The meaning of city based on Ludwig Wittgenstein's philosophy from contemporary and historical architecture (case study: Semnan city)

محورهای موضوعی : Architecture

Seyed Mahyar Hashemi Hezaveh ¹ , Faramarz Hassan Pour ² , Saeed Kamyabi ³

1 - Department of Architecture, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.
2 - Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
3 - Department of Geography, Faculty of Human Science, Semnan branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan branch. Semnan. Iran.

تاریخ دریافت : 1403/07/03 تاریخ پذیرش : 1403/11/20 تاریخ انتشار : 1404/04/12

کلید واژه: Ludwig Wittgenstein, logical, contemporary architecture, historical architecture, Semnan,

چکیده مقاله :

The insights of Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein can be useful in understanding the intricate dynamics of contemporary architecture and urban life and juxtaposing various facets of modernity and historical context. In his text, 20th-century modernism, which focuses on logic, modernity, technology, and spiritual matters, is intelligible. Wittgenstein was an analytic philosopher who believed in the correspondence between the real world, thought, and language. This study aims to analyze Wittgenstein's opinions and uses them to define a conceptual model that includes four components: Logic, avoidance of psychologism, viewing from the perspective of eternity, and modernity. The components are divided into ten subcomponents in architecture: Logic, usefulness, function, style, decorations, transcendence, positive feelings, tolerance, modernity, and technology. There was a focus on six cases, three historical buildings, and three contemporary ones in Semnan. Two questionnaires for citizens and experts have been prepared, and a field study has been implemented after the validity assessment. Then, the results of the questionnaires were entered into the data bank in IBM SPSS and were analyzed and compared. The findings show that three of the ten model variables, attention to excellence, creating a positive feeling, and a positive approach to technology, are ranked higher than the other variables, with an importance of nearly 80%. The acceptability of all three historical buildings is higher than the three contemporary buildings in both groups of citizens and experts, but the difference is much greater among experts.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The insights of Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein can be useful in understanding the intricate dynamics of contemporary architecture and urban life and juxtaposing various facets of modernity and historical context. In his text, 20th-century modernism, which focuses on logic, modernity, technology, and spiritual matters, is intelligible. Wittgenstein was an analytic philosopher who believed in the correspondence between the real world, thought, and language. This study aims to analyze Wittgenstein's opinions and uses them to define a conceptual model that includes four components: Logic, avoidance of psychologism, viewing from the perspective of eternity, and modernity. The components are divided into ten subcomponents in architecture: Logic, usefulness, function, style, decorations, transcendence, positive feelings, tolerance, modernity, and technology. There was a focus on six cases, three historical buildings, and three contemporary ones in Semnan. Two questionnaires for citizens and experts have been prepared, and a field study has been implemented after the validity assessment. Then, the results of the questionnaires were entered into the data bank in IBM SPSS and were analyzed and compared. The findings show that three of the ten model variables, attention to excellence, creating a positive feeling, and a positive approach to technology, are ranked higher than the other variables, with an importance of nearly 80%. The acceptability of all three historical buildings is higher than the three contemporary buildings in both groups of citizens and experts, but the difference is much greater among experts.

منابع و مأخذ:

