فراروش مطالعات توسعه مجدد اراضی قهوه‌ای با رویکرد ارتقای پایداری
محورهای موضوعی : شهرهای پایدار
ارزو بانگیان تبریزی
1
,
تکتم حنایی
2
,
هادی سروری
3
,
ساناز سعیدی مفرد
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
2 - دانشیار، گروه شهرسازی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
3 - دانشیار، گروه شهرسازی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
4 - دانشیار، گروه شهرسازی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
کلید واژه: فراروش, توسعه مکانی, پایداری زیست‌محیطی, برنامه‌ریزی پایدار.,
چکیده مقاله :
اهداف و زمینه ها: اکثر کشورهای توسعه‌یافته از توسعه مجدد اراضی قهوه ای استقبال می‌کنند و آن را یک ابزار مؤثر سیاست شهری می‌دانند. درحالی‌که پذیرش آن به دلیل مواجهه با چالش‌ها ابتدای راه کمی سخت به نظر می‌رسد؛ بنابراین، شناسایی راه‌حل‌های پایداری که بتواند توسعه‌ی مجدد اراضی قهوه‌ای را در کشورهای درحال‌توسعه تسهیل کند، ضروری است. هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی و مطالعه‌ی ادبیات و پیشینه‌ی حوزه توسعه مجدد اراضی قهوه‌ای با رویکرد ارتقای پایداری هست
روششناسی: در مطالعات موردبررسی و دستاوردهای پژوهشی سال‌های اخیر در جهان با روش تحقیق کیفی و بعدازآن روش‌های در رتبه‌ی دوم ترکیبی صورت گرفته است. اما مطالعات با روش تحقیق کمی و تجربی بسیار کم مورد استقبال نویسندگان می باشد؛ بر اساس اهداف پژوهش تعداد 28 مقاله انتخاب شد. سپس به‌منظور تجزیه‌وتحلیل محتوایی مقالات از روش تحلیل محتوا و کدگذاری باز استفاده شد. البته باید در نظر داشت برای تحلیل یافته‌های پژوهش، از نرم‌افزار مکس کیودا استفاده‌شده است.
یافتهها: بر اساس طبقه‌بندی موضوعی پژوهش می‌توان مطالعات ذکرشده را به چهار گروه؛ احیا و توسعه مجدد زمین قهوه‌ای، آلودگی اقلیم و آب هوا و اکوسیست، پایداری زیست‌محیطی و اقتصادی، فناوری می‌باشد.و بیشترین فروانی این دسته‌بندی مربوط به احیا و توسعه‌ی زمین‌های قهوه ای تقسیم نمود.
نتیجه گیری: می‌توان این‌گونه نتیجه گرفت که باز توسعه‌ی اراضی قهوه‌ای یکی از دغدغه‌های مهم و چالش‌های پیش روی طراحان و برنامه ریزان شهری است که برای حل آن نیاز به مطالعات گسترده و تخصصی می‌باشد.
Objectives and Background: Most developed countries welcome brownfield redevelopment and consider it an effective urban policy tool. While its acceptance seems to be a bit difficult at the beginning due to the challenges it faces; therefore, it is necessary to identify sustainable solutions that can facilitate brownfield redevelopment in developing countries. The aim of this research is to identify and study the literature and background in the field of brownfield redevelopment with an approach to promoting sustainability.
Methodology: In the studies reviewed and research achievements in recent years in the world, qualitative research methods have been used, followed by mixed methods in second place. However, studies with quantitative and experimental research methods are very rarely welcomed by the authors; Based on the objectives of the research, 28 articles were selected. Then, content analysis and open coding methods were used to analyze the content of the articles. Of course, it should be noted that Max Quda software was used to analyze the research findings.
Findings: Based on the thematic classification of the research, the mentioned studies can be divided into four groups: brownfield restoration and redevelopment, climate and water pollution and ecosystem, environmental and economic sustainability, and technology. The most frequent of this category is related to brownfield restoration and development.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that brownfield redevelopment is one of the important concerns and challenges facing urban designers and planners, which requires extensive and specialized studies to solve.
