مقایسه اضطراب، احساس تنهایی و کیفیت زندگی در زنان مجرد با فرزندخوانده و بدون فرزندخوانده
محورهای موضوعی : سلامت زنانپریناز باباخانی 1 , ناصر صبحی قراملکی 2
1 - گروه روانشناسی بالینی دانشکده علوم پزشکی ، واحد کرج ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، کرج ، ایران p_babakhani@yahoo.com
2 - گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، اسادیار دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
و سازمان نظام روانشناسی و مشاوره کشور
کلید واژه: اضطراب, احساس تنهایی, زنان مجرد با فرزندخوانده, زنان مجرد بدون فرزندخوانده, کیفیت زندگی ,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده مقدمه: امروزه جامعه پزشکی ایران، شاهد آسیب های روان‌شناختی و جسمی بسیاری در دو جمعیت مهم زنان و دختران مجرد و کودکان بی‌سرپرست و بدسرپرست کشور می‌باشد؛ بنابراین، هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسه اضطراب، احساس تنهایی و کیفیت زندگی زنان مجرد با فرزندخوانده و بدون فرزندخوانده بود. روش پژوهش: در مطالعه توصیفی، علی-مقایسه ای حاضر،تعداد 140 نفر (70 نفر زن مجرد با فرزندخوانده و 70 نفر زن مجرد بدون فرزندخوانده ) که به اداره بهزیستی استان تهران مراجعه کردند و دارای معیارهای ورود بودند، با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها شامل پرسشنامه‌های احساس تنهایی و پرسشنامه کیفیت زندگی SF-36و پرسشنامه اضطراب کتل بود. داده‌ها با نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخه ۲۶ و آزمون‌های مفروضههای آماری و تحلیل واریانس چندمتغیره آنالیز شدند. یافته‌ها : به ترتیب بین دو گروه و مؤلفه‌های آنها در اضطراب (283/24=F، 000/0=P و 150/0=η) و کیفیت زندگی (089/93=F، 000/0=P و 403/0=η) و احساس تنهایی (630/118=F، 000/0=P و 462/0=η) از نظر آماری تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد ( 05/0 p<). میانگین اضطراب پنهان و آشکار در زنان مجرد دارای فرزندخوانده کمتر، میانگین احساس تنهایی رمانتیک، خانوادگی واجتماعی در زنان مجرد با فرزندخوانده بطور معناداری بیشتر و در متغیر کیفیت زندگی میانگین مؤلفه سلامت عمومی در زنان مجرد دارای فرزندخوانده کمتر بود. نتیجه‌گیری: بنابراین لزوم اجرای برنامه فرزندپذیری برای زنان مجرد واجد شرایط و نیاز به مداخلات لازم جهت پیشگیری و درمان اضطراب و بالا بردن کیفیت زندگی زنان مجرد بدون فرزند خوانده و مداخله جهت رفع مشکلات ناشی از سلامت عمومی و احساس تنهایی در زنان مجرد با فرزندخوانده می‌باشد.
Abstract Introduction: Today, the medical community of Iran is witnessing many psychological and physical injuries in two important populations of unmarried women and girls and orphaned and abused children in the country. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare anxiety, loneliness and quality of life of single women with adopted children and those without adopted children. Materials and methods: In this descriptive, causal-comparative study, the number of 140 people (70 single women with adopted children and 70 single women without adopted children) who referred to the welfare department of Tehran province and met the entry criteria, were selected by sampling method in Available were selected. Data collection tools included loneliness questionnaires quality of life questionnaire SF-36 and Kettle's anxiety questionnaire. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 26 software and statistical hypothesis tests and multivariate analysis of variance. Results: respectively between the two groups and their components in anxiety (F=24.283, P=0.000, η=0.150) and quality of life (F=93.089, P=0.000, η=0.403) and loneliness (F = 118.630, P = 0.000, η = 0.462), there is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The mean of hidden and overt anxiety in single women with adopted children less, the average feeling of romantic, family and social loneliness in single women with adopted children was significantly higher and in the quality of life variable, the average general health component was lower in single women with adopted children. Conclusion: Therefore, it is necessary to implement the adoption program for qualified single women and the need for necessary interventions to prevent and treat anxiety and improve the quality of life of single women without adopted children and to intervene to solve the problems caused by public health and the feeling of loneliness in single women with adopted children.
