بررسی نقش فناوری‌های پیشرفته در بازسازی تغییرات محیطی پیشین و الگوهای پراکنش محوطه‌های باستانی: نگاهی به دشت قم
محورهای موضوعی : باستانشناسینسیمه یوسفوند 1 , محمد رضا سعیدی 2 , بهمن فیروزمندی شیره جین 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری باستان‌شناسی، گروه تاریخ و باستان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - دانشیار، پژوهشکده تحقیق و توسعه علوم انسانی، سازمان و مطالعه و تدوین کتب دانشگاهی در علوم اسلامی و انسانی (سمت)، تهران، ایران
3 - استاد تمام و هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز
کلید واژه: باستان‌شناسی محیطی, تحلیل رسوبات, تغییر اقلیم, پراکنش محوطه‌های باستانی, سنجش از دور, دشت قم.,
چکیده مقاله :
باستان‌شناسی محیطی به‌عنوان یک رویکرد میان‌رشته‌ای، به بررسی تعاملات پیچیده بین جوامع انسانی و محیط زیست آن‌ها در طول تاریخ می‌پردازد. این پژوهش با تمرکز بر دشت قم، به تحلیل روش‌های مختلفی مانند تحلیل زمین‌سیما، بررسی بقایای زیستی، آنالیز خاک و رسوبات، و داده‌های اقلیمی پرداخته است تا چگونگی بازسازی اکوسیستم‌های گذشته را ارزیابی کند. هدف اصلی این مطالعه، بررسی تأثیر تغییرات زیست‌محیطی بر الگوهای استقراری و معیشتی جوامع باستانی در دشت قم است. با استفاده از تکنیک‌های پیشرفته مانند سنجش از دور (GIS و LiDAR)، تحلیل‌های ژئوفیزیکی و مطالعات زیست‌باستان‌شناسی، این پژوهش به بازسازی چشم‌اندازهای باستانی و تحلیل تأثیر فعالیت‌های انسانی بر تغییرات اکوسیستمی پرداخته است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهند که تغییرات اقلیمی، از جمله خشکسالی‌ها و نوسانات بارندگی، تأثیر مستقیمی بر الگوهای استقراری و شیوه‌های معیشتی جوامع گذشته داشته‌اند. همچنین، توسعه سیستم‌های مدیریت آب مانند قنات‌ها و تکنیک‌های کشاورزی پایدار، نقش کلیدی در بقای جوامع باستانی در این منطقه ایفا کرده است. این پژوهش بر اهمیت مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در درک تعاملات انسان و محیط تأکید می‌کند و راهکارهایی برای مدیریت پایدار منابع طبیعی و حفاظت از میراث فرهنگی ارائه می‌دهد. نتایج این مطالعه نه‌تنها به شناخت تحولات تاریخی و انسانی کمک می‌کند، بلکه در مواجهه با چالش‌های زیست‌محیطی معاصر نیز کاربرد دارد.
Environmental archaeology, as an interdisciplinary approach, examines the complex interactions between human societies and their environment throughout history. This study, focusing on the Qom Plain, analyzes various methods such as geomorphological analysis, bioarchaeological remains, soil and sediment analysis, and climate data to evaluate how past ecosystems can be reconstructed. The main aim of this research is to investigate the impact of environmental changes on settlement patterns and subsistence strategies of ancient communities in the Qom Plain. By employing advanced techniques such as remote sensing (GIS and LiDAR), geophysical surveys, and bioarchaeological studies, this research reconstructs ancient landscapes and analyzes the impact of human activities on ecological changes. The findings suggest that climatic changes, including droughts and rainfall fluctuations, directly influenced settlement patterns and subsistence strategies of past communities. Additionally, the development of water management systems, such as qanats, and sustainable agricultural techniques played a crucial role in the survival of ancient communities in the region. This study highlights the importance of interdisciplinary research in understanding the interactions between humans and their environment and offers solutions for sustainable resource management and the preservation of cultural heritage. The results of this study contribute not only to the understanding of historical and human developments but also provide practical insights for addressing contemporary environmental challenges.
Introduction
Environmental archaeology is an interdisciplinary branch of archaeology that examines the relationship between human societies and the environment in past periods (Campbell, 2018; Wilkinson & Stevens, 2003). This field uses various geological, biological, and paleoclimatic data to reconstruct past environments and analyze the interactions between humans and nature (Reitz et al., 2008). Given the environmental changes throughout history, human societies have always been influenced by these transformations. Climatic changes and geological events have directly impacted lifestyle, economy, and the geographical distribution of societies (Reitz & Shackley, 2012). Archaeological evidence shows that climatic changes have played a decisive role in migration, settlement patterns, and human adaptation strategies (Hudson et al., 2012).
