Empowering EFL learners: How teacher interactional scaffolding and peer collaborative scaffolding reshape EFL learners' reading comprehension
محورهای موضوعی : Instructional Design, Planning, and Strategies including ELTNarges Sardabi 1 , Mehrdad Bakhshi 2
1 - English Department, Ershad Damavand University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - English Department, Ershad Damavand University, Tehran, Iran.
کلید واژه: Blended Learning Context, Peer Collaborative Scaffolding, Reading Comprehension, Teacher Interactional Scaffolding,
چکیده مقاله :
Reading comprehension is a fundamental skill for language learners, yet EFL students often encounter obstacles in developing this ability. Grounded in the sociocultural theory, the current study explored the impact of teacher interactional scaffolding and peer collaborative scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners in a blended learning context. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating quantitative analysis of pre-and post-reading comprehension tests as well as qualitative examination of semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed that both teacher interactional scaffolding and peer collaborative scaffolding significantly enhanced learners' reading comprehension. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two scaffolding approaches. Qualitative data analysis uncovered EFL learners' positive attitudes toward both forms of scaffolding, citing the dynamic support, collaborative problem-solving, and development of metacognitive skills as key benefits. The study underscores the pivotal role of scaffolding in facilitating EFL reading comprehension, with teacher interactional and peer collaborative scaffolding serving as complementary pedagogical strategies. Implications of this research include the need for EFL instructors to incorporate a judicious blend of teacher-led and peer-mediated scaffolding techniques to optimize learners' reading comprehension development. Additionally, the study highlights the adaptability of scaffolding approaches to blended learning environments, where the interactions between teachers, peers, and learners may necessitate innovative scaffolding implementations. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on the efficacy of sociocultural learning principles in enhancing EFL reading comprehension.
Reading comprehension is a fundamental skill for language learners, yet EFL students often encounter obstacles in developing this ability. Grounded in the sociocultural theory, the current study explored the impact of teacher interactional scaffolding and peer collaborative scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners in a blended learning context. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating quantitative analysis of pre-and post-reading comprehension tests as well as qualitative examination of semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed that both teacher interactional scaffolding and peer collaborative scaffolding significantly enhanced learners' reading comprehension. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two scaffolding approaches. Qualitative data analysis uncovered EFL learners' positive attitudes toward both forms of scaffolding, citing the dynamic support, collaborative problem-solving, and development of metacognitive skills as key benefits. The study underscores the pivotal role of scaffolding in facilitating EFL reading comprehension, with teacher interactional and peer collaborative scaffolding serving as complementary pedagogical strategies. Implications of this research include the need for EFL instructors to incorporate a judicious blend of teacher-led and peer-mediated scaffolding techniques to optimize learners' reading comprehension development. Additionally, the study highlights the adaptability of scaffolding approaches to blended learning environments, where the interactions between teachers, peers, and learners may necessitate innovative scaffolding implementations. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on the efficacy of sociocultural learning principles in enhancing EFL reading comprehension.
Abdulaal, M. A. A. D., Shaalan, I. E. N. A. W., Alenazi, M. H., Alharbi, W. M., & Abuslema, N. F. M. A. (2024). A Sociocultural Perspective on the Impact of Instructor Versus Peer Scaffolding Upon Lexical Digesting and Reading Perception. SAGE Open, 14(2), 21582440241257915.
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2017). The impact of scaffolding and nonscaffolding strategies on the EFL learners' listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 447-456.
Akiyama, Y., & Fleshler, M. (2013). Effects of dynamic written corrective feedback on JFL students’ homework. New perspectives on Japanese language learning, linguistics, and culture, 12, 49-68.
Amirian, S. M. R., & Ramazanian, M. (2017). The Effect of interactionist dynamic assessment on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension. In S. M. R. Amirian & Gh. Zareian (Eds.), Challenges in foreign language teaching in Iran. Cambridge University Press.
Ankrum, J. W., Genest, M. T., & Belcastro, E. G. (2014). The power of verbal scaffolding: "Showing" beginning readers how to use reading strategies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 39-47.
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72.
Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, Current Debates, and Future Directions. In Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., & Bishop M. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_39
Booth, D. (2012). Scaffolding during the formal assessment of young EAL learners: A New Zealand case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 5-27.
Buli, A., Amarta, N., & Muslem, A. (2017). The effect of scaffolding strategies on students' reading comprehension. English Education Journal, 8(3), 392-407.
Chen, H., & Mei, H. (2024). How vocabulary knowledge and grammar knowledge influence L2 reading comprehension: a finer-grained perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 3767-3789.
Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.020
Dehqan, M. & Ghafar samar, R. (2014). Reading comprehension in sociocultural context: Effect on learner of two proficiency levels. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 404-410. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.433
de Oliveira, L. C., Jones, L., & Smith, S. L. (2021). A language-based approach to content instruction (LACI) for multilingual learners: Six cs of scaffolding in first grade. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2021.1885409
Enyew, C., & Yigzaw, A. (2015). Effects of teacher scaffolding on students' reading comprehension. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 4(2), 263-271.
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Gilmore, A. (2018). Expert-novice interaction as the basis for L2 developmental activity: A SCT perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 5(1), 21–45. https:// doi.org/ 10. 1558/ lst. 33621
Hamidi, E., & Bagherzadeh, R. (2018). The logical problem of scaffolding in second language acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3, 19. https:// doi. org/ 10.1186/ s40862- 018- 0059-x
Hong, T. D., & Nguyen, H. B. (2019). Teacher beliefs and practices of scaffolding students' reading comprehension through questioning at pre-reading stage. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(2), 72-92. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3270743
Karimi, M. N., & Jalilvand, M. (2014). The relationship between learner autonomy and reading comprehension ability of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), 2384-2391.
Khajeh Khosravi, S. (2017). The effect of symmetrical scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 95–99.s
Kivi, P. J., Namaziandost, E., Alamdari, E. F., Saenko, N. R., Inga-Arias, M., Fuster-Guillen, D., Sirirakpanich, D., & Nasirin, C. (2021). The comparative effects of teacher versus peer-scaffolding on EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension: A socio-cultural perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50, 1031-1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in human behavior, 19(3), 335-353.
Lee, Y. (2021). Scaffolding university students’ epistemic cognition during multimodal multiple-document reading: The effects of epistemic prompting and the automated reflection report. The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100777
Liu, Y., Cheong, C. M., Ng, R. H. W., & Tse, S. K. (2024). The role of L1 self-efficacy in L2 reading comprehension: an exploration of L1–L2 cross-linguistic transfer. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 27(7), 883-897.
Lin L. (2015). Investigating Chinese HE EFL classrooms: Using collaborative learning to enhance learning. Berlin: Springer.
Mansouri, S., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2020). The sociological effects of peer/ teacher technology-enhanced scaffolding through process approach on young male vs female EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. Sociological Studies of Youth, 11(38), 29–48. https:// doi.org/ 10. 22034/ssyj. 2020. 676245
Marzban, A., & Arabahmadi, S. (2013). The effect of written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL students’ writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 1000-1005.
McGrath, L., Berggren, J., & Mezek, S. (2016). Reading EAP: Investigating high proficiency L2 university students’ strategy use through reading blogs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 152–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.003
Mežek, Š., McGrath, L., Negretti, R., & Berggren, J. (2022). Scaffolding L2 academic reading and Self‐Regulation through task and feedback. Tesol Quarterly, 56(1), 41-67.
Muhonen, H., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A. M., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2016). Scaffolding through dialogic teaching in early school classrooms. Teaching and teacher education, 55, 143-154.
Muna, N. (2018). Investigating the factors that affect EFL learners' reading comprehension. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 114-128.
Nassaji, H., & Cumming, A. (2000). What’s in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 95–121.
Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. Tesol Quarterly, 30(1), 131-153.
Osman, N., Syed Nong, S. N. M., & Munir, Z. (2020). Technology-mediated scaffolding in improving EFL learners' reading comprehension. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 7-27.
Pifarre, M., & Cobos, R. (2010). Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 237-253.
Raphael, L. M., Pressley, M., & Mohan, L. (2008). Engaging instruction in middle school classrooms: An observational study of nine teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 61-81.
Reynolds, D., & Daniel, S. (2018). Toward contingency in scaffolding reading comprehension: Next steps for research. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 363-373.
Riazi, M., & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher-and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects on EFL students’ writing improvement. In Clesol 2010: Proceedings of the 12th national conference for community languages and ESOL (pp. 55–63).
Rodgers, E. (2017). Scaffolding word solving while reading: New research insights. The Reading Teacher, 70(5), 525-532.
Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74-88. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 09571 736. 2019. 17058 79
Salem, A. A. (2017). The impact of explicit differentiated instruction in reading comprehension strategies on fifth graders' reading comprehension. Herschel Science Journal, 3(1), 83-100.
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77-96.
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X. & Grabe, W.P. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43.
Shin, S., Brush, T. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2020). Patterns of peer scaffolding in technology-enhanced inquiry classrooms: Application of social network analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2321-2350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09779-0.
Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language teaching research, 4(3), 251-274.
Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.
Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers & Education, 48(3), 362-382.
Yusuk, C. (2018). The effects of different scaffolding strategies in developing EFL reading comprehension. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 144-155.
Zarei, A. A., & Alipour, M. (2019). The effect of scaffolding techniques on EFL reading comprehension in a multimodal context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(3), 269-279.
Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2018). Metacognition in TESOL: Theory and practice. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0803