Ahmadian, Q. & Nouri, Q. (2010). Modernity is the place of conflicting votes, Political Studies Journal, 3(9), pp. 99-127.
https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Journal/jourm/DownloadFile/960521
Audi, R. (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
http://assets.cambridge.org/97805216/37220/frontmatter/9780521637220_frontmatter.pdf
Ayer, j. A. (1952). Language, Truth and Logic, New York, Dover Publications.
https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/language-truth-and-logic.pdf
Ayer, j. A. (1984). Wittgenstein, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
https://www.amazon.com/Wittgenstein-J-Ayer/dp/0226033376
Beigpour, R. (2011). Truth and Meaning in Contemporary Analytical Philosophy, Tehran: Hekmat Publications.
https://www.adinehbook.com/product/9642440306
Carnap, Rudolf (1963). Intellectual Autobiography. In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Ill., Open Court. pp. 3--84.
https://philpapers.org/rec/CARIA-3
Cupen, D. S. (2013). Architectural Theory, Volume Two. (Yaran, A. Trans.), Islamic Azad University، Tehran: Science and Research Branch pressing. https://srb.iau.ir/Files/books-pic/mabani%20nazari%20memari%202.pdf
Dabbagh, S., Farmanfarmai, T. (2010). Culture and art in Wittgenstein's philosophy, Journal of Cultural Management, Year 4, Number 10, pp. 99-113.
https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/818441
Dabbagh, S., Abedini Fard, M. (2012). Wittgenstein and Looking at the eternal face, Shiraz University Religious Thought Quarterly, Shiraz, pp. 29-42.
https://jrt.shirazu.ac.ir/article_1242.html
Dabbagh, S. & Mahdian, P. (2013). Kant, Early Wittgenstein, and the Critique of Empirical Ethics, in The Moral, the Transcendent: Philosophical Essays, Tehran, Parseh Books, second edition.
https://www.iranketab.ir/book/16007-the-moral-of-the-transcendent
Duncan, R. (2004). Wittgenstein at his Word, Continuum, London.
https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/wittgenstein-at-his-word-9781847142184/
Gharibpour, A. (2010). The concept of "Function" in Louis Kahn's thought. Soffeh, 20(51), 31-40.
https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100389.html
Graver, N. (1994). This Complicated Form of Life: Essays on Wittgenstein. Chicago, IL, and La Salle, IL.
https://www.amazon.com/This-Complicated-Form-Life-Wittgenstein/dp/0812692535
Glock, H.J. (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
https://www.amazon.com/Wittgenstein-Dictionary-Hans-Johann-Glock/dp/0631185372
Hafez. (2008). The Divan of Hafez. Edited by Mohammad Ghazvini & Ghasem Ghani. Tehran: Elmi Publications. Ghazal 80.
https://ganjoor.net/hafez/ghazal/sh80
Hassan Pour, F., Lewis, M. & Guo, Q. (2013). The theoretical inapplicability of regionalism to analyzing architectural aspects of Islamic shrines in Iran in the last two centuries. International Congress of Imam's Descendants, Esfahan, Iran. University of Melbourne's institutional repository. pp. 16-32. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/33373
Hassan Pour, F.; Lewis, M. and Guo, Q. (2015). Educational architecture and architectural education: through Dar al-Fonun to Iranian modern universities, in R.H. Crawford and A. Stephan (eds.), Living and Learning: Research for a Better Built Environment, 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association, Melbourne, 2-4 December, pp. 768-777.
https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/scholarlywork/1029032-educational-architecture-and-architectural-education--through-dar-al-fonun-to-iranianised-modern-universities https://anzasca.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/074_Hassan-Pour_Lewis_Guo_ASA2015.pdf
Hanfling, O. (2018). Wittgenstein's later philosophy, (Hojjat, M. Trans.), Tehran: Hermes publications.
https://www.iranketab.ir/book/36040-wittgenstein-s-later-philosophy
Kosuth, J.& Santos, M. (1993). Art After Philosophy and After: Collected Writings, 1966-1990, Mit Pr.
https://www.amazon.com/Art-After-Philosophy-Collected-1966-1990/dp/0262610914
Last, N. (2000). Transgressions and inhabitations: Wittgensteinian spatial practices between architecture and philosophy. Assemblage, Apr., 1998, No. 35 (Apr., 1998), pp. 36-47.
