ارائه مدل سازمان باز در نظام آموزش عالی (دستاورد رهبری باز و کارکنان باز در سازمان)
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت آموزشی
مریم کلوندی
1
,
محمد علی سرلک
2
,
مجید ضماهنی
3
,
امير حسين امير خاني
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
2 - استاد گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشگاه پیام نور
4 - دانشيار مركز تحصيلات تكميلي دانشگاه پيام نورتهران، ايران
کلید واژه: سازمان باز, ابعاد مدل سازمان باز, نظام آموزش عالي, پذیرش سازمان باز, مدل سازمان باز,
چکیده مقاله :
تحقيق حاضر با هدف كلي طراحي فرایندی مدل سازمان باز در نظام آموزش عالي (دانشگاه هاي منتخب استان كردستان)انجام شد. روش شناسی: پژوهش حاظر با بهره گيري از روش آميخته (كمي - كيفي)به عنوان روش تحقيق استفاده شد. از حيث هدف كاربردي مي باشد. جامعه و نمونه آماري در بخش كيفي اساتيد و مديران دانشگاه هاي منتخب استان كردستان و از طريق روش هدفمند و تكنيك گلوله برفي انتخاب شدند و جامعه آماري در بخش كمي را کارکنان دانشگاه هاي منتخب به تعداد 204 نفر تشكيل دادند گرد آوري داده هاي پژوهش از طريق پرسشنامه پژوهشگر ساخته ای که گویه های آن از دل داده های کیفی مستخرج از مرحله نخست پژوهش تدوین شده بود انجام گرفت. سپس بررسي تأييد مدل در بين كاركنان دانشگاه هاي منتخب با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS و ليزرل انجام شد. یافته‌ها: در اين پژوهش ابعاد و مولفه هاي سازمان باز طراحی شده در نمونه آماری مورد پژوهش با مولفه های تحت عنوان رهبري باز، كاركنان باز، ساختار باز، فرهنگ باز و فناوري باز تدوين شد. نتیجه‌گیری: توجه و استقرار سازمان باز موجب افزايش بهره وري و عملكرد مديران و كاركنان، افزايش عملكرد سازمان و همچنين آمادگي و انعطاف پذيري سازمان را براي تسهيل تغييرات مثبت فراهم مي نمايد. پژوهش حاظر به يكي از انواع مدل سازمان كه از نظر محققان داخلي كمتر به آن توجه شده در استقرار سازمان باز در دانشگاه پرداخته و مدلي در خصوص آن ارائه نموده است.
the current research with the overall goal of designing an open organization model in the higher education system (selected universities of Kurdistan province) Done. Method: The current research was done using the mixed method (quantitative-qualitative) as a research method. In terms of practical purpose. The population and statistical sample in the qualitative part of the professors and managers of the selected universities of Kurdistan province were selected through the purposeful method and the snowball technique, and the statistical population in the quantitative part was made up of 204 employees of the selected universities. The research data was collected through a researcher-made questionnaire whose items were compiled from the qualitative data extracted from the first stage of the research. Then, the validation of the model was conducted among the employees of selected universities using SPSS and Liserl software. Results: In this research, the dimensions and components of the open organization designed in the statistical sample of the research were compiled with the components under the titles of open leadership, open employees, open structure, open culture and open technology. Conclusion: The attention and establishment of open organization increases the productivity and performance of managers and employees, increases the performance of the organization, and also provides the readiness and flexibility of the organization to facilitate positive changes. The current research has addressed one of the types of organization model that has been less paid by internal researchers in the establishment of open organization in the university and presented a model about it.
منابع فارسی
بندریان.(2018). تبیین الزامات پیاده سازی مدل کسب‌و‌کار باز در سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری. رهیافت28-13، (69)28.
محمد رهبان.(1398). سازمان باز برانگیختن شور و عملکرد. عنوان اصلی The open organization: Igniting passion and performance. تهران پردیس.208ص اثر وایت هرست جیم/ ترجمه محمد رهبان.
منصورفر، کریم ( 1385). روش های پیشرفته آماری همراه با نرم افزارهای آماری، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
میرکمالی، سید محمد؛ فرهادی راد، حمید (1392). کنکاشی در ساختارهای سازمانی دانشگاه به منظور ارائه یک مدل
منابع لاتین
Aldrich H E 1979 Organizations and Enironments. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Almirall, E. and Casadesus-Masanell, R., (2010). Open versus closed innovation: A model of discovery and divergence", Academy of Management Review, 35(1), pp. 27-42.
Ashby W R (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. Wiley, New York
Balka, K., Raasch, C., & Herstatt, C. (2014). The effect of selective openness on value creation in user innovation communities. Journal of Product Innovation Manage ment, 31(2), 392–407.
Boissier, O., Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., (2007). Organization oriented programming: from closed to open organizations. In: Engineering Societies in the Agents World VII 4457, pp. 86–105.
Bond, E., III, Walker, B., Hutt, M., & Reingen, P. (2004). Reputational effectiveness in cross-functional working relationships. Journal of Product Innovation Manage ment, 21(1), 44–60.
Buckley W (1967). Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Pren tice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Buganza, T., & Verganti, R. (2006). Life-cycle flexibility: How to measure and improve the innovative capacity in turbulent environments. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 393–407.
Burke, R., & Wilcox, D. (1969). Effects of different patterns and degrees of openness in superior–subordinate communication on subordinate job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 12(3), 319–326.
