تحلیل مطالعات عدالت جنسیتی در فضاهای عمومی شهری(علم سنجی و مرور سیستماتیک)
محورهای موضوعی : شهرسازینرگس طالب ولی اله 1 , محسن رفیعیان 2 , نجما اسمعیل پور 3 , حمید رضا صارمی 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.
2 - دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.
3 - دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.
4 - دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: علم سنجی, عدالت جنسیتی, فضاهای عمومی, مرور سیستماتیک, نرم‌افزار وی او اس ویوئر.,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش با هدف، تحلیل علم سنجی مطالعات عدالت جنسیتی فضاهای عمومی جهت کشف مسائل و تحولات اصلی و نیز یافتن روند عملکرد نوظهور مقالات و مجلات، شناخت الگوهای همکاری کشورها و هم‌استنادی نویسندگان در ادبیات جهانی انجام شده و از روش‌های کمی علم‌سنجی استفاده می‌کند. نتایج هم زمانی وقوع کلمات کلیدی نشان می‌دهد کلیدواژه‌ی "جنسیت" با 35 بار تکرار بالاترین تعداد دفعات هم رخدادی وقوع کلیدواژگان برخوردار است. تحلیل هم استنادی بر اساس نویسندگان نشان می‌دهد بیشترین تعداد استناد مربوط به الین اونترهالتر با قدرت پیوند 100 می‌باشد. همچنین تحلیل هم استنادی بر اساس منابع استناد شده نشان می‌دهد منبع international journal of urban and regional research، 33 بار مورد استناد قرار گرفته است که بیشترین تعداد استناد را در بین منابع دارا است. در آخر تحلیل همکاری علمی در سطح کشورها نشان می‌دهد کشور ایالات متحده بیشترین تعداد مدارک، استناد و قدرت پیوند را در بین سایرکشورها دارا است.
There is an increasing number of articles related to gender justice and urban public spaces, which requires the necessity of refining, summarizing, and classifying scientific findings and results to advance science and fill gaps in knowledge. The purpose of this research is to analyze the scientometric analysis of gender justice studies in public spaces to discover the main issues and developments, as well as to find the emerging performance trends of articles and magazines, to recognize the patterns of cooperation between countries and the co-citation of authors in world literature; To achieve these goals, scientometric analysis was used. In this way, to discover issues such as the time of occurrence of keywords, authorship, and citation of cited sources, quantitative methods have been used. The current research is quantitative in terms of approach and applied in terms of purpose, which was carried out by scientometric method (co-occurrence analysis, co-authorship analysis, and co-reference analysis). The research community consists of scientific papers and documents of global researchers in the field of gender justice and public spaces who are indexed in the Scopus database between 1991 and 2024 and have the phrase gender justice and public spaces in their documents. The Scopus database was used because it is a stronger database than the Web of Science and provides access to more journals. The network analysis method and VOS viewer software were used to illustrate the network of co-occurrence, co-authorship, and co-citation. In the Scopus advanced search, the two keywords combined “gender justice” and “public space” without creating a specific restriction in the title, abstract, and keywords indicated the existence of 200 documents, of which the most frequent articles were in 2021, there were 23 articles. It should also be mentioned that during many years from 1992 to 1997 and in 1999, 2001, 2004, and 2005, no articles were published with the mentioned keywords. The results of keyword co-occurrence show that the keyword “gender” has the highest number of keyword co-occurrences, with 35 occurrences. Co-citation analysis based on authors shows that the highest number of citations is related to Elaine Unterhalter, with a link strength of 100. After him, Judith Butler is in second place with 34 citations and a link strength of 459, and David Harvey is in third place with 33 citations and a link strength of 429. Also, the co-citation analysis based on cited sources shows that the International Journal of Urban and Regional Research source has been cited 33 times, and the citation strength of this source with other sources is 347, which has the highest number of citations among the sources. Is. Finally, the analysis of scientific cooperation at the level of countries shows that the United States has the highest number of documents, citations, and linking powers among other countries, with the number of 69 documents, 876 citations, and 16 linking powers. Future researchers can use any of the existing keywords, especially recent hot words with regard to the Indigenous context, as potential thematic areas of gender justice in public spaces.