Scientific methods in environmental archaeology include soil and sediment analysis, study of faunal and floral remains, and remote sensing data analysis (Barham & Macphail, 2016; Niknami & Chaychi Amirkhiz, 2008; Howey et al., 2020). These methods help to better understand the use of natural resources, agricultural development, and environmental management practices of ancient societies (McClatchie, 2020). Additionally, modern techniques such as ancient DNA analysis and stable isotopes have provided new insights into human diet and migration patterns (de Vareilles et al., 2021).
Environmental archaeological studies not only analyze tangible environmental remains in archaeological sites but also examine climatic, geomorphological, and ecological factors and their role in the cultural and social development of human societies (Wilkinson & Stevens, 2003). This scientific field helps us better understand the connection between ecosystem changes and cultural dynamics. For example, changes in rainfall and temperature patterns can affect agricultural systems and food supply, leading to the formation of new social structures (Haldon et al., 2018).
The Qom Plain, as an example of an important region in environmental archaeological studies, has contributed to the understanding of environmental and settlement dynamics of past societies. Geomorphological studies and satellite data indicate that this region has been influenced by multiple climatic changes, and settlement patterns have undergone transformations (Masoumi et al., 2021). In this area, climatic changes, including persistent droughts, have directly impacted the livelihoods of past societies and, in some cases, caused severe reductions in water resources and population displacement (see Chaychi & Shaikh Baikloo, 2020; Kaboli, 1999).
The aim of this paper is to analyze the application of environmental archaeological methods in identifying past ecosystem changes and their consequences for human societies. The environmental challenges of today share many similarities with those of past periods. Therefore, environmental archaeological studies can provide solutions for managing natural resources, preserving cultural heritage, and adapting to climatic changes.
Methodology
This research, using interdisciplinary methods in environmental archaeology, investigates human-environment interactions, specifically in the Qom Plain. This methodology, which combines traditional and modern techniques, enables a more comprehensive understanding of human behavior based on climatic and environmental conditions in the study area and contributes to providing solutions for sustainable resource management and cultural heritage preservation. The research process includes the following steps: (1) collecting and reviewing previous studies in the field of environmental archaeology, focusing on the methods and techniques used to analyze human-environment interactions. (2) Utilizing library resources related to the Qom Plain and similar regions. (3) Reviewing environmental archaeological study methods, including soil and sediment analysis, study of biological remains (plant and animal), and analysis of climatic data. (4) Referencing advanced techniques such as remote sensing (GIS and LiDAR) and geophysical analysis used in environmental archaeological studies to identify archaeological sites and analyze environmental changes. (5) Investigating methods applicable to environmental archaeological studies in the Qom Plain, such as paleoclimatology analysis, ancient sediment and soil studies, and archaeological botany and zooarchaeology studies. (6) Proposing new methods and approaches for future studies in environmental archaeology, with an emphasis on using advanced technologies and interdisciplinary analyses. (7) Highlighting the importance of integrating environmental, archaeological, and paleoclimatic data to better understand human-environment interactions in the past.
Discussion
Environmental Archaeology of Qom Plain
The Qom Plain is considered one of the most important cultural and historical regions of central Iran, where numerous archaeological evidence from different periods has been found. This area, located on the edge of the central Iranian desert, has been influenced by specific climatic and geographical conditions that played a significant role in shaping human settlement patterns and lifestyles. Geological studies show that climatic changes and geomorphological processes have greatly impacted demographic changes and settlement patterns in this region. Furthermore, natural resources such as groundwater and seasonal rivers like Qomroud and Qarachay have played a key role in attracting human societies from prehistoric to historical periods (Saatsaz & Rezaie, 2021; Gholikandi et al., 2013). Environmental archaeology in the Qom Plain uses data from paleoclimatology, sedimentary studies, and cultural material analysis to reconstruct ancient landscapes. Advanced techniques such as remote sensing (GIS and LiDAR) and geophysical analyses have enabled archaeologists to explore the connection between environmental changes and human behaviors (Lavery, 2023; Chase et al., 2013, 2017; Simbolon & Comer, 2023; Hadjimitsis et al., 2013).
Geographical Location and Environmental Characteristics of the Qom Plain
The Qom Plain is located in northern central Iran and the western part of the central desert. It is bordered by Tehran to the north, the central province and Kashan to the south, the Salt Lake to the east, and the central mountains to the west. The region has an elevation ranging from 900 to 1500 meters above sea level and includes seasonal rivers and salt lakes such as Hoz-e-Soltan and the Qom Desert. The climate of Qom is semi-arid, with annual precipitation less than 165 millimeters, most of which occurs in the colder seasons. Temperature fluctuations in the region are severe, affecting the patterns of life and livelihoods of ancient humans (Shaterian, 2013: 271).