Calantone, R., Cavusgil, S., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innova tion capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–524.
Chau, P., & Tam, K. (1997). Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 1–24.
Chau, P., & Tam, K. (2000). Organizational adoption of open systems: A‘technology-push, need-pull’ perspective. Information & Management, 37(5), 229–239.
Chau, Y. K. , Kar Yan Tam,(2014). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to MIS Quarterly, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Mar., 1997), pp. 1-24.
Chen, K., & Liu, R. (2005). Interface strategies in modular product innovation. Tech novation, 25(7), 771–782.
Chen, T., Li, F., & Leung, K. (2016). When does supervisor support encourage innovative behavior? Opposite moderating effects of general self - efficacy and internal locus of control. Personnel Psychology, 69, 123–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12104.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan management review, 48(2), 22.
Chesbrough, H., & Appleyard, M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–76.
Christopher M. Kelty, (2009). Conceiving Open Systems, 30 WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 139 , https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol30/iss1/7.
Ciavarella, M., Buchholtz, A., Riordan, C., Gatewood, R., & Stokes, G. (2004). The Big Five and venture survival: Is there a linkage? Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 465–483.
Damanpour, F.(1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors, Journal of Management 13 (4, pp. 675-688.
de Brentani, U., & Kleinschmidt, E. (2004). Corporate culture and commitment: Impact on performance of international new product development programs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 309–333.
del Val, E., Rebollo, M., Botti V.,(2014). Combination of self-organization mechanisms to enhance service discovery in open systems, Information Sciences. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ins
Denyer, D. Parry, E., Flowers, Paul.(2011). “Social”, “Open” and“Participative”? Exploring Personal Experiences and Organisational Effects of Enterprise2.0 Use, Long Range Planning 44 – 375-396.
Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–industry and projects: The importance of searching, screening, and signaling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309–323.
Foster, P. A. (2016). The open organization: A new era of leadership and organizational development: CRC Press
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021 - 9010.86.3.513.
Hacki, R., & Lighton, J. (2001). The future of the networked company. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 26–39.
Hung,Tai., Sheila Hsuan,Yu .(2015). Performance effects of technology–organization–environment openness, service co-production, and digital-resource readiness: The case of the IT industry, International Journal of Information Management 35, 1–14
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54.
Kandemir, D., & Hult, G. (2005). A conceptualization of an organizational learning culture in international joint ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 430–439.
Kibbeling, M., der Bij, H., & Weele, A. (2013). Market orientation and innovativeness in supply chains: Supplier’s impact on customer satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 500–515.
Kim, S. L. (2019). The interaction effects of proactive personality and empowering leadership and close monitoring behavior on creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6(28), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12304.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
Lawrence P R, Lorsch J W 1967 Organization and Enironment Harvard University Press, Boston.
Lee, T.H. , Chen, M. , Norman, R.J. , (1991). Computer aided software engineering (CASE) adoption and implementation: a theore- tical analysis from an organizational innovation perspective, Proceedings of the Tewnty-Fourth Annual Hawaii Interna- tional Conference on Systems Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 3-17.
Li, C. (2010). Open Leadership - How Social Technology Can Transform the Way You Lead, Jossey-Bass - A Wiley Imprint.
Mccrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258.
Mccrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.). Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-012134645-4/50032-9.
McGarry, S. (1993). Open systems: The user reality. Computerworld, 27(7), 39–60.
Mithas, S., Tafti, A., Bardhan, I., & Goh, J. M. (2012). Information technology and firm
Neill, S., McKee, D., & Rose, G. (2007). Developing the organization’s sensemak ing capability: Precursor to an adaptive strategic marketing response. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(6), 731–744.
Nevis, J. A. , Cummings, T. G.,2001. Closed and Open Systems: Organizational, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences ISBN: 0-08-043076-7.
Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. (2003). Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 745–755.
Saebi, T. and Foss, N. J., (2015). "Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions", European Management Journal, 33(3), 2015, pp. 201–213.
Scott W R (1981). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007.
Sharif, N. and Baark, E., (2011). "The Transformation of Research Technology Organizations (RTOs) in Asia and Europe", Science, Technology & Society, 16(1), pp. 1–10.
Straub, D. W., & Watson, R. T. (2001). Transformational issues in researching IS and net-enabled organizations. Information Systems Research, 12(4), 337–345.
Uslu,T., Bülbül, Idil., Çubuk, D.,(2015). An Investigation of the Effects of Open Leadership to Organizational Innovativeness and Corporate Entrepreneurship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195 ( 2015 ) 1166 – 1175, World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Wengang, Z., Feng, X., Baiqing, S.,(2020). Are open individuals more creative? The interaction effects of leadership factors on creativity, Personality and Individual Differences 163 (2020) 110078, journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paid
Weyns, D., Haesevoets, R., Helleboogh, A., Holvoet, T., Joosen, W., (2010b). The Macodo middleware for context-driven dynamic agent organizations. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 5, 1–28.
Whitehurst, J. (2015). The open organization: Igniting passion and performance: Harvard Business Review Press.
Zare, M., & Flinchbaugh, C. (2019). Voice, creativity, and big five personality traits: A meta - analysis. Human Performance, 32(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2018.1550782.
Zhang, W., Sun, S. L., Jiang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2019). Openness to experience and team creativity: Effects of knowledge sharing and transformational leadership. Creativity Research Journal, 31(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1577649.
Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226.