https://frontdeskapparatus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/3171237.pdf
Lacey, A.R. (1996). A Dictionary of Philosophy, Routledge.
https://staffsites.sohag-univ.edu.eg/uploads/818/1539210339%20-%20%5BAlan_Lacey%5D_A_Dictionary_Of_Philosophy(Bookos.org).pdf
McGuinness, B. (2008). Wittgenstein in Cambridge (Letters and Documents 1911-1951), London: Blackwell.
https://www.amazon.com/Wittgenstein-Cambridge-Letters-Documents-1911/dp/1405147016
McGuinness, B. (2002). Approaches to Wittgenstein; Collected Papers. London and New York: Rutledge.
https://www.academia.edu/3399215/Approaches_to_Wittgenstein_Collected_Papers
Morris, M. (2008). Wittgenstein and the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London and New York: Rutledge.
https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Philosophy-GuideBook-to-Wittgenstein-and-the-Tractatus/Morris/p/book/9780415357227?srsltid=AfmBOooorC3g3o24Y11QInRGkwuxf8TOS3vn9POXD5nHoQX1OlogKeJX
Mulhaull, S. (2007). "Words, Waxing and Waning: Ethics in/and/or the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus." In: Kahane, G., Kanterian, E. and Kuusela, O. (Eds.) Wittgenstein and His Interpreters: Essays in Memory of Gordon Baker. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. pp. 221-247.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470690963.ch9
Mounce, H. (1990). Wittgenstein's Tractatus an introduction, (Alavinia, S. Trans.), Tehran: Tarh-e-No.
https://bazarketab.ir/product/2049005
Neurath, O. (1983). Philosophical Papers 1913-1946, Edited and Translated by Robert s. Cohen and Marie Neurath, O., Dordrecht, D., Reidel Publishing Company. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-009-6995-7
Pihlstrom, S. (2019) "Wittgenstein on Happiness: Harmony, Disharmony and Antitheodicy," Philosophical Investigations, 42:1, pp. 15-39.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phin.12201
Schilpp, P. A. (1963). The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court.
http://fitelson.org/confirmation/carnap_schilpp_volume.pdf
Stevanović, V., & Raičević, A. (2017). Aesthetics of unspoken: Architectural form and visible boundary of language. SAJ-Serbian Architectural Journal, 9(2), pp. 121-132.
https://www.academia.edu/112406073/Aesthetics_of_unspoken_Architectural_form_and_visible_boundary_of_language
Stein, J. M. & Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1999). Classic Readings in Architecture, The University of Michigan, WCB/McGraw-Hill.
https://books.google.com/books/about/Classic_Readings_in_Architecture.html?id=NhBQAAAAMAAJ
Stokhof, M. (2008). The architecture of meaning: Wittgenstein's Tractatus and formal semantics. In Wittgenstein's enduring arguments (pp. 223-256). Routledge.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249716390_The_architecture_of_meaning_Wittgenstein's_Tractatus_and_formal_semantics
Weir, S. (2007). Kripke's Second Paragraph of Philosophical Investigations 201. Philosophical Investigations 30 (2):172–178.
https://philarchive.org/rec/WEIKSP
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notebooks 1914–16, ed. von Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M. Trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Oxford: Blackwell.
https://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/Wittgenstein-Notebooks-1914-19161.pdf
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, [German-English parallel text], (Ogden, K. C. and Ramsey, F. P. Trans.). Edinburgh Press.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5740/5740-pdf.pdf
Wittgenstein, L. (1998). The Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
https://www.amazon.com/Blue-Brown-Books-Philosophical-Investigations/dp/0060904518
Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4294631/mod_resource/content/0/Ludwig%20Wittgenstein%2C%20P.%20M.%20S.%20Hacker%2C%20Joachim%20Schulte.%20Philosophical%20Investigations.%20Wiley.pdf
Wittgenstein, L. (2015), Logical-Philosophical Tractatus, second edition, (Dabbagh, S. Trans.), Tehran: Hermes Publications.
https://www.gisoom.com/book/11379078/
Websites:
Semnan University website: https://english.semnan.ac.ir/About-the-City