This region has widespread evaporative and alluvial deposits that formed during the Quaternary period (Habibi et al., 2021). Paleoclimatic studies show that during different Holocene periods, several environmental changes occurred in the Qom Plain. For example, during the mid-Holocene, increased moisture led to the expansion of human settlements, while in the late Holocene, repeated droughts led to changes in settlement patterns (Schmidt et al., 2011). Additionally, land subsidence in the region is a major contemporary issue that has been exacerbated by the excessive extraction of groundwater resources and has had a direct impact on the environmental sustainability of the area (Masoumi et al., 2021).
Due to its unique geographical position and proximity to water resources, this region has always served as an important passageway in the communication routes of the central Iranian plateau. Archaeological evidence shows that the area hosted human settlements from the Neolithic to historical periods, benefiting from its natural resources (Kabli, 1999; Sarlak, 2010).
Environment and Natural Resources
The Qom Plain has a variety of natural resources that played a fundamental role in the settlement of ancient communities. The water resources of this region included seasonal rivers like Qarachay, Qomroud, the Salt Lake, and Hoz-e-Soltan, which were valuable resources for drinking water and agriculture in the past (Yousefi et al., 2012). However, climatic changes and natural processes such as land subsidence and increasing soil salinity have gradually had negative effects on these resources (Masoumi et al., 2021). Paleobiological studies and environmental data analysis in the Qom Plain show that natural and climatic changes have had a profound impact on the settlement and livelihoods of human societies (Kabli, 1999). These findings highlight the importance of managing natural resources in arid and semi-arid regions like Qom.
Settlement Distribution Patterns
Archaeological analyses using techniques such as remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have shown that the distribution of archaeological sites in the Qom Plain is influenced by geographical factors such as proximity to water sources and fertile lands (Niknami et al., 2009). These studies show that ancient communities followed specific patterns in their settlements and mostly established them near water routes and alluvial plains (Li, 2024; Deng et al., 2010).
By examining settlement distribution maps, it has been found that the focus of settlements shifted to specific areas in different periods. For instance, during the Neolithic era, most sites were concentrated near water sources, whereas in the Parthian and Sassanid periods, with advances in agricultural knowledge and water management, settlements expanded to wider areas. Spatial pattern analysis using methods like kernel density and point pattern analysis has shown that the distribution of archaeological sites in some areas was clustered, indicating a concentration of human activities in those locations (Kempf & Günther, 2023; Zhu et al., 2021).
In addition to natural factors, political and economic factors have also influenced settlement patterns. Administrative and economic centers in different periods played a significant role in shaping settlement patterns. For example, during the Achaemenid and Sassanid periods, urban centers were established in areas with access to trade routes and natural resources, indicating the role of economy and politics in the spatial distribution of settlements (Gholikandi et al., 2013; Altaweel, 2013).
Overall, the study of settlement distribution patterns in the Qom Plain shows that geographical, climatic, economic, and political factors all played a role in determining the locations of human settlements in different historical periods. Integrating archaeological data with modern remote sensing methods provides a better understanding of past settlement trends, which can also be useful in cultural heritage conservation and historical resource management studies (Elfadaly et al., 2017; Moise et al., 2021).
Climatic Changes and Their Impact on Ancient Societies
Paleoclimatological research shows that the Qom Plain has been influenced by multiple climatic changes over thousands of years. Geological and sedimentary data indicate that during the early Holocene, the region experienced drier conditions, but during the mid-Holocene, moisture levels increased, leading to the expansion of human settlements (Shaikh Baikloo Islam & Chaychi Amirkhiz, 2020). Climatic changes profoundly impacted the livelihoods of ancient communities, leading to migration, changes in agricultural practices, and water resource management (Shaikh Baikloo Islam et al., 2020).
Evidence from soil and sediment analysis shows that climatic changes intensified erosion processes and caused shifts in settlement patterns (Shaikh Baikloo Islam et al., 2023). During certain periods, human communities had to relocate due to the reduction of water resources and the increase in desertification. Conversely, in periods with increased rainfall, evidence of agricultural development and societal growth can be observed (Reitz & Shackley, 2012). For example, Kaboli (1999) in his research and excavations in the Qomroud Basin, based on environmental sedimentology, revealed floods caused by the overflow of the Qomroud River, which led to population displacement and the absence of long-term settlement in part of the area.