References
1. Alemu A. Dendir G. Gonfa A. Sisay Y. Tadesse T. Abebe A. Health-related quality of life and associated factors among adult patients with epilepsy in public hospitals of Wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia. An embedded mixed method study Epilepsy and Behavior. 2024: 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe15010002
2. Asgarizadeh Z. Giford R. Colborne L. Predicting climate change anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 2023; 90(6): 102-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102087
3. Bamidele J. Abiodun O. Sodeinde K. Daniel K. Quality of life among tuberculosis
patients on treatment in Southwest Nigeria. Indian Journal of Tuberculosis, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtb.2023.04.009
4. Gonzalez C A. Tosin M. Goets C G. The plight of loneliness in Parkinson's diseases:
new opportunities. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 2022; 105(11): 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.10.029
5. Stewart S. Graham A.A. Poss J.W. Examining the mental health indicators and service needs of children living with foster families. Children and Youth Services Review. 2023; 147(4): 101-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106833
6. Lee K. Effects of formal center based care and positive parenting practices on children in foster care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2023; 142(1): 203-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105946
7. Nadorff D.K. Scott R.K. Griffin R. Custodial grandchildren and foster children: A school performance comparison. Children and Youth Services Review. 2021; 131(6): 268-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106253
8. Pellegrina A. Sabbagh C. Berdah S. Menahem B. Quality of life after sigmoid
diverticulitis. Journal of Visceral Surgery. 2023; 160(4): 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.06.003
9. Platt C. Gephart S.M. Faan F. Placement Disruption of children with disabilities in foster care. J of Pediatric Nursing. 2022; 44(4): 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2022.05.004
10. Bas-Hoogendam J. Subcortical brain volumes in social anxiety disorder: An enigma anxiety international mega-analysis of 37 samples. Biological Psychiatry. 2023; 93(9): 85-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.02.222
11. Butlinski A. Pinqurqt M. Rates and predicators of depression in adoptive mothers: moving toward theory. Nursing & the environment sci. 2023; 35(1): 51-63. DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e318244553e
12. Krygsman A. Anxiety symptoms before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal examination of Canadian young adults. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2024; 14(99): 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102769
13. Brown L. White L.K. Balderston N.L. Role of the intraparietal sulcus in anxiety related disorders. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2023; 23(4): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100385
14. Chen Z. Song X. Lee T. Zhang R. The robust reciprocal relationship between
loneliness and depressive symptoms among the general population: Evidence from a
quantitative analysis of 37 studies. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2024; 343: 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.09.035
15. Chiplunkar G. Weaver J. Marriage markets and the rise of dowry in India. Journal of
Development Economics, 2023; 164(10), 60-72. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103115
16. Holmberg R. Langballe E.M. Hansen T. Time trends in loneliness from 1948 to 2019 among 27,032 older adults in Norway. Preventive Medicine. 2023; 175(6): 107-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107659
17. Kasparian N.A., Kovacs A.H. Quality of Life and Other Patient-Reported Outcomes
Across the Life Span Among People With Fontan Palliation. Canadian Journal of
Cardiology, 2023; 38(7): 963-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2022.04.025
18. Rahman W. Stefan S. Ahmed A. Siddiqi M. Malek R. The effects of calcitonin on quality of life in hypothyroid patient's a pilot study. Endocrine and Metabolic Science, 2023; 11(4): 100-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endmts.2023.100125
19. Potluka O. Why and how to use the quality of life as an evaluation criterion? Evaluation and Program Planning, 2023; 100(11): 234-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.
20. Chang E.C. Yang H. Personal and family growth initiative as predictors of study engagement in Chinese and American college students: Is there any evidence for group differences. Journal Personality and Individual Differences. 2021; 102: 186–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.004
21. Lutomski J. Hoekstra T. van den Akker M. Blom J. Marengoni A. Multi morbidity patterns in older persons and their association with self-reported quality of life and limitations in activities of daily living. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2023; 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2023.105134
22. Miranda P. Rejano J. Tristancho A. Holgado M. Comparative effect of different patient education modalities on quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. European J Oncology Nursing. 2024; 67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102411
23. Othman E.H. Alosta M. Abu-Snieneh H.M. Zeilani R. Shamoun S.A. The effect of burdensome symptoms and functional status on quality of life among older patients with cancer: A correlational study. European. Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102434
24. Kasparian N.A. Kovacs A.H. Quality of Life and Other Patient-Reported Outcomes across the Life Span among People with Fontan Palliation. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2023; 38(7): 963-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2022.04.025
25. Mund M. Yang J. Qualter P. Loneliness in action: behavioral correlates of loneliness in friendship interactions. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 112(5): 100-135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100135
26. Sattler K.M.P. Herd T. Fonts A. Foster care, kinship care, and the transition to adulthood: do child welfare system processes explain differences in outcomes? Children and Youth Services Review. 2023; 153(1): 70-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107098
27. Dagostin Ferraz S. Rodrigues A.C. Rodrigues Uggioni M.L. Assessment of anxiety, depression and somatization in women with vulvodynia: A systematic review and META-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.025
28. Clayton S. Karazsia B. T. Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2020; 69: 101-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434