1. Abbas, a., sajid, m. b., shahzad, n., din, e. u., mahmood, m., & salahuddin, u. (2022). barriers and drivers for adoption of energy efficient and environment friendly brick kiln technologies in punjab, pakistan. energy reports, 8, 15563-15573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.128
2. Adams, d., de sousa, c., & tiesdell, s. (2010). brownfield development: a comparison of north american and british approaches. urban studies, 47(1), 75-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009346868
3. Aghaei,m., ahmadian,v., jahazatashi, a., (2014). factors affecting capital structure in small and medium iranian companies. financial accounting and auditing research, 6(22(, 175-212. (Persian)
4. Ahmad, n. zhu, y. shao, j. & lin, h. (2020). stakeholders’ perspective on strategies to promote contaminated site remediation and brownfield redevelopment in developing countries: empirical evidence from pakistan. environmental science and pollution research, 27, 14614-14633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07990-3
5. Ahmad, n., zhu, y. ibrahim, m. waqas, m. & waheed, a. (2018). development of a standard brownfield definition, guidelines, and evaluation index system for brownfield redevelopment in developing countries: the case of pakistan. sustainability, 10(12), 4347. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124347
6. Ahmad, n., zhu, y., ullah, z., iqbal, m., hussain, k., & ahmed, r. i. (2021). sustainable solutions to facilitate brownfield redevelopment projects in emerging countries–pakistani scenario. land use policy, 109, 105727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105727
7. Almeida, c. m. v. b., bonilla, s. h., giannetti, b. f., & huisingh, d. (2013). cleaner production initiatives and challenges for a sustainable world: an introduction to this special volume. journal of cleaner production, 47, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.010
8. Alonso, i. b., sánchez-rivero, m. v., & pozas, b. m. (2022). mapping sustainability and circular economy in cities: methodological framework from europe to the spanish case. journal of cleaner production, 357, 131870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131870
9. Altrock, u. (2022). new (sub) urbanism?-how german cities try to create “urban” neighborhoods in their outskirts as a contribution to solving their recent housing crises. urban governance, 2(1), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.04.001
10. Asar s, jalalpour s, ayoubi f, rahmani m, rezaeian m. prisma; preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. jrums 2016; 15 (1):68-80.(Persian)
11. Bardos, r. p., jones, s., stephenson, i., menger, p., beumer, v., neonato, f., ... & wendler, k. (2016). optimising value from the soft re-use of brownfield sites. science of the total environment, 563, 769-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.002
12. Beriro, d., nathanail, j., salazar, j., kingdon, a., marchant, a., richardson, s., ... & nathanail, p. (2022). a decision support system to assess the feasibility of onshore renewable energy infrastructure. renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 168, 112771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112771
13. Blanco, e., raskin, k., & clergeau, p. (2022). reconnecting neighbourhoods with ecosystem functioning: analysis of solutions from six international case studies. sustainable cities and society, 77, 103558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103558
14. Canelas, p., & noring, l. (2022). governmentalities of land value capture in urban redevelopment. land use policy, 122, 106396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106396
15. Cavicchia, r. (2023). housing accessibility in densifying cities: entangled housing and land use policy limitations and insights from oslo. land use policy, 127, 106580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106580
16. Chen, y. (2022). financialising urban redevelopment: transforming shanghai’s waterfront. land use policy, 112, 105126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105126
17. Drenning, p., chowdhury, s., volchko, y., rosén, l., andersson-sköld, y., & norrman, j. (2022). a risk management framework for gentle remediation options (gro). science of the total environment, 802, 149880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149880
18. Etzion, d. (2018(. management for sustainability. nature sustainability, 1(12(, 744-749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0184-z.
19. Filip, s., & cocean, p. (2012). urban industrial brownfields: constraints and opportunities in romania. carpathian journal of earth and environmental sciences, 7(4), 155-164.https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84878250229&partnerID=40&md5=7a4adfcd651f1868be66addd7ab7c6a5.