Environmental archaeology plays a key role in identifying strategies of past societies in dealing with climatic changes. Studies suggest that some civilizations, using water management techniques such as qanats and small dams, were able to adapt to climatic changes (Kaptijn, 2018). These findings can help understand how modern societies may adapt to environmental changes.
In general, climatic changes in the Qom Plain are recognized as a key factor in the historical transformation of the region. Analyzing paleobiological and sedimentary data enables us to examine past impacts and use them for better understanding of the future (Caseldine & Turney, 2010).
Paleoclimatological studies in various regions of Iran, including those conducted on the Katleh-Khur Cave in Zanjan (Andrews et al., 2020) and the Neor Lake in Ardabil (Sharifi et al., 2015), show that climatic changes in the Holocene had significant effects on ancient societies, especially in northern central Iran. These studies emphasize that temperature fluctuations and changes in rainfall during the Holocene led to environmental instability, which directly impacted the distribution and density of human settlements. For example, the 4.2 ka BP dry event (2200 - 1900 BC) and 3.2 ka BP dry event (1250 - 950 BC) placed immense pressure on societies, leading to cultural decline and changes in settlement patterns (Shaikh Baikloo Islam, 2020). In the Qom Plain, there is also evidence of flood events in the 4th millennium BC, indicating the impact of climatic changes on human societies (Chaychi Amirkhiz & Shaikh Baikloo Islam, 2020). These climatic changes led to the adoption of adaptation strategies such as relocating settlements and developing innovative irrigation systems.
Archaeological-paleoclimatological studies in northern central Iran have shown that during the 3rd and 2nd millennia BC, the inhabitants of the region, due to frequent drought events, shifted their subsistence system from sedentary farming to pastoralism and hunting to adapt to climatic and environmental conditions (Shaikh Baikloo & Chaychi, 2020).
Incorporating these climatic data into environmental archaeology studies in the Qom Plain allows for a more precise analysis of the relationships between environmental changes and settlement dynamics. The existing data show that during certain periods in history, increased biodiversity and improved climatic conditions enabled wider settlements in central Iran, while sudden climatic changes had adverse effects on the sustainability of these societies. These insights help us better understand how environmental changes influenced human societies and their adaptation strategies.
- Irrigation Systems and Water Management: One of the most important achievements of ancient societies in the Qom Plain was the development of water management systems. Qanats, as a significant innovation, enabled sustainable use of water in dry regions. These systems, which extend for thousands of kilometers, transported groundwater from mountainous areas to agricultural lands, minimizing evaporation and water pollution (Boustani, 2008). In addition to qanats, ancient communities also used irrigation canals and water mills, which helped develop agriculture and the growth of civilizations (Gholikandi et al., 2013).
Agriculture in the Qom Plain heavily relied on qanat irrigation systems. These systems enabled the cultivation of various crops in semi-arid environments and demonstrated the ancient communities' understanding of local ecological capacities (Jomehpour, 2009). Traditional crops like barley and wheat were integrated into agricultural practices, creating a need for new soil and water management strategies (Li et al., 2022). However, qanat systems today face challenges, and researchers suggest that with the help of modern technology, these ancient water extraction methods could be revitalized (Taghavi-Jeloudar et al., 2013).
- Climate-Responsive Architecture: The hot and dry climate of the Qom Plain has influenced traditional architectural designs. Ancient societies were able to achieve thermal comfort in harsh climatic conditions by using thick walls, small windows, and central courtyards (Hejazi, 2007). The Qajar-era houses in Qom are an example of sustainable architectural principles that show harmony with the local climate (Saedi & Aali, 2021). These climate-sensitive architectural techniques provide valuable insights for contemporary designers seeking to build energy-efficient and comfortable structures in hot and dry climates (Taher Tolou Del et al., 2022; Moosavi, 2011).
Archaeological Methods Used in Qom Plain Studies
In archaeological studies of the Qom Plain, various techniques have been used to examine the history of human settlement and environmental interactions. Modern methods such as remote sensing, geophysical analyses, and bioarchaeological studies have helped researchers gather accurate information about the cultural and natural landscapes of the biosphere-cultural regions (Lambers, 2018).
- Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis: Remote sensing technology, including the use of satellite images and spatial data modeling, has provided effective tools for mapping archaeological sites (Lasaponara & Masini, 2013). These technologies can be employed in the Qom Plain to identify buried settlements and analyze environmental changes. High-resolution satellite data, such as Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2, have enabled the study of human settlement distribution in relation to climate changes (Alexakis et al., 2012).
