinical outcomes in patients at nutritional risk: Secondary analysis of a ran-domized clinical trial. Nutrients. 16, 2608-2618.
Xu D., He G., Mai K., Zhou H., Xu W. and Song F. (2015). Postprandial nutrient-sensing and metabolic responses af-ter partial dietary fishmeal replacement by soybean meal in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) Br. J. Nut. 115, 379-388.
Yang Y.W., Chen M.K., Yang B.Y., Huang X.J., Zhang X.R., He L.Q., Zhang J. and Hua Z.C. (2015). Use of 16S rRNA gene-targeted group-specific primers for real-time PCR analysis of predominant bacteria in mouse feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 6749-6756.
Zaky A.A., Simal-Gandara J., Eun J.B., Shim J.H. and Abd El-Aty A.M. (2022). Bioactivities, applications, safety, and health benefits of bioactive peptides from food and by-products: A review. Front. Nutr. 8, 815640-815648.
Zhang L., Wang Y., Zhang R., Jia H., Liu X. and Zhu Z. (2022). Effects of three probiotics and their interactions on the growth performance of and nutrient absorption in broilers. Peer J. 10, 13308-13318.
Zheng H., Liu E., Hao P., Konno T., Oda M. and Ji Z.S. (2012). In silico analysis of amino acid biosynthesis and proteolysis in Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 2038 and the implications for bovine milk fermenta-tion. Biotechnol. Lett. 34, 1545-1551.
Zheng X., Chen Z., Zhuang W., Zhang J., He J., Xie Y. and Chen J. (2022). Chicken LEAP2 level substantially changes with feed intake and may be regulated by CDX4 in small intestine. Animals. 12, 3496-3508.
Zhu Z., Xu Z., Li Y., Fan Y., Zhou Y., Song K. and Meng L. (2024). Antioxidant function and application of plant-derived peptides. Antioxidants. 13, 1203-1213.
Zwarycz B. and Wong E.A. (2013). Expression of the peptide transporters PepT1, PepT2, and PHT1 in the embryonic and posthatch chick. Poult. Sci. 92, 1314-1321.