20. Gao, j. (2023(. spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban china: iv. a case study of jointly redevelopment by multi-actors. regional sustainability, 4(1(, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2023.02.003
21. Gerber, j. d., & debrunner, g. (2022). planning with power. implementing urban densification policies in zurich, switzerland. land use policy, 123, 106400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106400
22. Gurevitch, j., koricheva, j., nakagawa, s., & stewart, g. (2018). meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. nature, 555(7695), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25753
23. Hammond, e. b., coulon, f., hallett, s. h., thomas, r., hardy, d., & beriro, d. j. (2023). digital tools for brownfield redevelopment: stakeholder perspectives and opportunities. journal of environmental management, 325, 116393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116393
24. Hasani, f., saeedi mofard, s., (2016) compilation of urban design framework for brown lands with emphasis on place-making based on environmental security approach., the first national conference of modern researches in civil engineering, architecture, environment and sustainable urban development. (Persian)
25. Ives, c. d., abson, d. j., von wehrden, h., dorninger, c., klaniecki, k., & fischer, j. (2018). reconnecting with nature for sustainability. sustainability science, 13, 1389-1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0542-9
26. Jacek, g., rozan, a., desrousseaux, m., & combroux, i. (2022). brownfields over the years: from definition to sustainable reuse. environmental reviews, 30(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2021-0017
27. Klusáček, p., navrátil, j., krejčí, t., martinát, s., frazier, r. j., pícha, k., ... & osman, r. (2021). variation in brownfield reuse of derelict agricultural premises in diverse rural spaces. journal of rural studies, 87, 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.004
28. Krigsholm, p., puustinen, t., & falkenbach, h. (2022). understanding variation in municipal land policy strategies: an empirical typology. cities, 126, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103710
29. Longo, a., & campbell, d. (2017). the determinants of brownfields redevelopment in england. environmental and resource economics, 67, 261-283. Doi: 10.1007/s10640-015-9985-y
30. Madeddu, m., & clifford, b. (2022). the conversion of buildings to housing use: england’s permitted development rights in comparative perspective. progress in planning, 100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2022.100730
31. Mohajeri, n., walch, a., smith, a., gudmundsson, a., assouline, d., russell, t., & hall, j. (2023). a machine learning methodology to quantify the potential of urban densification in the oxford-cambridge arc, united kingdom. sustainable cities and society, 92, 104451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104451
32. Mohammad nejad shorkai, m., jashni arani, m., yazdani, h., (1390). meta-methodology of the research conducted in the field of factors affecting customer satisfaction: document analysis of master's and doctorate theses of tehran state universities. business management perspectives, 10(7), 141-164. (Persian)
33. Mostofi, v., faramarzi, m., & darskhan, r. (2021). an analysis of the drivers affecting the desirable pattern of intermediate development and management of brown lands (case study: tabriz metropolis(. scientific journal of geography and planning, 25 (76), 279-289. .(Persian)
34. Mura, m., longo, m., micheli, p., & bolzani, d. (2018). the evolution of sustainability measurement research. international journal of management reviews, 20(3), 661-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12179
35. Naseri-rad, m., berndtsson, r., aminifar, a., mcknight, u. s., o'connor, d., & persson, k. m. (2022). dynsus: dynamic sustainability assessment in groundwater remediation practice. science of the total environment, 832, 154992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154992
36. Navrátil, j., martinát, s., krejčí, t., pícha, k., klusáček, p., škrabal, j., & osman, r. (2019). the fate of socialist agricultural premises: to agricultural ‘brownfields’ and back again?. moravian geographical reports, 27(4), 207-216. doi: 10.2478/mgr-2019-0016
37. Newell, j. p., foster, a., borgman, m., & meerow, s. (2022). ecosystem services of urban agriculture and prospects for scaling up production: a study of detroit. cities, 125, 103664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103664
38. Norris, c., nigrelli, c., newcomer-johnson, t. a., white, d. p., beaubien, g. b., pelka, a., & mills, m. a. (2022). defining community revitalization in great lakes areas of concern and investigating how revitalization can be catalyzed through remediation and restoration. journal of great lakes research, 48(6(, 1432-1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.05.006
