اثربخشی اقدامات حاکمیتی به منظور سازگاری با انتشار دی اکسید کربن در دستیابی به اهداف توسعه پایدار در ایران
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی
محمد رضا اکبری
1
,
مهناز کلانتری پور
2
,
حامد نجفی علمدارلو
3
,
سید حبیب الله موسوی
4
1 - اقتصادکشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
2 - اقتصادکشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس،تهران، ایران
3 - گروه اقتصادکشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
4 - گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی/ دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
کلید واژه: انتشار کربن, رگرسیون چندک, تغییرات اقلیمی. ,
چکیده مقاله :
در سالهای اخیر، ایران با تنوع الگوهای آب و هوایی گسترده و چالشهای جدی در برابر تغییرات اقلیمی و توسعه پایدار مواجه شده است. مشکلات متعددی مانند خشکسالیهای مداوم، کمبود آب، گرد و غبار، سیل و بلایای طبیعی، امنیت غذایی، سلامت عمومی و زیرساختهای حیاتی کشور را تهدید کردهاند. در چنین شرایطی، اقدامات حاکمیتی نقش مهمی در مقابله با تغییرات اقلیمی و هدایت کشور به سمت توسعه پایدار دارند. هدف اصلی این تحقیق بررسی تأثیر شاخصهای حاکمیت بر کنترل انتشار کربن، از طریق افزایش آگاهی زیستمحیطی و ارتقاء رفتارهای محیطزیستی است. مطالعات قبلی به بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر انتشار کربن پرداخته و راهکارهایی برای کاهش آن ارائه دادهاند؛ با این حال، تخریب محیطزیست همچنان ادامه دارد. این تحقیق از تکنیک رگرسیون چندکی برای دادههای سالانه ایران در دوره 2000 تا 2022 استفاده میکند. نتایج نشان میدهد که متغیرهای حاکمیت با ضرایب منفی قابل توجه، انتشار کربن را کاهش میدهند و بهبود اثربخشی حاکمیت و کیفیت نظارت نیز باعث کاهش انتشار کربن در ایران میشود. بنابراین، برای مقابله با خطرات زیستمحیطی، بهبود اثربخشی حکمرانی باید در کشور ایران تقویت شود. همچنین، لازم است که کیفیت مقررات مربوط به تدوین و اجرای سیاستهای محیطزیستی افزایش یابد تا اطمینان حاصل شود که شرکتها و افراد به رفتارهای محیطزیستی مسئولانه پایبند هستند.
In recent years, Iran has faced a wide variety of weather patterns and serious challenges against climate change and sustainable development. Several problems such as continuous droughts, lack of water, dust, floods and natural disasters have threatened the country's food security, public health and critical infrastructure. In this situation, governance measures play an important role in dealing with climate change and guiding the country towards sustainable development. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of governance indicators on carbon emission control, through increasing environmental awareness and promoting environmental behaviors. Previous studies have examined the factors affecting carbon emission and have provided solutions to reduce it; However, environmental degradation continues. This research uses the quantile regression (QR) technique for Iran's annual data in the period from 2000 to 2022. The results of the QR technique show that governance variables reduce carbon emissions with significant negative coefficients, and improving the effectiveness of governance and the quality of supervision also reduces carbon emissions in Iran. Therefore, to deal with environmental risks, improving governance effectiveness should be strengthened in Iran. Also, it is necessary to increase the quality of regulations related to the formulation and implementation of environmental policies to ensure that companies and individuals adhere to responsible environmental behaviors.
1. Abid, M. (2016), “Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions:evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies”, Utilities Policy, Elsevier, Vol. 41, pp. 85-94.
2. Ali, R., Bakhsh, K. and Yasin, M.A. (2019), “Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissio inemergingeconomy: evidence from Pakistan”, Sustainable Cities and Society, Elsevier, Vol. 48, p. 101553.
3. Asian Development Bank. (2019). Governance Assessment Tool. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
4. Awodumi, O.B. and Adewuyi, A.O. (2020), “The role of non-renewable energy consumption ineconomic growth and carbon emission: evidence from oil producing economiesinAfrica”,Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol. 27, Elsevier, p. 100434.
5. Azmat, G. (2012) The relationship between good governance and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from developing economies, Journal of Economic Development, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 77-93.
