احراز و اثبات مسولیت بین المللی دولت ترکیه در ارتباط با پیامدهاي زیست محیطی ناشی از اجراي پروژه گاپ
محورهای موضوعی : حقوق بین الملل
فتانه دهقانی
1
,
محسن دیانت
2
,
فخرالدین سلطانی
3
1 - گروه حقوق بین الملل عمومی، واحد قشم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قشم، ایران.
2 - دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
3 - گروه روابط بین الملل، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران.
کلید واژه: پیامدهاي زیست محیطی, حقوق بین‌الملل, پروژه گاپ,
چکیده مقاله :
Regarding the implementation of the Gap project by the Turkish government and its severe damage to the environment and its direct impact on the economic and social life of the region, the question arises as to how the international responsibility of the Turkish government can be established and proven. Therefore, the present study, which is of a descriptive-analytical type, was conducted using library and electronic resources and with the aim of examining the possibility of proposing the international responsibility of the Turkish government resulting from the implementation of the Gap project. Although there are no specific international treaties and rules prohibiting the construction of unprincipled and destructive dams, the international responsibility of the Turkish government resulting from the implementation of the Gap project can be established and proven through international custom, the fundamental principles of international environmental law contained in international conventions, judicial practice, and the proposal for the international responsibility of the state resulting from unprohibited acts. Unilateral actions by the Turkish government that cause serious damage to other basin countries will entail international responsibility for the Turkish government, based on the principles of fair and reasonable use of the waterway, non-cause of serious harm, cooperation and the obligation to protect and prevent transboundary damage, environmental impact assessment and prior notification.
Hanqin, Xue, (2003), Transboundary Damage in International Law,
,First Edition, Published by the Press Syndicate University of Cambridge,
Cambridge.
33- Flogl, W. , (2011), The History of the World Register of Dams,
International Commission on Large Dams, Annual Report.
34- Sahan, E. , Mason, S. , Gilli, A. , Zogg, A. , (2000), Southeastern
Anatolia Project in Turkey – GAP, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
Zurich.
35- Soffer, A. ,Trans. M. R. , and Nina, C. , (1999), Rivers of Fire: The
Conflict over water in the Middle East, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
36- Williams, P. , (2012), Euphrates and Tigris Waters – Turkish-Syrian and
Iraqi Relations, in Dhirendra K. Vajpeyi (ed.). Water Resource Conflicts and
International Security: A Global Perspective. Lexington Book: Plymouth,
UK.
37- Yearbook of International law commission,1980, part2, P. 256.
38- Al-Ansari, N. A. , Knutsson, S. and Ali, A. , (2012). “Restor- ing the
Garden of Eden, Iraq”, Journal of Earth Science and Geotechnical
Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1.
39- Gruen, G. E. , (2000), “Turkish Waters: Source of Regional Conflict of
Catalyst for Peace?” , Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, P. 123,
40- Naiman, R. J. , Bunn, S. E. , Nilsson, C. , Petts, G. E. , Pinay, G. and
Thompson, L. C. , (2002), ” Legitimizing Fluvial Ecosystems as Users of
Water: An Overview”, Environmental Managemen, Vol. 30, No. 4.
41- Wolf, A. T. , (2007), “Shared waters: conflict and cooperation”, Annual
Review of Environmental Resources, Vol. 32, No. 3.
42- Wolf, A. T. , (1999), “Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of
international water conflict”, Natural Resources Forum, 23(4).
43- MacQuarrie, P. , (2004), “Water Security in the Middle East, Growing
Conflict over Development in the Euphrates-Tigris Basin”, M. Phil Thesis,
Trinity College, Dublin, P. 20.