39. Pavolová, h., bakalár, t., emhemed, e. m. a., hajduová, z., & pafčo, m. (2019). model of sustainable regional development with implementation of brownfield areas. entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 6(3), 1088. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(2)
40. Planas-carbonell, a., anguelovski, i., oscilowicz, e., pérez-del-pulgar, c., & shokry, g. (2023). from greening the climate-adaptive city to green climate gentrification? civic perceptions of short-lived benefits and exclusionary protection in boston, philadelphia, amsterdam and barcelona. urban climate, 48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101295
41. Preston, p. d., dunk, r. m., smith, g. r., & cavan, g. (2023). not all brownfields are equal: a typological assessment reveals hidden green space in the city. landscape and urban planning, 229, 104590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104590
42. Raco, m., ward, c., brill, f., sanderson, d., freire-trigo, s., ferm, j., ... & livingstone, n. (2022). towards a virtual statecraft: housing targets and the governance of urban housing markets. progress in planning, 166, 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2022.100655
43. Rahnama,m., khakpour, b., razavi, m., (2014). identification and clustering of brown lands in mashhad city in order to provide investment patterns. geography and regional development, 131.. (Persian).
44. Raymond, c. m., stedman, r., & frantzeskaki, n. (2023). the role of nature-based solutions and senses of place in enabling just city transitions. environmental science & policy, 144, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.021
45. Sessa, m. r., russo, a., & sica, f. (2022). opinion paper on green deal for the urban regeneration of industrial brownfield land in europe. land use policy, 119, 106198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106198
46. Silvestre, b. s. (2015(. sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. international journal of production economics, 167, 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.025
47. Silvestre, b. s., & ţîrcă, d. m. (2019). innovations for sustainable development: moving toward a sustainable future. journal of cleaner production, 208, 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244
48. Simis, m., & awang, a. (2015). planning for ex-landfill redevelopment: assessing what community have in mind. asian social science, 11(15), 136. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n15p136
49. Sucháček, j., seďa, p., friedrich, v., & koutský, j. (2017). regional aspects of the development of largest enterprises in the czech republic. technological and economic development of economy, 23(4), 649-666. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2017.1318314
50. T., krigsholm, p., & falkenbach, h. (2022(. land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: a literature-based approach. land use policy, 123, 106405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106405
51. Taqvai, a., zabetiyan taroghi, e., asgarizadeh, z., (2015). applying new technologies in the redevelopment of brown lands. naqsh jahan - theoretical studies and new technologies of architecture and urban planning, 6 (3): 15-25(Persian)
52. Thomas, m. r., asher, a. j., o'neil, g. a., & allan, j. w. (2022). a decision support tool for measuring and tracking the social benefits of water resources in michigan coastal communities. journal of great lakes research, 48(6), 1401-1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.07.005
53. Tonne, c., adair, l., adlakha, d., anguelovski, i., belesova, k., berger, m., ... & adli, m. (2021(. defining pathways to healthy sustainable urban development. environment international, 146, 106236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106236
54. Turku, v., kyrönviita, m., jokinen, a., & jokinen, p. (2023). exploring the catalytic power of temporary urbanism through a binary approach. cities, 133, 104145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104145
55. Xu, s., & ehlers, m. (2022). automatic detection of urban vacant land: an open-source approach for sustainable cities. computers, environment and urban systems, 91, 101729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101729
56. Yu, j., hagen-zanker, a., santitissadeekorn, n., & hughes, s. (2022). a data-driven framework to manage uncertainty due to limited transferability in urban growth models. computers, environment and urban systems, 98, 101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101892
57. Zheng, b., & masrabaye, f. (2023). sustainable brownfield redevelopment and planning: bibliometric and visual analysis. heliyon, 9(2) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13280
