Ranking general two-stage feedback systems: Navigating undesirable exogenous inputs
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه ریاضی
Jafar Pourmahmoud
1
,
Davoud Norouzi
2
1 - Department of Applied Mathematics, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 - Department of Applied Mathematics, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.
کلید واژه: Network Data Envelopment Analysis, Ranking, Non-discretionary factors, Undesirable factors, Feedback factors.,
چکیده مقاله :
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely used method for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units in real-world applications. Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) extends this approach by assessing the efficiency of network systems, taking into account internal processes within departments. A key challenge in evaluating such systems is ranking efficient units, particularly when undesirable data and feedback mechanisms are present. While previous research has explored ranking methods for network systems, no study has addressed the ranking of systems that simultaneously involve undesirable data and feedback loops. This study proposes a novel model for ranking general two-stage feedback systems with undesirable exogenous inputs. A structural numerical example is provided to demonstrate the model's applicability and effectiveness. The results show that the proposed model successfully evaluates and ranks two-stage systems, offering valuable insights for decision-makers. By addressing this gap in the literature, the research provides a practical tool for analyzing complex network systems with undesirable data and feedback, advancing the field of DEA.
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely used method for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units in real-world applications. Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) extends this approach by assessing the efficiency of network systems, taking into account internal processes within departments. A key challenge in evaluating such systems is ranking efficient units, particularly when undesirable data and feedback mechanisms are present. While previous research has explored ranking methods for network systems, no study has addressed the ranking of systems that simultaneously involve undesirable data and feedback loops. This study proposes a novel model for ranking general two-stage feedback systems with undesirable exogenous inputs. A structural numerical example is provided to demonstrate the model's applicability and effectiveness. The results show that the proposed model successfully evaluates and ranks two-stage systems, offering valuable insights for decision-makers. By addressing this gap in the literature, the research provides a practical tool for analyzing complex network systems with undesirable data and feedback, advancing the field of DEA.
[1] T.R. Sexton, R.H. Silkman and A.J. Hogan, Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions, in: Silkman R.H. (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, (1986) 73-105.
[2] M. Oral, O. Kettani and P. Lang, methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects, Manag. Sci, 7(37) (1991) 871- 883.
[3] A.M. Torgersen, F.R. Forsund and S.A.C. Kittelsen, Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units, J. Prod. Anal, 7 (1996) 379-398.
[4] P. Andersen and N.C. Petersen, procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Manag. Sci, 39(10) (1993) 1261-1294.
[5] S. Mehrabian, M.R. Alirezaei and G.R. Jahanshahloo, complete efficiency ranking of decision-making units; an application to the teaches training university, Comput. Opt. Appl, 14 (1999) 261-266.
[6] G.R. Jahanshahloo, M. Sanei, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi and N. Shoja, Using the gradient line for ranking DMUs in DEA, Appl. Math. Comput. 151(1), (2004) 209-219.
[7] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, R. B. Golany, G. Klopp, E. Schmitz and D. Thomas, , Two-phase data envelopment analysis approaches to policy evaluation and management of army recruiting activities: tradeoffs between joint services and army advertising, Research Re- port CCS 532.Center for Cybernetic Studies, University of Texas-Austin (1986).
[8] R. Fare, and S. Grosskopf, Network DEA, Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 30 (2000) 35–49.
[9] M. Khodabakhshi, M. Asgharian, G. Gregoriou, an input-oriented super-efficiency measure in stochastic data envelopment analysis: Evaluating chief executive officers of US public banks and thrifts, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3) (2010) 2092-2097.
[10] S.J. Sadjadi, H. Omrani., S. Abdollahzadeh, M. Alinaghian and H. Mohammadi, A robust super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for ranking of provincial gas companies in Iran, 38 (2011) 10875-10881.
[11] S. M. Razavi, S. Shahriari, and M. Ahmadpour Dariani, Evaluation of Innovative Performance of Knowledge based Company by Network Data Envelopment Analysis-Game Theory Approach. Industrial Management Journal, 7(4) (2015) 721-742.
[12] H. Gheisari, G. Farajpour Khanaposhtani and M. Alemi, Measuring the Efficiency, Productivity and Ranking of the Iranian Gas Refineries Based on the Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis. jor, 15 (2) (2018) 135-156
[13] M. Fallah, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and M. Hosseinzadeh, Discriminant Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis with Specific Data and Its Application for Companies in the Iranian Stock Exchange, Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 11(1) (2020) 144-156.