- Geophysical Studies and Non-invasive Excavations: Geophysical analyses, such as magnetometry, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), and electrical resistivity, are non-invasive methods used to identify buried structures and settlement layers (Horsley, 2015). In the Qom Plain, these methods can help uncover architectural remains and ancient water supply networks—these networks reflect the advanced knowledge of ancient societies in resource management (Martorana et al., 2023).
- Bioarchaeological Analyses: Zooarchaeological studies in this region have provided important evidence about the diets, agriculture, and animal husbandry of past societies (Khoshnevis, 2001). By combining paleoecological and zooarchaeological analyses, researchers can study the interactions between humans, plants, and animals, which shaped ecosystems and influenced human actions in the past (Overton & Taylor, 2018). Overall, the combination of these modern methods enhances our understanding of the environmental and cultural history of the Qom Plain and contributes to better conservation of the region’s ancient heritage. In particular, the use of cutting-edge technologies, such as artificial intelligence in archaeological data analysis, will revolutionize the future of research in this field (Argyrou & Agapiou, 2022).
Conclusion
The interaction between humans and the environment is a complex and multifaceted process that has continued throughout history. Studying these interactions in environmental archaeology not only helps in understanding the past but can also provide solutions for managing natural resources and addressing contemporary environmental challenges. Examining historical examples shows that successful societies were those that effectively adapted to environmental changes and developed sustainable strategies. Environmental archaeology of the Qom Plain reflects the intricate interactions between humans and the environment over time. Ancient societies, through the development of water management systems such as qanats and adopting strategies for adapting to climatic changes, were able to sustain themselves in harsh environmental conditions. These approaches not only helped the survival of these societies but also led to the development of ancient civilizations in the region. The results of this study show that interdisciplinary analyses in environmental archaeology enable the accurate reconstruction of past environments and understanding the impact of human activities on ecosystem changes. Moreover, the findings emphasize that advanced methods, such as remote sensing and geological data analysis, play a key role in the sustainable management of natural resources and the protection of cultural heritage. Overall, environmental archaeology, as an interdisciplinary approach, provides valuable insights into both the past and present and contributes to a better understanding of current environmental challenges.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Siamak Sarlak, whose generous support and assistance in the research of the first author’s doctoral dissertation were invaluable. He kindly provided his field findings for examination and analysis based on the objectives and research questions of the dissertation. This article serves as an introduction to the analysis of settlement patterns in the Qom Plain during the Parthian and Sassanian periods, taking into account the environmental conditions and potentials of the region, with the results to be gradually published. In this article, we have attempted to highlight the significance of this research.
چایچی امیرخیز، احمد، شیخ بیکلو اسلام، بابک (۱۳۹۹). مخاطرات اقلیمی هزاره چهارم ق.م و پاسخ‌های فرهنگی جوامع انسانی مطالعه موردی: دشت تهران و حوضه قمرود ـ قره‌چای. پژوهه باستان‌سنجی، ۶(۱): ۶۷-۸۰. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jra.6.1.67
خوشنویس، شیوا (۱۳۸۰). باستان‌جانورشناسی قره‌تپه قمرود در هزارة پنجم ق.م. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، گروه زیست‌شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کازرون.
سرلک، سیامک (۱۳۸۹). فرهنگ هفت هزار ساله شهر قم: کاوش‌های باستان‌شناختی محوطه قلی‌درویش جمکران ـ قم. قم: موسسه فرهنگی‌انتشاراتی نقش.
شاطریان، رضا (۱۳۸۸). اقلیم و معماری. تهران: سیمای دانش.
شیخ‌بیکلو‌اسلام. (۱۴۰۱). ضرورت انجام مطالعات رسوب‌شناسی محیطی در محوطه‌های باستانی. پژوهه باستان‌سنجی, 15(8), 207-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jra.8.1.207
شیخ بیکلو اسلام، چایچی امیرخیز، احمد (۱۳۹۹). سازگاری‌های جوامع انسانی عصرهای مفرغ و آهن شمال ایران مرکزی با رویدادهای اقلیمی هولوسن. پژوهش‌های تغییرات آب و هوایی، 1(2)، 39-54. https://doi.org/10.30488/ccr.2020.111121
شیخ بیکلو اسلام، بابک، چایچی امیرخیز، احمد، ولی پور، حمیدرضا، صفایی راد، رضا (1399). بررسی اثر تغییرات اقلیمی هولوسن میانه بر جوامع دورة سیلک III در شمال ایران مرکزی بر اساس رسوب‌شناسی محیطی محوطة مافین‌آباد اسلامشهر. مطالعات باستان شناسی، 12(3)، 143-166. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2021.239133.142465
کابلی، میر عابدین (۱۳۷۸). بررسی‌های باستان‌شناسی قمرود. تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی کشور.
