Educational Model of Architecture Based on the Professor’s Position (Case Study: Students of Selected Universities of Iran)
محورهای موضوعی : Urban Design
Hassan Torabi
1
,
Razieh Labibzadeh
2
,
Hossein Zabihi
3
1 - Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Corresponding author, Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 - Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
کلید واژه: Position of Man, Competent Professor, Traditional Architecture Education, Wisdom and Knowledge, Skill,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aims to enhance the quality of higher education by introducing a model of a competent professor in Iran’s higher education system.
Among the elements of the education system, the teacher element is the most important one, so professors and teachers are the underlying agents for the renewal of pedagogy. It is hoped that the lack of effective position of man in traditional education of architecture is removed in contemporary architecture education by investigating the human component, profound vision, and principles that architect masters acquired when they were solving the problems ruling the implementation of the building, creating a relationship between new building and teaching these principles in details and accurately to their students.
To achieve this, a qualitative study employing a content analysis approach was conducted. Semi-structured interviews and participant observation were used to collect data.
The main question of this study is whether students of Selected universities in Iran can identify the characteristics of a competent professor. The information indicates that the averages of the total dimensions of human existence, cognitive dimension, wisdom dimension, and skill dimension were reported as 3.605, 3.701, 4.097, and 3.017, respectively.
It can be seen that the average score for the total score, as well as the average score for the cognitive dimension, was above average. The average score for the wisdom dimension was desirable and excellent, while the average score for the skill dimension was poor.
This study aims to enhance the quality of higher education by introducing a model of a competent professor in Iran’s higher education system.
Among the elements of the education system, the teacher element is the most important one, so professors and teachers are the underlying agents for the renewal of pedagogy. It is hoped that the lack of effective position of man in traditional education of architecture is removed in contemporary architecture education by investigating the human component, profound vision, and principles that architect masters acquired when they were solving the problems ruling the implementation of the building, creating a relationship between new building and teaching these principles in details and accurately to their students.
To achieve this, a qualitative study employing a content analysis approach was conducted. Semi-structured interviews and participant observation were used to collect data.
The main question of this study is whether students of Selected universities in Iran can identify the characteristics of a competent professor. The information indicates that the averages of the total dimensions of human existence, cognitive dimension, wisdom dimension, and skill dimension were reported as 3.605, 3.701, 4.097, and 3.017, respectively.
It can be seen that the average score for the total score, as well as the average score for the cognitive dimension, was above average. The average score for the wisdom dimension was desirable and excellent, while the average score for the skill dimension was poor.
1. Afsharian, S., and Omidvar, E. (2023). Strategic comparison of traditional and contemporary architecture education based on the promotion of future architecture (case study: architects of Bushehr province). Second International Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Development, Environment, and Horizons of Islamic Art in the Declaration of the Second Step of the Revolution. Tabriz. https://civilica.com/doc/1612207
2. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college professors do. Harvard University Press.
3. Bonakdari, N., Mehran, G., Mahroozadeh, T., & Hashemi, S. A. (2016). Characteristics of Iranian Competent Professor: A Qualitative Research. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 7(27), 117-138. https://jedu.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_2036.html?lang=en
4. Entesari, N. Teimouri, S. Ghasemi Sichani, M. (2015). Investigating the role of architecture in the design of urban spaces, case study: modern educational spaces. Urban Management, 14(40), 107-139. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/92161/fa
5. Farzian, M. and Karbasi, A. (2014). handcrafts - personal experience Learning by doing in architectural design education. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 19(3), 87-96. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2014.55411 .https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_55411_en.html
6. Ghafari, M. (2024). Integration of traditional and modern architecture. Tenth International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Management. https://civilica.com/doc/1691751
7. Gooran, S., Foroutan, M., and Dezhdar, O. (2022). Explaining the Effective Out-of-University Factors of Architectural Education on Contemporary Iranian Architects from the Perspective of University Professors. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 19(112), 81-92. doi: 10.22034/Bagh.. 2022.288974.4902. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_153549.html
8. Hojjat, I. (2010). Architectural Practice, First Edition. Tehran University Press, Tehran.
9. Hojjat, I. (2012). Tradition and modernity in architecture. First Edition. Tehran University Press, Tehran.
10. Lowman, J. (1995) ’ Mastering the Techniques of Teaching’ Second Edition. Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
11. Nadimi, H. (2010). Apprenticeship Method, a Second View. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 2(44), 27-36. https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_23973.html
12. O'Malley, S. G., Rosen, R. C., & Vogt, L. (Eds.). (1990). Politics of education: Essays from Radical Teacher. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
13. Sedaghati, A. and Gholizadeh, H. (2024). Relationship and coordination of traditional and modern architectural techniques in conceptualizing Iranian spaces. First International Conference on Tourism Industry. Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/2155507
14. Seifi, N., Balkhari-Ghahhi, H., & Mohammadzadeh, M. (2017). A reflection on the relationship between teacher and student in arts education with an emphasis on the traditional system. Negareh, 12(42), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2017.528 https://negareh.shahed.ac.ir/article_528.html
15. Taghi, Z. (1995).A look at architectural education in the contemporary era. Sofeh, 5(2), -.https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100299.html
16. Zarafshani, M. A., Tahmasebi, A., and Bayzidi, Q. (2021). A Study on the Architectural Education System in Iranian Universities in Order to Solve the Identity Crisis of Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Islamic Art Studies, 18(42), 175-187. doi: 10.22034/ias.2021.288751.1622. https://www.sysislamicartjournal.ir/article_133884.html?lang=en