6. Danish, K.S., Baloch, M.A. and Wang, B. (2019), “Analyzing the role of governance inCO2emissionsmitigation: the BRICS experience”, Structural Change and EconomicDynamics,Vol.51,pp. 119-125, doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.007.
7. Dincer I. Environmental impacts of energy. Energy policy. 1999;27(14):845-54.
8. Egbetokun, S., Osabuohien, E., Akinbobola, T., Onanuga, O.T., Gershon, O. and Okafor,V.(2020),“Environmental pollution, economic growth and institutional quality: exploring the nexusinNigeria”, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 18-31.
9. Emir, F. and Bekun, F.V. (2019), “Energy intensity, carbon emissions, renewable energy,andeconomicgrowth nexus: new insights from Romania”, Energy and Environment, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 427-443.
10. Fotros, M., Barzegar, H. (2013). Macro variables and CO2 diffusion, Macroeconomic Research, 8(16), 141-158(in Farsi).
11. Halicioglu, F. (2009). An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey, Energy Policy, Vol.37, No.3, pp.1156-1164. (in Persian).
12. Hajiaghamohammadi, N., Sedehi, M., Kheiri, S. and Khoshdel, A. (2015) Influential factors on growth parameters in infants using quantile regression analysis. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 17(2):7-16. (Persian)
13. Hassan, S.T., Khan, S.U.D., Xia, E. and Fatima, H. (2020), “Role of institutions in correctingenvironmental pollution: an empirical investigation”, Sustainable Cities andSociety,Vol.53,p. 101901, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101901.
14. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC.
15. IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. IPCC.
16. IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
17. Karimi Alavijeh, N., Salehnia, N., & Ahmadi Shadmehr, M. T. (2021). The impact of some effective factors on carbon dioxide emissions in selected MENA countries: A panel quantile regression approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 23(8), 119-133. (in Farsi).
18. Khodaverdizadeh, S., Khodaverdizadeh, M., & Eimanzadeh, M. (2018). Examining the impact of globalization on energy intensity in selected developing countries: A panel data approach. Proceedings of the 11th National Congress of Pioneers of Progress, Tehran. (in Farsi).
19. Morad Hasl, N., & Mazini, A. H. (2008). Evaluating the role of government in Iran's environmental challenges: An environmental economics approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10(4), 11-24. (in Persian).
20. Navidi AmirKhiz, M. R., Rahimi Zadeh, F., & Shokouhi Fard, S. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between economic growth, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (Case study: Selected OIC countries). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(3), 26-43. (in Persian).
21. Pata, U.K. (2018), “The effect of urbanization and industrialization on carbon emissions in Turkey:evidence from ARDL bounds testing procedure”, EnvironmentalScienceandPollutionResearch,Springer, Vol. 25 No. 8, pp. 77407747.
22. Poor Ebadolahan Kovich M, Bargi Oskoee MM, Sadeghi SK, Ghasemy i. Decomposing the Influencing Factors of CO2 Emissions of Iranian Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran. 2013;3(9):115-31. (In Farsi)
23. Raihan, Asif., Tuspekova, , Almagul. 2022. Nexus between economic growth, energy use, agricultural productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions: new evidence from Nepal. Energy Nexus 7, 100113.
24. Salahuddin, M., Ali, M.I., Vink, N. and Gow, J. (2019), “The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Springer, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 2699-2709.
25. Sarpong, S.Y. and Bein, M.A. (2020), “The relationship between good governance andCO2emissionsin oil- and non-oil-producing countries: a dynamic panel study of sub-Saharan Africa”,Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Springer, Vol. 27 No. 17, pp. 21986-22003.
26. Sarwar, S. and Alsaggaf, M. I. (2021) The role of governance indicators to minimize the carbon emission: a study of Saudi Arabia. Management of Environmental Quality, 32(5), 970-988. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0275.
27. Statistical Center of Iran. (2021). Annual Statistical Yearbook of Iran. Tehran: Statistical Center of Iran.
28. UNFCCC. (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
29. UNFCCC. (2019). The Impacts of Climate Change at 1.5°C, 2°C and Beyond. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
30. World Bank. (2020). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
31. Zarenezhad, M., Abdollahian, H., Amiri, A., & Sadiyan, S. (2022). Effect of economic growth, energy consumption, and urbanization on CO2 emissions in selected OPEC member countries: A spatial econometric approach. Journal of Energy Economics of Iran, 11(43), 61-83. (in Farsi).