یوسفی، محسن، بافکار، حسین و هدیه¬لو، اکرم، مطهری، ابوالفضل، جاهدپری، فاطمه، خوش¬سخن، محمدحسین، نمازی¬خواه، مهدی (1391). استان¬شناسی قم. تهران: شرکت چاپ و نشر کتاب¬های درسی ایران.
Alexakis, D., Agapiou, A., Hadjimitsis, D., & Sarris, A. (2012). Remote sensing applications in archaeological research. Remote Sensing-Applications, 435-462. https://doi.org/10.5772/37668
Altaweel, M. (2013). The application of an entropy maximising model for understanding the rise of urbanism. Archaeopress.
Andrews, J. E., Carolin, S. A., Peckover, E. N., Marca, A., Al-Omari, S., & Rowe, P. J. (2020). Holocene stable isotope record of insolation and rapid climate change in a stalagmite from the Zagros of Iran. Quaternary Science Reviews, 241, 106433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106433
Anshori, A., Suswatiningsih, T. E., & Susilawati, H. L. (2023, April). Traditions of soil and water conservation based on farmer knowledge as an adaptation to climate condition in dry land. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1165, No. 1, p. 012038). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1165/1/012038
Argyrou, A., & Agapiou, A. (2022). A review of artificial intelligence and remote sensing for archaeological research. Remote Sensing, 14(23), 6000. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14236000
Banning, E. B. (2020). Soils, Sediments, and Geoarchaeology. The Archaeologist's Laboratory: The Analysis of Archaeological Evidence, 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47992-3_17
Barham, A. J., & Macphail, R. I. (2016). Archaeological sediments and soils: analysis, interpretation and management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315434452
Boustani, F. (2008, September). Sustainable water utilization in arid region of Iran by Qanats. In Proceeding of world Academy of science, engineering and technology (Vol. 33, pp. 213-216).
Campbell, G. (2018). Environmental Archaeology. The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0218
Casana, J. (2021). Rethinking the landscape: Emerging approaches to archaeological remote sensing. Annual Review of Anthropology, 50(1), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-ANTHRO-101819-110344
Caseldine, C. J., & Turney, C. (2010). The bigger picture: towards integrating palaeoclimate and environmental data with a history of societal change. Journal of Quaternary Science, 25(1), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.1337
Chase, A.F., Chase, D.Z., & Weishampel, J.F. (2013). The Use of LiDAR at the Maya Site of Caracol, Belize. In: Mapping Archaeological Landscapes from Space. Springer Briefs in Archaeology, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6074-9_15
Chase, A. S., Chase, D. Z., & Chase, A. F. (2017). LiDAR for archaeological research and the study of historical landscapes. Sensing the Past: From artifact to historical site, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3_4
Deng, B., Guo, H. D., Wang, C. L., & Nie, Y. P. (2010). Applications of remote sensing technique in archaeology: a review. Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(1), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20100115
de Vareilles, A., Pelling, R., Woodbridge, J., & Fyfe, R. (2021). Archaeology and agriculture: plants, people, and past land-use. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(10), 943-954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.003
Diamond, J. (2001). Ecological collapses of pre-industrial societies. Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 22, 389-406.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2013). Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1754), 20122845. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2845
Elfadaly, A., Lasaponara, R., Murgante, B., & Qelichi, M. M. (2017). Cultural heritage management using analysis of satellite images and advanced GIS techniques at East Luxor, Egypt and Kangavar, Iran (a comparison case study). In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2017: 17th International Conference, Trieste, Italy, July 3-6, 2017, Proceedings, Part IV 17 (pp. 152-168). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_12
Gholikandi, G. B., Sadrzadeh, M., Jamshidi, S., & Ebrahimi, M. (2013). Water resource management in ancient Iran with emphasis on technological approaches: a cultural heritage. Water science and technology: Water Supply, 13(3), 582-589. https://doi.org/10.2166/WS.2013.084
Gildemacher, P. R. (2012). Innovation in seed potato systems in Eastern Africa. Wageningen University and Research.