[14] J. Pourmahmoud, and D. Norouzi bene, provide a new model for evaluating and ranking DMUs with ordinal data, International Journal of Industrial Mathematics, 14(3) (2022) 271-277.
[15] J. Pourmahmoud, and D. Norouzi bene, Ranking general two-stage network systems with undesirable exogenous inputs and feedback factors, 16th International Conference on Data Envelopment Analysis and Decision Science, (2023) 1120-1130.
[16] K. Chiang, Network Data Envelopment Analysis, Foundations and Extensions, ISBN 978-3-319-31718-2 (eBook) (2016).
[17] R. Pittman, Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs, Economic Journal, 93(372) (1983) 883–891.
[18] L.M. Seiford, and J. Zhu, Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation, European Journal of Operational Research, 142 (1) (2002) 16–20.
[19] R. Fare, and S. Grosskopf, Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment, European Journal of Operational Research, 157(1) (2004) 242–245.
[20] G.R. Jahanshahloo, A. Hadi Vencheh, A.A. Foroughi and R. Kazemi-Matin, Inputs/ outputs estimation in DEA when some factors are undesirable, Applied Mathematics and Computations, 156(1) (2004) 19–32.
[21] S. Kordrostami and A. Amirteimoori, Undesirable factors in multicomponent performance measurement, Applied Mathematical Computations, 171(2) (2005) 721–729.
[22] A. Amirteimoori, S. Kordrostami and M. Sarparast, modeling undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematical Computations, 180(2) (2006) 444–452.
[23] S. Akther, H. Fukuyama and W. Weber, Estimating two-stage network slacks-based inefficiency: An application to Bangladesh banking, Omega, 41(1) (2013) 88–96.
[24] M. Homayounfar, and A. Amirteimoori, Network production planning considering undesirable outputs- a fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach, Journal of Operational Research and Its Applications, 13(1) (2016) 121–141.
[25] S. Madadi, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, M. Rostamy Malkhalifeh and M. Fallah jelodar, DEA-Based Re -allocation Model with Constant the Efficiency and Improvement of Undesirable Factors. The Case Study in Tejarat Bank of Iran, Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 9(1) (2018) 63-75.
[26] F. Seihani Parashkouh, S. Kordrostami, A. Amirteimoori and A. Ghane-Kanafi, Two-Stage Network DEA with Undesirable Outputs: An Application in the Air Transportation in the Spain, Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 11(1) (2020) 1-24.
[27] K. Teimourzadeh, J. Pourmahmoud and S. Kordrostami, A Novel Approach to Evaluate the Road Safety Index: A Case Study in the Roads of East Azerbaijan Province in Iran, Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 12(2) (2019) 213-233.
[28] M. Mahboubi, S. Kordrostami, A. Amirteimoori, A. Ghane-Kanafi, Estimating marginal rates of substitution in two-stage processes with undesirable factors, Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 14(2) (2021) 419-436.
[29] H. Omrani, A. Emrouznejad, M. Shamsi, P. Fahimi, Evaluation of insurance companies considering uncertainty: A multi-objective network data envelopment analysis model with negative data and undesirable outputs, Socio-economic planning sciences, 1 (2022) 101-130.
[30] J. Pourmahmoud, and D. Norouzi bene, Evaluation of general two-stage network systems in the presence of undesirable and non-discretionary data, Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 13(2) (2022) 83-95.
[31] A. Shirvani, A. Azizi, Developing a Two-Stage Network Data Envelopment Analysis Model with Desirable and Undesirable Outputs (Case Study of Butter Manufacturing Industry), International Journal of Industrial Mathematics, 14(4) (2022) 445-456.
[32] L. Liang, Z.Q. Li, W.D. Cook, Data envelopment analysis efficiency in two-stage networks with feedback. IIE Trans 43 (2011) 309–322.
[33] M. Tavassoli, G. R. Faramarzi, R. Farzipoor Saen, Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using an SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input, Journal of Air Transport Management, 34 (2014) 146–153.
[34] H. Wu, K. Lv, L. Liang and H. Hu, Measuring performance of sustainable manufacturing with recyclable wastes: a case from China’s iron and steel industry, Omega, 66 (2017) 38–47.
[35] Z. Hu, S. Yan, L. Yao and M. Moudi, Efficiency evaluation with feedback for regional water use and wastewater treatment, Journal of Hydrology, 562 (2018) 703–711.
[36] D. Wang, L. Zhao, F. Yang and K. Chen, Performance evaluation of the Chinese high-tech industry: a two-stage DEA approach with feedback and shared resource, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 18(5) (2021) 3315-3338.