Habibi, V., Ahmadi, H., Jafari, M., & Moeini, A. (2021). Mapping soil salinity using a combined spectral and topographical indices with artificial neural network. PLoS One, 16(5), e0228494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228494
Hadjimitsis, D. G., Agapiou, A., Themistocleous, K., Alexakis, D. D., & Sarris, A. (2013). Remote sensing for archaeological applications: management, documentation and monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment-Integrated Approaches, 57-95. https://doi.org/10.5772/39306
Haldon, J., Mordechai, L., Newfield, T. P., Chase, A. F., Izdebski, A., Guzowski, P., Labuhn, I., & Roberts, N. (2018). History meets palaeoscience: Consilience and collaboration in studying past societal responses to environmental change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(13), 3210-3218. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716912115
Hassan, F. A. (1978). Sediments in archaeology: methods and implications for palaeoenvironmental and cultural analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology, 5(2), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346978791489899
Haug, G. H., Gunther, D., Peterson, L. C., Sigman, D. M., Hughen, K. A., & Aeschlimann, B. (2003). Climate and the collapse of Maya civilization. Science, 299(5613), 1731-1735. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080444
Hayashida, F. M. (2005). Archaeology, ecological history, and conservation. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 34(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.ANTHRO.34.081804.120515
Hejazi, M. (2007). Persian architecture: Conformity with nature in hot-dry regions. International Journal of Design and Nature, 1, 186-196. https://doi.org/10.2495/jdn-v1-n2-186-196
Horsley, T. J. (2015). The use of geophysical survey in archaeology. In R. A. Scott & M. C. Buchmann (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0356
Howey, M. C., Sullivan, F. B., Burg, M. B., & Palace, M. W. (2020). Remotely sensed big data and iterative approaches to cultural feature detection and past landscape process analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology, 45(sup1), S27-S38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1713435
Hudson, M. J., Aoyama, M., Hoover, K. C., & Uchiyama, J. (2012). Prospects and challenges for an archaeology of global climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(4), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.174
Jomehpour, M. (2009). Qanat irrigation systems as important and ingenious agricultural heritage: case study of the qanats of Kashan, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 66(3), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230902752629
Kaniewski, D., Van Campo, E., Guiot, J., Le Burel, S., Otto, T., & Baeteman, C. (2013). Environmental roots of the Late Bronze Age crisis. PloS one, 8(8), e71004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071004
Kaptijn, E. (2018). Learning from ancient water management: Archeology's role in modern‐day climate change adaptations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 5(1), e1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1256
Kempf, M., & Günther, G. (2023). Point pattern and spatial analyses using archaeological and environmental data–A case study from the Neolithic Carpathian Basin. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 47, 103747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103747
Lambers, K. (2018). Airborne and spaceborne remote sensing and digital image analysis in archaeology. Digital Geoarchaeology: New Techniques for Interdisciplinary Human-Environmental Research, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25316-9_7
Lasaponara, R., & Masini, N. (2013). Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Overview. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 6, 7-17.
Lavery, M. J. (2023). Review of ‘Andrews’ diseases of the skin: Clinical dermatology, | Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology, WD James, DM Elston, JR Treat, MA Rosenbach, IM Neuhaus, Elsevier (2019), 992 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.06.003
Li, X. (2024). Determination of the temporal–spatial distribution patterns of ancient heritage sites in China and their influencing factors via GIS. Heritage Science, 12(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01258-6
Li, H., Sun, Y., Yang, Y., Cui, Y., Ren, L., Li, H., Chen, G., Vaiglova, P., Dong, G., & Liu, X. (2022). Water and soil management strategies and the introduction of wheat and barley to northern China: an isotopic analysis of cultivation on the Loess Plateau. Antiquity, 96(390), 1478-1494. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2022.138
Martorana, R., Capizzi, P., Pisciotta, A., Scudero, S., & Bottari, C. (2023). An overview of geophysical techniques and their potential suitability for archaeological studies. Heritage, 6(3), 2886-2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030154
Masoumi, Z., Mousavi, Z., & Hajeb, Z. (2022). Long-term investigation of subsidence rate and its environmental effects using the InSAR technique and geospatial analyses. Geocarto International, 37(24), 7161-7185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1964616
McClatchie, Meriel (2020). Archaeobotany. obo in Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0253
Mirshekaran, Y. (2020). The effects of Climate change on Security consequences of Water resources crisis with an emphasis on hydropolitic of border regions. Climate Change Research, 1(2), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.30488/ccr.2020.111127
Moise, C., Dana Negula, I., Mihalache, C. E., Lazar, A. M., Dedulescu, A. L., Rustoiu, G. T., Inel, I.C., & Badea, A. (2021). Remote sensing for cultural heritage assessment and monitoring: the case study of Alba Iulia. Sustainability, 13(3), 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13031406
Moosavi, M. (2011). An Analysis to Historic Roots of Climatic Design in Ancient Architecture of Central Zone of Iran. International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research, 17.
Niknami, K. A., Amirkhiz, A. C., & Jalali, F. F. (2009). Spatial pattern of archaeological site distributions on the eastern shores of Lake Urmia, northwestern Iran. Archeologia e calcolatori, (20), 261-276.
Niknami, K. A., & Chaychi Amirkhiz, A. (2008). A GIS technical approach to the spatial pattern recognition of archaeological site distribution on the eastern shores of Lake Urmia, northwestern Iran. Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37, 167-172.
Overton, N. J., & Taylor, B. (2018). Humans in the environment: plants, animals and landscapes in Mesolithic Britain and Ireland. Journal of World Prehistory, 31, 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-018-9116-0
Reitz, E., Scarry, C. M., & Scudder, S. J. (Eds.). (2008). Case studies in environmental archaeology. Springer Science & Business Media.
Reitz, E. J., & Shackley, M. (2012). Introduction to environmental archaeology. Environmental Archaeology, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3339-2_1
Revelles, J. (2021). Archaeoecology. The application of palaeoenvironmental sciences for the reconstruction of human–environment interactions. Applied Sciences, 11(18), 8782. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188782
Rick, T. C., & Sandweiss, D. H. (2020). Archaeology, climate, and global change in the Age of Humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(15), 8250-8253. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003612117
Rivera-Collazo, I. (2022). Environment, climate and people: Exploring human responses to climate change. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 68, 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2022.101460
Roberts, P., Hunt, C., Arroyo-Kalin, M., Evans, D., & Boivin, N. (2017). The deep human prehistory of global tropical forests and its relevance for modern conservation. Nature plants, 3(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.93
Saatsaz, M., & Rezaie, A. (2021). Water Resources management, technology, and culture in ancient Iran. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2021, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.5194/HESS-2021-173
Saedi, Z., & Aali, H. (2021). Assessment of effective factors in sustainable architecture of Qajar period historical houses (case study houses of Qom city) (May 11, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3843717 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3843717
Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D. B., ... & Kabat, P. (2014). Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3245-3250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110
Schmidt, A., Quigley, M., Fattahi, M., Azizi, G., Maghsoudi, M., & Fazeli, H. (2011). Holocene settlement shifts and palaeoenvironments on the Central Iranian Plateau: Investigating linked systems. The Holocene, 21(4), 583-595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683610385961
Shaikh Baikloo Islam, B. , Chaychi Amirkhiz, A. and Mosadeghi Amini, F. (2023). Extremes and Cultures: Investigating the Decline of the Chalcolithic Age in the Tehran Plain with the Environmental Archaeology Approach. Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies, 13(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijas.2023.45046.1259
Shaikh Baikloo Islam, B. (2020). Holocene climatic events in Iran. Climate Change Research, 1(4), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.30488/ccr.2020.244327.1017
Shaikh Baikloo Islam, B., & Chaychi Amirkhiz, A. (2020). Human-Climate Connection in North Central Iran Between 6000 and 2700 BCE. Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies, 10(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijas.2020.6792
Sharifi, A., Pourmand, A., Canuel, E. A., Ferer-Tyler, E., Peterson, L. C., Aichner, B., ... & Swart, P. K. (2015). Abrupt climate variability since the last deglaciation based on a high-resolution, multi-proxy peat record from NW Iran: The hand that rocked the Cradle of Civilization?. Quaternary Science Reviews, 123, 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.07.006
Simbolon, R. S., & Comer, A. (2023). Unveiling the Past: LiDAR Technology's Role in Discovering Hidden Ar-chaeological Sites. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 12(1), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v12i1.28
Taghavi-Jeloudar, M., Han, M., Davoudi, M., & Kim, M. (2013). Review of ancient wisdom of Qanat, and suggestions for future water management. Environmental Engineering Research, 18(2), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.4491/EER.2013.18.2.057
Taher Tolou Del, M. S., Bayat, S., & Zojaji, N. (2022). The effect of building plan form on thermal comfort in the traditional residential patterns of the hot and dry climate of Qom. Heritage Science, 10(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00807-1
Tiloca, M. T., Vanessa, L., Paola Antonia, D., Federico, S., Marco, C., Giuseppe, B., & Luigi, L. (2024). The role of management practices on soil seed bank agrobiodiversity and agronomic sustainability in a horticultural cropping system. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 70(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2024.2414990
Weiss, H. (Ed.). (2017). Megadrought and collapse: from early agriculture to Angkor. Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, K., & Stevens, C. (2003). Environmental archaeology: approaches, techniques & applications: Tempus. Tempus Publishing Ltd.
Zhu, L., Li, Z., Su, H., & Wang, X. (2021). Temporal and spatial distribution of ancient sites in Shaanxi Province using geographic information systems (GIS). Heritage Science, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00598-x
